[CTRL] Fwd: Oil is Murder

2007-03-11 Thread RoadsEnd

-Caveat Lector-



Begin forwarded message:


From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: March 11, 2007 10:01:44 PM PDT
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Oil is Murder

http://www.rollingstone.com/politics/story/13751944/ 
the_dark_side_of_texas_pete_maiden_reports_on_corpus_christis_koch_ind 
ustries




The Dark Side of Texas: Koch Industries

PETE MAIDEN

Bobi Miller needs only to open the door of her home in Corpus  
Christi, Texas, to see toxic waste from the Koch West oil refinery.  
Miller's back yard is covered in a thick black sludge, and across  
the street is the school where she used to teach before a lawsuit  
revealed that the Koch refinery had released ninety tons of  
benzene, a highly toxic chemical. Miller and other teachers were  
often forced to implement a safety procedure called "shelter in  
place," keeping students inside with the air conditioner off on  
days when Koch was pumping waste into the air. Today the school's  
playground is completely deserted: The company bought the property,  
and children no longer play in the yard.


Before the school closed, Miller would often come home to find her  
husband, Jim, prone on the couch with a headache. In 2001, Jim was  
diagnosed with thyroid cancer and had a tumor removed. Today, when  
he speaks, there is a distinct wheeze, and his breathing is  
labored. Bobi suffers from sarcoidosis, a disease that causes  
shortness of breath, persistent coughing and skin rashes. "We've  
always wondered whether that's from living close to the  
refineries," she says. "We very often hear the sirens from the  
refinery, and we don't know what they mean. It's very scary."


Short-term exposure to benzene, a natural part of crude oil and  
gasoline, can cause drowsiness, dizziness and unconsciousness; long- 
term effects include leukemia and a decrease in the size of women's  
ovaries. According to a recent study by the Texas Department of  
State Health Services, overall birth defects in Corpus Christi from  
1996 to 2002 was eighty-four percent higher than the state average.


In 2000, a federal grand jury indicted Koch, now the largest  
privately run company in the world, on 97 felony counts of  
violating air-pollution standards at its Koch West refinery in  
Corpus Christi. According to the Justice Department, the plant  
released about ninety-one tons of benzene in its liquid-waste  
streams -- some fifteen times greater than the regulatory limits to  
the refinery.


Koch settled the case for $20 million, pled guilty to one count and  
maintains that the excessive benzene release was never proven. "All  
Koch companies strive to operate their facilities in a safe and  
environmentally responsible manner," says a company spokesman.


Yet Corpus Christi is hardly the only place where Koch has been  
accused of violating environmental standards. In 2000, Koch was  
fined $35 million -- the largest civil penalty ever imposed on a  
company under federal environmental law -- for more than 300 oil  
spills into lakes, streams and waterways from its pipelines and oil  
facilities in six states. "In one case," the Environmental  
Protection Agency reported, "almost 100,000 gallons of oil was  
spilled in Texas and caused a twelve-mile oil slick on Nueces Bay  
and Corpus Christi Bay."


In Texas, many blame the state for failing to curb Koch's  
pollution. The Texas Commission on Environmental Quality, which is  
responsible for monitoring pollution at Koch's refineries, lists  
pages of "Air Emission Event Reports" on its Web site that describe  
repeated violations by the company.


Yet the commission has taken little or no action against Koch.  
Instead of being a watchdog, the TCEQ is "the lap dog of the  
industry," says Dr. Neil Carmen, who served for twelve years as a  
regional investigator at the commission. "The failure of the TCEQ's  
investigators to take action on the refinery's serious benzene  
violations reflects how poorly the agency is doing its job at large  
industrial plants."


Since effective oversight by the state of Koch isn't forthcoming,  
citizens in Corpus Christi have taken it upon themselves to monitor  
the pollution. Suzie Canales, the director of Citizens for  
Environmental Justice, lost a sister to cancer and has two young  
grandchildren with birth defects. She has teamed up with Melissa  
Jarrell, an assistant professor of criminal justice at Texas A&M  
University who is working on a book about Koch called Environmental  
Crime and the Media. The two women are organizing local residents,  
maintaining a constant watch on the company's refineriesand  
checking the surrounding area for elevated levels of toxins.


"An estimated tens of thousands of Americans die each year as a  
result of environmental pollution," Jarrell says. "These refineries  
are getting away with silent mass murder."


Posted Mar 09, 2007 12:50 PM




AOL now offers free email to everyone. Find o

[CTRL] Fwd: Oil in Iraq, Shifting Like the Desert Sand

2005-12-08 Thread RoadsEnd
-Caveat Lector-
Begin forwarded message:From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Date: December 8, 2005 3:31:39 PM PSTTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: Oil in Iraq, Shifting Like the Desert Sand  “We do not know the exact quantity of oil we are exporting,  we do not exactly know the prices we are selling it for, and  we do not know where the oil revenue is going to.” Iraqi oil industry in crisisIraqi oil exports fell to their lowest level in two years in November 2005. Bad management of the reconstruction effort, widespread corruption among government figures, and sabotage by insurgents are the reasons for the decline. Experts say that the US strategy of military intervention in oil-rich regions can only diminish, rather than increase, the supply to world markets. By Heiko Flottau in Cairo for ISN Security Watch (7/12/2005)  Two-and-a-half years after the US invasion of Iraq, the country's oil industry is still in disarray. An official of the Oil Ministry in Baghdad told ISN Security Watch, on condition of anonymity: “We do not know the exact quantity of oil we are exporting, we do not exactly know the prices we are selling it for, and we do not know where the oil revenue is going to.”According to Baghdad press reports, export revenues are still not sufficient to cover the Iraqi state budget. The government is forced to take loans from international banks to cover its running expenses.Although the US invested around US$1.3 billion in the rehabilitation of oil plants damaged by lack of maintenance during 13 years of UN sanctions, the daily output of approximately 1.3 million barrels remains far below Iraq’s pre-war production level of 2.5 million barrels.The production goal for December 2004 of 3 million barrels per day, set by the US and the Iraqi government, cannot be reached in the near future, according to experts within the Iraqi Oil Ministry who talked to ISN Security Watch.The Iraqi government looks set to lose US$8 billion a year in potential oil revenue, due to the poor current state of the oil industry. Botched reconstructionOne of the reasons for the decline of the industry is a lack of progress in the reconstruction effort, due to serious managerial deficiencies.For instance Halliburton subsidiary Kellogg Brown & Root (KBR) was awarded a US$225 million contract, without a tender, to rehabilitate the Qarmat Ali Water Plant in southern Iraq, according to a report in the Los Angeles Times.The plant is used to pump water into the ground in order to build pressure that brings the oil to the surface.However, the contract did not include the repair of the pipelines carrying the water to the oilfields. When the water was pumped into the ground, the old pipes burst, spilling large amounts of water into the desert. In addition, farmers often tap the water pipes in order to irrigate their fields.US officials apportion some of the blame for the delay in rehabilitating the oil industry to their own Army Corps of Engineers. During the first months after the war, the Corps was given responsibility for the first phase of repairs to oil pumps and pipelines.Members of the Corps lacked experience in handling the complicated, outdated technology that was imported by Iraq from the former Soviet Union. A member of the Corps later told a Congress hearing: "The Corps of Engineers had absolutely no abilities as far as oil production is concerned."  In Kurdistan, KBR signed a US$70 million contract to rehabilitate part of the pipeline system. According to the Los Angeles Times, KBR was only able to fulfill half of the contract. A couple of million barrels that had already been pumped could not be transported, and had to be re-injected into the ground – a practice that engineers regard as harmful to oilfields. Insurgent attacksAnalysts identify the constant attacks by insurgents on pipelines as a further obstacle to the recovery of the oil industry. Between May 2003 and late October 2005, observers counted 282 attacks on Iraq's oil transportation system.The first incident was an attack on 1 June 2003 against the Kirkuk-Ceyhan pipeline, which carries oil from northern Iraq to Turkey's Mediterranean coast. According to observers, the most recent attack was on 24 October 2005 in the same area near Kirkuk.Although US forces try to protect the Kirkuk-Ceyhan pipeline and Iraq's offshore loading terminals in the northern Persian Gulf, oil exports are frequently interrupted.In April 2004, suicide bombers attacked the Iraqi Khor al-Amaya offshore loading terminal in the Gulf from a speedboat, killing three US troops.ISN Security Watch spoke to a journalist from Baghdad's Al-Mada newspaper, who did not wish to be identified, on this topic: “The Iraqi government pays a lot of money to tribal chiefs, who say they will protect pipelines. But nobody can completely secure the thousands of kilometers of pipelines crossing the deserts."The Brookings Institution warned in June 2004 that the new “oil ter

