[CTRL] Corporations ubber alles: Who's in charge here???

2001-02-24 Thread Nurev Ind Research

-Caveat Lector-

http://news.cnet.com/investor/news/
newsitem/0-9900-1028-4825719-RHAT.html?tag=ltnc

2/14/01 4:57 PM
Source:Bloomberg News

Redmond, Washington, Feb. 14 (Bloomberg) -- Microsoft Corp.'s Windows
operating-system chief, Jim Allchin, says that freely distributed software
code such as rival Linux could stifle innovation and that legislators need
to understand the threat.

The result will be the demise of both intellectual property rights and the
incentive to spend on research and development, he said yesterday, after
the company previewed its latest version of Windows. Microsoft has told
U.S. lawmakers of its concern while discussing protection of

Linux is developed in a so-called open-source environment in which the
software code generally isn't owned by any one company. That, as well as
programs such as music-sharing software from Napster Inc., means the
world's largest software maker has to do a better job of talking to
policymakers, he said.

"Open source is an intellectual-property destroyer," Allchin said. "I
can't imagine something that could be worse than this for the software
business and the intellectual-property business."

Microsoft distributes some of its programs without charge to customers,
although it generally doesn't release its programming code, and it retains
the ownership rights to that code. Linux is the most widely known
open-source product, though other programs including the popular Apache
system for Web server computers also are developed the same way.

COREL INQUIRY

Allchin made his comments several hours before Microsoft confirmed that
its $135 million investment in software maker Corel Corp. last October is
being reviewed by the U.S. Justice Department. Corel said last month it
willl drop efforts to develop the Linux operating system, though it will
continue to make Linux applications. Corel said it hadn't consulted with
Microsoft before making that decision.

Brian Behlendorf, founder of open-source company CollabNet Inc., said most
companies that use the open-source development model do retain the rights
to some of their intellectual property.

"I think Microsoft is trying to paint the open-source community as being
fascist; that all software have has to be free, or none of it can be,"
said Behlendorf, whose company helps businesses run their own open-source
projects.

Allchin said he's concerned that the open-source business model could
stifle initiative in the computer industry.

"I'm an American, I believe in the American Way," he said."I worry if the
government encourages open source, and I don't think we've done enough
education of policy makers to understand the threat."

LINUX ADOPTION

Some leading computer companies including International Business Machines
Corp. and Hewlett-Packard Co. are selling Linux- based products and
working on open-source projects, noted Jeremy Allison, a VA Linux Systems
Inc. software developer. He's also a leader in a project develop an
open-source file and printer server program.

Microsoft only began significant lobbying efforts in the last few years.
The Redmond, Washington-based company also talks to lawmakers about issues
including the need for more visas for people with computer skills and
computer privacy and security.

Linux is the fastest-growing operating system program for running server
computers, according to research firm IDC. It accounted for 27 percent of
unit shipments of server operating systems in 2000. Microsoft's Windows
was the most popular on that basis, with 41 percent.

Despite Linux's success in some markets, Allchin says he isn't concerned
about sales competition from the product. Microsoft provides support to
change and develop products based on its operating system software that
Linux companies don't, he said. Companies that use Linux in their products
then must pay someone else for support, he said.

"We can build a better product than Linux," he said."There is always
something enamoring about thinking you can get something for free."

==


Commentary...

The solution of course, is to do away with Intellectual Property rights
alltogether. To make ideas property, is the modern equivalent of what
the Rich did to the " commons " through " enclosure."

Ideas can not and should not be owned. That is not to say that inventive
people should not be well compensated for their efforts. They certainly
should. But once compensated, that's it.

Only capitalism could produce such an absurdity as making human ideas
into property. What's next? Owning the Genome? Making sound property,
like Harley-Davidson tried to do by patenting the sound of their bikes?
Or how about where McDonald's sued a man in Scotland who sold hamburgers
under the name McDonald. How DARE he be born with the name of their
corporate logo!

ALL the evils of Capitalism are based on the idea of " Private Property."
This is not the same thing as personal property. The things we each own.
This is a legal slight of hand, as is

Re: [CTRL] Corporations ubber alles: Who's in charge here?

