date:20040720

[CTRL] No nationalists on Jack's 'shining hill'

2004-07-20 Thread William Shannon

http://www.wnd.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=39513

No nationalists on Jack's 'shining hill'
Patrick J. Buchanan
Posted: July 19, 2004
1:00 a.m. Eastern

ÂÂ2004ÂCreators Syndicate, Inc.

"A struggle is underway for the soul of the Republican Party, between a minority of protectionist xenophobes and those who are pro-trade and pro-immigration."

Thus does Jack Kemp begin a column in which he jettisons the black conservative running for Congress in North Carolina whom he earlier endorsed. Kemp accuses Vernon Robinson of "running a very negative and aggressive anti-immigration campaign ... contrary to the core values of the party of Lincoln."

Jack is right about that struggle for the soul of the party. But why is it necessary to demonize disagreement? Webster's defines xenophobia as "fear and hatred of strangers and foreigners." What evidence is there that Robinson is not a man of good heart?

Jack cites George Washington as having "famously quipped in 1788, 'I had always hoped that this land might become a safe and agreeable asylum to the virtuous and persecuted part of mankind, to whatever nation they might belong.'"

But, as James Fulford of VDare.com notes, Washington was talking about a persecuted Dutch minority that had supported the American Revolution. Few of the illegal aliens here were victims of persecution, and not all are necessarily virtuous. Their only common characteristic is that all have broken our laws.

Can Jack seriously believe the Father of Our Country would have approved of amnesty for 8 million to 14 million illegal aliens and an immigration policy that will leave us in 2050 with 100,000,000 Hispanics, concentrated in our Southwest, with scores of millions not speaking English and loyal to nations not our own?

Jack says illegals come for work, not welfare. Most do. But why, then, did Jack oppose California's Proposition 187, which would have denied welfare benefits only to aliens here illegally? Why, as HUD-meister, did he hand out housing subsidies to illegal aliens?

Jack believes being pro-illegal is good politics. But Gov. Pete Wilson overcame a 20-point deficit to win re-election in 1994 by backing Proposition 187. Wilson was the last Republican to win major statewide office before Arnold, whose best issue, pollsters say, was opposition to Gray Davis' handing out of driver's licenses to illegals. Even John Kerry now opposes driver's licenses for illegals.

The Dole-Kemp ticket, however, unfortunately lost first-time Hispanic voters to Clinton-Gore 91 percent to 7 percent. And California, which Nixon carried five times on national tickets and Reagan swept four times, is now routinely written off by the GOP in presidential elections, partly due to the surging Hispanic vote.

Since Bush took office, his free-trade policies have produced a net loss of 2.6 million manufacturing jobs, one in every six in the United States. The textile and apparel industries in the Carolinas have been especially hard hit. These jobs have historically been the access ramp to the American Dream for blacks, Hispanics, single moms and the working poor. Is Vernon Robinson wrong to want to stop shipping these jobs off to China?

Our open-borders policy is forcing millions of our workers into a Darwinian competition for jobs with desperate immigrant folks willing to work for less than the minimum wage. Unlike Jack, these Americans are not often invited onto the boards of Empower America, the Heritage Foundation, G2 Satellite Solutions, SmartCOP, Oracle, Hawk Corp., IDT Telecom, ING Americas, Thayer Capital or Thomas Weisel Partners.

After naming all the big men he met with in Mexico recently, Jack thunders, "[T]he best way to stop mass migration from Mexico is not to militarize the border." Did Jack ask his Mexican chums, then, why they have militarized their border with Guatemala?

Before using derogatory terms like "reactionary" and "protectionist xenophobes," Brother Kemp might read a little more deeply into American history than Carl Sandburg's "Lincoln."

The first act of Congress Washington proudly signed on July 4 was the Tariff Act of 1789. Abe ("Give us a protective tariff and we shall have the greatest country on earth") Lincoln was not only the father of 70 years of Republican protectionism, he raised the Morrill tariff 12 times. And, sorry to report, the old Rail Splitter spoke openly and often about sending slaves back to Africa.

