-Caveat Lector-
>From SpikedOnLine
}}}>Begin
Article19 September 2001
Terrorising liberty
by Brendan O'Neill
After the attacks on America, UK prime minister Tony Blair declared
'war on terrorism' - not only overseas, but here in Britain too.
The day after the attacks, foreign secretary Jack Straw invoked the
Terrorism Act 2000 as playing a 'major role' in tackling terrorist
bases and support in the UK, and already arrests have been made at
Heathrow Airport under anti-terrorism legislation. 'Britain's counter-
terrorist laws are crucial', said home secretary David Blunkett. 'We
were right to keep them.'
Yet if the legislation's previous incarnation is anything to go by,
the laws will do little to 'prevent terrorism' - but a lot to erode
liberties.
New Labour's Terrorism Act came into force in February 2001,
superseding both the Prevention of Terrorism Act 1974 (PTA) and the
Northern Ireland Emergency Provisions Act 1973. The original PTA was
passed in November 1974
- the last time a British government declared 'war on terrorism' - in response to the
IRA's Birmingham pub bombings that left 21 people dead. But despite its stated aims,
the Act was less about 'preventing terrorism' tha
n about harassing Irish people and undermining their civil liberties.
The PTA allowed the authorities to detain suspects for up to seven days without
charge. It gave the home secretary powers to exclude people from Britain to Northern
Ireland - internal exile within the UK - if he 'reasonab
ly believed' them to be involved in terrorism, without needing to go to court or offer
any evidence. It allowed the police to cordon off entire areas, to stop and search
people they 'reasonably suspected' might be terrori
sts, and to confiscate any items they suspected could be used for 'terrorist purposes'
(including, in some instances, black gloves, rope, building equipment and even A-Z
maps).
Of the 7052 (mostly Irish) people detained under the Prevention of Terrorism Act
between 1974 and 1991, only 14 percent had charges brought against them (1). Many of
the other 6097 (86 percent) were held for days at a tim
e, denied access to a solicitor, interrogated (without the safeguards that suspects
today are promised in police custody), and then released again - left with the stigma
of being an Irish person arrested on suspicion of b
eing involved in terrorism.
And of the 350 people excluded from the UK to Northern Ireland or the Irish Republic
under the PTA from 1974 to 1992, the vast majority were just ordinary Irish people
suspected of being terrorists - with fewer than 30 of
them being charged with 'terrorist acts' once they arrived back in
Ireland. A study carried out by the Commission for Racial Equality in
1993 found that 60 percent of Irish people surveyed in Britain had
been stopped and questioned under the PTA (2).
That so many Irish people were conveyor-belted under anti-terrorism
legislation and only small numbers of them charged showed that the
PTA was more about harassing the Irish community than about hunting
for terrorists. Far from being one-off miscarriages of justice, the
cases of the Guildford Four and the Birmingham Six - framed for the
IRA pub bombings of 1974 and then released after being found innocent
in 1989 and 1991 respectively - were part of a climate of hysteria
fostered by anti-terrorist legislation that effectively criminalised
the Irish community.
Following the IRA ceasefire of 1994, the then Tory government was put
under pressure to rethink anti-terrorist legislation, while Labour
promised an overhaul if it got into power. So what did the New Labour
government do? It passed the new and improved Terrorism Act in 2001,
which includes much of what was bad about the PTA - and then some.
The Terrorism Act defines terrorism as 'the use or threat of action
designed to influence the government or to intimidate the public or a
section of the public', which 'involves serious violence against a
person', 'serious damage to property', 'endangers a person's life',
'creates a serious risk to the health or safety of the public', or
'is designed seriously to interfere with an electronic system'. As
some have pointed out, such a broad definition of terrorism not only
covers aeroplanes crashing into buildings, but also rowdy political
protests and hacking into internet systems. According to Guardian
columnist George Monbiot, the Terrorism Act criminalises protest:
'You can become a terrorist without having to harm a living being -
provided you believe in something.' (3)
If the police 'reasonably suspect' that acts of terrorism are likely
to be carried out, they can seek an 'authorisation' to declare an
area an 'emergency zone' for up to 28 days. And within the emergency
zone, rights go out the window. A police officer can 'arrest without
a warrant a person whom he reasonably suspects to be a terrorist',
'may stop and search a person whom he reasonably suspects to be a
terrorist', and 'can stop a vehicle, and may search the vehicle, the
driver of the vehicle, any passenger in the vehicle, anything in or
on the vehicle or carried by the driver or passenger'.
