As everyone was thinking of Condit, Levy and Jenna..... -----Original Message----- From: "kate dixon" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Sun, 08 Jul 2001 11:49:40 +0800 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: 2 Articles re 4/5/01 Revelation of Rove's leak then coverup ofG.W. Bush cocaine How Karl Rove tricked the media into trashing the messenger while ignoring the message By Sander Hicks Publisher, Soft Skull Press Source: Online journal http://www.onlinejournal.com/Media/Hicks052301/hicks052301.html May 23, 2001 "They're heat! Furnace fodder!" snapped the vitriolic St. Martin's Vice President Sally J. Richardson to the New York Times on October, 23, 1999. I was doing maintenance work on my two buildings in New York's Lower East Side that Saturday morning; drinking black coffee. I was reading the entire national section of the Times to keep from having to start mopping. This story on the bottom of page A12 caught my eye: "Citing Distrust of Author, Publisher Kills Book on Bush." At first I laughed, imagining the problems we publishers have with our prickly and precious authors. As the head of a scrappy, fierce independent press, I had had authors thrown out of their own readings at Barnes & Noble for showing up with urine samples and drugs. I had had writers shout in my face, "Look, Sander, I am a genuis!" when working with me as an editor. How bad could St. Martin's writer be? I read on. Reporter Doreen Carvajal was level-headed about the salacious details: "The book's author, J.H. Hatfield, matched police photographs of a felon convicted of hiring a hit man 11 years ago in an unsuccessful car bombing of his boss. . . ." That was a new one. "Mr. Hatfield's book included claims from anonymous sources that Mr. Bush . . . was arrested in 1972 on cocaine possession charges that were later expunged by a judge as a favor to Mr. Bush's father." She then pointed out that although St. Martin's did not recant or question any of the material in the book, their chief counsel said they no longer viewed the author as credible. That week, I borrowed one of the rare, repossessed copies of the book from a friend and read it on a bus trip to Washington, DC. As I traveled to see my family, I used a pack of sticky notes to hit every page where I found something relevant, newsworthy and under-reported about Bush's past. Pretty soon, the book overflowed with the edges of sticky notes poking out like the feathers of a peacock. Bush dodged the draft, was a C student at Yale, lost a lot of other people's money in boom times in the Texas Oil market, was investigated by the SEC for insider trading. What a garish life of special favors, what a clear colorful pattern of cut corners, what blurry values. This book was well-sourced, consistent and professionally written. I came back to New York and maneuvered my company, Soft Skull Press, Inc., to step in and acquire the rights to the book. Meanwhile, Hatfield was in hiding. The tabloids were after him. Camera crews camped on his front lawn for two weeks. The phone rang off the hook. They all wanted to know who the confidential sources were who fed him the story, but Hatfield stuck to his journalistic code. He had sworn to the sources they would be talking to him under condition of anonymity. Two months after the bloody October of Hatfield's public destruction, the media kept up steady fire. With no sources revealed, the focus of feature coverage in print and on television shifted fast from reporting on Hatfield's Bush story to loud, loose talk about Hatfield's crime. The major media tended to sing the same chorus: "How ironic, this Hatfield who was involved in a dirty plot to kill his boss in 1987 is trying to verify these rumors about young Bush being arrested for cocaine possession in 1972. But this story couldn't be true, of course, since Hatfield's a criminal . . . right?" I begged J.H. Hatfield to come back to New York, to set the record straight in a taping of an episode for 60 Minutes. It was a crisp, sunny winter day in New York City. Although Hatfield had the flu, he taped his portion of the program early in the morning, and I went in later. After the taping, we walked through the Lower East Side. I had taken Hatfield and his lawyer to lunch at a Chinese restaurant. I needed to hold him to his promise to share the sources with me; I needed to see the phone and travel records. I needed to know the whole thing wasn't a big sick joke. I needed to be 100 percent sure. Part of me already believed in Jim Hatfield, because he had incredible heart, and hope. He believed in what we were doing. He stood behind all his research. We were both mavericks, just trying to do the right thing and not get killed. His lawyer and my co-worker at Soft Skull went back to our basement office. Hatfield stopped on the corner of Ludlow and Rivington and turned to me in the bright light. His hands were stuffed deep into the pockets of his Navy peacoat. He looked tired, but determined. He looked down the street. "You've got to take this information with you to your grave. You've got to swear." I swore not to repeat it to