[CTRL] child abuse articles

2007-10-01 Thread Smart News
-Caveat Lector-

Beyond the Dutroux Affair - The reality of protected child abuse and snuff  
networks  
_http://www.pehi.eu/dutroux/Belgian_X_dossiers_of_the_Dutroux_affair.htm_ 
(http://www.pehi.eu/dutroux/Belgian_X_dossiers_of_the_Dutroux_affair.htm) 
 
The Darkest Secret - By revealing the painful story of her sexual abuse as  a 
child, actress Teri Hatcher hopes to help other victims. By Teri Hatcher   - 
Newsweek Oct. 8, 2007 issue I tell you this story with trepidation. But my 
 fear is far outweighed by what I know is my obligation to help other victims 
of  sexual abuse to not feel alone. To inspire other victims to realize that 
their  lives do not have to be paralyzed by guilt and shame; they do not have 
to be  defined by victimhood. And to convey to each and every damaged girl or 
woman  that it is not her fault.  Unfortunately, many, many girls are victims 
of  sexual abuse. So even as we fight evil abroad, the evil of this abuse 
lives on  in our neighborhoods. 
_http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/21047603/site/newsweek/_ 
(http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/21047603/site/newsweek/) _  


Sex predators proliferating in cyberspace, experts say  By Shirley  Ragsdale 
- Register Religion Editor 9/30/07By several measures, the  prevalence of 
online predators is increasing, despite the risk of being  caught.
_http://www.desmoinesregister.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20070930/NEWS/709
300330/1001/RSS01_ 
(http://www.desmoinesregister.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20070930/NEWS/709300330/1001/RSS01)
 
 
Court hears about Sirois' mental state TheRecord.com - Local - Court hears  
about Sirois' mental state Dianne Wood - Record Staff - Kitchener  The  
Kitchener man who admitted killing an elderly woman and her longtime boarder in 
 2004 
practised Satanic rituals and saw demons, a hearing into his mental state  at 
the time of the crime heard yesterday. Michael Sirois, 29, pleaded guilty  
last April to two counts of second-degree murder in the vicious stabbings of  
Verna Bast, 87, and Randy Penner, 47. The pair was killed on Feb. 20, 2004 in  
the Glasgow Street home that Bast, a devout Christian, had shared with Penner  
and another boarder, John Routley, for many years. Although Sirois has 
admitted  to the murder, he hasn't yet been convicted. A hearing has begun in 
Superior  Court to determine whether he should be held criminally 
responsibleThere  will be testimony about a satanic bible found among 
Sirois' possessions, 
satanic  writings found in his room and satanic rituals and ceremonies he 
performed, Gehl  said. "You will hear a lot about Mr. Sirois' adherence to 
satanic 
beliefs,''  Gehl said. _http://news.therecord.com/printArticle/246604_ 
(http://news.therecord.com/printArticle/246604)  



** See what's new at http://www.aol.com

www.ctrl.org
DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER
==
CTRL is a discussion & informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic
screeds are unwelcomed. Substance—not soap-boxing—please!   These are
sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'—with its many half-truths, mis-
directions and outright frauds—is used politically by different groups with
major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought.
That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and
always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no
credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.

Archives Available at:

http://www.mail-archive.com/ctrl@listserv.aol.com/
http://www.mail-archive.com/ctrl@listserv.aol.com/";>ctrl

To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om


[CTRL] Fwd: Bush's Global 'Dirty War'

2007-10-01 Thread RoadsEnd

-Caveat Lector-



Begin forwarded message:


From: "Consortiumnews.com" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: October 1, 2007 8:05:12 AM PDT
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Bush's Global 'Dirty War'
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

For years, there have been whispers in the U.S. intelligence  
community that George W. Bush has been transforming his "global war  
on terror" into an international "dirty war."


But now two U.S. military investigations have revealed that the  
chain of command has approved rules of engagement that let elite  
American military units kill Iraqis and Afghanis on mere suspicion  
that they may be "enemy combatants."



For the full story, go to http://www.consortiumnews.com.

There are two easy ways you can help Consortiumnews.com continue to  
produce independent investigative journalism:


If you buy a copy of our new book, "Neck Deep: The Disastrous  
Presidency of George W. Bush," through the publisher's Web site,  
http://www.neckdeepbook.com, $5 per book will go to help pay the  
bills at Consortiumnews.com.


