This 1998 Ottawa Citizen article is in response to a 1998 article by
columnist Christopher Hitchens, recently circulated on the Internet
(May 2000).

Alfred Webre
EcoNews Service
Vancouver, BC
=====
http://www.tibet.ca/wtnarchive/1998/10/2_1.html

1. Defending the Dalai Lama (OC)


Ottawa Citizen, Thursday, October 01, 1998

by Brian J. Given

We have become so accustomed to learning that our cultural icons, the
Presidents and Priests, have feet of clay that we are perversely
pleased when yet another role model is caught in flagrente delecto with
the alter boys or interns. It is hardly surprising, that the Dalai Lama
of Tibet should be the subject of an attempt at expose' (Behind The
Dalai Lama's Smile. (Sept. 17:A15). Unfortunately Mr. Hitchens' pique
overcomes his reason and his article is polemic more than critique.

I have conducted research, over a period of 15 years, among Tibetan
refugees and western-born Tibetan Buddhists in India and Canada. For
Tibetans the Dalai Lama is the symbolic embodiment of their nation and
for most non-Tibetans the Dalai Lama's credibility is the credibility of
the Tibetan cause itself so Hitchens ill-informed comments should be
answered.

First, he tells his readers that the Dalai Lama supported India's
nuclear tests. The Tibetan leader was responding to a journalist's
question in Madison Wisconsin on May 13. What he said was that the
tests saddened him and that he supported complete nuclear disarmament.
He did say, however, that it is undemocratic for a few nuclear powers,
in condemning India, to ask others not to indulge in actions that they
are, themselves, undertaking.

Christopher Hitchens thinks that the Dalai Lama's meeting with Shoko
Asahara, whose followers later perpetrated the Tokyo nerve gas murders,
is evidence of some sinister side of the Tibetan leader. The obvious
explanation, and the correct one, is that meetings with the Dalai Lama
are widely available. The officials who make his appointments in India
cannot conduct international investigations before granting audiences.
Ironically, Hitchens is angry that the Dalai Lama may not have been
omniscient!

Next the article blames the Dalai Lama for the fact that another Lama
has recognized action film hero Steven Seagal as a minor reincarnation.
The Dalai Lama is the head of the Gelug school of Tibetan Buddhism and
Seagal was recognized as a reincarnated Lama (the Tibetan term is
"Tulku") by Penor Rinpoche, who is head of the Nyingma school. Many
Buddhists did wonder at the Rinpoche's choice of Tulkus but none think
the Dalai Lama had anything to do with it.

Hitchens raises the issue of Dorje Shugden (not Hitchens' "Dorge") and
echoes the complaints of a small group of followers of this ancient
"wrathful protector" deity. Shugden is a beatified former antagonist of
a former Dalai Lama, often worshipped for material benefit and this
controversy has quietly existed for centuries in Tibet. What has changed
is that some western followers of Shugden and a few Tibetan supporters,
with considerable resources at their disposal, have used the Dalai
Lama's advice that the worship of Shugden is harmful to argue that he is
suppressing freedom of religion. Practitioners of Dorje Shugden are
terrorized by tales of what will happen to them if they don't refrain
from receiving other religious instruction, including from the Dalai
Lama. He responded to the evidence that the followers of Shugden were
teaching religious intolerance by stating that this practice was harmful
and asking Tibetans to refrain from it. It is true that a few people
in some of the refugee communities in India were overly aggressive in
their attempts to discourage this practice which many Tibetans believe
harms the Dalai Lama, shortening his life. There were only a few
incidents and there is no reason to believe that they were part of any
centrally organized campaign. Hitchens piece echoes very closely the
text of a book published by the Dorje Shugden International Coalition as
part of their European-based campaign against the Dalai Lama. Had
Hitchens researched the issue he would have discovered that the Dalai
Lama's advice about Shugden was intended to preserve, rather than to
diminish, freedom of religion.

The article criticizes the Dalai Lama for teaching Tibetan Buddhist
doctrine on sexual misconduct. It is ethnocentric to condemn the most
important Tibetan spiritual authority for stating Tibetan Buddhist
beliefs, regarding one of the Five Precepts, when asked by a reporter.
Hitchens also berates the media for its reportage about a "mere mortal
who, at the very least, proclaims the nonsense of reincarnation..." The
ancient Buddhist doctrines on death and rebirth were not invented by the
Dalai Lama. Anyone has the right to believe or not to believe that an
incredible carpenter can be the Son of God or that our mind-continuum
takes form after form on the path to enlightenment.

Hitchens refers to a "Hollywood cult that almost exceeds the power of
Scientology itself." Any theme Hollywood embraces becomes simplified
and trendy. However, Tibetans have worked with non-Tibetans, ever since
China's invasion (1949-59), to build a well-informed base of over 100
Tibet Support Groups in 64 countries and most were around before
Hollywood discovered Tibet. Prior to his exile in 1959 and for the 39
years afterward the Dalai Lama and his followers have opted for the
"middle way" of non-violence which won him the Nobel Peace Prize in
1989. Hitchens complains that the Dalai Lama benefits from "modern PR"
such that "his words and actions are judged by his reputation, rather
than the other way about." If world opinion judges Tibetans and their
leader in light of their consistent moderate behavior and philosophy it
is because they have earned that consideration.

The Dalai Lama assures us that he is indeed a "mere mortal." He is also
a very good man. He and the Tibetan refugee community have earned our
respect the hard way, by their conduct. They deserve better than
simplistic adulation based on our need for Shangrila or cranky and
inaccurate expose.

Brian J. Given is an Associate Professor of Sociology and Anthropology,
a member of the College of the Humanities at Carleton University and a
Research Consultant to the Canada Tibet Committee. He is currently
writing a book about the Tibetan-Canadian refugee communities.

_________
earthradioTV.com - Alternative News Forum for ecology, politics &
consciousness.  MIRROR SITES:
USA     http://www.earthradioTV.com/
CZECH   http://mujweb.cz/www/ecologynews/
UK      http://members.tripod.co.uk/ecologynews/
Canada http://www.ecologynews.com/

<A HREF="http://www.ctrl.org/">www.ctrl.org</A>
DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER
==========
CTRL is a discussion & informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic
screeds are unwelcomed. Substance—not soap-boxing—please!  These are
sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'—with its many half-truths,
misdirections
and outright frauds—is used politically by different groups with major and
minor
effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought. That being said,
CTRL
gives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and always suggests to readers;
be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no credence to Holocaust denial and
nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.
========================================================================
Archives Available at:
http://home.ease.lsoft.com/archives/CTRL.html
<A HREF="http://home.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html">Archives of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]</A>

http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
 <A HREF="http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/">ctrl</A>
========================================================================
To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om

Reply via email to