Teddy ("I thank God I am not a free trader") Roosevelt called free trade a "pernicious doctrine."

Jack twice refers to America as a "city on a shining hill," Reagan's signature phrase. But Reagan slammed import quotas on steel, machine tools, computer chips, and Japanese cars and motorcycles â to save the Big Three and the Harley "Hog." Which Reagan did, God bless him.

And as the Gipper said in 1983: "This country has lost control of its borders. And no country can sustain that kind of position."

By the way, Jack â the phrase is "a shining cit

[CTRL] 'Saving the World' With Your Money

2004-07-20 Thread William Shannon

-Caveat Lector-
July 20, 2004
'Saving the World' With Your Money
by Rep. Ron Paul

The Millennium Challenge Act, a new foreign aid scheme I wrote about back in May, received its hoped-for $2.5 billion from Congress last week. Only 41 members of Congress supported an effort to strip the funding, demonstrating once again that the two parties are not serious about reducing federal spending. Considering all the rhetoric in Washington about runaway spending, one would think a new foreign welfare program would be among the easiest things to cut politically.

Since American foreign aid programs began in earnest decades ago, tens of billions of U.S. tax dollars have been given to nations around the globe. The utter failure of this money to change things for the better in those nations is no longer in question; even the most earnest liberals are beginning to admit the obvious. Most of the recipient nations remain endlessly mired in poverty, political and legal corruption, and cultural malaise.

A rational person would argue that failed aid programs should be eliminated. In Washington, however, failed programs get more money thrown at them.

The Millennium Challenge Act is designed to appease fiscal conservatives and defense hawks by appearing to single out friendly, well-behaved nations for aid payments, ostensibly creating a carrot-and-stick approach. But the Act merely puts a shiny new label on the same old failed policy of trying to remake the world using welfare. Welfare has never worked at home and itâs never worked abroad, no matter what âincentivesâ Congress tries to attach.

The proponents of the Millennium Challenge Act tell us this time it will be different. If only we condition foreign aid money on the adoption of certain policies, the recipient nations will clean up their acts. Market economies and democratic political reforms surely will follow, if only American taxpayers provide a little seed money.

Does anyone actually believe this? It is beyond presumptuous to think Congress can change the politics, economies, and cultures of foreign nations. It is simply preposterous to imagine that foreign aid will be cut off once given, no matter what a nation does or fails to do. After all, weâve been giving billions to some of our worst enemies for decades. Once a federal program begins, it becomes permanent. Mark my words, the Millennium Challenge Act budget will grow in future years.

The question nobody in Washington wants to answer is this: What gives the Congress the right to send American tax dollars overseas in the first place? Certainly not the Constitution. Why should American taxpayers, many of whom are poor themselves, be expected to fund foreign welfare? Remember that the poorest Americans are hardest hit by the inflation tax, which is the direct result of deficit spending and the printing of new money to service federal debts.

Congress hardly needs to concoct another way to spend money. Government debt already exceeds seven trillion dollars, and runaway spending will force yet another increase in the federal debt ceiling law before the end of the year. At its current pace, Congress soon will create single-year deficits of one trillion dollars. Combine this indebtedness with future liabilities â in the form of exploding Social Security and Medicare obligations â and itâs clear that Congress can find better things to do with $2.5 billion than send it overseas.

My very modest proposal is this: eliminate the Millennium Challenge Act, apply half the money to the national debt, and spend the rest domestically if Congress simply canât bear to give it back to taxpayers. Even the worst domestic program is better than useless and meddlesome foreign aid.

www.ctrl.org
DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER
==
CTRL is a discussion & informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic
screeds are unwelcomed. Substanceânot soap-boxingâplease! These are
sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'âwith its many half-truths, mis-
directions and outright fraudsâis used politically by different groups with
major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought.
That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and
always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no
credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.