[CTRL] Fwd: Oil

2005-07-04 Thread RoadsEnd
-Caveat Lector-
Begin forwarded message:From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Date: July 4, 2005 12:07:25 AM PDTTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: Oil  Oil Traders Increase Bets for $80 Crude on Supply Concerns July 4 (Bloomberg) -- Record oil prices may increase to $80 a barrel this year, options contracts on the New York Mercantile Exchange show. Investors are speculating OPEC won't produce enough oil to compensate for any disruption to supplies.    New York Mercantile Exchange data show 6,900 options contracts outstanding that allow the buyer to purchase crude oil for December delivery at $80 a barrel, compared with an average of 77 in January. The probability that oil will top $75 a barrel when the December crude contract expires is 21 percent, according to Adam Sieminski and Michael Lewis, strategists at Deutsche Bank AG, up from 5 percent at the start of the year.    ``The perception is that the risk of higher prices now is higher than at the beginning of this year,'' Deutsche Bank's Sieminski said in an interview. ``The market is so tightly balanced that issues like a nuclear confrontation with Iran could add a great deal of worry'' about oil supplies.    The Organization of Petroleum Exporting Countries, the producer of about 40 percent of the world's oil, is pumping almost as much crude as it can to increase inventories before an expected fourth-quarter peak in consumption. Crude oil reached a record $60.95 on June 27, deepening concern that the cost of energy would slow economic growth.    Growth Concern    Oil prices have surged 53 percent in the past year on concern that producers and refiners will strain to meet demand for products ranging from gasoline to diesel and heating oil.    U.S. Treasury Secretary John Snow on June 28 said high prices are hurting the world economy. German Chancellor Gerhard Schroeder on June 27 called for more transparency in global oil markets to stem speculation and lower prices from levels that are threatening to crimp expansion. The Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development in May cut its global growth estimate for this year and next, partly because of rising energy costs.    The Paris-based OECD now expects economic growth of 2.6 percent this year for its 30 member nations, down from its previous semi-annual forecast in November of 2.9 percent, the group said in May. In 2006, growth will reach 2.8 percent instead of 3.1 percent.    Oil companies are profiting from the price surge. Exxon Mobil Corp., BP Plc, Royal Dutch/Shell Group, Chevron Corp. and Total SA, the five largest publicly traded oil companies, reported combined net income of about $85 billion last year, when prices averaged more than $41 a barrel.    Shares of energy companies are rising. The Morgan Stanley Capital International World Energy Index, one of 10 industry groups making up the global equity benchmark, is leading gains with a 17 percent surge this year. The broader MSCI World measure has lost 1.8 percent in the period.    $100 `Disastrous'    Saudi Arabia's oil minister Ali al-Naimi on June 14 said his country, OPEC's largest exporter, can increase oil production by 1.5 million barrels a day from the 9.5 million a day the kingdom plans to pump in July, for a total of 11 million barrels a day.    One of his predecessors, Sheikh Ahmad Zaki Yamani, who was the Saudi oil minister when Arab countries declared an embargo on exports to the West in 1973, said that $100 a barrel oil ``isn't far-fetched.''    For that to happen, he said, ``it needs the help of a political event or a military adventure, like attacking Iraq. It would be disastrous,'' he said on June 28 at a conference near London.    A supply disruption of ``a couple of million'' barrels a day could send prices to $105, William Dudley, the chief U.S. economist at Goldman, Sachs & Co. in New York, said June 14. Global oil demand will rise to a record 86.4 million barrels a day in the fourth quarter, the Paris-based International Energy Agency forecasts.    Output Cut    ``We've certainly seen people asking for prices on $100'' contracts, said Orrin Middleton, who markets options and other securities for Barclays Capital in London. ``This was way off people's radars 12 months ago. They now believe there's a possibility, but it's going to take a supply disruption to take us there.''    Oil shipments from Iraq, which in May pumped an average 1.78 million barrels a day, were cut by about 50 percent on two occasions last year following attacks on pipelines. When the U.S. invaded the country in March 2003, production plummeted from 2.48 million a day in February of that year to 140,000 a day in April, according to Bloomberg data.    `Forget $60'    The daily average volumes of crude oil options trading on Nymex in the five months through May was 55,036, more than the 46,237 that traded on average in 2004, data on the exchange's Web site shows. The record was a daily average 80,710 in 2002.   

[CTRL] Fwd: Oil Corrupts, Absolutely

2004-10-20 Thread Kris Millegan
-Caveat Lector-
 
www.ctrl.org
DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER
==
CTRL is a discussion & informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic
screeds are unwelcomed. Substance—not soap-boxing—please!   These are
sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'—with its many half-truths, mis-
directions and outright frauds—is used politically by different groups with
major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought.
That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and
always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no
credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.

Archives Available at:

http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
ctrl

To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om
--- Begin Message ---
-Caveat Lector-


Oil-producing nations rank high in corruption
Report: Energy firms should be more transparent
The Associated Press
Updated: 11:30 a.m. ET Oct. 20, 2004

LONDON - Most oil-producing nations are also rife with corruption, and oil companies should provide more information about their operations to help clean up the market, a global watchdog group said Wednesday in an annual report.
Angola, Azerbaijan, Chad, Ecuador, Indonesia, Iran, Iraq, Kazakhstan, Libya, Nigeria, Russia, Sudan, Venezuela and Yemen scored very low in clean government practices, said Transparency International Chairman Peter Eigen in releasing the "Corruption Perceptions Index" for 2004.
"In these countries, public contracting in the oil sector is plagued by revenues vanishing into the pockets of Western oil executives, middlemen and local officials," he said.
Eigen said oil companies could help stamp out corruption by publishing details of the fees, royalties and other payments made to governments and state oil companies.
Transparency International said 146 countries were surveyed for the report â not just oil-producers â and it found that corruption was rampant in 60 nations.
The survey found that 106 scored lower than a 5, with a top score of 10 being the least corrupt. Bangladesh, Haiti, Nigeria, Chad, Myanmar, Azerbaijan and Paraguay were perceived to be the most corrupt, all scoring lower than 2.
The United States ranks number 17, with a score of 7.5, tied with Belgium and Ireland, better than France but worse than Canada.
The index is compiled from a series of polls on perceptions of corruption made by independent organizations. This year's report is based on 18 surveys conducted since 2002, by a dozen groups. The index rates only those countries which appear in three or more surveys.
Finland, New Zealand, Denmark, Iceland, Singapore, Sweden and Switzerland were rated the least corrupt, all scoring higher than 9 out of 10 on the index.
Compared to last year's report, corruption was perceived to be worse in Bahrain, Belize, Cyprus, Dominican Republic, Jamaica, Kuwait, Luxembourg, Mauritius, Oman, Poland, Saudi Arabia, Senegal, and Trinidad and Tobago.
Improved scores were recorded for Austria, Botswana, Czech Republic, El Salvador, France, Gambia, Germany, Jordan, Switzerland, Tanzania, Thailand, Uganda, United Arab Emirates and Uruguay, Transparency International said.
Copyright 2004 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.
URL: http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/6288647/
www.ctrl.org
DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER
==
CTRL is a discussion & informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic
screeds are unwelcomed. Substanceânot soap-boxingâplease!   These are
sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'âwith its many half-truths, mis-
directions and outright fraudsâis used politically by different groups with
major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought.
That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and
always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no
credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.

