-Caveat Lector-

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/main.jhtml?xml=/news/2002/02/22/wafg22.xml&sSh

eet=/news/2002/02/22/ixworld.html

WJPBR Email News List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Peace at any cost is a Prelude to War!

CIA warns on seeds of new Afghan civil war
By Ben Fenton in Washington
(Filed: 22/02/2002)


THE seeds of renewed civil war in Afghanistan have already been planted, the
CIA said in a report made public yesterday.

The analysis of an increasingly lawless situation backs Britain's view that
more needs to be done to prop up the infant regime of Hamid Karzai as he
tries to stabilise his country.

With the CIA and the State Department both urging a greater effort by America
and its allies to maintain peace, the White House is coming under pressure to
launch a fresh peacekeeping initiative.

The rest of the Bush administration, and in particular the Pentagon, has been
reluctant to do anything more than it is already doing, except in pursuit of
Osama bin Laden, his al-Qa'eda terrorist network and the Taliban.

Intelligence analysis suggests that a return to the civil war that wracked
the country after Soviet invaders were driven out in 1989 is not imminent.

But the CIA has identified rising tensions between the Tajik and Uzbek ethnic
groups in Afghanistan and areas of lawlessness where the influence of the
central government has not been extended.

The report says the agency is alarmed at how slowly progress is being made in
setting up the national army and police force for Afghanistan.

"Civil war is not imminent but the seeds are there," a senior official of the
intelligence agency said in an interview with the New York Times.

The question that the CIA was facing was: "What do we do in the meantime to
deter war among the warlords?"

Donald Rumsfeld, the defence secretary, said he did not know how the
situation would develop, but was not obviously enthusiastic for an increase
in peacekeeping forces beyond the 4,500-strong existing force, half of which
is British and which is under British command.

The Pentagon is known to have argued that it is not necessary to enlarge the
peacekeeping force and would stretch already thin resources at a time when
America is trying to fight terrorism on a global front.

Mr Rumsfeld said it was a waste of time, money and effort to build up the
International Security Assistance Force to 5,000 or even 20,000 when the same
resources could be devoted to training and equipping an Afghan army.

The State Department told the newspaper it was suggesting only that areas
outside Kabul could be protected by an expanded international force, as Mr
Karzai proposed to President Bush in a meeting in Washington last month.

The Foreign Office supports this idea although the Ministry of Defence is far
less enthusiastic, a division mirroring the current differences of opinion in
the Bush administration.

Britain's Armed Forces commanders are also concerned that they are being
overstretched and do not want to be committed to sending more troops to
Afghanistan.


Mr Rumsfeld admitted that between 10 and 15 people killed in an American
commando raid on Jan 23 were not al-Qa'eda or Taliban, as the Pentagon had
claimed since the attack.
But he defended the raid on the two compounds at Hazar Qadam, because he said
all the deaths occurred after American special forces troops were fired on.




*COPYRIGHT NOTICE** In accordance with Title 17 U. S. C. Section 107,
any copyrighted work in this message is distributed under fair use
without profit or payment to those who have expressed a prior interest
in receiving the included information for nonprofit research and educational
purposes only.[Ref. http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml ]

Want to be on our lists?  Write at [EMAIL PROTECTED] for a menu of our lists!
Write to same address to be off lists!

<A HREF="http://www.ctrl.org/";>www.ctrl.org</A>
DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER
==========
CTRL is a discussion & informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic
screeds are unwelcomed. Substance—not soap-boxing—please!  These are
sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'—with its many half-truths, mis-
directions and outright frauds—is used politically by different groups with
major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought.
That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and
always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no
credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.
========================================================================
Archives Available at:
http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html
 <A HREF="http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html";>Archives of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]</A>

http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
 <A HREF="http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/";>ctrl</A>
========================================================================
To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om

Reply via email to