-Caveat Lector-

http://www.freemasonwatch.freepress-freespeech.com/disco_bombing.html

WSW.org
http://www.wsws.org/news/1998/aug1998/bomb1-a27.shtml

German TV exposes CIA, Mossad links to 1986 Berlin
disco bombing

By a German correspondent

27 August 1998

A documentary broadcast August 25 by German public
television presents compelling evidence that some of
the main suspects in the 1986 Berlin disco bombing,
the event that provided the pretext for a US air
assault on Libya, worked for American and Israeli
intelligence.

The report, aired by Zweites Deutsches Fernsehen (ZDF
television), is of the greatest relevance to events of
the past three weeks, in which attacks on US embassies
in Kenya and Tanzania have become the justification
for US missile strikes against Afghanistan and Sudan,
and a shift in American foreign policy to an even more
unbridled use of military force internationally.

With Washington declaring "war against terrorism" and
arrogating to itself the right to use its military
might unilaterally against any target anywhere in the
world, the German TV report raises the most serious
and disturbing questions. All the more so, since the
US media and leading Republican politicians, within
hours of the American embassy bombings, began citing
Reagan's 1986 air attack on Libya as an exemplary
response to terrorist attacks, and pressed Clinton to
carry out similar military action.

The air strike on Libya

On April 15, 1986 US war planes bombed the Libyan
cities of Tripoli and Benghazi. They destroyed the
home of Libyan leader Muammar Gaddafi and killed at
least 30 civilians, including many children. Gaddafi
himself, the main target of the air strike, was not
hurt.

Two hours later President Ronald Reagan justified the
unprecedented attack on a sovereign country and its
head of state in a national television address. The
US, Reagan claimed, had "direct, precise and
irrefutable" proof that Libya was responsible for a
bomb blast in a West Berlin discotheque. The explosion
10 days earlier at the disco La Belle, a favorite
nightspot for US soldiers, had killed three people and
injured 200.

Since November of 1997 five defendants have been on
trial in a Berlin court for their alleged involvement
in the La Belle attack. But in the course of more than
half a year the case has proceeded very slowly. ZDF
television, which carried out its own investigation
into the case, explained why in the August 25
documentary produced by its political magazine
Frontal.

What the German documentary reveals

The Frontal report arrives at the following
conclusions:

1) The lead defendant presently on trial, Yasser
Chraidi, is very possibly innocent, and is being used
as a scapegoat by German and American intelligence
services.

2) At least one of the defendants, Musbah Eter, has
been working for the CIA over many years.

3) Some of the key suspects have not appeared in
court, because they are being protected by Western
intelligence services.

4) At least one of those, Mohammed Amairi, is an agent
of Mossad, the Israeli secret service.

The man charged with being the mastermind of the La
Belle attack, 38-year-old Yasser Chraidi, was a driver
at the Libyan embassy in East Berlin in 1986. He later
moved to Lebanon, from whence he was extradited to
Germany in May 1996.

Frontal interviewed the two Lebanese responsible for
the extradition of Chraidi: the former public
prosecutor Mounif Oueidat and his deputy Mrad Azoury.
Both confirm that the German authorities used deceit
to have Chraidi extradited.

According to Azoury, he received no evidence that
Chraidi was actually involved in the attack; there
were only "hints." Oueidat states that the Germans
showed tremendous interest in getting Chraidi. "The
Americans were behind this demand," he says. "This was
obvious. They spurred on the Germans to speed up the
extradition."

Eventually Chraidi, declared to be a "top terrorist,"
was flown to Germany in a spectacular security
operation. But a Berlin judge found the evidence
presented by the prosecution so weak, he threatened to
release Chraidi within three weeks unless more proof
was presented.

At this point another man was brought into the case,
who, according to Frontal, "was obviously supposed to
be spared by the prosecution until then." On September
9, 1996, the very day the Berlin judge threatened to
release Chraidi, Berlin public prosecutor Detlev
Mehlis, Berlin police inspector Uwe Wilhelms and a Mr.
Winterstein of the German Federal Intelligence Service
(BND) met Musbah Eter in the Mediterranean island
state of Malta.

CIA involvement

The meeting had been prepared by the BND, which
maintains close connections to its American
counterpart, the CIA. Musbah Eter was running an
international business in Malta, which, according to
Frontal, served as a cover for extensive intelligence
operations on behalf of the CIA.

The German authorities wanted him on a murder charge.
But during the Malta meeting a deal was struck:
"Immunity for Eter, if he incriminates Chraidi for La
Belle." The next day Eter went to the German embassy
and testified. As a result, the warrant against him
was scrapped and he was allowed to travel to Germany.