Archives Available at:

http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
ctrl

To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om
--- End Message ---


[CTRL] Fwd:   oil and gas politics

2004-07-05 Thread Kris Millegan
-Caveat Lector-
 
www.ctrl.org
DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER
==
CTRL is a discussion & informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic
screeds are unwelcomed. Substance—not soap-boxing—please!   These are
sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'—with its many half-truths, mis-
directions and outright frauds—is used politically by different groups with
major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought.
That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and
always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no
credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.

Archives Available at:

http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
ctrl

To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om
--- Begin Message ---
-Caveat Lector-

The Undeclared Oil War 

By Paul Roberts
Monday, June 28, 2004; Page A21 


While some debate whether the war in Iraq was or was not "about oil," 
another war, this one involving little but oil, has broken out 
between two of the world's most powerful nations. 

  

For months China and Japan have been locked in a diplomatic battle 
over access to the big oil fields in Siberia. Japan, which depends 
entirely on imported oil, is desperately lobbying Moscow for a 2,300-
mile pipeline from Siberia to coastal Japan. But fast-growing China, 
now the world's second-largest oil user, after the United States, 
sees Russian oil as vital for its own "energy security" and is 
pushing for a 1,400-mile pipeline south to Daqing. 

The petro-rivalry has become so intense that Japan has offered to 
finance the $5 billion pipeline, invest $7 billion in development of 
Siberian oil fields and throw in an additional $2 billion for 
Russian "social projects" -- this despite the certainty that if Japan 
does win Russia's oil, relations between Tokyo and Beijing may sink 
to their lowest, potentially most dangerous, levels since World War 
II. 

Asia's undeclared oil war is but the latest reminder that in a global 
economy dependent largely on a single fuel -- oil -- "energy 
security" means far more than hardening refineries and pipelines 
against terrorist attack. At its most basic level, energy security is 
the ability to keep the global machine humming -- that is, to produce 
enough fuels and electricity at affordable prices that every nation 
can keep its economy running, its people fed and its borders 
defended. A failure of energy security means that the momentum of 
industrialization and modernity grinds to a halt. And by that 
measure, we are failing. 

In the United States and Europe, new demand for electricity is 
outpacing the new supply of power and natural gas and raising the 
specter of more rolling blackouts. In the "emerging" economies, such 
as Brazil, India and especially China, energy demand is rising so 
fast it may double by 2020. And this only hints at the energy crisis 
facing the developing world, where nearly 2 billion people -- a third 
of the world's population -- have almost no access to electricity or 
liquid fuels and are thus condemned to a medieval existence that 
breeds despair, resentment and, ultimately, conflict. 

In other words, we are on the cusp of a new kind of war -- between 
those who have enough energy and those who do not but are 
increasingly willing to go out and get it. While nations have always 
competed for oil, it seems more and more likely that the race for a 
piece of the last big reserves of oil and natural gas will be the 
dominant geopolitical theme of the 21st century. 

Already we can see the outlines. China and Japan are scrapping over 
Siberia. In the Caspian Sea region, European, Russian, Chinese and 
American governments and oil companies are battling for a stake in 
the big oil fields of Kazakhstan and Azerbaijan. In Africa, the 
United States is building a network of military bases and diplomatic 
missions whose main goal is to protect American access to oilfields 
in volatile places such as Nigeria, Cameroon, Chad and tiny Sao Tome -
- and, as important, to deny that access to China and other thirsty 
superpowers. 

The diplomatic tussles only hint at what we'll see in the Middle 
East, where most of the world's remaining oil lies. For all the talk 
of big new oil discoveries in Russia and Africa -- and of how this 
gush of crude will "free" America and other big importers from the 
machinations of OPEC -- the geological facts speak otherwise. Even 
with the new Russian and African oil, worldwide oil production 
outside the Middle East is barely keeping pace with demand. 

In the run-up to the Iraq war, Russia and

[CTRL] Fwd: oil in vietnam split between world powers!

2004-06-12 Thread Kris Millegan
-Caveat Lector-
 
www.ctrl.org
DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER
==
CTRL is a discussion & informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic
screeds are unwelcomed. Substance—not soap-boxing—please!   These are
sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'—with its many half-truths, mis-
directions and outright frauds—is used politically by different groups with
major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought.
That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and
always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no
credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.

Archives Available at:

http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
ctrl

To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om
--- Begin Message ---
-Caveat Lector-

That huge war USA did in NAM was because VIETNAM has the biggest oil field on
the planet, just offshore. Bigger than RUSSIA GEORGIA or ARABIA! I was hoping to
be able to tell you buy Vietnamese oil drilling stocks on the emerging markets,
you won't go wrong. In the belief that, even while the OVERLORDS of WALL STREET,
rule, there's a way to make some money and be an activist. We can have it both
ways. But The war in Vietnam was a resource war. Read Anthony Sampson's THE
SEVEN SISTERS" available at abebooks.com). And that oil field offshore, in the
ocean, is going to come into play very soon. Hopefully it will belong to them
and not the Seven Sisters. BUT I do not have hope. My research today tells me
that
the COMPANIES THERE NOW who are DRILLING are CHEVRON/ TEXACO gong in with the
name CALTEX and THE RUSKI has the other half. Very weird. Was some pact made
between the two nations in the Gorby period? We give you half the planet's
goodies if you stop this commie crap?

http://biz.yahoo.com/rm/040521/energy_russia_vietnam_2.html they entered NAM in
81 to drill. MORE ON RUSKI: http://therussiajournal.com/index.htm?obj=2021

http://www.vietnamvetcontacts.com/gpage32.html has the CALTEX info.

Now famed Daniel ELLSBERG sez no oil there.
http://www.commondreams.org/headlines04/0610-11.htm

SO what do you make of it? Are the barges going out full of oil at night, the
way POLISH ASTRONAUTS go to the SUN? Are the wells offshore? Their booty taken
without payment to the Vietnamese? WHO made the deal that the country's oil
should be taken away by the WEST? AND is NAM part of OPEC?

http://www.aasianst.org/absts/1995abst/seasia/sease121.htm
INFO on the plunder of Nam here, how CONOCO struck oil in 99 in Vietnam, block
15-1 they call the wells!5,600 barrels-per-day  from one well.
Another well is BLOCK 16-2 owned by BSC partners, in Rong Dong.

GOOGLE around with this, see what you make of it. PLANETARY OVERLORDS seem to
have carved up the country that WON THE DAMN WAR! This is as bizarre as JAPaN/
GERMANY LOSING the war and becoming PLANETARY OVERLORDS. Does this mean that the
cancerous TUMOR  CALLED CAPITALISM is the only game in town?

"RESISTANCE IS FUTILE" SOME NAZI once said. IS THAT TRUE? Do events bear that
out? Is any hope of nationalism misguided? Did Gandhi live for nothing? ARe the
slick walls of the pyramid lathered with the sweat of conquered nations and on
its pinnacle sitting firmly the 14 families?

I write you cuz you're bright. YOU KNOW. Any thoughts?

www.ctrl.org
DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER
==
CTRL is a discussion & informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic
screeds are unwelcomed. Substance—not soap-boxing—please!   These are
sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'—with its many half-truths, mis-
directions and outright frauds—is used politically by different groups with
major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought.
That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and
always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no
credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.

Archives Available at:

http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/">ctrl

To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om
--- End Message ---


[CTRL] Fwd: Oil Production in 42 Countries

2004-02-13 Thread Kris Millegan
-Caveat Lector-
 
www.ctrl.org
DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER
==
CTRL is a discussion & informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic
screeds are unwelcomed. Substance—not soap-boxing—please!   These are
sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'—with its many half-truths, mis-
directions and outright frauds—is used politically by different groups with
major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought.
That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and
always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no
credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.

