[CTRL] interesting article on powers behind NWO
-Caveat Lector- http://www.rense.com/general66/passt.htm excerpt - Although most central bankers are racially Jewish, they belong to a Luciferian sect known as Sabbatean Frankists that actually hates the Jewish people and plots their ultimate destruction. Svali, a former Illuminati trainer said, "I have always wondered why some of the highest ranking financial families in the group (baron Rothschild of France is one of the 13 European lords, or "kings" that run the group in Europe, and sits on the World Council) are Jewish, yet the group espouses hatred of their own race." http://www.savethemales.ca/141002.htmlThe Sabbateans are behind Zionism, Communism (and possibly Nazism) and are responsible for war and for the Jewish holocaust. They remove the Ten Commandments as well as references to Christ from public places. They make the Jewish people their instruments and eventually their scapegoats.__Do You Yahoo!?Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the www.ctrl.org DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER == CTRL is a discussion & informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic screeds are unwelcomed. Substance—not soap-boxing—please! These are sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'—with its many half-truths, mis- directions and outright frauds—is used politically by different groups with major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought. That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply. Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector. Archives Available at: http://www.mail-archive.com/ctrl@listserv.aol.com/ ctrl To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email: SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED] To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email: SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED] Om best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com
[CTRL] Interesting article on War, Politics, Culture
-Caveat Lector- Hello CTRL: Your friend Euphorian considered the following article interesting and wanted to send it to you. War Veterans Gather To Stop A New War (Date: 2002-11-10 23:37:49) Topic: Articles & Essays URL: http://www.interventionmag.com/cms/modules.php?op=modload&name=News&file=article&sid=238 You can read interesting articles on War, Politics, Culture http://www.interventionmag.com/cms/ http://www.ctrl.org/";>www.ctrl.org DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER == CTRL is a discussion & informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic screeds are unwelcomed. Substancenot soap-boxingplease! These are sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'with its many half-truths, mis- directions and outright fraudsis used politically by different groups with major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought. That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply. Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector. Archives Available at: http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html";>Archives of [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://archive.jab.org/ctrl@;listserv.aol.com/ http://archive.jab.org/ctrl@;listserv.aol.com/">ctrl To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email: SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED] To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email: SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED] Om
[CTRL] Interesting article
-Caveat Lector- Rense.com How Long Can China Now Stand In The Shadows?By Joseph Ehrlich [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sender, Berl & Sons 10-13-2 First: Update on the sniper(s). We note that nearly two weeks into the terror, police are first checking into those with sniper training. The experts are discounting international terrorism because the number of deaths are contained, no massive strike for large numbers of casualties, a believed signature of genuine terrorism. This is because they are missing that the terrorism TO DATE HAS BEEN A MESSAGE. Now, it may escalate. They also seemed pretty slow in admitting to two sniper(s) preferring the psychotic scenario of one very sick person committing the crime. Now, finally they realize it has to be more than one. Moreover, once the message avenue is accepted, then it also ties into the type of people who are willing to shoot a child. Again, our initial perception was people paying America back for the deaths of children due to US policies. We have had our necks on the block on this matter since the first, and while slow, the experts are now confirming a disciplined trained person, which was obvious to us from the first. We continue to believe that the message will be amplified, or the terrorism further expanded, if we see two shootings within minutes in two different areas. Remember aside from the chaos and economic impact, if it is was we say, and remember it occurred literally hours after we expected it (formally for the first time since 9-11), one other critical message is that the US is one vulnerable country, inept, consistent the paper tiger image China paints for the US throughout the world. This message will be heightened should the two contemporary shootings take place, leaving the federal and state authorities which major egg on their faces. If we also are correct, these sniper(s) will not be taken alive, and may take many with them. We must also note that on the Sunday morning news shows there was absolute no discussion at all whatsoever regarding either the Bali terrorism and the Pakistani elections. Americans should cry as much over the reality of a controlled media as with the sniper(s), because such control in the long run will claim massive lives. So much meaningless news on the sniper(s) spending millions upon millions of man hours of production and audience on nothing meaningful and failing to discuss the true implications thereof. As a result, then speak about Bali and Pakistan two news stories carrying incredible significance in the view of the congressional vote this week. Analysis: On June 25, 2002, we wrote that President Bush in his Rose Garden remarks on June 24, 2002, took the battle from Israel and the PLO and made it one between the New World Order and Islam. We wrote that Oslo united the Arab world against Israel, and now, from his remarks, President Bush united the Islamic world against the United States and the West. Further, to make it crystal clear, President Bush issued on September 20, 2002, the historical National Security Strategy document, letting not only the Islamic world but the entire world know that new US policy was to pursue any perceived enemy at any time to undermine the enemy and colonize it to mold it into the New World Order image for that previous sovereign state. Moreover, we went deep into the interpretation to show that Israel itself was a successful target of the New World Order strategy and that with its controlled leadership and infiltrated infrastructure, Israel followed New World Order directives, to set up the Middle East region for New World Order domination and control. Saddam Hussein could have been one way or another removed from office, but he was kept around for the day the New World Order crew needed to capture Iraqi oil and establish a long term residency in the Middle East. The only dynamic we never would have seen or interpreted and which truly surprises us, if not shocks us, is that President Bush would so openly and brazenly let everyone know it, and act as if he didn't care whether anyone internationally or domestically knew no
[CTRL] Interesting article on War, Politics, Literature
-Caveat Lector- Hello CTRL: Your friend Euphorian considered the following article interesting and wanted to send it to you. The Selling Of A War: The War With Iraq (Date: 2002-09-10 16:20:03) Topic: Articles & Essays URL: http://www.interventionmag.com/cms/modules.php?op=modload&name=News&file=article&sid=175 You can read interesting articles on War, Politics, Literature http://www.interventionmag.com/cms/ http://www.ctrl.org/";>www.ctrl.org DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER == CTRL is a discussion & informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic screeds are unwelcomed. Substancenot soap-boxingplease! These are sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'with its many half-truths, mis- directions and outright fraudsis used politically by different groups with major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought. That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply. Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector. Archives Available at: http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html";>Archives of [EMAIL PROTECTED] http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/ http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/";>ctrl To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email: SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED] To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email: SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED] Om
[CTRL] Interesting Article
-Caveat Lector- There's an intriguing article by George Soros in "The New Republic (2 Sep 2002 issue). Prudy http://www.ctrl.org/";>www.ctrl.org DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER == CTRL is a discussion & informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic screeds are unwelcomed. Substancenot soap-boxingplease! These are sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'with its many half-truths, mis- directions and outright fraudsis used politically by different groups with major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought. That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply. Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector. Archives Available at: http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html";>Archives of [EMAIL PROTECTED] http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/ http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/";>ctrl To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email: SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED] To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email: SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED] Om
[CTRL] Interesting Article: Washington's NWO Weapons
-Caveat Lector-
There's been a lot of discussion about the HAARP project in conspiracy
theory circles. I'm not sure if there really is something going on here
(weather control as a weapon is not inherently unfeasible or absurd) -
does anyone else have any comments?
