Re: [CTRL] Larouche vs. Jesuits & Synarchists
-Caveat Lector- What the hell are you mewling about now you pious Whining Wuzzy McWindbag! Do you want a shoulder to cry on? Someone to hold your hand perhaps? What if Salter doesn't want to hold hands with Justin(e) Raimondo's Backdoor Bandit! Are you going to liken Salter to a "Nazi" or an "anti-Semite," words you've already used; if he diss's your phoney advances. You fouled-mouthed, scurrilous and obnoxious little prat. McMuttonHead; you came, you bitched, you got slapped-down. The cause of the latter was of your own making and nobody else's. Now you want somebody to mommy you, and pretend that your own foul and insidious mouth is not in fact your own worst enemy. You have a terminal case of foot-in-mouth. Here's something infinitely more interesting than McMoron's mind-farts. A fish flatus! http://www.zoology.ubc.ca/~bwilson/Herring_sound.wav Dave. - Original Message - From: Sean McBride To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Saturday, November 08, 2003 10:37 AM Subject: Re: [CTRL] Larouche vs. Jesuits & Synarchists -Caveat Lector- Brian, Your efforts to try to conduct a well-informed, rational, fair and civil discussion on this and other topics have been greatly appreciated. What is the best way to handle disrupters who are vicious and deranged, and clearly have no interest in dealing reasonably with the facts? Probably, after making a few failed efforts to engage them in serious discussion, the best course is to ignore them entirely. These exchanges have nicely demonstrated that it is much better to be the target than the source of irrational verbal abuse and personal attacks. On the net, the attackers will have to live with the consequences of their words forever. political-research at http://groups.yahoo.com/group/political-research/ is wide open for discussion of these topics, and has a policy of firmly moderating any personal attacks or obvious efforts at disruption. By the way, I regard any blanket condemnation and negative stereotyping of entire religious and ethnic groups to be a form of unacceptable bigotry, particularly when members of groups are singled out for attack without any regard for what they've said as individuals and how they've conducted their lives. As a rule it's a good idea to discourage this kind of hate speech in discussion forums, unless one wants the forums to descend into violent chaos. - Original Message - From: Brian Salter To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, November 07, 2003 10:37 AM Subject: [CTRL] Larouche vs. Jesuits & Synarchists -Caveat Lector-the following article is of interest as it is a clear refutation ofrecent spurious disinfo claims that larouche is pro-jesuit, and thathis opposition to the synarchist movement is a cypher foranti-semitism. here, jesuits are identified as being behind synarchistefforts to promote the catholic "christero rebellion" in mexico, 1929.i rest my case! i don't think it could be any clearer. and i will notinsult myself by responding any further to obvious slander attacks;however, if anyone is interested in a further discussion and critiqueof larouche based on an adult standard of debate and constructive,factual analysis, i'm willing to continue sharing info.Synarchism, the Spanish Falange,and the Nazishttp://www.larouchepub.com/other/2003/3029cristero.htmlps: another source for the larouche org's views on jesuits (which, tomy knowledge, they generally consider to be an infiltrated front foranglo-venetian interests within the the various factions of thevatican, FWIW) is anton chaitkin's "treason in america". there are 13index references for jesuits, all of them very negative and critical,and which portray jesuits as allies of oligarchal subversion ofamerican democracy over the past two centuries. whether this is anaccurate analysis is a separate question, but this is what is on therecord.pps: i know full well that in other ways, larouche clearly has apro-vatican bias. to be clear, i'm not denying that.www.ctrl.orgDECLARATION & DISCLAIMER==CTRL is a discussion & informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandicscreeds are unwelcomed. Substanceâ?"not soap-boxingâ?"please! These aresordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'â?"with its many half-truths, mis-directions and outright fraudsâ?"is used politically by different groups withmajor and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought.That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the
Re: [CTRL] Larouche vs. Jesuits & Synarchists
-Caveat Lector- Brian, Your efforts to try to conduct a well-informed, rational, fair and civil discussion on this and other topics have been greatly appreciated. What is the best way to handle disrupters who are vicious and deranged, and clearly have no interest in dealing reasonably with the facts? Probably, after making a few failed efforts to engage them in serious discussion, the best course is to ignore them entirely. These exchanges have nicely demonstrated that it is much better to be the target than the source of irrational verbal abuse and personal attacks. On the net, the attackers will have to live with the consequences of their words forever. political-research at http://groups.yahoo.com/group/political-research/ is wide open for discussion of these topics, and has a policy of firmly moderating any personal attacks or obvious efforts at disruption. By the way, I regard any blanket condemnation and negative stereotyping of entire religious and ethnic groups to be a form of unacceptable bigotry, particularly when members of groups are singled out for attack without any regard for what they've said as individuals and how