Archives Available at:

http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
ctrl

To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om
--- Begin Message ---
-Caveat Lector-

http://dieoff.org/42Countries/42Countries.htm

Graphs do not use the same scale




www.ctrl.org
DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER
==
CTRL is a discussion & informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic
screeds are unwelcomed. Substance—not soap-boxing—please!   These are
sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'—with its many half-truths, mis-
directions and outright frauds—is used politically by different groups with
major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought.
That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and
always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no
credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.

Archives Available at:

http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/">ctrl

To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om
--- End Message ---


[CTRL] Fwd: OIL the Main Topic at Davos

2003-01-25 Thread RoadsEnd
-Caveat Lector-
 
www.ctrl.org
DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER
==
CTRL is a discussion & informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic
screeds are unwelcomed. Substance—not soap-boxing—please!  These are
sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'—with its many half-truths, mis-
directions and outright frauds—is used politically by different groups with
major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought.
That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and
always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no
credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.

Archives Available at:
http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html
 Archives of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
 ctrl

To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om
--- Begin Message ---
-Caveat Lector-
Business Week Online

David Fairlamb
DAVOS, JANUARY 24, 2003 

How Global Growth Could Skid on Oil 

Even a quick end to an Iraq war might not be enough to pull prices back down to the $23-per-barrel range. That could be disastrous 

The prospect of war with Iraq weighs heavily on the minds of many business leaders at the World Economic Forum meeting in Davos, Switzerland. The Europeans, in particular, are worried that an assault on Baghdad will sap already feeble consumer confidence, thus undermining demand, hurting corporate profits, and slowing the sluggish global economy. They also fear that conflict in the Gulf will drive oil prices higher and keep them there for at least the rest of the year.

Most business strategists have drawn up their forecasts for this year assuming that the price of oil would average about $23 a barrel. But it's already up to $30 -- partly because of the general strike in Venezuela, partly because of fears about Iraq. Although oil prices may dip slightly when the Venezuelan situation eases, analysts doubt that they'll fall sustainably below $30 until the Iraq crisis is esolved. 

"Some commentators predict the U.S. will win a quick war and that Iraqi oil will then flood onto the world markets driving prices down," says William F. Browder, chief executive of Hermitage Capital Management in Moscow. "But that's wishful thinking. The market could be disrupted for a year or more." 

HARDLY GROWING  

That could be disastrous for the world economy. Kenneth Rogoff, economic counseler and director of research at the International Monetary Fund in Washington, D.C., estimates that a sustained increase of $5 a barrel knocks between 0.25% to 0.50% off global growth. Stephen S. Roach, chief economist at Morgan Stanley, warns that "an oil shock" could "easily push the U.S. economy into  recession." American output was hardly growing at all by the end of last year, he points out. So higher oil prices is the last thing it needs. Adds Daniel Yergin, chairman of Cambridge Energy Research Associates: "Every U.S. recession since the 1970s has ultimately been caused by rising oil prices." 

The Europeans are worried because -- even if the U.S. does win a quick war -- Iraq won't be able to pump more than 1.8 million barrels of oil a day above its current daily output of from 1.7 million to 2.8 million. That's only 2.4% of global output and isn't enough to drive prices down significantly. And that's an optimistic scenario. "Saddam Hussein could destroy a lot of Iraq's oil capacity if he loses a war," points out Browder. So it may be unable to increase production at all after the conflict is over. 

Abdallah S. Jum'ah, president and chief executive officer of Saudi Aramco, says Saudi Arabia will do its bit to nudge prices down by pumping more oil. "We want a price in the $23 to $24 range," he says. And OPEC Secretary-General Alvaro Silva-Calderón says the cartel is committed to creating stability in the markets. OPEC countries have been pumping up to 1.5 million more oil a day than usual in recent weeks, he points out, in an attempt to neutralize the impact of Venezuela's problems. "I think the oil price spike is a transitory rather than permanent phenomonen," he says. 

GROWING VOLATILITY

But how much additional oil OPEC, including Saudi Arabia, can produce over the longer term is limited. And Silva-Calderón warns, in a reference to Iraq, that "developments outside our control" could yet disrupt the markets and drive prices higher. "The market is volatile and is getting more volatile," adds Andrei Illarionov, Russian President Vladimir Putin's personal representative to the G-8 gourp of countries. He doubts prices will come down to the mid-$20s level in the short term. 

That's good news for Russia, w

[CTRL] Fwd: Oil Firm Links Bahrain, BCCI, Bush Son--1991 article

2001-10-31 Thread Kris Millegan







Oil Firm Links Bahrain, BCCI, Bush Son
This article was prepared by staff reporters Thomas Petzinger Jr., 
Peter
Truell and Jill Abramson
12/09/1991
The Asian Wall Street Journal
PAGE 1
(Copyright (c) 1991, Dow Jones & Co., Inc.)
 
Two years ago, Talat Othman didn't have the president's ear. But 
since
August 1990, the Palestinian-born Chicago investor has attended three 
White
House meetings with President George Bush to discuss Middle East 
policy.
Mr. Othman's political access coincides with the remarkable ascendance of 
a
little Texas oil company on whose board he serves alongside George W. 
Bush,
the president's oldest son. That company, Harken Energy Corp. -- though 
it
had never drilled a single well overseas or in water -- recently won 
the
rights to drill potentially lucrative offshore wildcat wells in a 
contract
bestowed by the government of Bahrain.
 
When the Harken deal was announced in January 1990, it attracted only
perfunctory notice. More recently, a number of publications have 
written
about the case, raising questions about whether Bahrain might have 
chosen
Harken in part because a presidential son sat on its board.
Now, George W. Bush is emerging as a principal adviser to his father. 
He
was a lead player in the campaign to oust White House Chief of Staff 
John
Sununu, and was cited by his father last week as among those who will 
play
"key roles in the re-election effort." Thus, the issues surrounding 
the
Harken deal take on fresh importance.
 
The White House says there is nothing questionable in this story of
petroleum, politics and the presidential son. "There is no conflict 
of
interest, or even the appearance of conflict, in these business
arrangements," says spokesman Marlin Fitzwater. The matters had been
reviewed and disclosed, he said, adding, "They are legitimate 
business
undertakings."
 
Indeed, an investigation by The Wall Street Journal hasn't revealed
evidence of wrongdoing or influence-peddling by George W. Bush or 
anyone
else connected to Harken. Yet what does emerge is a complex pattern 
of
personal and financial relationships behind Harken's sudden good fortune 
in
the Middle East, raising the question of whether Bahrainis or others in 
the
Middle East may have hoped to ingratiate themselves with the White 
House.
Even more intriguing, there are numerous links among Harken, Bahrain 
and
individuals close to the discredited Bank of Credit & Commerce
International, a banking empire that used Mideast oil money to seek ties 
to
political leaders in several countries.
 
The mosaic of BCCI connections surrounding Harken Energy may prove 
nothing
more than how ubiquitous the rogue bank's ties were. But the number 
of
BCCI-connected people who had dealings with Harken -- all since George 
W.
Bush came on board -- likewise raises the question of whether they mask 
an
effort to cozy up to a presidential son.
 