In the words of Frontal, Eter is "the key figure in
the La Belle trial." At the time of the disco bomb
attack he worked for the Libyan embassy in East
Berlin. But he paid regular visits to the US embassy.
According to Christian Ströbele, the lawyer for
Chraidi, this highly unusual fact is proven by
extensive notes of the East German secret police, who
watched Eter very closely at the time.

There are many indications that Eter was actively
involved in the La Belle bombing. According to
interrogation transcripts studied by Frontal, he had
the detailed knowledge of a participant. He even
admitted that he brought the operating instructions
for the bomb to the flat of a codefendant.

Frontal asserts that besides the defendants in the
present trial, another group was involved in the La
Belle bombing--a group of professional terrorists,
working for anybody who paid them, led by a certain
"Mahmoud" Abu Jaber. Members of this group, according
to Frontal, "have barely been bothered by the
prosecution and live securely in other countries."

In the months preceding the La Belle attack they lived
in East Berlin and met, almost on a daily basis, with
the present defendants. Hours before the attack they
moved to West Berlin, where the bomb exploded. Their
movements were monitored by the East German and
Russian secret services, who concluded that they were
working for Western intelligence.

The Russian KGB, in a document cited by Frontal, gave
the opinion that American counterintelligence planned
to use "Mahmoud" to concoct a case for the involvement
of Libyan terrorists in the attack. According to the
same KGB document, "Mahmoud" had warned West Berlin
intelligence two days before the explosion.

Frontal followed the traces of Mohammed Amairi, the
right-hand man of "Mahmoud" Abu Jaber, who, according
to the documents it has studied, "was particularly
involved in the preparation of the La Belle attack."

An agent of Mossad

Amairi left Germany for Norway in 1990, when a warrant
was issued for his arrest. He now lives in the
Norwegian town of Bergen, where Frontal found and
interviewed him. He stopped the interview when he was
asked what secret service he had been working for. His
lawyer, Odd Drevland, finally told the story.

When Amairi moved to Norway he was arrested and
branded "a danger to the country" on the front page of
tabloids. But then the Israeli secret service Mossad
took charge of him and "everything changed."

"Was Amairi a Mossad agent?" asked Frontal. "He was a
Mossad man," answered Drevland.

In the meantime, Norway has granted asylum to Amairi
and he will soon receive Norwegian citizenship. The
Berlin prosecutor has lifted the warrant against him.

"These secret service intrigues present a task for the
Berlin court that is almost insoluble," concludes the
Frontal report. "But one thing is certain, the
American legend of Libyan state terrorism can no
longer be maintained."

There are striking parallels between the 1986 bombing
of Libya and last week's missile strikes against
targets in Sudan and Afghanistan. Once again
Washington claims to have "proof" to justify its use
of deadly force. But as the Frontal report shows, such
claims cannot be trusted. Twelve years after the
bombing of Libya, Reagan's proof turns out to be
anything but irrefutable. Instead there is powerful
evidence that the La Belle attack was a carefully
prepared provocation.

It may come as a shock to many Americans, all the more
so given the utterly venal and lying role of the US
media, but US intelligence services are well versed in
the most unscrupulous and bloody methods, not
excluding those that result in injury or death to
Americans. No serious consideration of the August 7
East African bombings can rule out the possibility of
a provocation, organized either directly or indirectly
by US agencies.

Certainly the US embassy bombings, with their terrible
human toll--for the most part, African--provided a
welcome pretext for forcing through a desired shift in
policy and obtaining public support for unilateral
military action. Indeed, within hours of the US
embassy bombings, the International Herald Tribune had
published a column declaring the attacks were "acts of
war and the United States could take reprisals against
the bombers under international law without the
approval of the United Nations."

We wait with interest to see whether any of the
American television networks--CBS, NBC, ABC, CNN--or
any of the establishment newspapers will even take
note of the German exposé of the events surrounding
the bombing of Libya. We have no expectation that they
will.



__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Buy the perfect holiday gifts at Yahoo! Shopping.
http://shopping.yahoo.com

<A HREF="http://www.ctrl.org/";>www.ctrl.org</A>
DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER
==========
CTRL is a discussion & informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic
screeds are unwelcomed. Substance—not soap-boxing—please!  These are
sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'—with its many half-truths, mis-
directions and outright frauds—is used politically by different groups with
major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought.
That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and
always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no
credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.
========================================================================
Archives Available at:
http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html
 <A HREF="http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html";>Archives of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]</A>

http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
 <A HREF="http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/";>ctrl</A>
========================================================================
To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om

Reply via email to