-Caveat Lector-

> Jonah Goldberg
>      A Mexican suicide bomber walked into a pizza restaurant in a
> Santa Fe,
> N.M., mall this morning, killing at least 15 people, mostly children.
> Up to a
> hundred others were wounded.
>      The bodies of two young boys who had been playing hooky from
> school were
> found in a cave outside of Phoenix. They had been beaten to death,
> and their
> bodies mutilated. Authorities are looking for Navajo separatists they
> believe
> are responsible.
>      Militia in Tijuana, Mexico, fired rocket grenades into downtown
> San
> Diego, killing 20, wounding 50 and, once again, snarling morning
> traffic.
>      It's more than a little uncomfortable ascribing such barbarous
> crimes to
> completely innocent folk. Still, imagine if such things happened here
> instead
> of in Israel on an almost daily basis. How do you think the United
> States
> would respond?
>      Indeed, the comparison is less outlandish than you might think.
> After
> all, the United States took land from American Indians. It took land
> from
> Mexicans. In a sense, "we" even took land from the British. And, no
> matter
> how you slice it, America's claim to Texas and the Southwest is
> certainly far
> less morally compelling than Israel's is to its land.
>      When the European Jews not already living in Palestine arrived
> there
> after World War II, the area was largely empty. What is today called
> Jordan
> was the historic home of many "Palestinians." And, after all, even
> the most
> militant Muslim must concede that the Bible places the land as the
> historic
> home of the Jews.
>      Meanwhile, when European colonists came to North America, they
> had no
> historical claim to the land whatsoever and, besides, it was
> occupied.
>      But for the sake of argument, imagine if Mexican irredentists or
> Indian
> militants took it upon themselves to routinely blow up innocent
> civilians.
> America, conventional wisdom dictates, couldn't handle watching young
>
> (italics) soldiers (end italics) being killed in Vietnam. How would
> they
> handle seeing young girls shopping for the prom being blown to
> unrecognizable
> bits outside the Gap? Or US Army Reservists being killed by mobs of
> Mexican
> day-workers? Or old ladies being shot by sniper fire?
>      My guess is that most Americans would see, with abundant
> clarity, that
> such violence would have to be stopped. Unfortunately, Israel doesn't
> get the
> same consideration.
>      Last week, when a suicide bomber blew up a Sbarro restaurant in
> Jerusalem full of kids, killing 15 people and wounding 100, Israel
> responded
> by seizing control of some Palestinian military installations.
>      Secretary of State Colin Powell's response? "I hope that both
> sides will
> act with restraint," Powell said. "They both have to do everything
> they can
> to restrain the violence, restrain the provocation and the
> counter-response
> to the provocation."
>      This is the equivalent of saying that if someone sucker-punches
> you, you
> are just as wrong for punching him back in self-defense.
>      In fact, it's worse than that because Israel never (italics)
> intends
> (end italics) to kill innocents. When terrorists kill Israeli
> civilians,
> Israelis attack terrorist strongholds, military targets and
> bomb-making
> infrastructures.
>      Sometimes, they've even used rubber bullets. But even when the
> "payback"
> is unambiguously severe, it is always delivered to grown-up, declared
>
> combatants. Hence, when Palestinian innocents die it is virtually
> always an
> unfortunate byproduct of Israeli action. When Palestinians kill,
> innocents
> are the target.
>      And yet, night after night, the American media feel compelled to
> list
> Israel's unintended casualties alongside Yasser Arafat and Hamas'
> intended
> casualties. For example, when two Jewish boys (one of them American)
> were
> beaten to death in a cave last May, press reports linked it to the
> death of a
> Palestinian baby killed by accident in a crossfire two days earlier.
>      ``In a region seemingly numb to violence, the deaths of both
> Palestinian
> and Israeli youngsters have struck nerves on both sides of the
> conflict,"
> reported a CNN correspondent.
>      But the baby was shot by accident when Israeli soldiers were
> returning
> fire on mortars. The baby was, tragically, in the way. But the two
> Jewish
> kids were simply murdered. If an American cop shoots a kid by
> accident in a
> crossfire, would it then be OK to go out and shoot two kids because
> their
> parents are police officers? Well, that's precisely the moral
> equivalence
> we've established for the Middle East.
>      Israel offered a stunningly generous peace settlement to Yasser
> Arafat
> in the last days of the Clinton Administration. I thought it was
> foolish at
> the time, but it turned out to be fortunate, because it showed that
> the
> Palestinians cannot accept peace.
>      When Arafat turned down the ultimate land-for-peace deal, even
> Israeli
> doves knew, finally, that Israel is the only party willing to take
> peace
> seriously. If someone refuses to pay you $1 for your car, you know he
> was
> never serious about buying it in the first place.
>      So now Israel is in a situation where its enemies have declared
> war, but
> it cannot. Because even when Israel merely responds to terror, it is
> called
> no better than a terrorist. And that is a disgrace.
>      You can write to Jonah Goldberg in care of this newspaper or by
> e-mail
> at [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> Goldberg is the editor of National Review Online (
> http://www.nationalreview.com).
>
> http://www.washtimes.com/commentary/goldberg.htm
>
>


__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Make international calls for as low as $.04/minute with Yahoo! Messenger
http://phonecard.yahoo.com/

<A HREF="http://www.ctrl.org/";>www.ctrl.org</A>
DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER
==========
CTRL is a discussion & informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic
screeds are unwelcomed. Substance—not soap-boxing—please!  These are
sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'—with its many half-truths, mis-
directions and outright frauds—is used politically by different groups with
major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought.
That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and
always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no
credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.
========================================================================
Archives Available at:
http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html
 <A HREF="http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html";>Archives of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]</A>

http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
 <A HREF="http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/";>ctrl</A>
========================================================================
To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om

Reply via email to