-Caveat Lector-
In a message dated 8/24/2004 7:11:03 AM Eastern Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?file=/c/a/2004/08/23/DDGEJ8C01K1.DTL&type=printable

   Life comes between a firebrand and her fiction

  San Fransisco Chronicle  Monday, August 23, 2004
       - Jonathan Curiel, Chronicle Staff Writer

The applause started at 7:40 p.m., when she was first introduced to the
overflow crowd at the San Francisco Hilton. By the time Arundhati Roy
finished an hour later -- by the time this novelist-activist-public
intellectual completed her speech titled "Public Power in the Age of
Empire" - - the audience had given her two standing ovations, 20 more
rounds of applause and countless variations of more personal salutations
like, "That's right!"

Roy says she doesn't want to be "iconized" by the public, but it's
happening anyway. After readings and speeches, she's mobbed by people
seeking her handshake, her signature in a book or a photograph to prove
they got close to this firebrand from India. Firebrand may be an
understatement. Last Monday at the Hilton, where she addressed the
American Sociological Association, Roy generated some of her biggest
responses when she urged the United States to immediately pull its troops
from Iraq and "pay reparations" to Iraqis, criticized John Kerry and other
Democrats ("How dare the Democrats not be anti- war!") and described
President Bush's Cabinet as "thugs."

Two days later, at a KPFA fund-raiser in Berkeley, Roy energized the sold-
out crowd within minutes of taking the stage by saying, "We have to
strategize and take our struggle forward."

It's been seven years since Roy burst onto the international literary
scene with "The God of Small Things," her semiautobiographical novel about
a hard-luck family in southern India. Roy could have been content to stay
within the confines of fiction -- and some critics say she should have --
but she was too restless for that. Her first big project: fighting dam
building in India. Roy's celebrity helped generate media coverage of
India's anti-dam movement, which objects to the way New Delhi's water
projects have displaced millions of poor people. Roy has also opposed
India's nuclear weapons capabilities and its embrace of capitalism --
issues that connected her with international human rights groups such as
the World Social Forum.

Roy's name is now synonymous with other well-known activists and liberal
figures, including Noam Chomsky (who calls Roy "a wonder"), Howard Zinn
(another big fan) and Michael Moore. In fact, Roy has essentially given up
her love of fiction for a full-time career as a social critic. She still
writes prodigiously, but every one of her new books -- such as the
just-released "An Ordinary Person's Guide to Empire" -- is a critique of
current affairs. It's hard to find another writer who made such a big
splash with a first novel ("The God of Small Things" commanded a $1
million advance, won the Booker Prize and has been translated into more
than 30 languages), then veered so quickly into activist nonfiction, but
Roy's background gives clues to her transition.

Raised in Kerala, an Indian state whose electorate supported the Communist
Party for many years, Roy is the daughter of a woman who successfully
challenged India's inheritance law as it applied to Kerala's Christians.
Under the old law, a daughter could claim only one-fourth of what a son
could claim; Mary Roy's case was a landmark ruling in India that showed
the younger Roy that activism could be a central mission. Even before
writing "The God of Small Things," Roy wrote a series of essays called
"The Great Indian Rape Trick," which criticized filmmaker Shekhar Kapur
and "The Bandit Queen" for the way she says the drama exploited the life
of Phoolan Devi. Devi was a lower-caste woman who, after being sexually
attacked, led a group of men on robberies and at least one revenge
killing. Roy argued that Kapur should have gotten Devi's permission to
depict her rape on camera. Roy even helped convince India's courts that
the movie's filmmakers erred.

"I'm someone who has a very political way of looking at things," says Roy,
sitting on the steps of Union Square for a brief interview.

In person, Roy is soft-spoken and nothing like a rabble-rouser. She seems
to save her sharpest words for the printed page. For her public speeches
in the United States, Roy usually reads essays she has written. In fact,
Roy says, her onstage comments are really written for herself. That many
people (especially liberal thinkers) agree with her statements is but a
kind of bonus.

"I think what probably drives me as a writer is a curiosity to understand
and to keep understanding," Roy says. "When I write, I write for myself,
not just in order to let people know, because the writing clarifies things
to me."

