-Caveat Lector-   <A HREF="http://www.ctrl.org/">
</A> -Cui Bono?-

 <A HREF="http://www.leaa.org/columbus.html">LEAA Special
Report: Feds
Taking Over Local Law Enforcement</A>
http://www.leaa.org/columbus.html

Feds Threaten To Take Over Ohio Police Department:
Could Your Town Be Next?

(The following is part of a special investigation by LEAA into the
ever-expanding role the Clinton/Gore Justice Department is taking in
controlling local law enforcement. Stay tuned for continued coverage
of this issue on a weekly basis. More information will also be
published in the next edition of LEAA's magazine, SHIELD.
Additionally, LEAA is sharing information with Calibre Press' Street
Survival Newsline who are helping bring this important news to law
enforcement officers across the country)


A legal battle is now being waged in U.S. District Court in
Columbus,
Ohio, pitting the legal weight and limitless financial resources of
the U.S. Justice Department against that town's right to control its
own police department. At stake is no less than the fate of local
agencies everywhere to control their own destinies versus an
emerging
pattern by the Clinton Justice Department aimed at federalizing
municipal police departments.

Unfortunately, Columbus isn't the first victim. Already federal
takeovers of
departmental policy have occurred in Steubenville, Ohio, and in
Pittsburgh,
Penn. The police administrators in these two cities were, more or
less, forced to sign consent decrees admitting their departments
had
participated in a pattern of civil rights violations and therefore
needed the federal

government to come in and run all future operations. What sets
Columbus apart, what makes them different from these other two
cities
which acquiesced, is that this municipality has a contract with the
local police union and can't make a deal with the devil without
approval of FOP members - and thankfully they're fighting. The city's
30-year history of collective bargaining with rank-and-file legally
forbids the city from exposing its

officers to many of the changes demanded by the DOJ.

Therefore, since Columbus and the police union have decided not to
sign the consent decree, the Department of Justice has filed a
lawsuit
against the city to recoup all federal grant money awarded over the
years. Some would call this extortion. Bill Capretta, president of the
Capitol City Lodge No. 9 of the Fraternal Order of Police in
Columbus,
says the lawsuit is the "latest step in a Justice Department
campaign
to impose federal (law enforcement) standards on police
departments
nationwide."

Alleging a "pattern of civil rights abuses" by the Columbus police
department, DOJ attorneys filed their suit on October 21 forcing
Columbus to let the federal government implement their policy
changes
in the city's police department, which would include training and
staffing reforms as well as new disciplinary and reporting
procedures.
The suit was apparently the culmination of a two-year investigation.

What's worse is that the city of Columbus and DOJ were
negotiating for
more than a year about the proposed consent decree, more or less
behind closed doors, and the FOP was barred from attending or
commenting on those proceedings. Just this past summer, the
police
union and its officer-members were notified that the federal takeover
of the department was underway.

Further proof of the Justice Department's arrogant and dismissive
attitude toward officers' participation in determining their own fate,
is in the request made by DOJ to the presiding court to postpone
deliberation on the suit until December 20, 1999. Police observers
believe that date was selected as a blatant move to deny officers a
role in the court proceedings since it comes one week after the
expiration of the FOP contract with the city of

Columbus, and therefore the union maybe precluded from having a
say in
the matter.

Nonetheless, officers in Columbus are demanding to be heard.
Shortly
after the DOJ filed suit against the city (when the city failed to
concede), the FOP filed a 19-page motion asking U.S. Judge John
D.
Holschuh to include the organization as a defendant in the DOJ
lawsuit. FOP President Capretta claimed in the motion that the
union
is best able to defend itself and rank-and-file officers against the
federal claims and protect their reputations, because the city has
its
own separate interests to look out

for.

To Be Continued...

Get full coverage of this story and other important issues by joining
LEAA Today! (click here)

<A HREF="http://www.ctrl.org/">www.ctrl.org</A>
DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER
==========
CTRL is a discussion & informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic
screeds are not allowed. Substance—not soap-boxing!  These are sordid matters
and 'conspiracy theory'—with its many half-truths, misdirections and outright
frauds—is used politically by different groups with major and minor effects
spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought. That being said, CTRL
gives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and always suggests to readers;
be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no credence to Holocaust denial and
nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.
========================================================================
Archives Available at:
http://home.ease.lsoft.com/archives/CTRL.html

http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
========================================================================
To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om

Reply via email to