2001-01-21 Thread M.A. Johnson

-Caveat Lector-

Joshua
The problem is that we " CONSUMERS " ( A BIOLOGICAL ENTITY
WHOSE SOLE PURPOSE IS TO CONSUME ) are not modifying our
behavior well enough to conform to the machinations of the free
market and its corporate manipulators.
MJ
If someone is MANIPULATING a 'market' ... how is it free?
Joshua
   Ah so Grasshopper. Now you get it. The manure pile between
   your ears has finally produced some growth. THERE'S NO SUCH
   THING AS A FREE MARKET. The real question is who controls the
   markets that exist.
MJ
No, Joshua ... this is AGAIN *me* pointing to the Foolishness
you espouse as reality.  You call Statism, Capitalism ... You
call controlled markets, free markets ... you call restricted
trade, free trade ...

Regard$,
--MJ

War is peace; freedom is slavery; ignorance
is strength.   -- eorge Orwell

http://www.ctrl.org/">www.ctrl.org
DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER
==
CTRL is a discussion & informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic
screeds are unwelcomed. Substance—not soap-boxing—please!  These are
sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'—with its many half-truths, mis-
directions and outright frauds—is used politically by different groups with
major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought.
That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and
always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no
credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.

Archives Available at:
http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html
 http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html">Archives of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
 http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/">ctrl

To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om



Re: [CTRL] Corporations ubber alles: Who's in charge here?

2001-01-21 Thread Nurev Ind Research

-Caveat Lector-

"M.A. Johnson" wrote:
>
> -Caveat Lector-
>
> Joshua
> The problem is that we " CONSUMERS " ( A BIOLOGICAL ENTITY
> WHOSE SOLE PURPOSE IS TO CONSUME ) are not modifying our
> behavior well enough to conform to the machinations of the free
> market and its corporate manipulators.
>
> MJ
> If someone is MANIPULATING a 'market' ... how is it free?

Ah so Grasshopper. Now you get it. The manure pile between your ears has
finally produced some growth. THERE'S NO SUCH THING AS A FREE MARKET. The
real question is who controls the markets that exist.

Congratulations Johnson. A major breakthrough. Your Mommy must be so proud.

J2

>
> Regard$,
> --MJ
>
> If a million people believe a foolish thing, it is
> still a foolish thing. -- Anatole France
>
> http://www.ctrl.org/">www.ctrl.org
> DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER
> ==
> CTRL is a discussion & informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic
> screeds are unwelcomed. Substance—not soap-boxing—please!  These are
> sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'—with its many half-truths, mis-
> directions and outright frauds—is used politically by different groups with
> major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought.
> That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and
> always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no
> credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply.
>
> Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.
> 
> Archives Available at:
> http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html
>  http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html">Archives of
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
>  http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/">ctrl
> 
> To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
> SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
> SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> Om

http://www.ctrl.org/">www.ctrl.org
DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER
==
CTRL is a discussion & informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic
screeds are unwelcomed. Substance—not soap-boxing—please!  These are
sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'—with its many half-truths, mis-
directions and outright frauds—is used politically by different groups with
major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought.
That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and
always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no
credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.

Archives Available at:
http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html
 http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html">Archives of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
 http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/">ctrl

To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om



Re: [CTRL] Corporations ubber alles: Who's in charge here?

2001-01-21 Thread M.A. Johnson

-Caveat Lector-

Joshua
The problem is that we " CONSUMERS " ( A BIOLOGICAL ENTITY
WHOSE SOLE PURPOSE IS TO CONSUME ) are not modifying our
behavior well enough to conform to the machinations of the free
market and its corporate manipulators.

MJ
If someone is MANIPULATING a 'market' ... how is it free?

Regard$,
--MJ

If a million people believe a foolish thing, it is
still a foolish thing. -- Anatole France

http://www.ctrl.org/">www.ctrl.org
DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER
==
CTRL is a discussion & informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic
screeds are unwelcomed. Substance—not soap-boxing—please!  These are
sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'—with its many half-truths, mis-
directions and outright frauds—is used politically by different groups with
major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought.
That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and
always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no
credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.

Archives Available at:
http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html
 http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html">Archives of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
 http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/">ctrl

To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om



[CTRL] Corporations ubber alles: Who's in charge here?