Archives Available at:

http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
ctrl

To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

[CTRL] Signs Of The Times

2004-07-20 Thread William Shannon

-Caveat Lector-

www.ctrl.org
DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER
==
CTRL is a discussion & informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic
screeds are unwelcomed. Substance—not soap-boxing—please!   These are
sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'—with its many half-truths, mis-
directions and outright frauds—is used politically by different groups with
major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought.
That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and
always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no
credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.

Archives Available at:

http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
ctrl

To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om
<>

[CTRL] WSJ: Berger Took Secret 9/11 Docs on Five Occasions

2004-07-20 Thread Jim Rarey

-Caveat Lector-



Kerry campaign adviser Sandy Berger removed secret terrorism 
documents from a 9/11 Commission reading room on no fewer than five occasions, 
his lawyer Lanny Breuer admitted late Monday night. So much for 
inadvertence!!.
 
Why hasn't Berger been indicted yet. There is no indication 
prosecutors are even going to file criminal charges. Any bets? - JR

 
 
http://www.newsmax.com/archives/ic/2004/7/20/110408.shtml
 
 
Tuesday, July 20, 2004 11:02 a.m. EDT 

WSJ: Berger Took Secret 9/11 Docs on Five Occasions 
Kerry campaign adviser Sandy Berger removed secret terrorism 
documents from a 9/11 Commission reading room on no fewer than five occasions, 
his lawyer Lanny Breuer admitted late Monday night.Breuer told the Wall 
Street Journal that his client, who served previously as the Clinton 
administration's national security adviser, inadvertently removed several copies 
of an after-action report on the foiled 1999 Millennium bomb plot during two 
separate visits to the top secret facility. 
Story Continues 
Below 
 Breuer said also that Berger deliberately removed 
handwritten notes that he made during three additional visits to the Archives 
last fall to review classified documents. 
Breuer said removing those notes was a violation of National Archives policy, 
and that Berger regretted the action. "He knew it was a technical violation, and 
he admits that it was an error in judgment." 
But according to New York civil rights lawyer Ron Kuby, Berger's decision to 
remove his notes wasn't just a "technical violation." 
"You're not permitted to remove anything from that room - period," he said 
Tuesday morning. "And that means even your notes. If you're taking notes about 
classified information, those notes are now classified. They're placed in a 
secure area. You can have access to them only while being viewed by a security 
officer. Nothing gets removed." 
Even if Berger had removed only his personal notes on classified material, it 
would still be a crime, said Kuby, who learned about classified reading room 
procedures during his own involvement in the trial of the 1993 World Trade 
Center bombers. 

 
www.ctrl.org
DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER
==
CTRL is a discussion & informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic
screeds are unwelcomed. Substance—not soap-boxing—please!   These are
sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'—with its many half-truths, mis-
directions and outright frauds—is used politically by different groups with
major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought.
That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and
always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no
credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.

Archives Available at:

http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
ctrl

To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om

[CTRL] Voice of the White House July 15 & 16, 2004

2004-07-20 Thread William Shannon

-Caveat Lector-
http://www.tbrnews.org/Archives/a994.htm

Voice of the White House July 15 & 16, 2004

TBRNews.org - July 19, 2004

In previous issues, we carried comments from a reporter assigned to the White House press corps. Some of these remarks, most especially one about Bushâs physical and mental problems, drew an enormous number of viewers and hundreds of inquiries, most especially from foreign press entities. The reporter advised us by email that there was rampant fury in the White House and security was becoming very tight. As a result of this, he decided to lay low for a few weeks and see how the wind was blowing. Yesterday, he sent us the following material which we are now posting. Some of it is outrageous in the extreme but to date, no one has proven him wrong.