Among those relationships:
-- Sheik Khalifah bin-Salman al-Khalifah, the prime minister of Bahrain 
and
a brother of the country's ruling emir, is identified on an October 
1990
shareholder list as one of the 45 investors who own parent company 
BCCI
Holdings (Luxembourg) SA. The emir played a role in approving the 
Harken
transaction.
-- Sheik Abdullah Bakhsh, a major Harken shareholder represented by 
Mr.
Othman on the company's board, has been a co-investor in Saudi Arabia 
with
alleged BCCI front man Ghaith Pharaon, and used Khalid bin-Mahfouz, 
until
recently a principal BCCI shareholder, as his banker.
-- Harken's investment bankers helped BCCI gain its foothold in 
U.S.
banking, and they also arranged for a Swiss bank to help rescue 
Harken from
its debt woes in 1987 -- a Swiss bank that was at the time a 
joint-venture
partner with BCCI.
-- Harken's consultant on the Bahrain deal counts Kamal Adham, a 
principal
owner of BCCI, as a close friend and has had a long acquaintance with
BCCI's Mr. Pharaon.
As a candidate and later in the White House, President Bush vowed to 
avoid
even the appearance of any conflicts of interest in his administration. 
He
instructed Secretary of State James Baker to cable all U.S. embassies 
to
warn against the appearance of preferential treatment for Bush family
investments overseas. The president has also moved to distance himself 
from
the BCCI scandal, denouncing a former aide who recently went to work as 
a
lawyer for BCCI's Mr. Adham, and who resigned in the ensuing furor.
George W. Bush, a managing partner of the Texas Rangers baseball 
team,
declined to be interviewed. He did provide brief responses to written
questions through an intermediary. Asked whether his involvement with 
the
Dallas energy company lent it added credibility in the Arab world, he 
said
to "ask the Bahrainis."
Every individual involved denies any influence peddling. Mr. Othman, 
George
W. Bush and people involved in setting up the White House meetings on 
the
Mideast say the president's son had nothing to do with Mr. Othman's 
being
included amo

[CTRL] Fwd: Oil Company Histories

2001-08-28 Thread Saba

What I remember in the sixty period was a manager of Standard Oil coming
into the Mayor's Office demanding we do something about the "price wars"
- for we had 4 stations in town, on one corner and the gas war was on
and the prices went down, down and down.   Now this idiot thought I
should take up the crusade but what did I know about oit - this was a
job for Superman?   Well maybe Mighty Mouse, but not me for they did not
pay me enough to devote my life to oil - but I did however invite a
Saudi Arabian Prince to our town and he accepted but after they murdered
his father - Sorry Charlie, no drag re oil prices.and that guy was
loaded.

So - every jew in town came to my office to stop the dinner -
Rockefeller had stopped his dinner and we would be destroyed politcally,
and our Saudi Arabian Flags sent by State Department would be torn down.

So in the end - I believe the American people have been the ones
"screwed" by our so called friends...for you see, Sadaam Hussein
offered us cheap oil, he wanted to be friends.

Now Marc Rich - this man who gets away with murder, and do not think he
does not - during Iranian crisis bought oil contrary to our law from
Iran at $6.00 a barrel and sold from $29.00 up to 40.00 plus.

It is the like of a Marc Rich with which we have to be concernedthis
man is evil,
he is mafia thug, and his floosie wife is nothing but courtesan who
tried to get next to Clinton with the ADL - but then, Rich did get his
pardon right?   But hey, that Italian mob what is left, all in slammer?

The plot thickens .. for I did not know Zapata oil had deal with
Kuwait Kings for I thought they had deal for off shore drilling like say
prior to Nixon peace feelers with Cina - oil companies were drilling off
shore then, what companies I do not remember.

So Remember this lovely American woman in Kuwait - on TV, while Sadaam
Hussein's "army" was looting stores, etc., kind of like the blacks did
in Cincinnati recently - this woman on TV. said - "They even stole my TV
and VCR - when are you Americans coming over here and do something about
this".

Well, we could have stopped a war and saved the lives of a lot of Iraqi
Children, gotten cheap oil - had we only sent that old bitch a new TV
and VCR.

Ugly Americans - note Bilderbergers and the Hotel Trade - and remember
Meyer Lansky in Cuba, all those hotels and motels and gambling casinos
run by the mob and today if Lansky were alive he would be reaping in
billions but Fidel, took care of that and the mob lost a mint and JFK
lost his life.

Joke on TV last night - showed a priest telling a story about Jesus and
the money changers - my mother always said Jesus did two wrong things -
he kicked the gamblers out of the temple - but this guy said as Jesus
was kicking out the money changers, he winked and smiled and said to the
one "hey, got two tens for a five"?

Now Jesus knew the difference between a Jew and a Zionist way back then
- for everywhere you go you find gambling, prostitution, drugs - guess
who is always in the background holding the bag..

Viva Zapata - if not Bush, who???   He is the best we have right
now...back in the early 1950 period, Dwight David Eisenhower once
reminded the King of Saudi Arabia - hey, watch your step for the day
will come when we will not need all that oiland I think the day, is
fast approaching.

California got a good example of energy crunch recently but have learned
nothign.

The Old Line were at least honest with public it was all out to see -
energy was cheap, but since Marc Rich - see what will happen if the
Zionists get that oil?

See what the American People have been taught to hate the Giants who
once ran this country - they were not perfect, but you have this trash
Marc Rich and Denise Rich element now bribing US Presidentsso add
this floosie to list of questionable people who liked to "get next to
the Boss".so as was said - Hey Meet the New Boss?   No way though,
he is like the Old Boss - at least he does not engage in acts of sodomy
with prostitutes under contract with Mafia and the likes of a Larry
Flynt - and who else got paid by Rich - why your ADL - who has put Jesus
Christ on their Hit Hate List.

Hey Foxman, got two tens for a five?  And if the lard ass is watching
that goes for you too - so cry havoc and turn loose the dogs of war but
do you think anybody will go this time - no they are hiring mercenaries
to do the dirty work but any American involved in foreign wars lose
their citizenship do they not?   Fighting for another country for we are
not running a French Foreign Legion - yet.


Saba




http://www.virginia.edu/igpr/apagoilhistory.html




[CTRL] [Fwd: -Oil Prices & DrugWar Electioneering]

2000-04-06 Thread Nurev Ind Research

-Caveat Lector-   http://www.ctrl.org/">
 -Cui Bono?-

 Original Message 
Subject: -Oil Prices & DrugWar Electioneering
Date: Thu, 6 Apr 2000 15:25:14 -0700
From: "David Crockett Williams" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: "Activist Mailing List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: ".GeneralAgencyServices" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Activist Mailing List - http://get.to/activist

Below is reproduced Tom Flocco's article of 16Mar2000 with evidence that the
high oil prices now are a calculated part of Electioneering 2000 by Bush
family interests, linked in the two other below referenced Flocco
WorldNetDaily articles to GWBush oil industry insider trading mechanations
covered up in recent years by his dad's loyalists.

Society's addictions to oil and drugs form basis of power/profit
politics/control, a root of wars and violence to destabilize societies for
exploitation of human and natural resources, at cost of solving critical
environmental emergency problems before it is too late (eg, global climate
change).

At end are reproduced my recent comments about biofuels alternatives and my
today's email to Flocco urging his investigation for WorldNetDaily of
related referenced skullduggery revelations in CIA Inspector General's
report volume2 acknowledging high level government officials complicit in
CIA protection of illegal drug trade.   The CIA drug connection has gone far
beyond its ongoing funding of covert operations, many of which are directed
at grabbing energy resources in foreign lands at the peril of indigenous
inhabitants, eg, the U'wa people and Occidental Petroleum in Columbia from
where most illicit drugs now come to US courtesy of CIA as in Vietnam
precedent, trying to grab oil resources there, and recently the Kosovo war
waged to secure oil pipeline route to Europe involving KLA/CIA heroin trade
cooperation. www.copvcia.com



CHECK THIS OTHER ARTICLE "Bush is no good trade" at:
http://www.worldnetdaily.com/bluesky_excomm/2218_xex_bush_no_good.shtml

AND FROM:
http://www.worldnetdaily.com/bluesky_excomm/19991228_xex_pr_makes_brw.shtml
"PR makes the war grow fonder"

IF YOU WANT YOUR BLOOD TO BOIL...


From
http://www.worldnetdaily.com/bluesky_excomm/2316_xex_oil_well_wit.shtml

Oil is well with Bush


By Tom Flocco   16March2000
© 2000 WorldNetDaily.com

Given the continuing heating oil cost crisis in the Northeast and rising
gasoline prices throughout the country coupled with the reported role Kuwait
is playing in that process, a report by the Chinese Xinhua News Agency that
former President Bush visited Kuwait just seven weeks ago notches a few
rungs higher on the "curious" list. This second trip to Kuwait by Bush since
his son's presidential aspirations became apparent should start to raise
some eyebrows.

