[CTRL] Elliott Abrams: It's Back!

2001-06-30 Thread Kris Millegan

-Caveat Lector-

FROM:
http://www.thenation.com/doc.mhtml?i=20010702s=corn
Click Here: A HREF=http://www.thenation.com/doc.mhtml?i=20010702s=corn;
Elliott Abrams: It's Back!/A
-
Here tis the whole article. And, please, may the phrentic displays of
affection be taken off list.

Om
K
-
COMMENT | July 2, 2001

Elliott Abrams: It's Back!

by David Corn
How would you feel if your wife and children were brutally raped before
being hacked to death by soldiers during a military massacre of 800
civilians, and then two governments tried to cover up the killings? It's a
question that won't be asked of Elliott Abrams at a Senate confirmation
hearing--because George W. Bush, according to press reports, may appoint
Abrams to a National Security Council staff position that (conveniently!)
does not require Senate approval. Moreover, this query is one of a host of
rude, but warranted, questions that could be lobbed at Abrams, the Iran/contra
 player who was an assistant secretary of state during the Reagan years and a
shaper of that Administration's controversial--and deadly--policies on Latin
America and human rights. His designated spot in the new regime: NSC's senior
director for democracy, human rights and international operations. (At press
time, the White House and Abrams were neither confirming nor denying his
return to government.)
IN
Bush the Second has tapped a number of Reagan/Bush alums who were involved in
Iran/contra business for plum jobs: Colin Powell, Richard Armitage, Otto
Reich and John Negroponte. But Abrams's appointment--should it come to
pass--would mark the most generous of rehabilitations. Not only did Abrams
plead guilty to two misdemeanor counts of lying to Congress about the Reagan
Administration's contra program, he was also one of the fiercest ideological
pugilists of the 1980s, a bad-boy diplomat wildly out of sync with Bush's
gonna-change-the-tone rhetoric. Abrams, a Democrat turned Republican who
married into the cranky Podhoretz neocon clan, billed himself as a
gladiator for the Reagan Doctrine in Central America--which entailed
assisting thuggish regimes and militaries in order to thwart leftist
movements and dismissing the human rights violations of Washington's cold war
partners.

One Abrams specialty was massacre denial. During a Nightline appearance in
1985, he was asked about reports that the US-funded Salvadoran military had
slaughtered civilians at two sites the previous summer. Abrams maintained
that no such events had occurred. And had the US Embassy and the State
Department conducted an investigation? My memory, he said, is that we did,
but I don't want to swear to it, because I'd have to go back and look at the
cables. But there had been no State Department inquiry; Abrams, in his
lawyerly fashion, was being disingenuous. Three years earlier, when two
American journalists reported that an elite, US-trained military unit had
massacred hundreds of villagers in El Mozote, Abrams told Congress that the
story was commie propaganda, as he fought for more US aid to El Salvador's
military. The massacre, as has since been confirmed, was real. And in 1993
after a UN truth commission, which examined 22,000 atrocities that occurred
during the twelve-year civil war in El Salvador, attributed 85 percent of the
abuses to the Reagan-assisted right-wing military and its death-squad allies,
Abrams declared, The Administration's record on El Salvador is one of
fabulous achievement. Tell that to the survivors of El Mozote.

But it wasn't his lies about mass murder that got Abrams into trouble. After
a contra resupply plane was shot down in 1986, Abrams, one of the
coordinators of Reagan's pro-contra policy (along with the NSC's Oliver North
and the CIA's Alan Fiers), appeared several times before Congressional
committees and withheld information on the Administration's connection to the
secret and private contra-support network. He also hid from Congress the fact
that he had flown to London (using the name Mr. Kenilworth) to solicit a
$10 million contribution for the contras from the Sultan of Brunei. At a
subsequent closed-door hearing, Democratic Senator Thomas Eagleton blasted
Abrams for having misled legislators, noting that Abrams's misrepresentations
could lead to slammer time. Abrams disagreed, saying, You've heard my
testimony. Eagleton cut in: I've heard it, and I want to puke. On another
occasion, Republican Senator Dave Durenberger complained, I wouldn't trust
Elliott any further than I could throw Ollie North. Even after Abrams copped
a plea with Independent Counsel Lawrence Walsh, he refused to concede that
he'd done anything untoward. Abrams's Foggy Bottom services were not retained
by the First Bush, but he did include Abrams in his lame-duck pardons of
several Iran/contra wrongdoers.

Abrams was as nasty a policy warrior as Washington had seen in decades. He
called foes vipers. He said that lawmakers who blocked contra aid would
have blood on their hands--while he 

Re: [CTRL] Elliott Abrams- It's Back!

2001-06-16 Thread lassey

-Caveat Lector-

Lying to Congress-we all know that is okay any more. In fact, that
makes him qualified to hold high office.