July 15, 2004: âThe Monkey Palaceâ is taking on the aspects of a gay bar at frantic hour. The inclusion of Edwards on the Kerry ticket, the plummeting Bush poll numbers, the imminence of a raging civil war in Iraq, the growing defections of âWilling Coalitionâ members and on and on are turning this place into a muted mad house. Bush is, according to [redacted], gobbling tranquilizers and screaming at anything that moves. The latest bit of lunacy is this business about cancelling the election in November because of trumped up âterroristâ charges. They dragged out the dimbulb, Ridge, to propose that, because he âknewâ there would be âterroristâ disruptions of the election, that it ought to be postponed for a âsafer time.â If that ever happened, the mobs would be carrying Bushâs head on a pike up and down Pennsylvania Avenue to the cheers of thousands and finally, someone with some sense realized that this just would not work like the last Florida rip-off so they quickly pretended that it was all âa misunderstandingâ and want the rest of us to forget about it.

This place is guarded like Fort Knox. There are more anti-antiaircraft rockets, machine guns, snipers and electronic snooping gear on the White House roof than at Aberdeen Proving Ground. In contrast to the Administrationâs strange lethargy prior to 9/11, the standing orders are that the President must be notified immediately of any âpotentially hostileâ aircraft entering into Washington Defense Zone airspace at which time, Bush will rush frantically down to the air raid bunker and close the bank vault- thick steel door behind him. Cheney will probably have a fatal heart attack down in his own bunker [a farting mouse could also cause this, so bad off is our de facto Presidentâs disintegrating pump these days] and the government will be run [into the ground] by the Likud boys. The RNC has teams out trying to find out if Edwards ever had sex with the mother of his own children or has overdue library books and Bush is looking at maps of North Korea in his Map Room! The general public would not believe how scary things are here, no matter how hard you try to alert them. I am planning to write a book about all of this, providing

I donât get caught talking out of school and it will be very successful, believe me. Some of the help here are most cooperative because not all of them are rabid Jesus freaks and view the White House as a very weird and dangerous place to work. And oddly enough, a number are grossly offended [as am I] about enforced staff prayer meetings and the omnipresent pictures of Jesus, the Destroyer of all Muslims and Democrats, glaring at you from every office wall.â

July 16, 2004: âThe brass here is delighted that they were able to arm-twist a compliant Congress into postponing the release of a Congressional report on who knew what and when until after the election. Their aim is to throw just enough doubt into the very valid belief that George W. Bush was given false information about WMD to influence the undecided voter [both of them]. This is pure crap and everyone around here knows it. Bush demanded âany informationâ that would bolster his drive to war and refused to accept anything less. George W., by the way, is the source for the miserable tortures in Iraqi jails. It went from Bush, who wanted wholesale shootings of prisoners, through Rumsfeld, who toned it down, to the troops. Both of these jokers are guilty as hell of fostering a deliberate U.S. policy of violations of the Geneva Convention. Their rationale? We are all-powerful and no one will dare to contradict us.

Also, they believe, the American people are divided into two distinct groups: the Good People who are all ultra right wingers, the Jesus freaks who are insane and the business world that expects complete support from Bush. [In exchange for huge bribes] And then there is the other side, the Bad People, composed, as they see it, of Muslims, queers, left wing idiots, niggers (oh yes, that word is occasionally heard in the Monkey Palace), sociopaths, secular humanists, Catholics, feminists and anyone and any group that does not realize that George W. Bush was called to the Monkey Palace b

[CTRL] Ala. Doctor Reactivated for Iraq War at 68

2004-07-20 Thread flw2

-Caveat Lector-

Ala. Doctor Reactivated for Iraq War at 68

Mon Jul 19, 7:19 PM ET

DECATUR, Ala. - At 68, many people are slowing down. Not John Wicks: He's going
to Iraq (news - web sites). Wicks, a psychiatrist, has been called out of
military retirement by the Army to fill a shortage of mental health experts
needed to help soldiers cope with combat. He could be gone as long as a year.

   The Army hasn't told Wicks what his exact assignment in Iraq is, or where in
the country it will send him.