For while private citizen Bush met with senior Kuwaiti officials according
to Xinhua, there was no reporting about the content of the high-level
discussions and the former president's January trip was quiet enough to
escape notice by U.S. media. Given Kuwait's role in the high fuel prices,
one wonders whether oil factored into the conversation.

Many American families have faced real home-heating struggles resulting from
oil prices having tripled since last year; but now the public is poised for
another financial assault as gasoline prices have already surpassed 1991
Gulf War levels with oil analysts projecting potential $2.00 per-gallon
prices for regular gas by Memorial Day, if not sooner.

As recently reported, American oil experts are complaining about Kuwait's
strange leadership role in pushing the current round of higher oil, given
the financial and human sacrifices Americans have made for Kuwait. Moreover,
those with good memories will recount the role President George Bush played
as prime mover of the coalition wherein American troops were sent off to
save Kuwait from the Iraqi occupation. "That's gratitude for you," said one
unidentified expert, quoted in the New York Times.


Storm On The Horizon

With good cause, the Clinton-Gore administration is worried that
skyrocketing oil prices will cause a series of inflationary problems leading
to higher interest rates by the Federal Reserve Board, a potential stock
market collapse and millions of highly stressed American budgets -- right
before the November election. In a March 2 interview with Fox News, former
Energy Secretary James Schlessinger said, "oil inventories for summer need
to be built now and we are not doing so. I think it could cause trouble (in
November) for the party in office if this continues."

Sen. Charles Schumer, D-N.Y., echoed these sentiments on CNN the same day,
saying, "the economy is being thrown off-kilter. OPEC (Organization of
Petroleum Exporting Countries) has dilly dallied and we're headed toward
$2.00 gas by Memorial Day." However, an examination of news report dates and
comment relating to Kuwait's primacy in driving oil higher thr

Re: [CTRL] (Fwd) Oil

2000-03-19 Thread Foxter



Is it my faulty recall or 
was inflation lower l980-88 than l989-92?  I remember housing prices sunk 
horribly low in those latter years.  What is the relationship between the 
cost of living in the US and the amount of oil production in the Middle 
East?  Terry
 

  - Original Message - 
  From: 
  Alamaine 
  To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
  Sent: Sunday, March 19, 2000 2:15 
AM
  Subject: [CTRL] (Fwd) Oil
  -Caveat Lector-    -Cui Bono?-Here's some 
  data for all you spreadsheet/dbf fans.  It shows how much oil 
  isgained from generalised sources.  You can go to the source URL and 
  find outother interesting bits and bytes of information like jet fuel, 
  heating oil,nat'l gas and the like.  Just think though:  if some 
  Middle Eastern nationswere denied a credible source of income for a while 
  (check out the Reaganyears, 1980-88), things might be thought of a little 
  differently.  Note that inthe Bush years (1989-1992), the Middle 
  Easterners produced near enough DOUBLEwhat they did the previous eight 
  years -- near enough.About a year and a half ago, I posted a brief 
  rationalisation for the 'GulfWar', portrayed in one single photograph of 
  GHW Bush on what I recall was aKuwaiti oil derrick.  'Nuff 
  said.  A<>E<>R--- Forwarded message follows 
  ---http://www.eia.doe.gov/pub/oil_gas/petroleum/data_publications/petroleum_supply_monthly/current/txt/table_s03.txtCrude 
  Oil Imports, 1973 - Present(Thousand Barrels per 
  Day)    
  Total/a/b 
  Total Year/Month Arab OPEC    
  Other OPEC/a OPEC   
  Non-OPEC/a   
  Imports1973 
  Average    
  838 
  1,257 
  2,095    
  1,149 3,2441974 
  Average    
  713 
  1,827 
  2,540  
  931 3,4771975 
  Average  
  1,330 
  1,882 
  3,211  
  893 4,1051976 
  Average  
  2,378 
  2,167 
  4,545  
  742 5,2871977 
  Average  
  3,136 
  2,507 
  5,643  
  971 6,6151978 
  Average  
  2,930 
  2,254 
  5,184    
  1,172 6,3561979 
  Average  
  3,002 
  2,110 
  5,112    
  1,407 6,5191980 
  Average  
  2,503 
  1,361 
  3,864    
  1,399 5,2631981 
  Average  
  1,774 
  1,149 
  2,922    
  1,474 4,3961982 
  Average    
  736   
  998 
  1,734    
  1,754 3,4881983 
  Average    
  533   
  944 
  1,477    
  1,853 3,3291984 
  Average    
  634   
  878 
  1,512    
  1,914 3,4261985 
  Average    
  300 
  1,012 
  1,312    
  1,888 3,2011986 
  Average    
  854 
  1,259 
  2,113    
  2,065 4,1781987 
  Average    
  965 
  1,435 
  2,400    
  2,274 4,6741988 
  Average  
  1,415 
  1,281 
  2,696    
  2,411 5,1071989 
  Average  
  1,794 
  1,582 
  3,376    
  2,467 5,8431990 
  Average  
  1,864 
  1,650 
  3,514    
  2,381 5,8941991 
  Average  
  1,754 
  1,622 
  3,377    
  2,405 5,7821992 
  Average  
  1,660 
  1,746 
  3,406    
  2,676 6,0831993 
  Average  
  1,661 
  2,026 
  3,687    
  3,100 6,7871994 
  Average  
  1,636 
  1,944 
  3,580    
  3,483 7,0631995 
  Average  
  1,505 
  1,835 
  3,341    
  3,889 7,2301996 
  Average  
  1,496 
  1,942 
  3,438    
  4,070 7,5081997 
  January  
  1,462 
  1,775 
  3,237    
  4,255 
  7,492 February 
  1,421 
  1,920 
  3,341    
  4,093 
  7,434 
  March    
  1,506 
  1,904 
  3,410    
  4,344 
  7,754 
  April    
  1,720 
  2,098 
  3,818    
  4,169 
  7,987 
  May  
  1,564 
  2,510 
  4,073    
  4,579 
  8,653 
  June 
  1,650 
  2,478 
  4,128    
  4,631 
  8,759 
  July 
  1,607 
  2,055 
  3,662    
  4,515 
  8,178 August   
  1,750 
  2,280 
  4,030    
  4,591 
  8,621 Septembe 
  1,839 
  2,329 
  4,168    
  4,672 
  8,840 October  
  1,812 
  2,323 
  4,134    

[CTRL] (Fwd) Oil

2000-03-18 Thread Alamaine

-Caveat Lector-   http://www.ctrl.org/">
 -Cui Bono?-

Here's some data for all you spreadsheet/dbf fans.  It shows how much oil is
gained from generalised sources.  You can go to the source URL and find out
other interesting bits and bytes of information like jet fuel, heating oil,
nat'l gas and the like.  Just think though:  if some Middle Eastern nations
were denied a credible source of income for a while (check out the Reagan
years, 1980-88), things might be thought of a little differently.  Note that in
the Bush years (1989-1992), the Middle Easterners produced near enough DOUBLE
what they did the previous eight years -- near enough.