Or you can help by making a tax-deductible donation either by  
credit card at the Web site or by sending a check to: Consortium  
for Independent Journalism (CIJ); 2200 Wilson Blvd.; Suite 102-231;  
Arlington, VA 22201.


For donations of $100, we'll send you an autographed gift copy of  
Neck Deep in paperback; for donations of $150 or more, we'll send a  
gift copy of the hard-cover version. Thanks for your support.


To remove yourself from this list, click here: http:// 
www.democracyinaction.org/dia/organizations/consortiumnews/ 
unsubscribe.jsp?remove






www.ctrl.org
DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER
==
CTRL is a discussion & informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic
screeds are unwelcomed. Substance—not soap-boxing—please!   These are
sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'—with its many half-truths, mis-
directions and outright frauds—is used politically by different groups with
major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought.
That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and
always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no
credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.

Archives Available at:

http://www.mail-archive.com/ctrl@listserv.aol.com/
http://www.mail-archive.com/ctrl@listserv.aol.com/";>ctrl

To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om


[CTRL] Fwd: HERSH: Not Learning from History (or Anything Else)

2007-10-01 Thread RoadsEnd

-Caveat Lector-



Begin forwarded message:


From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: September 30, 2007 10:06:13 PM PDT
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Fwd: HERSH:  Not Learning from History (or Anything Else)


Seymour Hersh:  You have to ask yourself: what possible interest  
did we have 40 years ago for going to war in Vietnam?  You'd think  
that, in this country, with so many smart people, we couldn't  
possibly do the same dumb thing all over again.  But no -- there's  
no learning curve [in America].


DER SPIEGEL:  If the Iraq war does end up as a defeat for the U.S.,  
will it leave as deep a wound as the Vietnam War did?


Hersh: Much worse.  Vietnam was a tactical mistake; this is  
strategic.  How do you repair lasting damage to whole cultures?  On  
the home front, though, we'll rationalize it away.  We'll pretend  
it never happened.  There's no learning curve [in America] -- in a  
couple of decades we'll be ready to fight another stupid war.





See what's new at AOL.com and Make AOL Your Homepage.

From: "Jim S." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: September 30, 2007 9:34:40 PM PDT
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: HERSH: "The President Has Accepted Ethnic Cleansing"
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


"The most common way people give up their power is by thinking they  
don't have

any."-- Alice Walker


http://www.spiegel.de/international/world/0,1518,508394,00.html
INTERVIEW WITH INVESTIGATIVE JOURNALIST SEYMOUR HERSH --
"The President Has Accepted Ethnic Cleansing"
September 28, 2007

[Investigative journalist Seymour Hersh has consistently led the  
way in telling
the story of what's really going on in Iraq and Iran.  SPIEGEL  
ONLINE spoke to
him about America's Hitler, Bush's Vietnam, and how the U.S. press  
failed the

First Amendment.
Seymour Hersh began his career as a police reporter.  But since  
then, he has
risen to become one of the most important investigative journalists  
in the
history of American journalism.  Hersh first made a name for  
himself in 1969 by
uncovering the My Lai Massacre during the Vietnam War, for which he  
won the 1970
Pulitzer Prize.  Hersh has worked for the New Yorker since 1992 and  
in 2004 was
instrumental in uncovering the U.S. military's abuses of prisoners  
at the Abu
Ghraib prison in Iraq.  Hersh was in Berlin this week to accept the  
Democracy

Prize handed out by the political journal, "Blätter für Deutsche und
Internationale Politik."]


SPIEGEL ONLINE:  Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad was just in  
New York
(more...) for the United Nations General Assembly.  Once again, he  
said that he
is only interested in civilian nuclear power instead of atomic  
weapons.  How much

does the West really know about the nuclear program in Iran?

Seymour Hersh:  A lot.  And it's been underestimated how much the  
International
Atomic Energy Agency (I.A.E.A.) knows.  If you follow what  
(I.A.E.A. head
Mohamed) ElBaradei (more...) and the various reports have been  
saying, the
Iranians have claimed to be enriching uranium to higher than a 4  
percent purity,
which is the amount you need to run a peaceful nuclear reactor.   
But the
I.A.E.A.'s best guess is that they are at 3.67 percent or  
something.  The
Iranians are not even doing what they claim to be doing.  The  
I.A.E.A. has been
saying all along that they've been making progress but basically,  
Iran is
nowhere.  Of course, the U.S. and Israel are going to say you have  
to look at the
worst case scenario, but there isn't enough evidence to justify a  
bombing raid.