anyone. But I also knew that the truth is bigger than one person. We would both choose to reveal the sources publicly when the time was right, when we had no other choice. When we no longer had anything left to lose. "The Eufaula Connection? That was Karl T. Rove. The other top Bush advisor was Clay Johnson. The Bush confidante source, was his minister, Mayfield. Now you know. Remember, you've got to swear now. . . ." J.H. Hatfield had just identified Karl T. Rove, the Bush campaign's senior advisor to me personally as the primary source for the G.W. Bush cocaine arrest story. It took me that whole year to understand why Rove would do such a thing. How Rove Made Hatfield the Target to Take the Heat Off Bush When the media stumbled upon the story that George W. Bush was arrested for cocaine possession in 1972, it was through an anonymous tip reported by a columnist at Salon.com ("Bush Up To His Arse In Allegations! Sharp-Toothed E-Mail, Killer Bees and Bags of Worms. Will This Hound Hunt?" by Amy Reiter.) Hatfield's book was in final proofing stages when this hot story broke on August 25, 1999. The piece was the first to state that Bush had been arrested in the early '70s, and that he "was ordered by a Texas judge to perform community service in exchange for expunging his record showing illicit drug use," according to the source. To make matters worse that August, Bush went out on his own on the campaign trail and improvised on camera about his drug past. With his handlers out of town ghost-writing his 'autobiography,' he blurted out at a press conference that he hadn't done drugs since 1974. The media crowed at the spectacle. For instance, USA Today gushed, "Bush has admitted s! omething, but he refuses to say what." Hatfield, who long suspected something was awry in young Bush's playboy days, went back to his Texas sources to corroborate this story through Clay Johnson and Karl Rove, his regular sources of information. According to Hatfield, Rove and Johnson explained the cocaine arrest on the phone, under condition of anonymity. Rove had earlier taken Hatfield on a fishing trip to Lake Eufaula, OK, to discuss Bush, so his pseudonym in the Afterword became the cloak-and-daggeresque "The Eufaula Connection." Why choose Jim Hatfield? Hatfield had committed his 1987 crime in Dallas, where longtime Bush schoolmate and friend Clay Johnson was an associate. Johnson was friends with Hatfield's employers Larry Burke and Kay Burrow. He would have heard about the violent workplace conspiracy that stemmed from an illicit affair Burke was having with Burrow. Burrow had tried to blackmail Burke, and Hatfield took the fall for the attempt he arranged on Burrow's life at his boss Burke's request. Rove and Johnson further ensured they could discredit Hatfield by feeding him flawed information. They altered key facts in the cocaine arrest story, and thus raised the burden of proof for future reporters. At one point, Hatfield was told that the arresting judge was a Republican, a falsehood which, although easily detected, served to damage Hatfield's credibility. After St. Martin's rushed the cocaine arrest story into the book as an Afterword, suddenly The Dallas Morning News received the private, criminal record of J.H. Hatfield's felony in Texas. The News published an article about Hatfield's felonious past and it was all over for the Bush cocaine arrest story. This style of disinformation follows the pattern set by all masters of public opinion of the 20th Century. Karl T. Rove is an avid history buff, and applies what he reads. In just two short months he surgically removed the media's talk of the Bush drug arrest by feeding it to a biographer he knew had a felony conviction in his past. Hatfield broke the story, and then Rove broke Hatfield. The Bush Campaign's friends at the Dallas Morning News broke a salacious, mesmerizing story about a car-bomb, a hit man, a boss, a felony conviction, and the mass media's attention is focused en masse on Hatfield, who can't take the heat, denies the allegations and flees town. St. Martin's doesn't know what's going on, but suddenly they are getting threatened by Bush campaign lawyers who are "looking into" suing them. St. Martin's behavior becomes paranoid, they announce that they are pulling 88,000 copies of the book from stores. So much for America, so much for the Bill of Rights. Rove, Atwater and Horowitz Karl Rove met Lee Atwater in 1972, and shortly afterward was investigated by the Republican National Committee for teaching "dirty tricks" to college students. After G.W. Bush, Atwater and Rove created the Willie Horton scandal that scuttled Dukakis in 1988, Rove and Bush blindsided the popular incumbent Ann Richards in the Texas governor's race. Rove learned this strategy from Atwater—use the scare-tactics of shocking TV ads and personal attacks. Rove minimized Bush's public appearances and limited the spontaneous public speaking of the tongue-tied Bush, a tactic Rove revived in the recent race for president. Rove used Governor Bush's re-election campaign in 1998 as an opportunity to portray Bush as White House material, even