Roy, who saw Moore's "Fahrenheit 9/11" during her Bay Area visit ("It was
fantastic"), is one of many people outside the country who've taken an
active interest in the November presidential election. Though she wants to
see U.S. voters oust Bush from office, Roy doesn't believe that Kerry and
the Democrats offer a viable alternative to Republicans. She says Bush's
conservative agenda will continue even if Kerry wins. Roy says the same
thing happened in India, where in May voters turned away the ruling
Bharatiya Janata Party in favor of the Congress Party.

"I personally don't think that public power today is about voting in an
election," Roy says. "If you look at the Hindu nationalists and the
Congress Party, the BJP is out of power -- but they set the agenda already
in the country. And the debate and the discussion and everything have been
shifted to the right. What you get is a situation in which we don't really
have choice. It's an apparent choice. I'm not an expert on the U.S.
elections, but I know this much: Kerry has said that, even if there were
no weapons of mass destruction (in Iraq), he would have still supported
the war, and that he intends to send 40,000 more troops, and that he hopes
to get U.N. consensus. (This way), they'll get Indians and Pakistanis to
die there instead of Americans, and the French and Russians and Germans
will share a little more than just what Halliburton and Bechtel have. As a
person who belongs to a 'subject nation,' I don't know if that's supposed
to make me more happy."

Regardless of what happens in November, Roy says that progress shouldn't
be measured in terms of "wins and losses." Citing her work in India, Roy
says that dam building is continuing on a large scale in the country, but
the anti- dam movement has succeeded in stopping smaller projects and has
persuaded some international investors to withdraw their support for the
dams.

"The philosophy that I believe in is, I'm not doing something in order to
win," she says. "I know people who go out to do their stuff every day
knowing that the chances of anything happening are not very high. But if
you're involved in something on a real basis, as opposed to just
conceptually -- if you look at the anti-dam movement, sure the dams are
getting built, but there's a whole different attitude of people involved
in the struggle. It's not that the police can go in there (anymore and
crack down illegally). Those are huge victories -- in a way, bigger
victories than stopping the dam. India is a bullying society in many ways.
And to just see people stand up to the police is such an amazing thing.
Just to see that is a huge victory. . . . Ten years ago, big dams were
like secular temples in people's heads. But now the faith has been broken.
And people know the government is building these dams and violating the
rights of people and doing it anyway. Even saying (my activism) was a
complete failure -- I'd rather be doing this. That's the kind of person I
am."

Roy says that she might one day write another novel but that "I never
think in advance. I never have plans. I still don't. The truth is that
fiction is my big love. But often you're in a situation where it's very
hard, especially because I live in India, not to intervene immediately
when someone is shot or police have opened fire. In India, we have all
these anti-terrorism laws, with thousands of people being picked up. We
have the highest number of custodial deaths in the world. And still, India
retains its reputation as some kind of spiritual destination and a real
democracy, which it is not, by any means. My life is a bit out of my
control right now. My plans keep getting ambushed by the real world."

Roy laughs at her comment. Though it's difficult to tell this from her
nonfiction, she has a keen sense of humor. During her two Bay Area talks,
Roy, 44, often had her audience laughing. She has a magnetic presence,
which leads to steady attention from the media, but she's cautious of it
-- especially "corporate media," which she says focuses on superficial
issues. (An example, perhaps: In 1998, People magazine named Roy, who is
striking, one of the world's "50 most beautiful people.") Though some of
Roy's critics say she is a grandstander, Roy is comfortable with who she
has become, and how far she has come. At 16, she left home and lived in a
squatter's camp in New Delhi before turning to architecture as an academic
pursuit. To earn a living, she taught aerobics for a few years.
Eventually, she found her mark as a writer with a strong voice.