SPIEGEL ONLINE:  Is this just another case of exaggerating the  
danger in
preparation for an invasion like we saw in 2002 and 2003 prior to  
the Iraq War?


Hersh:  We have this wonderful capacity in America to Hitlerize  
people.  We had
Hitler and, since Hitler, we've had about 20 of them.  Khrushchev  
and Mao and of
course Stalin, and for a little while Gadhafi was our Hitler.  And  
now we have
this guy Ahmadinejad.  The reality is, he's not nearly as powerful  
inside the
country as we like to think he is.  The Revolutionary Guards have  
direct control
over the missile program and if there is a weapons program, they  
would be the

ones running it.  Not Ahmadinejad.]

SPIEGEL ONLINE:  Where does this feeling of urgency that the U.S.  
has with Iran

come from?

Hersh:  Pressure from the White House.  That's just their game.

SPIEGEL ONLINE:  What interest does the White House have in moving  
us to the

brink with Tehran?

Hersh:  You have to ask yourself what interest we had 40 years ago  
for going to
war in Vietnam.  You'd think that in this country with so many  
smart people, that
we can't possibly do the same dumb thing again.  I have this theory  
in life that
there is no learning.  There is no learning curve.  Everything is  
tabula rasa.

Everybody has to discover things for themselves.

SPIEGEL ONLINE:  Even after Iraq?  Aren't there strategic reasons  
for getting so

deeply invo

[CTRL] Fwd: WTC7: First responder heard countdown to demolition on official's walkie-talkie

2007-10-01 Thread RoadsEnd

-Caveat Lector-



Begin forwarded message:


From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: September 30, 2007 9:19:26 PM PDT
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: WTC7: First responder heard countdown to demolition on  
official's walkie-talkie


Shocking New Revelations On 9/11 Ground Zero Cover-Up

First responder heard WTC 7 demolition countdown, was warned to  
"shut up" when he reported secondary explosions


Paul Joseph Watson
Prison Planet, September 28, 2007

http://www.prisonplanet.com/articles/ 
september2007/280907_new_revelations.htm


A 9/11 first responder has shed new light on how he heard a  
countdown before the demolition of Building 7, how he was told to  
"shut up" by superiors when he tried to report secondary explosions  
and why "vicious security" measures were enacted to prevent people  
from accessing certain areas of ground zero.


Former Air Force Special Operations for Search and Rescue expert,  
Kevin McPadden traveled to ground zero completely of his own accord  
and spent the next four days searching through the rubble and  
nearby buildings for survivors.


In a video interview with Alex Jones, McPadden describes the  
moments before the collapse of WTC 7.


"When we saw the firemen pick up their equipment and start bustling  
back and forth they were getting ready to do something, we started  
asking questions," said McPadden.


Despite numerous attempts to glean information from Red Cross  
officials, McPadden and other first responders were told nothing  
while one official, shortly after talking to firemen, held his hand  
over his radio and told them to "just sit tight" and "calm down"  
before admitting "they're thinking about bringing the building down."


McPadden and his colleagues were miffed as to what the official  
meant by this statement, initially thinking the building next to  
them was possibly being brought down.


"He took his hand off for the last three seconds of it - and you  
hear three, two, one," said McPadden, adding that the official then  
gave a heartfelt look and told the first responders, "just run for  
your life."


McPadden got the impression that the Red Cross official had been  
ordered not to give the first responders a warning that the  
building was coming down.


"And you heard - boom, boom, boom," said McPadden, describing the  
sound of bombs tearing down the building.


McPadden explained that the reason Democracy Now host Amy Goodman  
and others were captured on video (watch above) running from the  
scene and reaching stationary onlookers as the building started to  
collapse is that they were able to hear the full countdown on the  
radio further own the street.


Later in the interview, McPadden reveals how he witnessed up close  
steel beams from the twin towers that had been symmetrically cut at  
perfect angles as is shown in this image - a clear sign that  
explosives were used. McPadden said that officials were acting very  
suspiciously and subsequently prevented people from getting near  
the beams.


He also highlighted the fact that "vicious security" was quickly  
set up around certain areas of ground zero and that people were  
barred from accessing certain areas for no reason and also had  
their cameras confiscated.


When McPadden attempted to report that secondary explosions were  
heard by numerous people, he was harshly ordered to "shut up" and  
"don't repeat it" by superiors.