if it meant falsifying data on minority voting. Rove made Bush campaign hard to decimate his already weak opponent Gary Mauro. With the "landslide," they created the impression of a racially-diverse, popular mandate, setting the stage for the superficially inclusive "Compassionate Conservatism" two years later. Rove is a tough, burly, folksy character, a self-educated historian who never finished college. A life-long Republican strategist (and former consultant to tobacco giant Phillip Morris), he is known for discipline and hard-right ideological rigor. Yet, he is also known to burst spontaneously into song. Like Bush, he speaks in the common tongue. On television during the campaign, he was pugnacious, and taunting, calling opponents (like Mike Murphy of the McCain campaign), "Man." This salty use of late 60's youth culture slang belies Rove's identity as a leading conservative intellectual and a highly disciplined right-wing politico. Historically, Rove draws lessons from Machiavelli and Disraeli. He is in the tradition of such contemporary thinkers as Myron Magnet, Gertrude Himmelfarb, and James Q. Wilson, who shrink at the dynamism and inclusive energy of modern thought, and instead call for various returns to bygone eras. After eight years of Bill Clinton, the Republicans were eager for blood. Rove turned to ex-Marxist David Horowitz, biographer of the Rockefellers and Kennedys, and author of Radical Son, the memoir of Horowitz's transformation from 60's Leftist to neoconservative. For Campaign 2000, Horowitz wrote a book called The Art of Political War, in which he claimed that the left had a monopoly on strategy, aggression and tactics. The Republicans would not reclaim the White House until they crushed their opponent with the mercilessness of total war. Horowitz's story is that of a generation of 60's radicals who rebelled against war and imperialism, while simultaneously rejecting the Stalinist legacy of the previous generation's Left. Horowitz's parents were life-long devotees of the Communist Party, USA, but Horowitz was a leading New Left communist until he witnessed violence in his association with the Black Panthers. He was so shaken that his politics veered off to the far right. Today, he is best-known as the recent author of inflammatory ads in college newspapers against slavery reparations for African-Americans. Horowitz wrote The Art of Political War to call on New Republicans to create a politics that appealed to the masses: the working poor, the working families, gays, unions, etc. Karl Rove praised The Art of Political War as "A perfect pocket guide to winning on the political battlefield" in its cover blurb. It is recognized today as the genesis of "Compassionate Conservatism" and is used nationwide bythe Republican Party Chairs in 32 states. ..................... George W. Bush's Brain? How Karl T. Rove Used Fortunate Son to Stick George W. Bush in the White House Source: Softskull press http://www.softskull.com/catalog/hatfield/fs_karlrove.html by Sander Hicks All his life, George W. Bush has been allowed to cheat to get by. You see this in Fortunate Son, starting with the special favors Bush enjoyed in his youth, such as the family connections that shielded him from the ugly realities of Vietnam. The same pattern continued into his adulthood, when the careful, strategic handling of his advisors won him the Presidency. In 1989, Bush himself said "You know I could run for governor, but I’m basically a media creation…I’ve never done anything." Bush campaigned in the 1994 race for governor of Texas solely on his record as a "businessman." The sharp-tongued, popular incumbent Governor Ann Richards asked why all the businesses Bush had run since 1979 lost a combined $371 million. Bush was instantly put on television to plead with her to cease "these personal attacks." He eventually won this race with manipulative strategies, heavy spending and scare-tactic TV ads. In office, Governor Bush relaxed environmental controls to stick Texas with one of the highest concentrations of air and water pollution in the country, allowed 134 executions, and allowed the gulf between rich and poor to grow out of control. Bush limited access to abortions and legalized concealed handguns despite protests from law enforcement. He even refused to pass hate crimes laws after the murder of James Byrd by three racists,! saying that legislation was unnecessary, because "all crimes are hate crimes." Bush spent his youth in a haze of debauchery, and while that’s understandable for one whose life is so empty, what Soft Skull finds exceptional is his lack of accountability. It is commonly believed that Bush was busted for cocaine possession in 1972, but records of the arrest were expunged as a special family favor. Once again, Bush didn’t have to play by the rules, he was given special treatment over the rest of us commoners. On the campaign trail for President, Bush couldn’t seem to keep quiet about his drug past. In August 1999, with his handlers out of town ghost-writing his "autobiography," he blurted out at a press conference that he hadn’t done drugs since 