Re: [css-d] New and way less than confident

2006-11-29 Thread Chris Ovenden
Hi Morgana!

With the advent of IE7, CSS 2.1 is now quite well supported in modern
browsers, but unfortunately IE6 is likely to remain the majority
browser for several years yet :-( Apart from its many layout bugs (eg
the ones detailed at
http://www.positioniseverything.net/explorer.html) IE6 doesn't support
advanced selectors like p  a, p + p, a[href], etc - rendering them
next to useless apart from little styling 'treats' for people using
more standards-compliant browsers. More seriously, it doesn't support
the properties min-/max-height/width, content and probably more.

Some people here may object to the recommendation, but I found
Dreamweaver MX2004 (in code mode) very useful when I was learning CSS,
as it has a nice autocomplete feature, and warns about differing
browser support.

Welcome to the exciting and only occasionally infuriating world of CSS!

Chris

On 11/28/06, Morgana [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Hi,

 I'm sure this has been asked hundreds of times, but as I'm new, please
 forgive the repetition. What's the safest css version to work with at
 the current time, given the varying degrees of browser support... IOW,
 should I stick with CSS earlier than 2, to assure the broadest
 support? If this is laid out somewhere for me to simply read about,
 please feel free to point me in the right direction, and I'll read up.
 Many thanks from a longtime designer, but too-new css 'jockey'.

 - Jean

 PS: Are there any BrowserCam groups here wanting another member? If
 so, please contact me off-list. Please excuse req, and thanks again.
 __
 css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
 IE7 information -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/?page=IE7
 List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/
 Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/



-- 
Chris Ovenden

http://thepeer.blogspot.com
Imagine all the people / Sharing all the world
__
css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
IE7 information -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/?page=IE7
List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/
Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/


Re: [css-d] New and way less than confident

2006-11-29 Thread Barney Carroll
Chris Ovenden wrote:
 unfortunately IE6 is likely to remain the majority
 browser for several years yet :-(

Several years yet? IE7 is now a Microsoft recommended download, and 
virtually all PCs for sale post-January ship with Vista, and, 
inherently, IE7. The next couple of months will be very telling, but I 
reckon things may be about to change.

A lot of arrogant developers(TM) I know are telling me I'm an idiot to 
still spend so much time spoon-feeding IE6, and argue that I should just 
tell my clients that they should be looking at things with IE7. Of 
course, I can't quite take this idea seriously.

 Some people here may object to the recommendation, but I found
 Dreamweaver MX2004 (in code mode) very useful when I was learning CSS,
 as it has a nice autocomplete feature, and warns about differing
 browser support.

I'm one of those who'd go against Dreamweaver because I consider it a 
very bloated program that detracts you from the real nuts and bolts of 
your product.

The auto-complete and browser support warnings are useful, and if you 
want these I recommend a far better program that is absolutely 
non-bloated and purpose-built for css: Paul Young's StyleSpread. It's in 
beta right now and is set to get even better, plus it's free. 
Windows-only, but then if you're a css designer without Windows you have 
far bigger things to worry (or not worry) about!

http://www.stylespread.com

Regards,
Barney
__
css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
IE7 information -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/?page=IE7
List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/
Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/


Re: [css-d] New and way less than confident

2006-11-29 Thread Chris Ovenden
On 11/29/06, Barney Carroll [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Chris Ovenden wrote:
  unfortunately IE6 is likely to remain the majority
  browser for several years yet :-(

 Several years yet? IE7 is now a Microsoft recommended download, and
 virtually all PCs for sale post-January ship with Vista, and,
 inherently, IE7. The next couple of months will be very telling, but I
 reckon things may be about to change.

 A lot of arrogant developers(TM) I know are telling me I'm an idiot to
 still spend so much time spoon-feeding IE6, and argue that I should just
 tell my clients that they should be looking at things with IE7. Of
 course, I can't quite take this idea seriously.