About a year and a half ago, I posted a brief rationalisation for the 'Gulf
War', portrayed in one single photograph of GHW Bush on what I recall was a
Kuwaiti oil derrick.  'Nuff said.  A<>E<>R

--- Forwarded message follows ---

http://www.eia.doe.gov/pub/oil_gas/petroleum/data_publications/petroleum_supply_
monthly/current/txt/table_s03.txt

Crude Oil Imports, 1973 - Present
(Thousand Barrels per Day)




Total/a/b Total
 Year/Month Arab OPECOther OPEC/a OPEC   Non-OPEC/a   Imports


1973 Average838 1,257 2,0951,149 3,244
1974 Average713 1,827 2,540  931 3,477
1975 Average  1,330 1,882 3,211  893 4,105
1976 Average  2,378 2,167 4,545  742 5,287
1977 Average  3,136 2,507 5,643  971 6,615
1978 Average  2,930 2,254 5,1841,172 6,356
1979 Average  3,002 2,110 5,1121,407 6,519
1980 Average  2,503 1,361 3,8641,399 5,263
1981 Average  1,774 1,149 2,9221,474 4,396
1982 Average736   998 1,7341,754 3,488
1983 Average533   944 1,4771,853 3,329
1984 Average634   878 1,5121,914 3,426
1985 Average300 1,012 1,3121,888 3,201
1986 Average854 1,259 2,1132,065 4,178
1987 Average965 1,435 2,4002,274 4,674
1988 Average  1,415 1,281 2,6962,411 5,107
1989 Average  1,794 1,582 3,3762,467 5,843
1990 Average  1,864 1,650 3,5142,381 5,894
1991 Average  1,754 1,622 3,3772,405 5,782
1992 Average  1,660 1,746 3,4062,676 6,083
1993 Average  1,661 2,026 3,6873,100 6,787
1994 Average  1,636 1,944 3,5803,483 7,063
1995 Average  1,505 1,835 3,3413,889 7,230
1996 Average  1,496 1,942 3,4384,070 7,508
1997 January  1,462 1,775 3,2374,255 7,492
 February 1,421 1,920 3,3414,093 7,434
 March1,506 1,904 3,4104,344 7,754
 April1,720 2,098 3,8184,169 7,987
 May  1,564 2,510 4,0734,579 8,653
 June 1,650 2,478 4,1284,631 8,759
 July 1,607 2,055 3,6624,515 8,178
 August   1,750 2,280 4,0304,591 8,621
 Septembe 1,839 2,329 4,1684,672 8,840
 October  1,812 2,323 4,1344,793 8,927
 November 1,704 2,141 3,8454,521 8,366
 December 1,649 1,795 3,4444,208 7,653
 Average  1,641 2,134 3,7754,450 8,225

1998 January  1,726 1,977 3,7034,636 8,339
 February 1,716 1,941 3,6574,388 8,045
 March1,920 2,205 4,1263,998 8,124
 April1,933 2,272 4,2054,780 8,985
 May  1,815 2,463 4,2784,709 8,987
 June 2,132 2,129 4,2614,533 8,795
 July 2,315 2,400 4,7164,791 9,507
 August   2,453 2,116 4,5694,607 9,177
 Septembe 2,308 1,749 4,0574,4

Re: [CTRL] [Fwd: OIL: Hints of Supply Hikes Fail to Drive Down Prices]

2000-03-15 Thread [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

-Caveat Lector-   http://www.ctrl.org/">
 -Cui Bono?-

And to think that Saddam Hussein was just
trying to get oil prices up to around $18. a barrel.
When he couldn't get the other Arab oil producing
countries to cut back production to boost
crude prices, he took some drastic measures.
Now doesn't that $18 price look great from here?
   Regards to All
  Nakano

http://www.ctrl.org/">www.ctrl.org
DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER
==
CTRL is a discussion & informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic
screeds are not allowed. Substance—not soap-boxing!  These are sordid matters
and 'conspiracy theory'—with its many half-truths, misdirections and outright
frauds—is used politically by different groups with major and minor effects
spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought. That being said, CTRL
gives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and always suggests to readers;
be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no credence to Holocaust denial and
nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.

Archives Available at:
http://home.ease.lsoft.com/archives/CTRL.html

http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/

To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om



[CTRL] [Fwd: OIL: Hints of Supply Hikes Fail to Drive Down Prices]

2000-03-15 Thread Nurev Ind Research

-Caveat Lector-   http://www.ctrl.org/">
 -Cui Bono?-

 Original Message 
Subject: OIL: Hints of Supply Hikes Fail to Drive Down Prices
Date: Mon, 13 Mar 2000 21:40:31 -0600 (CST)
From: IGC News Desk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Organization: ?
To: undisclosed-recipients:;

   Copyright 2000 InterPress Service, all rights reserved.
  Worldwide distribution via the APC networks.

  *** 10-Mar-0* ***

Title: OIL: Hints of Supply Hikes Fail to Drive Down Prices

By Luis C¢rdova

CARACAS, Mar 10 (IPS) - Venezuela's Energy Ministry reported
Friday a more than one dollar rise in oil prices this week, which
indicated the market's apparent indifference to signals from the
Organisation of Petroleum Exporting Countries (OPEC) of
willingness to begin to ease production caps.

OPEC will make its final decision on production quotas on Mar
27 in Vienna, at a meeting anxiously awaited by traders in a
market that has posted the highest prices seen since the 1990 Gulf
War.

The price of the US benchmark West Texas Intermediate (WTI) has
held steady above 30 dollars a barrel since late February,
followed closely by Brent, which also shot above the 30-dollar
mark earlier this month.

Several OPEC members like Saudi Arabia, Venezuela and Kuwait
have expressed interest in achieving a stable market, and thus
agree that production should be gradually increased in order to
meet demand and reduce the pressure driving up prices.

Even Iran, which initially wanted to extend the production
cutbacks for a few more months, has apparently come round to the
idea of boosting supply, according to reports in Caracas.

Mexico, which a year ago agreed with OPEC on the need for
cutbacks to shore up slumping prices, has recently expressed its
support for the idea of lifting the strategy of production quotas.

Several OPEC spokespersons have said they would be satisfied
with a price of 20 to 25 dollars a barrel.

But prices are currently far above that level, as indicated by
a weekly bulletin on price developments issued by Venezuela's
Energy Ministry, which put this week's average WTI price at an
average of 32.30 dollars per barrel, five dollars higher than
January's average of 27.15 dollars.

In March 1999, when the strategy of cutbacks by OPEC and non-
OPEC members began to be applied, the price of WTI stood at 10 to
12 dollars a barrel - which means its price has risen threefold in
the past 12 months.

Brent, meanwhile, sold this week at an average of 30.34 dollars
a barrel, compared to 29.21 dollars last week and 25.26 dollars in
January.

The OPEC reference basket stood at 29.21 dollars this week,
1.30 dollars above last week's price, while it sold for 24.58
dollars a barrel in January.

Venezuela's basket of crudes fetched 28.90 dollars this week,
1.17 dollars above last week's price, and sold in January for
23.37 dollars - a far cry from the March 1999 price of seven
dollars a barrel.

But the success of the strategy designed to drive up prices has
caused serious problems for consumer countries, which have
insisted on the need for production hikes in order to bring prices
down to a more moderate level.

US Energy Secretary Bill Richardson met with his counterparts
from oil-producing nations, including several OPEC members, to
discuss agreements on production increases in order to meet the
deficit in supplies, today estimated at two million barrels per
day.

But while the signals of willingness to increase production did
not drive prices down, they did heighten expectations regarding
the decisive meeting OPEC will hold towards the end of the month.

OPEC countries that have already announced their support for
increasing production have clarified that a final decision by the
cartel will not be reached until the Vienna meeting.

Others, like Algeria and Libya, have backed the idea of
extending the strategy until the middle of the year, a period when
prices tend to fall.

At a meeting on oil in Miami, Venezuelan Energy Minister Al¡
Rodr¡guez commented Thursday that he also expected demand to fall
by 2.5 million barrels, a factor that could weigh heavily when it
comes to increasing supplies. (END/IPS/tra-so/lc/dm/sw/00)

Origin: Montevideo/OIL/
  

   [c] 2000, InterPress Third World News Agency (IPS)
 All rights reserved

  May not be reproduced, reprinted or posted to any system or
  service outside  of  the  APC  networks,  without  specific
  permission from IPS.  This limitation includes distribution
  via  Usenet News,  bulletin board  systems, mailing  lists,
  print media  and broadcast.   For information about  cross-
  posting,   send   a   message  to   <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>.For
  information  about  print or  broadcast reproduction please
  contact the IPS coordinator at <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>.

http://www.ctrl.org/">www.ctrl.org
DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER
==
CTRL is a discussion & informational exchange list. Proselytizing propaga

[CTRL] [Fwd: Oil Drilling poll ignites digital dogfight]

2000-03-12 Thread Nurev Ind Research

-Caveat Lector-   http://www.ctrl.org/">
 -Cui Bono?-

 Original Message 
Subject: Oil Drilling poll ignites digital dogfight
Date: Sat, 11 Mar 2000 21:19:45 -0600 (CST)
From: Mark Graffis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Organization: ?
To: undisclosed-recipients:;

   Copyright © 2000 Scripps McClatchy Western Service

   BY DAVID WHITNEY, Nando Washington Bureau

   WASHINGTON (March 11, 2000 1:09 a.m. EST http://www.nandotimes.com)
-
   It means nothing - just some zeros and ones zinging their way over
a
   fiber-optic cable somewhere to MSNBC's web site at the other end.