1974. The media crowed at the spectacle–another deer in the headlights, another conservative politician who puts his foot in his mouth on camera. Now imagine you’re Bush’s senior adviser, Karl T. Rove. It’s August 1999, 18 months from the election. This means that in just 18 months, you have to transform the public image of a right-wing incompetent into a "man of the people." This was not a small job: Karl Rove and company had to take an unproven, spoiled rich kid, and create a competent, eloquent, likable man. Rove is no angel. In the 70’s, he had been investigated by the Republican National Committee for teaching seminars on political "dirty tricks" to college students, and, like George W. Bush, trained under cagey campaign strategist Lee Atwater.1 But after managing Bush’s successful campaigns for governor in Texas, Rove was set to reinvent Bush as Predidential timber. In January of 2000, a year away from the election, The New York Times’ Frank Bruni reported on Rove’s passionate, almost homoerotic, dedication to Bush: "When Mr. Rove talks about Mr. Bush, he radiates a regard for him that goes beyond professional obligation or selfish investment in Mr. Bush’s fortune. It is more like a crush, both platonic and political, and it underscores the oddness of this particular couple: the pale, intense, bookish Mr. Rove and the ruddy, easygoing, folksy Mr. Bush."2 After the "election," Rove was chided for taking maximum credit for placing Bush in the White House. The New York Times reported "He committed a subtle breach of Bush-world etiquette at an election post-mortem at the University of Pennsylvania last weekend, when he took responsibility–and credit–for many of the candidate’s moves."3 As David Shribman asked, in the Boston Globe magazine in July of 2000, "Is there a place where George W. Bush ends and Karl Rove begins? Are you the wizard behind the curtain of George W.? Are you George W. Bush’s brain?"4 Hatfield was the Stalking Horse When Bush blurted out that he hadn’t done drugs since 1974, Rove probably realized he needed to find a way to remove discussion of Bush’s drug past from the national discussion so thoroughly that even Bush himself couldn’t bring it up again. Right around August 1999, when Bush made that blunder at his solo news conference, J. H. Hatfield’s biography Fortunate Son was in its final stages with its original publisher, St. Martin’s Press. In the late 1980’s in Texas, Hatfield had made the acquaintance of Clay Johnson, Bush’s lifelong friend and advisor to Bush as Governor. An author of several nonfiction books, Hatfield decided that his personal connections to the candidate would make for a great insider’s biography of Bush. He contacted Rove and Johnson and interviewed them at length. Hatfield mistakenly assumed that Johnson and Rove weren’t aware of his 1988 conviction for solicitation of capital murder (the result of a workplace conspiracy gone horribly awry). Hatfield had served five years in the penitentiary, but emerged and reinvented himself as a successful author of pop-culture guides and biographies. Rove and Johnson realized that, in Hatfield, they had found their solution to Bush’s drug problem. Hatfield’s book was in final proofing stages when a story broke on the online magazine Salon.5 The piece stated that Bush had been arrested in the early ’70s for drug use, and that he "was ordered by a Texas judge to perform community service in exchange for expunging his record showing illicit drug use," according to an anonymous tip-off. This article was the first to suggest that Bush did community service in Houston in exchange for having his record expunged. Hatfield went to work corroborating this story through Johnson and Rove, his regular sources of information. According to Hatfield, Rove and Johnson discussed the cocaine arrest on the phone, under condition of anonymity. Rove had earlier taken Hatfield on a fishing trip to Lake Eufaula, Oklahoma, to discuss Bush.6 Rove and Johnson apparently altered key facts in the story in an effort to discredit Hatfield–and thus they raised the burden of proof for future reporters. At one point, Hatfield was told that the arresting judge was a Republican, a falsehood which, although easily detected, served to damage Hatfield’s credibility. St. Martin’s rushed the cocaine arrest story into the book as an Afterword, and foresaw skyrocketing sales upon publication, an automatic cover story in the New York Times, and a spot on the Today show. But instead, they ran into a media firestorm and threats of possible lawsuits from the Bush campaign. In a panic, St. Martin’s pressured Hatfield to reveal the identity of his confidential sources. He refused. The Dallas Morning News happened to suddenly receive private, confidential information on Hatfield’s criminal background, and published an article about Hatfield’s felonious past. Hatfield quickly claimed that the Dallas Morning News had gotten him mixed up with another person bearing the same name, and promptly fled. He returned home to Arkansas, to find camera crews camped out outside his home. The story became an exercise in