"I believe that the morale in general is not that good since the scandal at that
prison," he said, referring to the allegations of abuse at Abu Ghraib prison.
"When morale is high, you have fewer of these kinds of problems. And when morale
is low you have more."


Wicks, who is beginning a week of training in Texas, will have the rank of
colonel. His previous military experience includes two years active duty with
the Marines and 18 years in the Alabama National Guard.


Wicks is a veteran of the U.S. war with Iraq in 1991, but his wife said things
are different this time.


"In Desert Storm, he was in the 109th Evacuation Hospital and they had drilled
together for years," said Jan Wicks. "He felt good about going with this team
that he knew. He doesn't have that support this time."


Wicks figures he will be among the oldest U.S. soldiers in the Iraq war. Martha
Rudd, a spokeswoman for the Army at the Pentagon (news - web sites), said she
has no way of knowing if Wicks would be the oldest. She said she had heard of
one other doctor who was 68 and went to Iraq.


Wicks' latest assignment started with a postcard the Army sent last fall that
explained the need for specialists and asked if he felt he was fit to serve.


"I stuck the thing in my pocket and carried it around for several weeks
agonizing on how I should respond," he told The Decatur Daily in a story Sunday.
"The truth is I consider myself fit to serve, so that's how I marked it and sent
it back."


"My wife said 'You'll never hear from them.' Well, it was no time at all till I
heard from them," Wicks said.


Wicks said recruiters initially hinted he could go to Europe or a stateside base
to relieve a younger psychiatrist who would go to Iraq. The Army even gave him
three choices should that scenario play out, and Dr. Wicks chose Italy, Germany
and England.


"Well, I now wonder if this was just to get me hooked. Because there's no way
I'm going to Italy or any of these places," he said. "I'm going to Iraq."






Story Tools
  Email Story
Post/Read Msgs (140)
Formatted Story

Ratings: Would you recommend this story?
Not at all 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5 Highly






Special Feature

Bargain Hunting
Find low-priced PCs without sacrificing quality







Copyright © 2004 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. The information
contained in the AP News report may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or
redistributed without the prior written authority of The Associated Press.
Copyright © 2004 Yahoo! Inc. All rights reserved.
Questions or Comments
Privacy Policy -Terms of Service - Copyright Policy - Ad Feedback

www.ctrl.org
DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER
==
CTRL is a discussion & informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic
screeds are unwelcomed. Substanceânot soap-boxingâplease!   These are
sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'âwith its many half-truths, mis-
directions and outright fraudsâis used politically by different groups with
major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought.
That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and
always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no
credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.

Archives Available at:

http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/">ctrl

To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om

[CTRL] Sharon Favors Bush Over Kerry

2004-07-20 Thread William Shannon

-Caveat Lector-
THE HOFFMAN WIRE
Dedicated to Freedom of the Press, Investigative Reporting and Revisionist History

Subscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Michael A. Hoffman II, Editor

Israel for the elephants

A victory for Bush would allow Sharon to continue with his limited plan.
John Kerry might want a larger withdrawal. Therefore, Sharon is praying
for Bush to win.

by Ya'akov Ahimeir

Maariv (Israeli newspaper) 21 July, 2004
http://www.maarivintl.com/index.cfm?fuseaction=article&articleID=9961

It is strange how much Israel, which was built on socialist foundation,
has become a Republican stronghold, from the perspective of many Israeli
prime ministers.

The first was Yitzhak Rabin. During his first term as prime minister, he
admired President Nixon and Secretary of State Kissinger. The first
American president that Menachem Begin met was Democratic Jimmy Carter.
Begin compared him to Jabotinsky, which is not a insignificant
comparison coming from someone who, in his youth, headed the Beitar
movement in Poland.