Says Roy: "I wouldn't feel I was doing anything right if everyone stood up
and applauded."
www.ctrl.org DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER ========== CTRL is a discussion & informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic screeds are unwelcomed. Substance—not soap-boxing—please! These are sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'—with its many half-truths, mis- directions and outright frauds—is used politically by different groups with major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought. That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector. ======================================================================== Archives Available at:

http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/ <A HREF="">ctrl</A> ======================================================================== To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email: SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email: SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om

--- Begin Message ---
-Caveat Lector-

http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?file=/c/a/2004/08/23/DDGEJ8C01K1.DTL&type=printable

   Life comes between a firebrand and her fiction

  San Fransisco Chronicle  Monday, August 23, 2004
       - Jonathan Curiel, Chronicle Staff Writer

 The applause started at 7:40 p.m., when she was first introduced to the
overflow crowd at the San Francisco Hilton. By the time Arundhati Roy
finished an hour later -- by the time this novelist-activist-public
intellectual completed her speech titled "Public Power in the Age of
Empire" - - the audience had given her two standing ovations, 20 more
rounds of applause and countless variations of more personal salutations
like, "That's right!"

Roy says she doesn't want to be "iconized" by the public, but it's
happening anyway. After readings and speeches, she's mobbed by people
seeking her handshake, her signature in a book or a photograph to prove
they got close to this firebrand from India. Firebrand may be an
understatement. Last Monday at the Hilton, where she addressed the
American Sociological Association, Roy generated some of her biggest
responses when she urged the United States to immediately pull its troops
from Iraq and "pay reparations" to Iraqis, criticized John Kerry and other
Democrats ("How dare the Democrats not be anti- war!") and described
President Bush's Cabinet as "thugs."

Two days later, at a KPFA fund-raiser in Berkeley, Roy energized the sold-
out crowd within minutes of taking the stage by saying, "We have to
strategize and take our struggle forward."

It's been seven years since Roy burst onto the international literary
scene with "The God of Small Things," her semiautobiographical novel about
a hard-luck family in southern India. Roy could have been content to stay
within the confines of fiction -- and some critics say she should have --
but she was too restless for that. Her first big project: fighting dam
building in India. Roy's celebrity helped generate media coverage of
India's anti-dam movement, which objects to the way New Delhi's water
projects have displaced millions of poor people. Roy has also opposed
India's nuclear weapons capabilities and its embrace of capitalism --
issues that connected her with international human rights groups such as
the World Social Forum.

Roy's name is now synonymous with other well-known activists and liberal
figures, including Noam Chomsky (who calls Roy "a wonder"), Howard Zinn
(another big fan) and Michael Moore. In fact, Roy has essentially given up
her love of fiction for a full-time career as a social critic. She still
writes prodigiously, but every one of her new books -- such as the
just-released "An Ordinary Person's Guide to Empire" -- is a critique of
current affairs. It's hard to find another writer who made such a big
splash with a first novel ("The God of Small Things" commanded a $1
million advance, won the Booker Prize and has been translated into more
than 30 languages), then veered so quickly into activist nonfiction, but
Roy's background gives clues to her transition.

Raised in Kerala, an Indian state whose electorate supported the Communist
Party for many years, Roy is the daughter of a woman who successfully
challenged India's inheritance law as it applied to Kerala's Christians.
Under the old law, a daughter could claim only one-fourth of what a son
could claim; Mary Roy's case was a landmark ruling in India that showed
the younger Roy that activism could be a central mission. Even before
writing "The God of Small Things," Roy wrote a series of essays called
"The Great Indian Rape Trick," which criticized filmmaker Shekhar Kapur
and "The Bandit Queen" for the way she says the drama exploited the life
of Phoolan Devi. Devi was a lower-caste woman who, after being sexually
attacked, led a group of men on robberies and at least one revenge
killing. Roy argued that Kapur should have gotten Devi's permission to
depict her rape on camera. Roy even helped convince India's courts that
the movie's filmmakers erred.

"I'm someone who has a very political way of looking at things," says Roy,
sitting on the steps of Union Square for a brief interview.

In person, Roy is soft-spoken and nothing like a rabble-rouser. She seems
to save her sharpest words for the printed page. For her public speeches
in the United States, Roy usually reads essays she has written. In fact,
Roy says, her onstage comments are really written for herself. That many
people (especially liberal thinkers) agree with her statements is but a
kind of bonus.

"I think what probably drives me as a writer is a curiosity to understand
and to keep understanding," Roy says. "When I write, I write for myself,
not just in order to let people know, because the writing clarifies things
to me."

