-Caveat Lector-

From
http://www.shianews.com/hi/articles/islam/0000139.php

}}}>Begin
Shia News.com
http://www.shianews.com

A Warning to Muslims against the Bid'ahs preached by Muhammad Ibn
'Abdi-l-Wahhab



By: Shaykh Abdul Hadi Palazzi and Zubair Qamar
This article has been written by prominent scholars of Ahlul Sunnah.
Although there are many articles and fatwas by Shia scholars
regarding the menace of Wahabism, we have published this fatwa by
Sunni scholars so that our Sunni brothers will not fall in the traps
laid down by the Wahabis who disguise their evil preachings as
Sunnism. Using this article does not mean that we agree with ALL the
fatwas by the above mentioned scholars.

Praised by Allah, Lord of the worlds, and blessing and peace upon the
best of His creatures, the Prophet Muhammad Ibn ‘Abdi-Llah, upon his
noble family, his pure wives, his purified Sahabahs and upon all
those who follow
his path till the Day of resurrection. This paper has been compiled by Shaykh Abdul 
Hadi Palazzi, Director of the Cultural Institute of the Italian Islamic Community and 
by Zubair Qamar as a mean to seek Allah’s favor and
 as a warning against the founder of the heretic Wahhabi-Salafi cult and against the 
bid’ahs he preached. May Allah save this Ummah from bid’ahs and dalalah, and preserve 
us on the right path followed by Asyaduna al-akram
in. Amin.

Rasul-Ullah (S) said:"Allahumma, bless Yemen, Allahumma, bless Sham." He was asked: 
"And what about Najd?" He answered: "From Najd Shaytan’s horn will rise."

He (S) also said: "Beware of Shaykhu-n-Najdi, since he is Shaytan."

He (S) also said: "There will be people who come from the eastern side of Arabia who 
will recite Qur’an, but their recitation will not pass beyond their collarbones. They 
will go out of Islam as swiftly as the arrow goes
through the prey. Their sign is shaving their heads."

Muhammad Ibn ‘Abdi-l-Wahhab was a descendent of the Bani Tamim tribe and was born in 
the Uyaynah village (Najd) in 1111 H. (1699 M.). His father was a learnt Hanbali 
scholar, and sent him to study tafsir, fiqh and tasawwu
f in Mecca, Medina, Baghdad, Basrah and Damascus, as well as in Iran and India. His 
attitude, from the beginning, was very much polemic, and he took active part in 
scholarly debates. During this period, he received the su
rname "Shaykhu-n-Najdi". He contacted many Shaykhs of tasawwuf, and tried his best to 
be appointed as a khalifah. This request of his, however, was not accepted, since the 
Shaykhs realized he was too must influenced by ki
br and by the desire to become a leader.

At the age of thirty-two he came back to Najd and started working as a teacher for 
Bedouins; he also started exercising ijtihad, and accusing Sunni scholars and 
Ahlu-t-tasawwuf of bid’ahs. In 1143 H. (1730 M.) he met a le
ader of a gang of marauders called Muhammad Ibn Sa’ud, whose main activity was 
plundering travelers in the desert of Najd. Since most of those Bedouins living in 
Dar’iyyah were completely unlearnt, Ibn ‘Abdi-l-Wahhab coul
d easily convict them of his theories; Ibn Sa’ud and him made an agreement, according 
to which the former was appointed as the "Amir", and the latter as the "Shaykh". The 
"Shaykh declared he was ready to publish "fatwahs"
 where non-Wahhabi Muslims were described as apostates and idol-worshippers; this 
point of view obviously represented a sort of "religious justification" for Ibn 
Sa’ud’s gang. They were not, anymore, robbers and criminals
, but "mujahids", authorized to kill "kuffars", to plunder their properties and to 
rape their women.