they've conducted their lives. As a rule it's a good idea to discourage this kind of hate speech in discussion forums, unless one wants the forums to descend into violent chaos. - Original Message - From: Brian Salter To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, November 07, 2003 10:37 AM Subject: [CTRL] Larouche vs. Jesuits & Synarchists -Caveat Lector-the following article is of interest as it is a clear refutation ofrecent spurious disinfo claims that larouche is pro-jesuit, and thathis opposition to the synarchist movement is a cypher foranti-semitism. here, jesuits are identified as being behind synarchistefforts to promote the catholic "christero rebellion" in mexico, 1929.i rest my case! i don't think it could be any clearer. and i will notinsult myself by responding any further to obvious slander attacks;however, if anyone is interested in a further discussion and critiqueof larouche based on an adult standard of debate and constructive,factual analysis, i'm willing to continue sharing info.Synarchism, the Spanish Falange,and the Nazishttp://www.larouchepub.com/other/2003/3029cristero.htmlps: another source for the larouche org's views on jesuits (which, tomy knowledge, they generally consider to be an infiltrated front foranglo-venetian interests within the the various factions of thevatican, FWIW) is anton chaitkin's "treason in america". there are 13index references for jesuits, all of them very negative and critical,and which portray jesuits as allies of oligarchal subversion ofamerican democracy over the past two centuries. whether this is anaccurate analysis is a separate question, but this is what is on therecord.pps: i know full well that in other ways, larouche clearly has apro-vatican bias. to be clear, i'm not denying that.www.ctrl.orgDECLARATION & DISCLAIMER==CTRL is a discussion & informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandicscreeds are unwelcomed. Substanceâ?"not soap-boxingâ?"please! These aresordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'â?"with its many half-truths, mis-directions and outright fraudsâ?"is used politically by different groups withmajor and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought.That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the validity of posts, andalways suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives nocredence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply.Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.Archives Available at:http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/ctrlhttp://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/">ctrl>To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]Om www.ctrl.org DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER == CTRL is a discussion & informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic screeds are unwelcomed. Substanceânot soap-boxingâplease! These are sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'âwith its many half-truths, mis- directions and outright fraudsâis used politically by different groups with major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought. That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and always suggests to readers; be wary of w
[CTRL] Larouche vs. Jesuits & Synarchists
-Caveat Lector- the following article is of interest as it is a clear refutation of recent spurious disinfo claims that larouche is pro-jesuit, and that his opposition to the synarchist movement is a cypher for anti-semitism. here, jesuits are identified as being behind synarchist efforts to promote the catholic "christero rebellion" in mexico, 1929. i rest my case! i don't think it could be any clearer. and i will not insult myself by responding any further to obvious slander attacks; however, if anyone is interested in a further discussion and critique of larouche based on an adult standard of debate and constructive, factual analysis, i'm willing to continue sharing info. Synarchism, the Spanish Falange, and the Nazis http://www.larouchepub.com/other/2003/3029cristero.html ps: another source for the larouche org's views on jesuits (which, to my knowledge, they generally consider to be an infiltrated front for anglo-venetian interests within the the various factions of the vatican, FWIW) is anton chaitkin's "treason in america". there are 13 index references for jesuits, all of them very negative and critical, and which portray jesuits as allies of oligarchal subversion of american democracy over the past two centuries. whether this is an accurate analysis is a separate question, but this is what is on the record. pps: i know full well that in other ways, larouche clearly has a pro-vatican bias. to be clear, i'm not denying that. www.ctrl.org DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER == CTRL is a discussion & informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic screeds are unwelcomed. Substance—not soap-boxing—please! These are sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'—with its many half-truths, mis- directions and outright frauds—is used politically by different groups with major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought. That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply. Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector. Archives Available at: http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/ http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/">ctrl To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email: SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED] To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email: SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED] Om