On Fri, 15 Jun 2001 17:20:19 EDT William Shannon [EMAIL PROTECTED]
writes:
 A

HREF=http://www.thenation.com/doc.mhtml?i=20010702s=corn;http://www.th
enation.com/doc.mhtml?i=20010702s=corn/A



 COMMENT | July 2, 2001


 Elliott Abrams: It's Back!

 by DAVID CORN

 How would you feel if your wife and children were brutally raped
 before
 being hacked to death by soldiers during a military massacre of 800
 civilians, and then two governments tried to cover up the killings?
 It's a
 question that won't be asked of Elliott Abrams at a Senate
 confirmation
 hearing--because George W. Bush, according to press reports, may
 appoint
 Abrams to a National Security Council staff position that
 (conveniently!)
 does not require Senate approval. Moreover, this query is one of a
 host of
 rude, but warranted, questions that could be lobbed at Abrams, the
 Iran/contra
  player who was an assistant secretary of state during the Reagan
 years and a
 shaper of that Administration's controversial--and deadly--policies
 on Latin
 America and human rights. His designated spot in the new regime:
 NSC's senior
 director for democracy, human rights and international operations.
 (At press
 time, the White House and Abrams were neither confirming nor denying
 his
 return to government.)

 Bush the Second has tapped a number of Reagan/Bush alums who were
 involved in
 Iran/contra business for plum jobs: Colin Powell, Richard Armitage,
 Otto
 Reich and John Negroponte. But Abrams's appointment--should it come
 to
 pass--would mark the most generous of rehabilitations. Not only did
 Abrams
 plead guilty to two misdemeanor counts of lying to Congress about
 the Reagan
 Administration's contra program, he was also one of the fiercest
 ideological
 pugilists of the 1980s, a bad-boy diplomat wildly out of sync with
 Bush's
 gonna-change-the-tone rhetoric. Abrams, a Democrat turned Republican
 who
 married into the cranky Podhoretz neocon clan, billed himself as a
 gladiator for the Reagan Doctrine in Central America--which
 entailed
 assisting thuggish regimes and militaries in order to thwart leftist
 movements and dismissing the human rights violations of Washington's
 cold war
 partners.

 One Abrams specialty was massacre denial. During a Nightline
 appearance in
 1985, he was asked about reports that the US-funded Salvadoran
 military had
 slaughtered civilians at two sites the previous summer. Abrams
 maintained
 that no such events had occurred. And had the US Embassy and the
 State
 Department conducted an investigation? My memory, he said, is
 that we did,
 but I don't want to swear to it, because I'd have to go back and
 look at the
 cables. But there had been no State Department inquiry; Abrams, in
 his
 lawyerly fashion, was being disingenuous. Three years earlier, when
 two
 American journalists reported that an elite, US-trained military
 unit had
 massacred hundreds of villagers in El Mozote, Abrams told Congress
 that the
 story was commie propaganda, as he fought for more US aid to El
 Salvador's
 military. The massacre, as has since been confirmed, was real. And
 in 1993
 after a UN truth commission, which examined 22,000 atrocities that
 occurred
 during the twelve-year civil war in El Salvador, attributed 85
 percent of the
 abuses to the Reagan-assisted right-wing military and its
 death-squad allies,
 Abrams declared, The Administration's record on El Salvador is one
 of
 fabulous achievement. Tell that to the survivors of El Mozote.

 But it wasn't his lies about mass murder that got Abrams into
 trouble. After
 a contra resupply plane was shot down in 1986, Abrams, one of the
 coordinators of Reagan's pro-contra policy (along with the NSC's
 Oliver North
 and the CIA's Alan Fiers), appeared several times before
 Congressional
 committees and withheld information on the Administration's
 connection to the
 secret and private contra-support network. He also hid from Congress
 the fact
 that he had flown to London (using the name Mr. Kenilworth) to
 solicit a
 $10 million contribution for the contras from the Sultan of Brunei.
 At a
 subsequent closed-door hearing, Democratic Senator Thomas Eagleton
 blasted
 Abrams for having misled legislators, noting that Abrams's
 misrepresentations
 could lead to slammer time. Abrams disagreed, saying, You've
 heard my
 testimony. Eagleton cut in: I've heard it, and I want to puke. On
 another
 occasion, Republican Senator Dave Durenberger complained, I
 wouldn't trust
 Elliott any further than I could throw Ollie North. Even after
 Abrams copped
 a plea with Independent Counsel Lawrence Walsh, he refused to
 concede that
 he'd done anything untoward. Abrams's Foggy Bottom services were not
 retained
 by the First Bush, but he did include Abrams in his lame-duck
 pardons of
 several Iran/contra wrongdoers.