2001-01-21 Thread Nurev Ind Research

-Caveat Lector-

The problem is that we " CONSUMERS " ( A BIOLOGICAL ENTITY WHOSE SOLE
PURPOSE IS TO CONSUME ) are not modifying our behavior well enough to
conform to the machinations of the free market and its corporate manipulators.

C'mon now kids...you're not trying.

Joshua2

===
Subject:
  "Power Crisis" -- a "Behavior Modification" Exercise
Date:
  Sat, 20 Jan 2001 19:06:19 EST
   From:
  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  To:
  [EMAIL PROTECTED]


 "Until now, Democrats have thwarted attempts to fashion a national
energy policy that would give incentives for more oil and gas drilling ...

 ""The biggest problem in California is that consumers are still not
[responding properly to the 'free market']," Enron Corp chairman Ken Lay
announced.
 ""They are not changing behavior so the problem is going to get worse.
Painful as it may be, they need to start modifying their behavior ..."
 ===

Clinton declares natural gas supply emergency in California

By Tom Doggett

WASHINGTON, Jan 19 (Reuters) - President Bill Clinton declared a natural gas
supply emergency in California on Friday, and ordered out-of-state suppliers
to continue selling gas to California's largest utility to fuel electric
generation plants.

Clinton directed Energy Secretary Bill Richardson to issue a federal order
requiring firms to supply natural gas to Pacific Gas and Electric ,
which is teetering on the edge of bankruptcy.

Richardson said the emergency order, which expires at 3 a.m. EST (8 a.m.
GMT)
on Jan. 24, was issued after PG&E said several energy firms refused to sell
it gas on credit because they feared the utility would be unable to pay for
the gas.

"I am very concerned that such supply disruptions could endanger the health
and welfare of PG&E's residential and commercial gas customers and could
exacerbate the already precarious condition of California's electric grid by
eliminating fuel supplies to a number of generating plants," Richardson
said.

The electricity shortage in the nation's richest and most populous state
will
be among the immediate issues facing President-elect George W. Bush when he
takes office Saturday.

A key energy adviser to Bush said the federal government should limit itself
to an "advisory" role and let California state lawmakers resolve a
complicated problem that was mostly self-inflicted by a flawed deregulation
plan.

"The biggest problem in California is consumers are not going to see the
price signals. If they don't see the price signals, they are not changing
behavior so the problem is going to get worse," Enron Corp  chairman
Ken Lay told reporters.

"Painful as it is, they need to see the price signals and start modifying
behavior to reduce demand until we get new supplies," he added.

PG&E and Edison International  have warned federal and state
officials
they face bankruptcy because California's landmark 1996 deregulation law
does
not allow them to pass on the tenfold leap in wholesale power costs to
consumers.

California's woes have also been exacerbate the also have not been helped by
the fact that practically no new power generating plants have been built in
the state for the last 10 years -- a period during which the population and
the economy have boomed, greatly increasing demand for electricity.

NATGAS NEEDED TO KEEP UTILITY RUNNING

California Gov. Gray Davis, a Democrat, asked Clinton last weekend for the
emergency natural gas supply order, before the state was hit with two days
of
rolling blackouts and a widening power crisis. Residents in many cities have
had to cope with the loss of traffic lights, automatic teller machines,
elevators and computers during the rolling blackouts.

Richardson said the Energy Department would take legal action against firms
that did not comply, saying: "There will be enforcement action if the order
is not carried out."

On Thursday, PG&E said its deteriorating credit rating could force it to
drain all its natural gas in storage by early February because suppliers
have
balked at providing more.

The Clinton administration has also tried to help ease the California crisis
with a separate order issued on Wednesday that forces out-of-state power
generators to sell extra electricity to PG&E and to Edison International
.

BUSH READY ON ENERGY ISSUES

Richardson said he had briefed his successor, Spencer Abraham, on the
California crisis. Abraham, a former Michigan senator, was expected to win
swift confirmation by the U.S. Senate as Bush's choice for energy secretary.

Richardson said Abraham was prepared, saying: "They are ready to act." He
did
not elaborate.

On Thursday, Abraham testified before the Senate Energy committee but
refused
to say what options, if any, the Bush administration was considering to help
solve the crisis.

The California state legislature met this week to try to work out a so