Although Carter created Camp David, Begin found that he had more a
common language with Republican Ronald Reagan, who was angered by the
bombing of the Iraqi reactor, but nothing more. The elder Bush caused a
lot of trouble for Yitzhak Shamir and his explicit intervention in the
Israeli election facilitated Rabin's second election. Now Sharon is
praying for the younger Bush to beat John Kerry, the Democratic
candidate.

Why Bush? I will attempt to answer on his behalf, without being privy to
his inner thoughts. I can image Sharon saying to himself, "I already
know Bush Jr. He rubber stamps our policy. I have not evacuated the
illegal outposts, despite my promise, and his advisor Condoleezza Rice
commented on it but nothing more.

This Texan president understands the language of power and because of
him, Israel does not have a problem on its eastern front. If we were to
bomb the Iranians' nuclear complex, he would understand. After he, too,
invaded a country where weapons of mass destruction are yet to be found,
which might, heaven forefend, cost him his second term.

Even if delegates at the Democratic Convention in Boston promise that
Kerry will move the Embassy from Tel Aviv to Jerusalem, who would
believe them? There have been promises in the past and the lot on
Allenby Street in Jerusalem, that is designated for the embassy, is
still sprouting thistle. Indeed, even though some Israelis fly a small
"Stars and Stripes" on Independence Day (Israel's; not the 4th of July),
we relate to promises (theirs and ours) with a reasonable degree of
cynicism.

If Kerry is elected, and there is an excellent chance that he will be, a
high-level envoy (perhaps Clinton, himself) will come to the region and
hamper implementation of what Sharon considers the "limited plan":
evacuation of four settlements in Samaria and Gush Katif. President
Kerry might not be satisfied with a finger. He might want the whole
hand, not just Kadim but also Ma'ale Adumim. Therefore, Sharon is a
Republican.

It should be noted that despite the love affair between Bush and Sharon,
a majority of American Jewry will continue to vote for the Democrats.
The sky will not fall. There will not be a spilt between Israel's
"Republican" government, even if it includes Shimon Peres, and American
Jewry.

However, part of the puzzle remains to unsolved (sic). If Bush is
re-elected, will his romance with Sharon continue? No one knows. As of
now, we know: we are walking down the republican path, that path of
elephants, in the jungle.

/--

The Israeli Holocaust Against the Palestinians
by Michael Hoffman and Moshe Lieberman

A Book Banned by Left and Right Alike. Get it here:

http://www.revisionisthistory.org/cgi-bin/store/agora.cgi?cart_id=5468705.25910*qP57l2&product=Books_and_Pamplets

The HOFFMAN WIRE is a public service of Independent History and Research, Box 849, Coeur d'Alene, Idaho 83816 USA

24 Hour Revisionist News Bureau: http://www.revisionisthistory.org/news.html

Subscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
www.ctrl.org
DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER
==
CTRL is a discussion & informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic
screeds are unwelcomed. Substanceânot soap-boxingâplease! These are
sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'âwith its many half-truths, mis-
directions and outright fraudsâis used politically by different groups with
major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought.
That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and
always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no
credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.

Archives Available at:

http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
ctrl
===

[CTRL] [TheEagle-L] The myth of "oil exhaustion" (fwd)

2004-07-20 Thread William Bacon

-Caveat Lector-

"I pledge Allegiance to the Flag of the United States of America and to
the REPUBLIC for which it stands,  one Nation under God,indivisible,with
liberty and justice for all."

Remember:More people have died in Ted Kennedy's car than have died in
United States Commercial Nuclear Power plant operations

 visit my web site at
http://www.voicenet.com/~wbacon My ICQ# is 79071904
for a precise list of the powers of the Federal Government linkto:
http://www.voicenet.com/~wbacon/Enumerated.html

-- Forwarded message --
Date: Tue, 20 Jul 2004 12:52:35 -0700
From: Les Lemke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: 
Subject: [TheEagle-L] The myth of "oil exhaustion"

