>
>====================
>
>
>
>
>"Gore Doesn't Seem to Trust People to Handle the Truth"
>by John R. Lott, Senior Research Scholar, Yale Law School
>from the Hartford Courant
>
>
>Vice President Gore is battling with Green Party candidate Ralph Nader for
>the hard-core environmentalist vote for president.  In response to
>environmentalists' claims that Gore is taking their votes for granted,
>Gore's campaign points to Gore's recently re-released book, "Earth in the
>Balance," as evidence of what his administration would do.  Indeed, if the
>book is a good indicator, the extremes to which it goes in supporting the
>environmentalist cause should give even the most radical environmentalists
>comfort.
>The book paints a grim future of overpopulation, mass starvation and death
>from disease and pollution, and suggests that only drastic changes in our
>lifestyles can prevent such a global nightmare.  The American automobile
is,
>for example, "more deadly than that of any military enemy we are ever again
>likely to confront."
>Gore expresses such great fear that he even proposes dispensing with the
>usual goal of an impartial press: The media should not give "equal weight"
>to both sides in environmental debates such as global warming, for "it
>undermines the effort to build a solid base of public support for difficult
>actions we must soon take."  Self-censorship is also justified because "98
>percent of the scientists" share his view that man-made pollution is
>responsible for global warming.
>His 98 percent figure, of course, represents just one of the book's many
>exaggerations.  At the time that he wrote the book, a Gallup poll revealed
>that only 18 percent of climate experts thought identifiable man-caused
>warming had occurred (whereas 49 percent held the opposite view and 33
>percent did not know).  Opinions today are similar.
>Gore advocates self-censorship on yet another ground:  People are addicted
>to consumption and will desperately grasp at false hopes to maintain their
>addiction.  The trouble supposedly started when God's importance in
peoples'
>lives diminished due to the start of the "scientific era."  In Gore's own
>words:
>"But with God receding from the natural world to an abstract place, the
>patriarchal figure in the family (almost always the father) effectively
>became God's viceroy, entitled to exercise godlike authority when enforcing
>the family's rules.  As some fathers inevitably began to insist on being
the
>sole source of authority, their children became confused about their own
>roles in a family system that was severely stressed by the demands of the
>dominant, all-powerful father. . . .
>"One of the ways dysfunctional families enforce adherence to rules and
>foster the psychic numbness on which they depend is by teaching the
>separation between mind and body and suppressing the feelings and emotions
>that might otherwise undermine the rules."
>How exactly fathers create this separation between their children's minds
>and bodies is never explained, but the resulting cleavage supposedly
>produces an emptiness that is alleviated only through consumption.  This
>"mental illness," as Gore labels it, has created for people the illusion
>that they want "the food on the supermarket shelves, the water in the
>faucets in our homes, the shelter and sustenance, the clothing and
>purposeful work, our entertainment."  He writes of "a false world of
plastic
>flowers and Astroturf, air conditioning and fluorescent lights . .  .
frozen
>food for the microwave oven."
>But even more worrisome is Gore's perspective of those who hold opposing
>views.  After classifying "denial" as a serious mental illness, Gore
charges
>that those who criticize environmental programs are themselves suffering
>from "a well-established form of denial."  Those who oppose him are not
just
>wrong, but sick.
>Largely because of people's inability to make the right decisions, Gore
>wants centralized government regulations to solve environmental problems.
>Take his example of California's water shortages during 1987-92.  While
>ignoring the oft-noted claim that extremely subsidized prices reduce
>farmers' incentives to carefully economize on water, Gore blames the
>shortage on farmers watering their crops so much that they stunt plant
>growth.  Gore's remedy is detailed watering regulations to keep apparently
>misguided farmers from harming their crops while simultaneously freeing up
>water for others.  As with essentially all environmental problems, Gore
sees
>the proper regulations as painlessly making everyone better off.
>Possibly Gore's view of most people not being able to handle the truth
>justifies his book presenting exaggerated claims and distorted evidence.
>After all, he is only following the advice that he has already given the
>media:  Make things look as bad as possible.
>Yet there is a nagging fear of what he might do if elected president.  What
>other policy issues are so compelling as to justify withholding evidence
>from voters?  When else will he discourage a free debate in the press and
>question the mental health of his opponents?
>
>=========
>
> CENTER-RIGHT is edited by Eugene Volokh, who teaches constitutional
>law, copyright law, and a seminar on firearms regulation at UCLA Law School
>(http://www.law.ucla.edu/faculty/volokh)
><http://www.law.ucla.edu/faculty/volokh)> , and organized with the help of
>Terry Wynn and the Federalist Society (http://www.fed-soc.org/)
><http://www.fed-soc.org/)> .
> Check out (and link to) our Web site,
> http://www.center-right.org/ <http://www.center-right.org/>
> To subscribe, visit our website.
>
>______________________________________________________________________
>To unsubscribe, write to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
><mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

<A HREF="http://www.ctrl.org/">www.ctrl.org</A>
DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER
==========
CTRL is a discussion & informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic
screeds are unwelcomed. Substance—not soap-boxing—please!  These are
sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'—with its many half-truths, mis-
directions and outright frauds—is used politically by different groups with
major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought.
That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and
always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no
credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.
========================================================================
Archives Available at:
http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html
 <A HREF="http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html">Archives of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]</A>

http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
 <A HREF="http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/">ctrl</A>
========================================================================
To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om

Reply via email to