-Caveat Lector-

<<Forwarded Message:
 Subj:   [corp-focus] Blue Light Special at the Smithsonian
 Date:  2/16/01 11:31:51 PM Mountain Standard Time
 From:  [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Robert Weissman)
 Sender:    [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To:    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

 Blue Light Special at the Smithsonian
 By Russell Mokhiber and Robert Weissman

 Lawrence Small has a great corporate pedigree.

 For 27 years, Small was a top executive with Citicorp/Citibank. In 1991,
 he became president of Fannie Mae, the bully on the housing finance
 market.

 Last year, he became Secretary of the Smithsonian Institution. He didn't
 bother resigning from the many corporate boards on which he sits today,
 including The Chubb Corp., Marriott International, Fannie Mae and
 Citicorp/Citibank.

 He's chairman of the financial advisory committee of TransResources
 International, the parent company of Haifa Chemical, an Israeli firm.

 We ran into Small this week at the Museum of American History. He had
 turned over the place to Kmart. Kmart and the Smithsonian had become
 "partners" in bringing to the public a traveling mobile museum featuring a
 exhibition titled "Wade in the Water: African-American Sacred Music
 Traditions 1871-2001."

 The mobile museum is a 48-foot, double expandable trailer, with giant red
 Kmart signs emblazoned on each side. The trailer will travel to Kmart
 stores, schools and elsewhere around the nation.

 At the auditorium, Small said that he was "delighted to work with Kmart on
 this important project" and thanked the retailing giant for its "generous
 donation."

 Brent Willis, Kmart's "chief marketing officer" made some syrupy statement
 about the benefits of diversity.

 We wanted to test Willis' corporate rhetoric against the reality at Kmart.

 So we asked Valerie Stokes, Kmart's vice president for human resources,
 and the company's highest ranking African-American, how many of the
 company's 300,000 employees were African American. Stokes said she didn't
 know. What about a ballpark number? Couldn't tell you. Are any of Kmart's
 more than 2,100 stores unionized? No. Have there been attempts to
 unionize? Couldn't tell you.

 We asked Small how much money Kmart kicked in to fund the project. "Don't
 know, you'll have to ask Kmart," Small said. We asked the numerous Kmart
 spokespeople at the event. Don't know. Can't tell you.

 We asked Small why he was turning over the Smithsonian to Kmart, a company
 with a poor reputation in America, in a corporate public relations effort
 to burnish its image?

 "It's not being used for corporate public relations," Small said.

 Then, in the very next breath, he asked, "Why shouldn't they get something
 out of it? They put up the money for it."

 Well, we wanted to know, is it okay for the Smithsonian, which gets
 two-thirds of its budget from the federal taxpayers, to partner with major
 American corporations?

 At this point, David Umansky, the Smithsonian's director of
 communications, cuts in.

 "I want you to understand something," Umansky says. "The Smithsonian is
 not a government institution. Write this down. Legislation was passed
 establishing the Smithsonian Institution as a trust instrumentality of the
 United States -- not the United States government -- but the United
 States. It is not a part of the executive branch, it is not a part of the
 legislative branch, it is not a part of the judiciary. It is a separate
 entity."

 Got that kids? The Smithsonian gets hundreds of millions of dollars from
 you and me, and they are before Congress begging for more taxpayer money
 -- and it is not a part of the government.

 Umansky wants to know: "Why are you so suspicious?"

 Well, there should be a stark dividing line between public and private
 institutions in America.

 You seem to be the only person in America who believes that, he says.

 That would come as a surprise to our readers. We have gotten hundreds of
 responses from readers who are unhappy with corporate control of public
 institutions, including when we wrote a couple of years ago about the oil
 companies taking over a part of the Smithsonian for their exhibit on the
 Alaska oil pipeline.

 You can get hundreds of people upset about the sunrise, Umansky counters.

 So, any public institution should be allowed to take private corporate
 money?

 If it's used properly, absolutely, Umansky says. For the Smithsonian,
 there is no problem.

 It's been 20 minutes now, and we still haven't gotten an answer to how
 much Kmart spent for this little public relations stunt. Umansky doesn't
 like the persistence. "Why are you being such an asshole?" he asks.

 Finally, Umansky gets us an answer on the funding -- Kmart put up $2
 million in cash and in kind -- about $500,000 in cash.

 At a press conference at the National Press Club last year, Small was
 asked about undue corporate influence over the operations of the
 Smithsonian.

 "There is a difference between providing the funding and having an
 endorsement or having a commercial relationship with the museum," he said.
 "So, if it's philanthropy, I don't think there's any problem with it."

 In this instance, and in many others, the Smithsonian has crossed the
 line. By allowing the Kmart logo and the Smithsonian logo to be emblazoned
 all over the press releases, press kits and trailer last week, by giving
 Kmart's "chief marketing officer" a stage to spout empty corporate
 platitudes, the Smithsonian Institution was putting its seal of approval
 on the company.

 Every major new exhibit at the Smithsonian over the past couple of years
 has been funded by a major American corporation or industry -- the Alaska
 Pipeline exhibit funded by the oil companies, the insect zoo funded by
 Orkin,  and on down the line. The place has become a museum of American
 corporations.

 Earlier this year, an exhibit on the American Presidency, sponsored by
 Cisco Systems and Chevy Chase Bank, among others, was deemed so important
 that it had to bump an exhibit on the work of the late folk singer and
 anti-corporate rabble rouser Woody Guthrie. The Guthrie exhibit was
 scheduled to run through the spring, but got pulled for the one about the
 corporate presidency.

 Through Small and his predecessors, the corporate state has overtaken the
 Smithsonian. Congress should take it back for the people.

 Congress should demand that as a condition of forking over hundreds of
 millions of taxpayers' dollars every year, the Smithsonian should kick the
 corporations out.

 It's time to clean house.


 Russell Mokhiber is editor of the Washington, D.C.-based Corporate Crime
 Reporter. Robert Weissman is editor of the Washington, D.C.-based
 Multinational Monitor. They are co-authors of Corporate Predators: The
 Hunt for MegaProfits and the Attack on Democracy (Monroe, Maine: Common
 Courage Press, 1999).

 (c) Russell Mokhiber and Robert Weissman

 _______________________________________________

 Focus on the Corporation is a weekly column written by Russell Mokhiber
 and Robert Weissman. Please feel free to forward the column to friends or
 repost the column on other lists. If you would like to post the column on
 a web site or publish it in print format, we ask that you first contact us
 ([EMAIL PROTECTED] or [EMAIL PROTECTED]).

 Focus on the Corporation is distributed to individuals on the listserve
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] To subscribe to corp-focus, send an e-mail
 message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the text: subscribe

 Focus on the Corporation columns are posted at
 <http://www.corporatepredators.org>.

 Postings on corp-focus are limited to the columns. If you would like to
 comment on the columns, send a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] or
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] >>

<A HREF="http://www.ctrl.org/">www.ctrl.org</A>
DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER
==========
CTRL is a discussion & informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic
screeds are unwelcomed. Substance—not soap-boxing—please!  These are
sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'—with its many half-truths, mis-
directions and outright frauds—is used politically by different groups with
major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought.
That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and
always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no
credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.
========================================================================
Archives Available at:
http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html
 <A HREF="http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html">Archives of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]</A>

http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
 <A HREF="http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/">ctrl</A>
========================================================================
To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om

Reply via email to