The "Shaykh" also appointed some "wakils" and send them to preach Wahhabism in Mecca, 
but scholars living in the Blessed City were ready in understanding how dangerous this 
doctrine was. Sayyid Ahmad Zayni Dahlan as-Shaf'
i (D) was the Chief Mufti of Mecca. In wrote in the book "Al- Futuhatu-l-Islamiyyah":

"To deceive the ‘ulemas in Mecca and Medina, those people sent emissaries in al- 
Haramayn, but these missionaries were not able to answer questions asked by Sunni 
scholars. It became evident that they were ignorant bid’ah
 holders. Muftis of the four madhhabs wrote a fatwah that declared them kuffars, and 
this document was distributed in the whole Jazirah. The Amir of Mecca, Sharif Mas’ud 
Ibn Sa’id, ordered that the Wahhabis should be impr
isoned. Some Wahhabis fled to Dar’iyyah and informed their leader of what was 
happening."

Muhammad Ibn ‘Abdi-l-Wahhab’s brother, Sulayman Ibn ‘Abdi-l-Wahhab (D), studied his 
works and tried his best to invite him to tawbah. At least, when he realized verbal 
admonitions had no effect, decided to write a book ca
lled "As-Sawa’iqu-l-Ilahiyyah fi-r-Raddi ‘ala-l-Wahhabiyyah". It contains a detailed 
refutation of his brother’s heresies, and states:

"One of the dalils showing that your path is heretic is the hadith sharif narrated by 
‘Uqbah Ibn Amir and collected in the Sahihayn [Bukhari and Muslim]: ‘Rasul- Ullah (S) 
ascended the minbar, and it was the last time I s
aw him on the minbar. He said: ‘I do not fear that you will become mushrikuns after 
me, but I fear that, because of worldly interests, you will fight each others, and 
thus be destroyed like the peoples of old.’

The Messenger of Allah (S) foretold all that would happen to his Ummah until the end 
of the world. This hadith sharif shows that he was certain of the fact that this Ummah 
will never worship idols. By saying so, he destro
ys Wahhabism from its roots, since Wahhabi books say that Ummah al-Muhammadiyyah is 
involved in polytheism, that Muslim countries are full of idols, and that Muslim 
graves are houses of shirk. They also claim that someone
 who does not accept to consider mushrikuns those who ask for intercession by the 
graves is himself a kafir. On the contrary, Muslims have been visiting graves and 
asking for the intercession of awliyas for centuries. No
Islamic scholar has even called such Muslims mushrikuns.

"My brother asks: ‘A hadith sharif says: "Of all that will befall you, shirk is what I 
fear more." Is not this a dalil of the fact that a part of this Ummah will be engaged 
in shirk?'

"I say: It is inferred by many other hadiths that this hadith refers to shirku-l- 
asghar. There are similar hadiths, narrated by Shaddad Ibn ‘Aws, Abu Hurayrah and 
Mahmud Ibn Labid (may Allah be pleased with all of them),
 according to which the Prophet (S) feared that shirku-l-asghar would be committed by 
his Ummah. It has exactly happened as it was foretold in the hadith, and many Muslims 
are guilty of shirku-l-asghar. But you, in your i
gnorance, confuse shirku-l-asghar with shirku-l-akbar, and the tragic consequence of 
this mistake of yours is that you regard as ‘unbelievers’ those Muslims that do not 
accept to call other Muslims ‘unbelievers’."

Another contemporary scholar, Muhammad Ibn Sulayman Effendi (D) wrote:

"O Muhammad Ibn ‘Abdi-l-Wahhab, do not slander Muslims! I admonish you for Allah’s 
sake! Does anyone of them says that there is a creator besides Allah? If you have 
anything to argue against Muslims, please, show them aut
horitative dalils. It is more correct to call you, a single person, ‘kafir’, than 
calling millions of Muslims ‘kuffars’. Ayah 114 of Surah an-Nisa’ says: ‘If anyone 
contends with the Messenger after guidance has been plai
nly conveyed to him, and follows a path other than the one followed by Believers, we 
shall leave him in the path he has chosen, and land him in Jahannam, quite an evil 
refuge!’ This ayah points to the situation of those w
ho have departed from Ahlu-s-Sunnah wa-l-Jam’ah."