He also talked to numerous firefighters who acknowledged that they  
also heard secondary explosions, but said that "Obviously somewhere  
in their command structure, they were told to shut up."





See what's new at AOL.com and Make AOL Your Homepage.



www.ctrl.org
DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER
==
CTRL is a discussion & informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic
screeds are unwelcomed. Substance—not soap-boxing—please!   These are
sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'—with its many half-truths, mis-
directions and outright frauds—is used politically by different groups with
major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought.
That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and
always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no
credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.

Archives Available at:

http://www.mail-archive.com/ctrl@listserv.aol.com/
http://www.mail-archive.com/ctrl@listserv.aol.com/";>ctrl

To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om


[CTRL] Fwd: (2) Supreme Court Says, "Listen Up, Liberals: It's PAYBACK Time!"

2007-10-01 Thread RoadsEnd

-Caveat Lector-



Begin forwarded message:


From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: September 30, 2007 8:53:00 PM PDT
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: (2) Supreme Court Says, "Listen Up, Liberals: It's PAYBACK  
Time!"


Justices Begin Work on
a Polarizing New Docket

By LINDA GREENHOUSE
New York Times, October 1, 2007

http://www.nytimes.com/2007/10/01/washington/01scotus.html? 
_r=1&ref=us&pagewanted=print&oref=slogin
WASHINGTON, Sept. 30 — The Supreme Court has so many polarizing  
cases on the docket for its new term that the deep ideological  
divisions that characterized the last term are all but certain to  
remain on display after justices reconvene on Monday.


The conservative majority under Chief Justice John G. Roberts Jr.  
drove the court to the right in a series of high-profile rulings  
during the term that ended in June. That performance, as well as a  
series of books and articles by and about justices, has placed the  
court in an unusually bright spotlight as the new term opens.


The conservative bloc will not necessarily prevail in every  
important case. For example, the Bush administration is clearly on  
the defensive as the court prepares to hear a third-round challenge  
to policies governing those held as enemy combatants at Guantánamo  
Bay, Cuba.


But the conservative justices clearly have the upper hand in the  
all-important task of shaping the court’s docket, a process that in  
effect shapes the country’s immediate legal agenda.


They demonstrated their power last week in accepting 19 new cases,  
an unusually large number, including an employer’s appeal in a  
racial discrimination case that could provide a vehicle for  
limiting remedies available under one of the country’s oldest civil  
rights laws.


At issue in the latest Guantánamo case is whether Congress properly  
stripped the federal courts of jurisdiction to hear challenges  
brought by detainees. The justices had seemed willing to steer  
clear of the issue in April, when they declined to hear appeals  
from two groups of detainees.


But the day after the term ended, they reversed course and agreed  
to hear the cases, an action without modern precedent. Because the  
reconsideration required the votes of five justices, instead of the  
four ordinarily needed to grant a case, the development strongly  
suggested that a majority of the court retains concerns about the  
current regime for determining and challenging the detainees’  
designation as enemy combatants. The Bush administration lost two  
earlier rounds at the court, in 2004 and 2006.


Among the new cases the justices granted last week was a challenge  
to a state law requiring voters to provide photo identification in  
order to cast a ballot, an issue that has divided legislators and  
judges along party lines throughout the country. Republicans  
generally stress the importance of preventing voter fraud, while  
Democrats view these increasingly popular measures as creating  
unwarranted barriers to voter access. Although the justices granted  
the case at the request of the Indiana Democratic Party and the  
American Civil Liberties Union, the action could well prove to be  
an example of “watch out what you wish for” if the result is to  
uphold the statute at issue and to encourage other states to follow  
Indiana’s lead.


The justices also took up a highly visible death penalty case, a  
challenge to the particular lethal injection method that is used in  
most states. While the validity of capital punishment, or even of  
lethal injection, is not at stake, the case will require the  
justices to take a position on the current meaning of the Eighth  
Amendment prohibition on cruel and unusual punishment. It is far  
from clear whether a majority of the justices will read the  
Constitution as mandating one chemical formulation versus another.


The discrimination case the justices granted on Tuesday, which has  
attracted almost no notice, could nonetheless produce an important  
shift in the court’s approach to interpreting statutes. The  
question is whether a law that bars racial discrimination in  
business dealings, including employment, also prohibits retaliation  
against those who complain about discrimination.


