-Caveat Lector- ----- Original Message ----- From: "Andrew Hennessey" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Friday, June 29, 2001 1:52 AM Subject: OLBER > > An Affirmation of Olbers Paradox - > > an ontological approach with reference to logical realism - andrew > hennessey > > I presented Olbers paradox ie.if the universe was infinite - there would be > an infinite amount of light and all of it would be here by now and the sky > would be white at night - as proof that there is ether holding up the > photons - because as we see the sky is dark at night. > But I am told Olber was dismissed because the Universe was deemed finite and > that there were only finite photons - therefore the night sky remains black. > > I would like to attempt to refute the concept of a finite universe with > reference to: > > 1. mathematical and logical ontology > 2. a non-linear chaos paradigm > 3. lack of validity of the empirical tools, models and processes used to > prove finity. > > and hence re-open the case for Olbers paradox as evidence for the existence > of ether. > > 1. with reference to the a priori tools and semantics we employ to > establish rationality in terms of logical realism - I would have to point > out that none of the ontology produces finite limits. > cf. Goedel numbering and the Turing problem - all of these a priori tools > tend to infinity - and hence the logical paradigm on which we base the > fundamentals of reason - can only point to infinity and it cannot be > logically proved otherwise. > > 2. the appearance of finite constraints is an irrational synthesis - eg. the > Koch Curve, Schifflers Horns all of these mechanisms are infinite > propositions in terms of fractals. > Indeed the chaos paradigm, emergence and other processes not only challenge > the classical physics; as was seen with Newtons [linear & rational] > Planetary Motions, but completely replace it with non-linear [and fractal] > chaos theory. > > 3. In order to bipass the empirical observation of the above two > propositions - to measure finity - certain assumptions, frames of reference > about the construction of the known cosmos have to have been made - eg. from > 2. the absolute non-linearity of the cosmos is proven, but Cosmologists eg. > Hawking have suggested that non-linearity is only partial eg. at black > holes. > Indeed there is a glaring disparity between known cosmology and recently > observed facts. > > To conclude, I suggest that the universe is indeed infinite, that Olbers > paradox is valid and consequently that Olbers paradox illustrates the > presence of Ether, and therefore highlights the lack of unity in the current > paradigm of Einstein. > > andrew hennessey > > <A HREF="http://www.ctrl.org/";>www.ctrl.org</A> DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER ========== CTRL is a discussion & informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic screeds are unwelcomed. Substance—not soap-boxing—please! These are sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'—with its many half-truths, mis- directions and outright frauds—is used politically by different groups with major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought. That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply. Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector. ======================================================================== Archives Available at: http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html <A HREF="http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html";>Archives of [EMAIL PROTECTED]</A> http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/ <A HREF="http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/";>ctrl</A> ======================================================================== To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email: SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED] To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email: SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED] Om