When the order from the Amir of Mecca reached the Khalifah in Istanbul, he ordered 
Muhammad ‘Ali Pashah (D), governor of Egypt to move to Najd and to stop the Wahhabi 
fitnah. The marauders of Ibn Sa’ud tied to attack Mecc
a and fought against mujahids, but Allah gave the victory to the Islamic army. 
Muhammad Ibn ‘Abdi-l-Wahhab was captured and sent in chains to Istanbul. A Shari’ah 
court found him guilty of homicide, marauding and rebellio
n, while Muftis of the four madhhabs declared him to be a kafir and murtaddid. 
Finally, after having caused so much danger for this Ummah, he was executed in 1206 H 
(1792 M). Since he refuted to make tawbah and to come ba
ck to Islam, his corpse was not permitted to be interred in a Muslim cemetery, and was 
burnt.

Among Sunni ‘uleams who refuted Wahhabism we must also mention Sayyed Dawud Ibn 
Sulayman, Mawlana Khalid al-Baghdadi, Sun’ Allah al-Halabi al- Makki al-Hanafi, 
Muhammad Ma’sum as-Sarhindi, Muhammad Ibn Sulayman al-Madani
ash-Shaf’i, may Allah be pleased with all of them. The latter was the Shaf’i Mufti of 
Medina, and was asked to write a fatwah against Muhammad Ibn ‘Abdi-l-Wahhab. This 
fatwah is quoted in the book "Ashaddu- l-Jihad" and s
ays:

"This man is leading the ignoramuses of the present age to a heretical path. He is 
trying to extinguish Allah’s light, but Allah will not permit His light to be 
extinguished, in spite of the opposition of mushrikuns, and
will enlighten every place with the light of Ahlu-s-Sunnah."

As-Sayyid ‘Abdur-Rahman al-Ahdal (D), the Mufti of Zabid, said, "...in refuting them 
[the Wahhabis], it is sufficient to mention the hadith of the Prophet (S): ‘Their sign 
is shaving their heads’, since no other innovator
s had ever done it."

The Wahhabis also call themselves the "Salafis," believing that they follow the 
footsteps of the pious Salaf, i.e. the Sahabahs, the Tabi’un, and Atba’u-t- Tabi’in. 
The Wahhabis, however, have a route of knowledge that tr
aces back to Muhammad Ibn ‘Abdi-l-Wahhab, the founder of the Wahhabi movement, who 
lived in the 1700’s M., and before him to Ibn Taymiyyah, another heretic who lived in 
the late 1200’s to early 1300’s M. Their route of kn
owledge does not trace back to the time of the Prophet Muhammad (S) or his pious 
followers whom he praised. The Wahhabis, therefore, cannot be "al-Firqatu- 
l-Najiyyah", or the Saved Sect, but are one of the other 72 devia
nt sects within the Ummah, which the Prophet (S) dispraised and warned us about.

As the British saw in Ahmad Mirza Qadiyani an instrument to divide Muslims in India 
during the 1800s, a similar instrument was seen by the British in Muhammad Ibn 
‘Abdi-l-Wahhab to fulfill the same purpose. Ahmad Mirza Qa
diyani was used to abolish the concept of Jihad to prevent Muslim opposition against 
British colonialism, while Muhammad Ibn ‘Abdi-l-Wahhab was used by the British to 
divide the Muslims in the name of Jihad against the Mu
slims residing in the Arabian peninsula by way of the sword.

In many of his "fatwahs," Muhammad Ibn ‘Abdi-l-Wahhab labeled Muslims as "kuffars" if 
they did not agree to his heretical teachings, which opposed the orthodox Islamic 
beliefs that Muslims had been adhering to for over a
thousand years. When the Sunni Muslims disagreed with the newly formulated Wahhabi 
cult, the blood of countless Muslims, including plenty of scholars of Ahlu-s-Sunnah, 
was made halal by the command of Muhammad Ibn ‘Abdi-l
-Wahhab.

Although thousands of Muslims were massacred by the deviant Wahhabis, the scholars of 
Ahlu-s-Sunnah continued to refute them in their books. An example is what the Mufti of 
Mecca, Ahmad Zayni Dahlan al-Makki ash-Shafi’i (
D) wrote in a work titled "Fitnatu-l-Wahhabiyyah", stating:

"In 1217 H. they [the Wahhabis] marched with big armies to the area of at-Tayf. In 
Dhu-l-Qa’dah of the same year, they lay siege to the area the Muslims were, subdued 
them, and killed the people: men, women, and children.
 They also looted the Muslims belongings and possessions. Only a few people escaped 
their barbarism."