In short, the Terrorism Act allows the authorities to create mini
states of emergency where you can forget your rights - as long as
there is 'reasonable suspicion' that a terrorist act is about to be
carried out. But given that airline passengers at UK airports are now
having everything from razor blades to nail scissors to tennis
rackets confiscated, the line between reasonable suspicion and
unreasonable panic seems a thin one indeed.
Under the Terrorism Act it is also a crime to 'fail to disclose'
information that might lead to the arrest of a terrorist. Under the
PTA, a similar subsection led to journalists being arrested -
including the makers of a documentary on Northern Ireland for the
Channel 4 Dispatches series - for failing to disclose their sources.
And the Terrorism Act makes it an offence, not only to be a member of
a list of proscribed organisations (14 Irish ones plus new, mostly
Islamic ones), but also to support them financially or to be present
at a meeting of three or more people if one of those people is a
member of a proscribed organisation. As some journalists have pointed
out, such measures can only undermine free speech and journalistic
integrity.
In Tony Blair's new 'war on terrorism', we might find once again that
the first casualty is liberty.
Read on:
Defend liberty - especially now, by Jennie Bristow
spiked-issues: Attack on USA
(1) See Suspect Community: People's Experience of the Prevention of
Terrorism Acts in Britain, Paddy Hillyard, Pluto Press, 1993
(2) See The Irish Community: Diversity, Disadvantage and
Discrimination, by Bronwen Walter, Runnymede Trust
(3) 'Wearing a t-shirt makes you a terrorist', George Monbiot,
Guardian, 22 February 2001
Reprinted from :
http://www.spiked-online.com/Articles/00000002D23D.htm
End<{{{
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Forwarded as information only; no endorsement to be presumed
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. section 107, this material
is distributed without charge or profit to those who have
expressed a prior interest in receiving this type of information
for non-profit research and educational purposes only.
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
The only real voyage of discovery consists not in seeking
new landscapes but in having new eyes. -Marcel Proust
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
"Do not believe in anything simply because you have heard it. Do not believe
simply because it has been handed down for many generations. Do not
believe in anything simply because it is spoken and rumored by many. Do
not believe in anything simply because it is written in Holy Scriptures. Do not
believe in anything merely on the authority of Teachers, elders or wise men.
Believe only after careful observation and analysis, when you find that it
agrees with reason and is conducive to the good and benefit of one and all.
Then accept it and live up to it."
The Buddha on Belief, from the Kalama Sutta
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
A merely fallen enemy may rise again, but the reconciled
one is truly vanquished. -Johann Christoph Schiller,
German Writer (1759-1805)
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
It is preoccupation with possessions, more than anything else, that
prevents us from living freely and nobly. -Bertrand Russell
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
"Everyone has the right...to seek, receive and impart
information and ideas through any media and regardless
of frontiers."
Universal Declaration of Human Rights
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
"Always do sober what you said you'd do drunk. That will
teach you to keep your mouth shut."
--- Ernest Hemingway
<A HREF="http://www.ctrl.org/";>www.ctrl.org</A>
DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER
==========
CTRL is a discussion & informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic
screeds are unwelcomed. Substance—not soap-boxing—please! These are
sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'—with its many half-truths, mis-
directions and outright frauds—is used politically by different groups with
major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought.
That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and
always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no
credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply.
Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.
========================================================================
Archives Available at:
http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html
<A HREF="http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html";>Archives of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]</A>
http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
<A HREF="http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/";>ctrl</A>
========================================================================
To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Om
