[CTRL] Blueprints For Colombian War

2001-08-02 Thread William Shannon
http://ww2.antiwar.com/cockburn/pf/p-c080201.html



August 2, 2000

Blueprints For Colombian War

As we all know, the war in Colombia isn't about drugs. It's about the 
annihilation of popular uprisings by the FARC (Revolutionary Armed Forces of 
Colombia) and the ELN (National Liberation Army), guerilla groups or Indian 
peasants fending off the ravages of oil companies, cattle barons and mining 
firms. A good old-fashioned counterinsurgency war, designed to clear the way 
for American corporations to set up shop in Colombia, with cocaine as the 
scare tactic. Two recent Defense Department-commissioned reports outline in 
chilling terms the same strategy of ongoing military intervention under the 
cover of the drug war. Both urge the Bush administration to drop the pretext 
of counter-narcotics and get on with the business of wiping out the 
insurgents.
 
Last year the US Air Force commissioned the RAND Corporation to prepare a 
review of the situation in Colombia. In early June the Santa Monica-based 
RAND think tank (progenitor of many a blood-sodden scenario in the Vietnam 
era) submitted its 130-page report, called "The Colombian Labyrinth: The 
Synergy of Drugs and Insurgency and Its Implications for Regional Stability." 
The other report is a paper written by Gabriel Marcella, titled "Plan 
Colombia: the Strategic and Operational Imperatives." Marcella is a former 
chief adviser to the Commander-in-Chief of the US Southern Command who now 
teaches on national security matters at the US Army War College.

Together, the two reports reach the same conclusion: the US needs to step up 
its military involvement in Colombia and quit forfeiting options by limiting 
its operations to counter-narcotics raids. Along the way, both reports make a 
number of astonishing admissions about the paramilitaries and their links to 
the drug trade, about human rights abuses by the US-trained Colombian 
military and about the irrationality of crop fumigation.

RAND argues that the drug war approach is on the brink of not only failing, 
but of prompting a wider conflict that might require the insertion of US 
troops. "If the Pastrana administration falters, either in its 
counter-narcotics or counterinsurgency approach, the US would be confronted 
with an unpalatable choice. It could escalate its commitment to include 
perhaps an operational role for US forces in Colombia, or scale it down, 
which would involve some significant costs, including a serious loss of 
credibility and degradation of the US's ability to muster regional support 
for its counter-narcotics and political objectives."

The RAND study draws heavily from a December 2000 report by the World Bank, 
titled Violence in Colombia: Building Sustainable Peace and Social Capital, 
which concluded that the quid pro quo for Colombia getting any future large 
infusions of international financial aid will depend on their successful 
suppression of the FARC and other rebel groups. Another World Bank memo 
describes the FARC's fundraising strategy as a "loot-seeking" assault on 
"primary commodities": cattle ranches on the eastern plains, commercial 
agriculture in Urabá, oil in Magaldena, gold mines in Antioquia and the coca 
fields of Putumayo. RAND cites a former CIA analyst as saying that the FARC 
has invested its "taxes" on these industries into "a strategic financial 
reserve," which will enable them to "sustain an escalation of the conflict." 
While the FARC peasant army has doubled over the past decade, it still only 
numbers about 7,000 fighters – 2,000 fewer than the paramilitary death squads.

Both RAND and the World Bank point to the horrifying level of "social 
intolerance killings," which for men aged 14-44 reached a level of 394 deaths 
per 100,000 last year. In all, Colombia endures 30,000 annual murders, double 
the number for the entire United States in 1998. Slightly more than 23,000 
murders have been linked to "illegal armed organizations" since 1988. The 
implication is that the FARC is responsible for these killings and one has to 
dig deep into the RAND analysis to discover otherwise. In fact, according to 
statistics compiled by the Colombian government, about 3,500 people were 
killed by the guerrillas and 19,652 by paramilitaries and "private justice" 
groups.