"They [the Wahhabis] plundered what was in the room of the Prophet (S), took all the 
money that was there, and did some disgraceful acts."

"In 1220 H. they [the Wahhabis] lay siege to Mecca and then surrounded it from all 
directions to tighten this siege. They blocked the routes to the city and prevented 
supplies from reaching there. It was a great hardship
on the people of Mecca. Food became exorbitantly expensive and then unavailable. They 
resorted to eating dogs."

What better person could the British have used to fulfill their motto, i.e. "divide 
and conquer?" The British were laughing at Muhammad Ibn ‘Abdi-l- Wahhab and his 
followers for plundering, looting, and killing Muslims in
 the name of Islam, causing Muslims in Mecca to resort to eating dogs, in addition to 
fighting Muslim armies sent by the Ottomans, e.g. Muhammad ‘Ali Pashah (D) of Egypt 
and his army.

This was indeed a fulfillment of the interests of the British, as well as 
entertainment for them. Contemporary members of the Sa'ud house are descendants of 
Muhammad Ibn Sa’ud, the heretic who collaborated with Muhammad I
bn ‘Abdi-l-Wahhab, to cause a Muslim bloodbath in the name of "Jihad." Their monarchy 
has existed since the Wahhabi movement originated, and they continue to raise the 
Dajjal’s banner to this very day. They have destroyed
 the maqams of our four Imams around al-Ka’bah, and identifying the place where the 
imam of salatu-l-jama’at must stand in Masjidu-l-Haram is today quite difficult. The 
sanctity of al-Haram is profaned five times each day
, since the Wahhabi "imams" stand too close to al-Ka’bah, in a place that is not 
justified in the light of fiqh.

The discovery of oil in Saudi Arabia in the 1930’s has enabled the Saudi- Wahhabi 
kingdom to become rich, and their leaders have used their wealth to disseminate the 
Wahhabi doctrine all across the globe. They have built
printing presses in Egypt, Syria, and even the United States to print beautiful books 
to attract the laypeople so that they may fall into their trap. The problem is that 
many new and naive Muslims are falling into the Wah
habi trap, and are propagating their false doctrine in Muslim Student Organizations, 
universities, and mosques – especially in the East Coast of the United States.

The Wahhabis are known for parroting the slogan of "Qur’an and Sunnah," without any 
profound understanding of the two sources of Islam, and are known for slandering 
scholars of Ahlu-s-Sunnah like Imams Suyuti, Imam Abu Ha
mid Ghazali, Imam Nawawi, (D) among others. The great Hanafi scholar, Imam Muhammad 
Amin Ibn Abidin (D), stated that the Wahhabis of today are reviving the creed of the 
Khawarij of the past. It is also known that the Khaw
arij wrongly understand the meanings of ayahs in the Qur’an and falsely attribute 
ayahs meant for non-Muslims to Muslims.

The Wahhabis are notorious for reviving this Kharijite practice. Moreover, the 
Wahhabis have a passion for trying to find faults among the mujtahids such as the 
noble Imam Abu Hanifahh, Imam Shaf’i, Imam Malik, and Imam A
hmad Ibn Hanbal. They try to find faults in their methodologies, while they do not 
possess a methodology of their own. Hence, Wahhabi "scholars" who have graduated from 
Wahhabi universities in Saudi Arabia are never taugh
t a methodology to enable them to understand the Qur’an and Sunnah. This is why they 
are in a constant state of self-contradiction, confusion, and fitnah among the Muslim 
population.

It is the scholars of Ahlu-s-Sunnah wa-l-Jam'ah who must awaken the Muslims and warn 
them by bidding the lawful and forbidding the unlawful Wahhabi doctrine by efficient 
means of da’wah. An anti-Wahhabi campaign must be f
ormulated and strengthened to defend the Ash’ari and Maturidi creeds, the Hanafi, 
Shafi’i, Maliki, and Hanbali madhhabs, and the numerous tariqahs of tasawwuf, of which 
the majority of Muslim scholars have been a part of.


And all praise is for Allah, Lord of the worlds.