Chris
>
>It's not only greenhouse gas emissions: Washington's new world order
>weapons
>have the ability to trigger climate change
>
>http://www.transnational.org/forum/meet/2000/Chossu_GreenHouseHAARP.html
>
>By Michel Chossudovsky
>Professor of Economics, University of Ottawa and TFF associate,
>author of The Globalization of Poverty, second edition, Common
>Courage Press
>
>
>The important debate on global warming under UN auspices provides
>but a
>partial picture of climate change; in addition to the devastating
>impacts of
>greenhouse gas emissions on the ozone layer, the World's climate
>can now be
>modified as part of a new generation of sophisticated "non-lethal
>weapons."
>Both the Americans and the Russians have developed capabilities to
>manipulate
>the World's climate.
>In the US, the technology is being perfected under the
>High-frequency Active
>Aural Research Program (HAARP) as part of the ("Star Wars")
>Strategic Defence
>Initiative (SDI). Recent scientific evidence suggests that HAARP is
>fully
>operational and has the ability of potentially triggering floods,
>droughts,
>hurricanes and earthquakes.
>
>
>HAARP is a mass destructive weapons - not part of any negotiations
>From a military standpoint, HAARP is a weapon of mass destruction.
>Potentially, it constitutes an instrument of conquest capable of
>selectively
>destabilising agricultural and ecological systems of entire
>regions.
>While there is no evidence that this deadly technology has been
>used, surely
>the United Nations should be addressing the issue of "environmental
>warfare"
>alongside the debate on the climatic impacts of greenhouse gases.
>Despite a vast body of scientific knowledge, the issue of
>deliberate climatic
>manipulations for military use has never been explicitly part of
>the UN
>agenda on climate change. Neither the official delegations nor the
>environmental action groups participating in the Hague Conference
>on Climate
>Change (CO6) (November 2000) have raised the broad issue of
>"weather warfare"
>or "environmental modification techniques (ENMOD)" as relevant to
>an
>understanding of climate change.
>The clash between official negotiators, environmentalists and
>American
>business lobbies has centered on Washington's outright refusal to
>abide by
>commitments on carbon dioxide reduction targets under the 1997
>Kyoto
>protocol.(1) The impacts of military technologies on the World's
>climate are
>not an object of discussion or concern. Narrowly confined to
>greenhouse
>gases, the ongoing debate on climate change serves Washington's
>strategic and
>defense objectives.
>
>
>"Weather warfare"
>World renowned scientist Dr. Rosalie Bertell confirms that "US
>military
>scientists · are working on weather systems as a potential weapon.
>The
>methods include the enhancing of storms and the diverting of vapor
>rivers in
>the Earth's atmosphere to produce targeted droughts or floods."(2)
>Already in the 1970s, former National Security advisor Zbigniew
>Brzezinski
>had foreseen in his book "Between Two Ages" that:
>"Technology will make available, to the leaders of major nations,
>techniques
>for conducting secret warfare, of which only a bare minimum of the
>security
>forces need be appraised... [T]echniques of weather modification
>could be
>employed to produce prolonged periods of drought or storm. "
>Marc Filterman, a former French military officer, outlines several
>types of
>"unconventional weapons" using radio frequencies. He refers to
>"weather war,"
>indicating that the U.S. and the Soviet Union had already "mastered
>the
>know-how needed to unleash sudden climate changes (hurricanes,
>drought) in
>the early 1980s." (3) These technologies make it "possible to
>trigger
>atmospheric disturbances by using Extremely Low Frequency (ELF)
>radar
>[waves]." (4)
>A simulation study of future defense "scenarios" commissioned for
>the US Air
>Force calls for: "US aerospace forces to 'own the weather' by
>capitalizing on
>emerging technologies and focusing development of those
>technologies to
>war-fighting applications." From enhancing friendly operations or
>disrupting
>those of the enemy via small-scale tailoring of natural weather
>patterns to
>complete dominance of global communications and counterspace
>control,
>weather-modif