The leader of the AUC (United Self-Defense Groups of Colombia), the central 
command for the 19 paramilitary "fronts," is a sadistic scoundrel named 
Carlos Castaño, who supervises a killing program right off the pages of the 
CIA's Phoenix Program's operations manual. The RAND report details how 
Castaño's AUC routinely executes "suspected guerrilla sympathizers" in order 
"to instill fear and compel support among the local population." When that 
strategy fails to deliver, the AUC simply launches an all-out attack on the 
villages and slaughters the inhabitants. RAND dispassionately notes that the 
AUC justifies these atrocities, in language that even Bob Kerrey might 
admire, as 

[CTRL] Blueprints For Colombian War

2001-08-02 Thread radtimes

-Caveat Lector-

Left Coast
by Alexander Cockburn
http://www.antiwar.com/cockburn/cockburn-col.html
Antiwar.com

Alexander Cockburn
August 2, 2000

Blueprints For Colombian War

As we all know, the war in Colombia isn't about drugs.
It's about the annihilation of popular uprisings by
the FARC (Revolutionary Armed Forces of Colombia) and
the ELN (National Liberation Army), guerilla groups or
Indian peasants fending off the ravages of oil
companies, cattle barons and mining firms. A good
old-fashioned counterinsurgency war, designed to clear
the way for American corporations to set up shop in
Colombia, with cocaine as the scare tactic. Two recent
Defense Department-commissioned reports outline in
chilling terms the same strategy of ongoing military
intervention under the cover of the drug war. Both
urge the Bush administration to drop the pretext of
counter-narcotics and get on with the business of
wiping out the insurgents.

Last year the US Air Force commissioned the RAND
Corporation to prepare a review of the situation in
Colombia. In early June the Santa Monica-based RAND
think tank (progenitor of many a blood-sodden scenario
in the Vietnam era) submitted its 130-page report,
called The Colombian Labyrinth: The Synergy of Drugs
and Insurgency and Its Implications for Regional
Stability. The other report is a paper written by
Gabriel Marcella, titled Plan Colombia: the Strategic
and Operational Imperatives. Marcella is a former
chief adviser to the Commander-in-Chief of the US
Southern Command who now teaches on national security
matters at the US Army War College.

Together, the two reports reach the same conclusion:
the US needs to step up its military involvement in
Colombia and quit forfeiting options by limiting its
operations to counter-narcotics raids. Along the way,
both reports make a number of astonishing admissions
about the paramilitaries and their links to the drug
trade, about human rights abuses by the US-trained
Colombian military and about the irrationality of crop
fumigation.

RAND argues that the drug war approach is on the brink
of not only failing, but of prompting a wider conflict
that might require the insertion of US troops. If the
Pastrana administration falters, either in its
counter-narcotics or counterinsurgency approach, the
US would be confronted with an unpalatable choice. It
could escalate its commitment to include perhaps an
operational role for US forces in Colombia, or scale
it down, which would involve some significant costs,
including a serious loss of credibility and
degradation of the US's ability to muster regional
support for its counter-narcotics and political
objectives.

The RAND study draws heavily from a December 2000
report by the World Bank, titled Violence in Colombia:
Building Sustainable Peace and Social Capital, which
concluded that the quid pro quo for Colombia getting
any future large infusions of international financial
aid will depend on their successful suppression of the
FARC and other rebel groups. Another World Bank memo
describes the FARC's fundraising strategy as a
loot-seeking assault on primary commodities:
cattle ranches on the eastern plains, commercial
agriculture in Urab?, oil in Magaldena, gold mines in
Antioquia and the coca fields of Putumayo. RAND cites
a former CIA analyst as saying that the FARC has
invested its taxes on these industries into a
strategic financial reserve, which will enable them
to sustain an escalation of the conflict. While the
FARC peasant army has doubled over the past decade, it
still only numbers about 7,000 fighters ? 2,000 fewer
than the paramilitary death squads.

Both RAND and the World Bank point to the horrifying
level of social intolerance killings, which for men
aged 14-44 reached a level of 394 deaths per 100,000
last year. In all, Colombia endures 30,000 annual
murders, double the number for the entire United
States in 1998. Slightly more than 23,000 murders have
been linked to illegal armed organizations since
1988. The implication is that the FARC is responsible
for these killings and one has to dig deep into the
RAND analysis to discover otherwise. In fact,
according to statistics compiled by the Colombian
government, about 3,500 people were killed by the
guerrillas and 19,652 by paramilitaries and private
justice groups.

The leader of the AUC (United Self-Defense Groups of
Colombia), the central command for the 19 paramilitary
fronts, is a sadistic scoundrel named Carlos
Casta?o, who supervises a killing program right off
the pages of the CIA's Phoenix Program's operations
manual. The RAND report details how Casta?o's AUC
routinely executes suspected guerrilla sympathizers
in order to instill fear and compel support among the
local population. When that strategy fails to
deliver, the AUC simply launches an all-out attack on
the villages and slaughters the inhabitants. RAND
dispassionately notes that the AUC justifies these
atrocities, in language that even Bob Kerrey might
admire, as a