"ABSTRACT:   For almost a century, various predictions have been made that the human 
race is imminently going to run out of available petroleum.  The passing of time has 
proven all those predictions to have been utterly wrong.  It is pointed out here how 
all such predictions have depended fundamentally upon an archaic hypothesis from the 
18th century that petroleum somehow (miraculously) evolves from biological detritus, 
and is accordingly limited in abundance.  That hypothesis has been replaced during the 
past forty years by the modern Russian-Ukrainian theory of deep, abiotic petroleum 
origins which has established that petroleum is a primordial material erupted from 
great depth.  Therefore, petroleum abundances are limited by little more than the 
quantities of its constituents as were incorporated into the Earth at the time of its 
formation;  and its availability depends upon technological development and 
exploration competence."


"The public-access pages on this site are presently being built to provide easy 
reference to various publications involving modern petroleum science.  Modern 
petroleum science, - or what is called often the modern Russian-Ukrainian theory of 
deep, abiotic petroleum origins, - is an extensive body of knowledge which has been 
recorded in thousands of articles published in the mainstream, Russian-language 
scientific journals, and in many books and monographs.  However, effectively nothing 
of modern petroleum science has been published in the U.S.A., and this body of 
knowledge remains largely unknown in the English-speaking world.  For reason of this 
circumstance, a brief introduction to modern Russian petroleum science has been 
written separately, and is offered together with a brief indication of some of its 
immediate economic consequences."

"In the pages containing articles connected with petroleum economics, there are 
several papers by Professor Michael C. Lynch of the Massachusetts Institute of 
Technology which address directly the myth of "oil exhaustion."  There is also a link 
to an article by Professor Peter Odell of the London School of Economics concerning 
the common misperceptions connected with petroleum economics."


Source:
http://www.gasresources.net/index.htm

Natural petroleum is NOT the result of dead, buried plants and animals subjected to 
immense pressure over the course of millions of years as you have been told.

The western petrochemical corporations are using the old "fossil fuel" petroleum 
exaustion game to rape YOUR wallets.

Les

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]



 Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ~-->
Make a clean sweep of pop-up ads. Yahoo! Companion Toolbar.
Now with Pop-Up Blocker. Get it for free!
http://us.click.yahoo.com/L5YrjA/eSIIAA/yQLSAA/zgSolB/TM
~->

"Please keep one liners to a minimum!"
Visit our new improved site at:
http://www.eaglehost.com/
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/theeagle-l/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/

www.ctrl.org
DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER
==
CTRL is a discussion & informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic
screeds are unwelcomed. Substance—not soap-boxing—please!   These are
sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'—with its many half-truths, mis-
directions and outright frauds—is used politically by different groups with
major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought.
That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and
always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no
credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.

Archives Available at:

http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/">ctrl

To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email

[CTRL] MRC Alert Special: Worst of the Week: Networks Push a Silly Rumor (fwd)

2004-07-20 Thread William Bacon

-Caveat Lector-

"I pledge Allegiance to the Flag of the United States of America and to
the REPUBLIC for which it stands,  one Nation under God,indivisible,with
liberty and justice for all."

Remember:More people have died in Ted Kennedy's car than have died in
United States Commercial Nuclear Power plant operations

 visit my web site at
http://www.voicenet.com/~wbacon My ICQ# is 79071904
for a precise list of the powers of the Federal Government linkto:
http://www.voicenet.com/~wbacon/Enumerated.html

-- Forwarded message --
Date: Tue, 20 Jul 2004 13:07:34 -0700
From: Media Research Center <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: MRC Alert Special: Worst of the Week: Networks Push a Silly Rumor

 ***Media Research Center CyberAlert Special***
 4:10pm EDT, Tuesday July 20, 2004

Worst of the Week: NETWORKS PUSH A SILLY RUMOR; "WEDGE" = NOT ON
LIBERALS' AGENDA

The latest edition of the MRC's weekly feature, "Worst of the
Week," identifying "the most egregious, horrendous and stupefying
liberal media bias of the week" -- the previous week, that is. Ten
weeks ago we inaugurated this new weekly feature as part of the
MRC's "Tell the Truth 2004" project.