   But on Friday the kilobytes were adding up to a megabyte battle
over
   oil development in Alaska's Arctic National Wildlife Refuge.

   The Internet news site posted a survey on whether its visitors
thought
   protected areas should be opened to oil drilling. The question
   appeared on a web page containing news stories on the revived
   controversy over opening the refuge's 1.5 million-acre coastal
plain
   to drilling.

   The issue arose in the Senate this week when Alaska Sen. Frank
   Murkowski seized upon the skyrocketing price of gasoline to
introduce
   a bill that would permit drilling in what the oil industry regards
as
   one of the most promising unexplored corners of the continent.

   When word of the MSNBC survey began to spread, interest groups
began
   sending out mass e-mail alerts to their followers urging them to
log
   onto the web site and cast their vote for or against.

   "Yes, we need to end our dependency on foreign oil," was one
choice.
   Slightly more than half of the respondents were clicking on that.
"No,
   we can end our oil dependency by investing in alternative energy,"
was
   the second choice, and slightly half of the respondents were
clicking
   on it.

   Those who couldn't make up their minds clicked on "can't decide,"
and
   2 percent of the respondents made that choice.

   Joan Connell, executive producer for opinions at MSNBC in Redmond,
   Wash., said the results have absolutely no value to anyone for
   anything.

   "This is a self-selecting, non-scientific survey," she said. "These
   are not scientific polls."

   Still, Connell said she was amazed that the question was drawing
the
   volume of responses, roughly three times what questions on most of
the
   other 400 or so interactive story pages on the web site might
attract.
   She said it may be because the broader issue, the high price of
   gasoline, was stirring a veritable digital storm of activity.

   "What this means more than anything is enthusiasm, or depth of
   feeling," Connell said.

   Frenzy is another word for it.

   Pro-development forces that until two weeks ago thought they'd be
   sitting out another year without legislation in Congress suddenly
not
   only had a bill, they had a digital dogfight.

   "I sent out e-mails to my board telling them what's on the web
site,"
   confessed Cam Toohey, executive director of Arctic Power, the
leading
   pro-development lobbying organization.

   E-mails spread throughout the land as recipients re-transmitted the
   message to others. Mike Heatwole, who works for the public
relations
   firm of Reid/Bradley in Anchorage, said anyone who was anything
   probably knew about the MSNBC survey. He helped spread the message.

   Toohey said they learned last year that a little get-out-the-vote
   elbow grease can turn the corner on a tough Internet vote. When a
   question popped up last year on whether the Interior Department
should
   open the National Petroleum Reserve-Alaska to leasing, a digital
poll
   was going down until the pro-drillers fired up their PCs and Macs.

   "We sent out alerts, and the results turned around favorably,"
Toohey
   said. "We've got a lot of computers."

   Environmentalists scoffed at all the excitement Friday.

   "This is who can turn out more of their troops," sniffed Adam
Kolton
   of the Alaska Wilderness League. "We've done real polls, and they
show
   overwhelming support for protecting the refuge."

   Recent polls done for The Wilderness Society by the polling firm of
   Lake, Snell and Perry in Florida, New Hampshire and Texas showed
that
   about 70 percent of the respondents somewhat or strongly opposed
the
   federal government allowing private companies to drill for oil in
the
   refuge, said Rindy O'Brien, vice president of the environmental
group.

   That's not to say environmentalists would be above trying to
   manipulate the turnout in the MSNBC survey.

   In some instances, they just didn't know about it.

   The Wilderness Society's Alaska representative, Allen Smith, was in
no
   position to know. He was stuck at the computer repair shop Friday,
   broken down on the information highway just when the speed was
picking
   up.

http://www.ctrl.org/">www.ctrl.org
DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER
==
CTRL is a discussion & informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic
screeds are not allowed. Substance—not

[CTRL] Fwd: Oil Co. Linked to Brain Tumors

1999-03-09 Thread Kris Millegan





Fifth Death in Amoco Cancer Mystery

.c The Associated Press

CHICAGO (AP) -- A mysterious outbreak of brain cancer at BP Amoco PLC's
suburban research center has claimed a fifth victim, oil company officials
said.

At the request of the victim's family, BP Amoco would not identify the
employee, who died Sunday.

A company spokeswoman said Monday the longtime employee was a chemical
researcher at the Naperville facility who had been diagnosed a year ago with a
malignant brain tumor.

``We're very sorry to lose a friend and colleague,'' said Jim Lowry, who heads
BP Amoco's task force on the tumors. The latest death ``strengthens our
resolve to get to the bottom of the issue.''

Since 1989, 21 workers at the facility have been diagnosed with benign and
malignant brain tumors. Seven with malignant tumors worked at the building 500
complex on similar projects from the late 1970s to the mid-1980s.

Last year, six former or current scientists filed a lawsuit, claiming Amoco
``exhibited reckless disregard for the health and well-being'' of the workers
and exposed them to dangerous chemicals.

BP Amoco has funded a two-year investigation of the cases. The company said in
October that investigators increasingly suspect chemicals used at the center
are linked to the brain tumors.




[CTRL] Fwd: Oil and Counter-Insurgency

1998-12-26 Thread RoadsEnd





Indonesian Rights Group Eyes Mobil

JAKARTA, Indonesia (AP) -- A government-backed human rights group said today
it was assessing allegations that Mobil Oil knew about military atrocities in
an Indonesian province in the early 1990s.

Mobil Oil Indonesia, a subsidiary of the U.S. oil giant, has big operations in
Aceh province, where the government recently ended a decadelong campaign
against separatist guerrillas.

Local human rights workers have alleged that hundreds of civilians died during
the fighting in the northwestern region and have unearthed several mass
graves. The military has apologized and has pledged to reduce its presence in
Aceh.

Muhammad Salim, a member of the National Human Rights Commission, said it had
received witness reports that Mobil managers were aware of abuses in Aceh and
even provided equipment to soldiers involved in atrocities.

``We have to learn whether this information is accurate and clarify these
reports,'' Salim said. Mobil denies the charges.

The human rights panel was set up by the government but has developed a
reputation for independent decision-making. It often issues highly publicized
reports but does not have the power to take legal action.

Indonesian human rights workers have said that Mobil must have known about
atrocities in Aceh and also provided earth-moving equipment to soldiers who
used it to dig mass graves.

The accusations were contained in an article this month in the U.S. magazine
Business Week.

In a Dec. 18 statement, Mobil said allegations that it was complicit in human
rights abuses were misleading and that it had cooperated fully with the
magazine's inquiries.

``Despite these efforts, the magazine chose to sensationalize the story by
emphasizing unsubstantiated allegations and rumor,'' the statement read.

``Mobil does not condone human rights abuses, and if substantiated claims
linking its activities to such abuses were brought to its attention, the
company would aggressively respond to and denounce such actions,'' the company
said from its Fairfax, Va., headquarters.

Critics say Mobil provided camps, electricity, communications and other
facilities to the armed forces at a time when it was widely known that a
military campaign was underway.

``They have helped since the beginning of the operation,'' said Abdurahman
Jacob, chairman of the legal aid foundation in Lhokseumawe, an oil and gas
center in Aceh.