 Abrams was as nasty a policy warrior as 

[CTRL] Elliott Abrams- It's Back!

2001-06-15 Thread William Shannon
http://www.thenation.com/doc.mhtml?i=20010702s=corn



COMMENT | July 2, 2001


Elliott Abrams: It's Back!

by DAVID CORN

"How would you feel if your wife and children were brutally raped before
being hacked to death by soldiers during a military massacre of 800
civilians, and then two governments tried to cover up the killings?" It's a
question that won't be asked of Elliott Abrams at a Senate confirmation
hearing--because George W. Bush, according to press reports, may appoint
Abrams to a National Security Council staff position that (conveniently!)
does not require Senate approval. Moreover, this query is one of a host of
rude, but warranted, questions that could be lobbed at Abrams, the Iran/contra
 player who was an assistant secretary of state during the Reagan years and a
shaper of that Administration's controversial--and deadly--policies on Latin
America and human rights. His designated spot in the new regime: NSC's senior
director for democracy, human rights and international operations. (At press
time, the White House and Abrams were neither confirming nor denying his
return to government.)

Bush the Second has tapped a number of Reagan/Bush alums who were involved in
Iran/contra business for plum jobs: Colin Powell, Richard Armitage, Otto
Reich and John Negroponte. But Abrams's appointment--should it come to
pass--would mark the most generous of rehabilitations. Not only did Abrams
plead guilty to two misdemeanor counts of lying to Congress about the Reagan
Administration's contra program, he was also one of the fiercest ideological
pugilists of the 1980s, a bad-boy diplomat wildly out of sync with Bush's
gonna-change-the-tone rhetoric. Abrams, a Democrat turned Republican who
married into the cranky Podhoretz neocon clan, billed himself as a
"gladiator" for the Reagan Doctrine in Central America--which entailed
assisting thuggish regimes and militaries in order to thwart leftist
movements and dismissing the human rights violations of Washington's cold war
partners.

One Abrams specialty was massacre denial. During a Nightline appearance in
1985, he was asked about reports that the US-funded Salvadoran military had
slaughtered civilians at two sites the previous summer. Abrams maintained
that no such events had occurred. And had the US Embassy and the State
Department conducted an investigation? "My memory," he said, "is that we did,
but I don't want to swear to it, because I'd have to go back and look at the
cables." But there had been no State Department inquiry; Abrams, in his
lawyerly fashion, was being disingenuous. Three years earlier, when two
American journalists reported that an elite, US-trained military unit had
massacred hundreds of villagers in El Mozote, Abrams told Congress that the
story was commie propaganda, as he fought for more US aid to El Salvador's
military. The massacre, as has since been confirmed, was real. And in 1993
after a UN truth commission, which examined 22,000 atrocities that occurred
during the twelve-year civil war in El Salvador, attributed 85 percent of the
abuses to the Reagan-assisted right-wing military and its death-squad allies,
Abrams declared, "The Administration's record on El Salvador is one of
fabulous achievement." Tell that to the survivors of El Mozote.

But it wasn't his lies about mass murder that got Abrams into trouble. After
a contra resupply plane was shot down in 1986, Abrams, one of the
coordinators of Reagan's pro-contra policy (along with the NSC's Oliver North
and the CIA's Alan Fiers), appeared several times before Congressional
committees and withheld information on the Administration's connection to the
secret and private contra-support network. He also hid from Congress the fact
that he had flown to London (using the name "Mr. Kenilworth") to solicit a
$10 million contribution for the contras from the Sultan of Brunei. At a
subsequent closed-door hearing, Democratic Senator Thomas Eagleton blasted
Abrams for having misled legislators, noting that Abrams's misrepresentations
could lead to "slammer time." Abrams disagreed, saying, "You've heard my
testimony." Eagleton cut in: "I've heard it, and I want to puke." On another
occasion, Republican Senator Dave Durenberger complained, "I wouldn't trust
Elliott any further than I could throw Ollie North." Even after Abrams copped
a plea with Independent Counsel Lawrence Walsh, he refused to concede that
he'd done anything untoward. Abrams's Foggy Bottom services were not retained
by the First Bush, but he did include Abrams in his lame-duck pardons of
several Iran/contra wrongdoers.

Abrams was as nasty a policy warrior as Washington had seen in decades. He
called foes "vipers." He said that lawmakers who blocked contra aid would
have "blood on their hands"--while he defended US support for a
human-rights-abusing government in Guatemala. When Oliver North was
campaigning for the Senate in 1994 and was accused of having ignored contra
ties to drug dealers, Abrams backed North and 

Re: [CTRL] Elliott Abrams- It's Back!

2001-06-15 Thread Carl Amedio
In a message dated 6/15/01 4:20:34 PM Central Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:


Elliott Abrams: It's Back!


HURRAAA!!