Ordinarily, the court grants cases only to resolve conflicting  
interpretations in the lower courts. But in this instance, every  
federal appeals court to consider the issue has agreed that the  
statute does apply to retaliation. For the court to grant a case in  
the absence of a lower-court conflict — as it did in the case  
decided in June that invalidated voluntary integration plans in two  
public school systems — is often an indication that the case was  
added to the docket as a vehicle for advancing a particular agenda.


The federal law at issue in the new case was originally part of the  
Reconstruction-era Civil Rights Act of 1866. Known now as Section  
198

[CTRL] Fwd: America's Stalingrad: Neocons Desperate for War with Iran

2007-10-01 Thread RoadsEnd

-Caveat Lector-



Begin forwarded message:


From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: September 30, 2007 9:04:42 PM PDT
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: America's Stalingrad: Neocons Desperate for War with Iran

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Norman_Podhoretz
The son of a Jewish immigrant from the Central European region of  
Galicia, NORMAN PODHORETZ was born and raised in Brownsville,  
Brooklyn.  Podhoretz's family was leftist, with his elder sister  
joining a socialist youth movement.


Podhoretz received bachelor's degrees from both Columbia University  
— where he studied under Lionel Trilling — and the Jewish  
Theological Seminary. He later received a BA with first-class  
honors and an MA from Cambridge University.



Career

Podhoretz served as Commentary magazine's editor-in-chief from 1960  
(when he replaced Elliot E. Cohen) until his retirement in 1995.  
Podhoretz remains Commentary's editor-at-large.


From 1981 to 1987, Podhoretz was an adviser to the U.S. Information  
Agency. From 1995 to 2003, he was a senior fellow at the Hudson  
Institute. He is a member of the Council on Foreign Relations. In  
2004, he was awarded the Presidential Medal of Freedom, the highest  
honor the U.S. president can bestow on a civilian.


Podhoretz is married to author Midge Decter**, and is the  
stepfather of Rachel Decter (Elliott Abrams' wife) and father of  
syndicated [neocon] columnist John Podhoretz.


Podhoretz received the Guardian of Zion Award from Bar-Ilan  
University on May 24, 2007.


He currently serves as a senior foreign policy advisor to Rudy  
Giuliani in his presidential campaign



Midge Decter (born July 25, 1927 in St. Paul, Minnesota) is an  
American neoconservative journalist and author of various books,  
including:


Always Right: Selected Writings of Midge Decter
Rumsfeld : A Personal Portrait
With Donald Rumsfeld, Decter is the former co-chair of the  
Committee for the Free World and one of the original drivers of the  
neo-conservative movement with her spouse, Norman Podhoretz. She is  
also a founder of the Independent Women's Forum, and was founding  
treasurer for the Northcote Parkinson Fund, founded and chaired by  
John Train.
Ms. Decter started her career in journalism as the secretary to the  
then-editor of Commentary, Robert Warshow. She resigned during her  
first pregnancy.


Among other positions, she was the executive editor of Harper's  
under Willie Morris, leaving the magazine in 1971. Her first job in  
publishing came as an editor at Basic Books.


She is one of the signatories to Statement of Principles for the  
Project for the New American Century


She is the mother of the conservative syndicated columnist John  
Podhoretz, the youngest of her four children, and the second by  
Norman Podhoretz.


---

"godfather of the neo-con movement"

http://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php?title=Norman_Podhoretz


The following comes from (and was adapted from) the March 9, 2003,  
Jim Lobe article "Family ties connect US right, Zionists":


"As godfather of the [neo-con] movement, Irving Kristol played  
mentor to Norman Podhoretz, the long-time but now-retired editor of  
Commentary, the influential monthly publication of the American  
Jewish Committee (AJC). Originally identified with the anti-war  
left in the mid-1960s, Podhoretz converted to neo-conservatism late  
in the decade and transformed the magazine into a main source of  
neo-conservative writing, despite the overwhelming majority of the  
Jewish community itself rejecting those positions.


"Podhoretz and his spouse, Midge Decter, a polemical powerhouse in  
her own right, created a formidable political team in the 1970s as  
they deserted the Democratic Party, and then, as leaders of the  
Committee on the Present Danger -- like (Project for the New  
American Century) PNAC a coalition of mainly Jewish, neo- 
conservatives and more traditional right-wing hawks like Defence  
Secretary Donald H. Rumsfeld - helped lay the foreign-policy  
foundation for the rise of Ronald Reagan. After Reagan's victory,  
Decter and Rumsfeld co-chaired the international offshoot of the  
committee, called the Coalition for the Free World.