To view the Adobe Acrobat PDF:
http://mrccyberalert.c.topica.com/maacsYkaa8yKfbn2mYPb/

Now, the text of the July 20 edition of the MRC's "Weekly
Worst" as compiled by Rich Noyes, the MRC's Director of Research:

NETWORKS PUSH A SILLY RUMOR;
"WEDGE" = NOT ON LIBERALS' AGENDA

> The so-called mainstream media never admit their liberal tilt,
so the news analysts at the Media Research Center tirelessly
document the bias and expose their left-wing agenda. The "awards"
for last week's lowlights:

Networks Push a Silly Rumor. Showing once again how the networks
mindlessly adopt the news priorities of the liberal New York
Times, the cable networks spent all day Thursday buzzing about
Elisabeth Bumiller's front-page gossip suggesting Dick Cheney
might be dumped as Vice President. Even though Bumiller's story
admitted the idea was "far-fetched" and "privately advanced" by
Democratic partisans, CBS and NBC chose to include the silliness
in their evening newscast. NBC's Tim Russert was forced to tell
Nightly News anchor Brian Williams that the premise was
preposterous: "Dick Cheney will be on the ticket, period."

For more, see the July 16 CyberAlert:
http://mrccyberalert.c.topica.com/maacsYkaa8yKgbn2mYPb/


"Wedge" = Any Issue Not on the Liberal Agenda. When gay activists
were crusading to impose their agenda on the rest of society, the
networks generally covered same-sex marriages as a sign of
"progress." But now that changing the Constitution may be the only
way left to protect traditional marriage, network reporters are
casting pro-marriage conservatives as calculating and divisive. On
July 13, Nightly News anchor Brian Williams wanted viewers to
think conservatives were exploiting the issue, not standing for
principle: "Gay marriage: Is it being used as a political club in
the race for the White House?"

In his story, reporter Chip Reid portrayed the President, not gay
activists, as the divisive force: "In Marquette, Michigan today,
President Bush firing up his base on same-sex marriage, an issue
that has become political red meat for conservatives." He ended by
assuming the defense of marriage was far more political than
principled: "For now, the gay marriage amendment is all but dead,
but if conservative Republicans have their way, as a political
issue, its life has barely begun."

For more, see the July 14 CyberAlert:
http://mrccyberalert.c.topica.com/maacsYkaa8yKhbn2mYPb/

For a RealPlayer video clip of Reid's Nightly News story, go to
the posted version of this Worst of the Week:
http://mrccyberalert.c.topica.com/maacsYkaa8yKibn2mYPb/

END Reprint of the "Worst of the Week" issued on July 13


For the archive of previous "winners":
http://mrccyberalert.c.topica.com/maacsYkaa8yKjbn2mYPb/


-- Brent Baker


>>> Support the MRC, an educational foundation dependent upon
contributions which make CyberAlert possible, by providing a tax-
deductible donation. To safely and securely donate via PayPal:
http://mrccyberalert.c.topica.com/maacsYkaa8yKkbn2mYPb/
tem_name=Media+Research+Center&item_number=Media+Research+Center&n
o_note=1&tax=0¤cy_code=USD

Or, if you can't get the lengthy link into your browser's
address line, go to the MRC's home page
( http://mrccyberalert.c.topica.com/maacsYkaa8yKlbn2mYPb/ ) and click on the gold 
"Support
the MRC" logo in the top right corner. That will take you to the
same place.

To subscribe to CyberAlert, go to:
http://mrccyberalert.c.topica.com/maacsYkaa8yKmbn2mYPb/

Or, send a blank e-mail to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

To unsubscribe, use the link at the very bottom of this
message.

Send problems and comments to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

You can learn what has been posted each day on the MRC's Web
site by subscribing t

37 matches

Mail list logo