Roy, who saw Moore's "Fahrenheit 9/11" during her Bay Area visit ("It was
fantastic"), is one of many people outside the country who've taken an
active interest in the November presidential election. Though she wants to
see U.S. voters oust Bush from office, Roy doesn't believe that Kerry and
the Democrats offer a viable alternative to Republicans. She says Bush's
conservative agenda will continue even if Kerry wins. Roy says the same
thing happened in India, where in May voters turned away the ruling
Bharatiya Janata Party in favor of the Congress Party.

"I personally don't think that public power today is about voting in an
election," Roy says. "If you look at the Hindu nationalists and the
Congress Party, the BJP is out of power -- but they set the agenda already
in the country. And the debate and the discussion and everything have been
shifted to the right. What you get is a situation in which we don't really
have choice. It's an apparent choice. I'm not an expert on the U.S.
elections, but I know this much: Kerry has said that, even if there were
no weapons of mass destruction (in Iraq), he would have still supported
the war, and that he intends to send 40,000 more troops, and that he hopes
to get U.N. consensus. (This way), they'll get Indians and Pakistanis to
die there instead of Americans, and the French and Russians and Germans
will share a little more than just what Halliburton and Bechtel have. As a
person who belongs to a 'subject nation,' I don't know if that's supposed
to make me more happy."

Regardless of what happens in November, Roy says that progress shouldn't
be measured in terms of "wins and losses." Citing her work in India, Roy
says that dam building is continuing on a large scale in the country, but
the anti- dam movement has succeeded in stopping smaller projects and has
persuaded some international investors to withdraw their support for the
dams.

"The philosophy that I believe in is, I'm not doing something in order to
win," she says. "I know people who go out to do their stuff every day
knowing that the chances of anything happening are not very high. But if
you're involved in something on a real basis, as opposed to just
conceptually -- if you look at the anti-dam movement, sure the dams are
getting built, but there's a whole different attitude of people involved
in the struggle. It's not that the police can go in there (anymore and
crack down illegally). Those are huge victories -- in a way, bigger
victories than stopping the dam. India is a bullying society in many ways.
And to just see people stand up to the police is such an amazing thing.
Just to see that is a huge victory. . . . Ten years ago, big dams were
like secular temples in people's heads. But now the faith has been broken.
And people know the government is building these dams and violating the
rights of people and doing it anyway. Even saying (my activism) was a
complete failure -- I'd rather be doing this. That's the kind of person I
am."

Roy says that she might one day write another novel but that "I never
think in advance. I never have plans. I still don't. The truth is that
fiction is my big love. But often you're in a situation where it's very
hard, especially because I live in India, not to intervene immediately
when someone is shot or police have opened fire. In India, we have all
these anti-terrorism laws, with thousands of people being picked up. We
have the highest number of custodial deaths in the world. And still, India
retains its reputation as some kind of spiritual destination and a real
democracy, which it is not, by any means. My life is a bit out of my
control right now. My plans keep getting ambushed by the real world."

Roy laughs at her comment. Though it's difficult to tell this from her
nonfiction, she has a keen sense of humor. During her two Bay Area talks,
Roy, 44, often had her audience laughing. She has a magnetic presence,
which leads to steady attention from the media, but she's cautious of it
-- especially "corporate media," which she says focuses on superficial
issues. (An example, perhaps: In 1998, People magazine named Roy, who is
striking, one of the world's "50 most beautiful people.") Though some of
Roy's critics say she is a grandstander, Roy is comfortable with who she
has become, and how far she has come. At 16, she left home and lived in a
squatter's camp in New Delhi before turning to architecture as an academic
pursuit. To earn a living, she taught aerobics for a few years.
Eventually, she found her mark as a writer with a strong voice.

Says Roy: "I wouldn't feel I was doing anything right if everyone stood up
and applauded."

www.ctrl.org
DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER
==========
CTRL is a discussion & informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic
screeds are unwelcomed. Substance—not soap-boxing—please!   These are
sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'—with its many half-truths, mis-
directions and outright frauds—is used politically by different groups with
major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought.
That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and
always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no
credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.
========================================================================
Archives Available at:

http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
<A HREF="http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/">ctrl</A>
========================================================================
To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om

--- End Message ---

Reply via email to