"Podhoretz is the father of John Podhoretz, a columnist for the  
Rupert Murdoch-owned New York Post, who also acts as a ubiquitous  
booster of the hawks. And his son-in-law, Elliott Abrams, who held  
a number of controversial posts in Reagan's State Department and  
was eventually convicted in the Iran-Contra scandal for lying to  
Congress, now serves in George Walker Bush's National Security  
Council as his top Middle East adviser.


"At Commentary, Podhoretz offered considerable space to such rising  
lights of the neo-conservative movement as future United Nations  
(UN) ambassador Jeane J. Kirkpatrick (whose late husband Evron  
Kirkpatrick was a long-time collaborator of Irving Kristol);  
Richard Pipe

[CTRL] Fwd: Supreme Court Justice Says, "Listen Up, Liberal Scum: It's PAYBACK Time!"

2007-10-01 Thread RoadsEnd

-Caveat Lector-



Begin forwarded message:


From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: September 30, 2007 8:31:08 PM PDT
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Supreme Court Justice Says, "Listen Up, Liberal Scum: It's  
PAYBACK Time!"



Justice Thomas Lashes Out in Memoir
Book Attacks Liberals and the Media, Breaks Near-Silence on Anita Hill

About his Senate confirmation he says, "Oh, big whoop-dee-damn doo."


By Robert Barnes, Michael A. Fletcher and Kevin Merida
Washington Post, September 29, 2007; A01

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/story/2007/09/29/ 
ST2007092900506.html?hpid=moreheadlines



Justice Clarence Thomas settles scores in an angry and vivid  
forthcoming memoir, scathingly condemning the media, the Democratic  
senators who opposed his nomination to the Supreme Court, and the  
"mob" of liberal elites and activist groups that he says desecrated  
his life.


"My Grandfather's Son," for which Thomas has received a reported  
$1.5 million, is a 289-page memoir of his life in rural Georgia,  
his reliance on religious faith and his rise to the high court. His  
book ends with the day he was sworn in and contains only fleeting  
mentions of his time on the bench.


Thomas lovingly describes the iron-willed grandfather who raised  
him after his own father abandoned him as a toddler, praises the  
Roman Catholic Church for providing him with an education but  
criticizes it for not being as "adamant about ending racism then as  
it is about ending abortion now," and gives a detailed description  
of the confirmation hearings that electrified the nation in 1991  
and the sexual harassment allegations by Anita Hill that he said  
destroyed his reputation.


They are the most extensive comments Thomas has made about Hill  
since his confirmation. Though he has given numerous speeches since  
he has been on the court, he has rarely mentioned Hill or spoken in  
detail about the nomination fight. In the book, Thomas writes that  
Hill was the tool of liberal activist groups "obsessed" with  
abortion and outraged because he did not fit their idea of what an  
African American should believe.


"The mob I now faced carried no ropes or guns," Thomas writes of  
his hearings. "Its weapons were smooth-tongued lies spoken into  
microphones and printed on the front pages of America's  
newspapers. . . . But it was a mob all the same, and its purpose --  
to keep the black man in his place -- was unchanged."


Thomas, 59, says in the foreword to the book, due to go on sale  
Monday, that he wrote it to "leave behind an accurate record of my  
own life as I remember it" rather than leave it to those "with  
careless hands or malicious hearts." He indicates he wrote it  
himself, with editing help from three others.


It has been eagerly awaited, especially in the [neo]conservative  
community, which is playing an active role in promoting it. The  
Heritage Foundation, the Federalist Society and the National Center  
for Policy Analysis are sponsoring a six-city book tour, in which  
patrons will pay $30 to attend events in Thomas's honor.


The normally media-shy justice has interviews booked on "60  
Minutes" tomorrow night and ABC on Monday as well as a 90-minute  
interview with radio host Rush Limbaugh, also scheduled for Monday.  
The book's contents had been closely guarded before its publication  
date of Oct. 1, the first day of the Supreme Court's new term, but  
The Washington Post purchased a copy yesterday at an area  
bookstore, where it had been placed on display.


Thomas writes of the hard lessons doled out by his grandfather,  
Myers Anderson, who raised him after his father abandoned the  
family and his mother was unable to care for her boys in Pin Point,  
Ga. "In every way that counts, I am my grandfather's son," Thomas  
writes, hence the title of the memoir.