I really would like to ditch IE6 support, except as a
degraded-but--still-functional experience, but sadly the upgrade to
IE7 is not an option for most Windows users, as it only works on XP
SP2 - currently standing at about 23% of web users worldwide. (And of
these, how many are legitimate? IE7 also comes with the hated WGA
check.) I hope I'm wrong, though.


 http://www.stylespread.com

Gonna check that out. Thanks!

-- 
Chris Ovenden

http://thepeer.blogspot.com
Imagine all the people / Sharing all the world
__
css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
IE7 information -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/?page=IE7
List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/
Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/


Re: [css-d] New and way less than confident

2006-11-29 Thread Courtney Nielsen
Enterprises often wait a long time before upgrading browsers as part of 
their Current Operating Environment plans and protocols.  What I have 
experienced over the years is that a new browser will be welcomed by the 
general community, but the IT departments of the (figurative) GE's, 
Citibank's, ATT's etc. often take months to years to authorize an 
update.  Large corporations have policy-driven updating for their 
computers instead of the typical click here for updates link.  So in 
turn, we end up with a general update acceptance, with a few 800-pound 
Gorillas (with all the money) holding it back.

--

Morgana,

Regarding the main question, for general web sites, 2.1 seems to be the 
norm now.   Erik Meyer's book More Eric Meyer on CSS is a great book 
to start. It's a few years old but the clarity is excellent and the 
lessons are very retainable and can be applied to many daily CSS tasks.  

Stylin' with CSS  is a good book too, which does a simple, no-frills, 
to-the-point instruction on building a proper, CSS-driven accessible web 
site. 

The CSS Zen Garden book is a neat design book to have and shows 
interesting tricks people use, but can sometimes be impractical as the 
Zen Garden project only involves one page of content. 

Bulletproof Web Design by Dan Cederholm is a great book on ensuring the 
site is built not to break, and to be accessible to all. 

Alistapart.com is a fantastic site of a-list authors giving away their 
secrets. 

and dont forget   positioniseverything.net which will explain why your 
CSS isn't displaying correctly on certain browsers and how to fix it 
(ironically the site looks better with the CSS turned off, but don't let 
that scare you--they really know what they're explaining on that site)

Hope that helps,

Court


 


Chris Ovenden wrote:
 On 11/29/06, Barney Carroll [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
   
 Chris Ovenden wrote:
 
 unfortunately IE6 is likely to remain the majority
 browser for several years yet :-(
   
 Several years yet? IE7 is now a Microsoft recommended download, and
 virtually all PCs for sale post-January ship with Vista, and,
 inherently, IE7. The next couple of months will be very telling, but I
 reckon things may be about to change.

 A lot of arrogant developers(TM) I know are telling me I'm an idiot to
 still spend so much time spoon-feeding IE6, and argue that I should just
 tell my clients that they should be looking at things with IE7. Of
 course, I can't quite take this idea seriously.

 

 I really would like to ditch IE6 support, except as a
 degraded-but--still-functional experience, but sadly the upgrade to
 IE7 is not an option for most Windows users, as it only works on XP
 SP2 - currently standing at about 23% of web users worldwide. (And of
 these, how many are legitimate? IE7 also comes with the hated WGA
 check.) I hope I'm wrong, though.

   
 http://www.stylespread.com
 

 Gonna check that out. Thanks!

   

__
css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
IE7 information -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/?page=IE7
List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/
Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/


[css-d] New and way less than confident

2006-11-28 Thread Morgana
Hi,

I'm sure this has been asked hundreds of times, but as I'm new, please
forgive the repetition. What's the safest css version to work with at
the current time, given the varying degrees of browser support... IOW,
should I stick with CSS earlier than 2, to assure the broadest
support? If this is laid out somewhere for me to simply read about,
please feel free to point me in the right direction, and I'll read up.
Many thanks from a longtime designer, but too-new css 'jockey'.

- Jean

PS: Are there any BrowserCam groups here wanting another member? If
so, please contact me off-list. Please excuse req, and thanks again.
__
css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
IE7 information -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/?page=IE7
List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/
Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/