irony. St. Martin’s panicked. They pulled 70,000 copies out of bookstores and promised to burn them. The message from influential media like 60 Minutes and media magazine Brill’s Content became: Isn’t it awful that felons are writing books about poor put-upon Presidential candidates? Where were the fact-checkers? When my company, Soft Skull Press, acquired the rights to republish Fortunate Son, Hatfield proudly phoned Clay Johnson and informed him that the campaign to discredit him and his story hadn’t been 100% successful. Johnson responded with a variety of harsh threats to be implemented if Fortunate Son made its way back into print. We believed that this was a bluff, and printed 45,000 copies in January, 2000. CBS’ 60 Minutes broadcast a piece on Hatfield and his book, titled "Unfortunate and Untrue?" The segment concentrated on Hatfield’s checkered past: they simply assumed that Hatfield must have gotten the story wrong. We were later told by 60 Minutes that they attempted to corroborate the Bush cocaine arrest story in the brief time they had in their production schedule, but couldn’t find anything. In other words, 60 Minutes chose to side with the establishment powers rather than a maverick biographer with a criminal record. Their decision, while probably safer, was neither truth-serving nor journalistically rigorous. How interesting then to see Bush himself effectively admit that Hatfield got the story right. In September of 2000, Brill’s Content printed an interview with Bush which produced his very telling slips of the tongue on Fortunate Son: "I think the book was outrageous. And, to the credit of my staff and Pete Slover from the [Dallas] Morning News who blew the whistle on the fraudulent nature of the writer. There is no recourse." There is no recourse? In his normally fragmented, stream-of-conscious prose, is Bush admitting here that he used his staff strategists, friends in the media, and a bogus lawsuit as the only recourse against the truth? Bush states that they destroyed Hatfield’s "nature," by calling who Hatfield is "fraudulent," but never attacking the story’s facts. They let the eager media go to town on the author’s past, but never do they expose the actual Afterword of Fortunate Son as "fraudulent." (For further analysis of other parts of this interview, see Mark Crispin Miller’s excellent new Foreword, pp. xi- xii.) Many times, Bush and company called Hatfield a "science fiction" writer, which is inaccurate, since our author’s other titles include biographies and pop culture reference books, but not science fiction. Shortly after we re-published Fortunate Son, Soft Skull, its author, and several major chain booksellers who had stocked the book were hit with a lawsuit. The suit did not come directly from the Bush campaign, but we long suspected that there was a relationship between members of the Bush campaign and the plaintiffs. We made a motion in a Texas Federal Court to discover exactly what this relationship was, but the magistrate judge wanted more proof first that such a relationship might exist first, before he would allow an investigation into that very question. After all the media overexposure and the legal harassment, not everyone had the courage to stand by our side. Our distributor at the time–who were not even named in the lawsuit–terminated distribution of the book at the beginning of February 2000. Public opinion is something created, and it had been created to destroy J.H. Hatfield and his book. Despite our desperate pleas, our former distributor shut down the entire sales and distribution chain for Fortunate Son. It hasn’t been distributed to stores in over a year, until now, thanks to the good people of Publisher’s Group West. Reading and editing Fortunate Son taught me a lot about George W. Bush, the man we will spend the next four years fighting at every turn. Publishing Fortunate Son taught me some hard lessons about America and the power of privilege. 1. "Behind Bush Juggernaut: An Aide's Labor of Loyalty, New York Times, January 11, 2000. 2. Ibid. Also--compare this semi-critical journalism in 2000 to Mr. Bruni's Times feature a year later "Architect of Bush Presidency Still Builds Bridges to Power." New York Times, Sunday, February 18, 2001. With Bush and Rove in power, the Times omitted the critical background information on Rove's relationship with Atwater, and the "dirty tricks" accusation from the R.N.C. 3. "Architect of Bush Presidency Still Builds Bridges to Power." New York Times, Sunday, February 18, 2001. 4. "As Chief Strategist for the Bush Campaign, Karl Rove Tells the Candidate What to Say, When to Say It, How to Say It, and Where to Say It. And Bush is Listening," July 23, 2000, Boston Globe Magazine. 5. "Bush Up to His Arse in Allegations! Sharp-Toothed E-Mail, Killer Bees and Bag of Worms. Will This Hound Hunt?" by Amy Reiter, August 25, 1999. 6. The Publisher holds copies of Hatfield's phone and travel records which prove to us that he was in Lake Eufaula, OK, at the time claimed, and that he did, in the summer of 1999, make phone connections with the private phone numbers of Johnson and Rove. --