W A R N I N G


Wahhabis today call themselves "Salafis," in an attempt to confuse the Muslim masses 
that they adhere to the methodology of the pious Salaf, or predecessors, i.e the 
Sahabahs, the Tabi’un, and Itba’u-t-Tabi’in. For exampl
e, some of the true Salaf applied ta’wil, or figurative interpretation, to Allah’s 
Attributes. Imam Bukhari gave a figurative interpretation of wajh to mean "Allah’s 
Dominion," in Suratu-l-Qasas, ayah 88. This can be foun
d in the Sahih of Bukhari in the Chapter "Tafsir ul-Qur’an." Plenty of other examples 
exist of how the Wahhabi-Salafis oppose the practices of the true and pious Salaf.

The following writers are representatives of this cult. Their followers call them 
"Shaykhs", and Muslims must stay away from their books, papers and Web pages, and do 
not confuse them with real Sunni scholars:



Yusuf al-Qaradawi al-Misri(the one who says that salah in al-Aqsa is "haram". He 
unites the errors of Wahhabis and the errors of Ikhwanis in a new form of heresy).



Abdu-l-‘Aziz Ibn Baz(the deceased official "Mufti" of the Saudi regime and their 
Rabitah, who oppressed Ahlu-s-Sunnah in al-Haramayn).



Muhammad Nasiru-d-Din al-Albani(a recently disappeared pseudo- muhaddith from Albania 
who classifyed hadiths according to his unlimited fantasy and forbade women to wear 
golden ornament).



Abu Aminah Bilal Philips (a ultra-Wahhabi from Jamaica who forges claims in the 
history of fiqh, full of slanders and absurd accusations against Ahlu-s-Sunnah).



Muhammad Nubar Yahya Silmy (a propagandist of Wahhabism in Sri Lanka who is very much 
hostile to the Sunni ‘aqidah).



Abu Bilal Mustafah al-Kanadi.



Muhammad Saleh.



Hamza Massimiliano Boccolini (a Wahhabi who lives in Naples and is exhorted to accept 
rahmah from Allah by tawbah and study of Sunnah)



'Abdur-Rahman Rosario Pasquini (an Ikhwani propagandist in Milano who, because of 
senescence, supports linguistic bid'at like "Allah is unipersonal" - sic! - "Muslims 
are islamocratics", wa na'udhu bi-Llah, afala yatadhak
karun)

This article is archived at:
http://www.shianews.com/hi/articles/islam/0000139.php

Copyright © 2000-2001 Shia News.com
End<{{{
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Forwarded as information only; no endorsement to be presumed
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. section 107, this material
is distributed without charge or profit to those who have
expressed a prior interest in receiving this type of information
for non-profit research and educational purposes only.
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
The only real voyage of discovery consists not in seeking
new landscapes but in having new eyes. -Marcel Proust
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
"Do not believe in anything simply because you have heard it. Do not believe
simply because it has been handed down for many generations. Do not
believe in anything simply because it is spoken and rumored by many. Do
not believe in anything simply because it is written in Holy Scriptures. Do not
believe in anything merely on the authority of Teachers, elders or wise men.
Believe only after careful observation and analysis, when you find that it
agrees with reason and is conducive to the good and benefit of one and all.
Then accept it and live up to it."
The Buddha on Belief, from the Kalama Sutta
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
A merely fallen enemy may rise again, but the reconciled
one is truly vanquished. -Johann Christoph Schiller,
                                     German Writer (1759-1805)
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
It is preoccupation with possessions, more than anything else, that
prevents us from living freely and nobly. -Bertrand Russell
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
"Everyone has the right...to seek, receive and impart
information and ideas through any media and regardless
of frontiers."
Universal Declaration of Human Rights
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
"Always do sober what you said you'd do drunk. That will
teach you to keep your mouth shut."
--- Ernest Hemingway

<A HREF="http://www.ctrl.org/";>www.ctrl.org</A>
DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER
==========
CTRL is a discussion & informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic
screeds are unwelcomed. Substance—not soap-boxing—please!  These are
sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'—with its many half-truths, mis-
directions and outright frauds—is used politically by different groups with
major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought.
That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and
always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no
credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.
========================================================================
Archives Available at:
http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html
 <A HREF="http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html";>Archives of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]</A>

http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
 <A HREF="http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/";>ctrl</A>
========================================================================
To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om

Reply via email to