Thomas's depiction of his grandfather is of a man unsparingly  
tough. Anderson wouldn't let him play on sports teams or join the  
Cub Scouts.


When Thomas informed the family that he was dropping out of the  
seminary, against the wishes of his grandfather, he learned, to his  
surprise, that Anderson had retreated to his garage and cried. Then  
his grandfather kicked him out of the house, telling him: "I'm  
finished helping you. You'll have to figure it out yourself. You'll  
probably end up like your no-good daddy or those other no-good  
Pinpoint Negroes."


After graduating from Yale Law School in 1974, Thomas spent the  
summer in St. Louis studying for the bar exam, where he was once so  
pressed for money that he attempted to sell his blood at a blood  
bank. He was turned down because his pulse rate was too low.


Throughout the book, Thomas describes himself as under siege --  
variously from preening elites, light-skinned African Americans and  
critics who object to his conservative politics. Feeling under  
duress from civil rights leaders, and desponde

[CTRL] Fwd: Look Who's Talking

2007-10-01 Thread RoadsEnd

-Caveat Lector-



Begin forwarded message:


From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: September 30, 2007 8:23:40 PM PDT
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Look Who's Talking

Is that a NAZI "Iron Cross" hanging from the neck of this man/woman/ 
transexual/alien


(move over, Ann Coulter!) with a Jewish surname and a Neocon  
Zionist agenda,


speaking on behalf of (the "duly elected" government of) the  
American people?



"I hate all Iranians," US aide tells MPs

By SIMON WALTERS - 29th September 2007
http://www.progressivedailybeacon.com/more.php?id=1690

Britsh MPs visiting the Pentagon to discuss America's stance on  
Iran and Iraq were shocked to be told by one of President Bush's  
senior women officials: "I hate all Iranians."



And she also accused Britain of "dismantling" the Anglo-US-led  
coalition in Iraq by pulling troops out of Basra too soon.


The all-party group of MPs say Debra Cagan, Deputy Assistant  
Secretary for Coalition Affairs to Defence Secretary Robert Gates,  
made the comments this month.




Hard line: Debra Cagan stunned the MPs with her comments


The six MPs were taken aback by the hardline approach of the  
Pentagon and in particular Ms Cagan, one of Mr Bush's foreign  
policy advisers.


She made it clear that although the US had no plans to attack Iran,  
it did not rule out doing so if the Iranians ignored warnings not  
to develop a nuclear bomb.


It was her tone when they met her on September 11 that shocked them  
most.


The MPs say that at one point she said: "In any case, I hate all  
Iranians."


Although it was an aside, it was not out of keeping with her  
general demeanour.


"She seemed more keen on saying she didn't like Iranians than that  
the US had no plans to attack Iran," said one MP. "She did say  
there were no plans for an attack but the tone did not fit the words."


Another MP said: "I formed the impression that some in America are  
looking for an excuse to attack Iran. It was very alarming."


Tory Stuart Graham, who was on the ten-day trip, would not discuss  
Ms Cagan but said: "It was very sobering to hear from the horse's  
mouth how the US sees the situation."


Ms Cagan, whose job involves keeping the coalition in Iraq  
together, criticised Britain for pulling out troops.


"She said if we leave the south of Iraq, the Iranians will take it  
over," said one MP.


Another said: "She is very forceful and some of my colleagues were  
intimidated by her muscular style."


The MPs also saw Henry Worcester, Deputy Director of the Office of  
Iranian Affairs, who said he favoured talks with Iran.


The Pentagon denied Ms Cagan said she "hated" Iranians.

"She doesn't speak that way," said an official.

But when The Mail on Sunday spoke to four of the six MPs, three  
confirmed privately that she made the remark and one declined to  
comment. The other two could not be contacted.





See what's new at AOL.com and Make AOL Your Homepage.



www.ctrl.org
DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER
==
CTRL is a discussion & informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic
screeds are unwelcomed. Substance—not soap-boxing—please!   These are
sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'—with its many half-truths, mis-
directions and outright frauds—is used politically by different groups with
major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought.
That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and
always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no
credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.

Archives Available at:

http://www.mail-archive.com/ctrl@listserv.aol.com/
http://www.mail-archive.com/ctrl@listserv.aol.com/";>ctrl

To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om