-Caveat Lector-

------- Forwarded message follows -------
To:                     [EMAIL PROTECTED]
From:                   Christopher Ruby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject:                SNET: INSIGHT: More Evidence of U.S. Govt 9/11 Complicity
Date sent:              Sun, 09 Mar 2003 21:58:36 -0700
Send reply to:          [EMAIL PROTECTED]


More Evidence of U.S. Govt 9/11 Complicity

From: http://feralnews.com/issues/911/dewdney/media_release_030304.html

9/11: The Enlightenment Can Science overcome Myth?

4th March 2003

Professor A.K. Dewdney, author of 'Ghost Riders in the Sky', has released the results 
of
an experiment testing the feasibility of claims that cellphone calls were made from
'hijacked' airplanes on September 11th 2001.

The cellphone calls from hijacked planes were a crucial element of the 'official 
version'
of the horrific events of '9/11', as they directly corroborated the notion that all 
four
planes were hijacked by Arab terrorists.

Dewdney's experiment suggests that it is highly unlikely the cellphone calls took place
as reported...

Dewdney's 'Ghost Riders in the Sky' hypothesis has been available on the web since 
early
2002. Now in its fourth version, it can be viewed HERE.

Dewdney is a Canadian Mathematician and Computer Scientist who holds the position of
Emeritus Professor at the University of Western Ontario and has some 100 academic 
papers
to his name. He proposes that the four 'hijacked' airplanes on 9/11 were taken over by
remote control after all crew and passengers were disabled (probably killed by a
poisonous gas such as sarin). Professor Dewdney further suggests that the 'Arab
hijackers', whose identity has been shrouded in mystery since it was discovered that
several alleged hijackers are in fact alive and well, were patsies.

A crucial objection to Dewdney's hypothesis has been the cellphone calls reportedly 
made
from the 'hijacked' planes. These cellphone calls appear to substantiate the official
version of events. If they took place as reported, Dewdney's hypothesis is clearly
incorrect.

In version four of 'Ghost Riders', Dewdney went to great lengths to analyze the 
numerous
reports of cellphone calls, and showed how they could have been faked and/or 
fabricated.

Now he's gone one better.

On Tuesday 25th February 2003, Dewdney chartered a light plane and flew up into the
airspace above London Ontario - an area extensively serviced with cellphone stations. 
His
goal was to test the essential feasibility of the claim that cellphone calls could have
been made from planes at high altitude.

Dewdney's report on this private experiment, entitled 'Project Achilles', is HERE

His report concludes:

"To the extent that the cellphones used in this experiment represent types in general
use, it may be concluded that from this particular type of aircraft, cellphones become
useless very quickly with increasing altitude. In particular, two of the cellphone 
types,
the Mike and the Nokia, became useless above 2000 feet. Of the remaining two, the
Audiovox worked intermittently up to 6000 feet but failed thereafter, while the BM 
analog
cellphone worked once just over 7000 feet but failed consistently thereafter. We
therefore conclude that ordinary cellphones, digital or analog, will fail to get 
through
at or above 8000 feet abga."

The light plane used by Dewdney for the experiment could be expected to yield much 
better
results for cellphone use than large commercial airliners of the type 'hijacked' on 
9/11,
because the carbon fiber skin of the test plane is 'radio transparent' and offers 
little
attenuation of the signal - unlike the aluminum surface of a Boeing 757 or 767. If
cellphones fail at a given altitude in the test plane, one may be confident they won't
work at equivalent altitude in an airliner with a metal surface.

Dewdney's experiment suggests that if cellphone calls from 'hijacked' airplanes on 9/11
happened at all, they must all have occurred at very low altitude. This is inconsistent
with the 'official version' of events.

The implications that 9/11 was a spectacular hoax are, of course, staggering. Many
journalists and commentators may be reticent to dissect the official version of events,
because to do so opens a veritable Pandora's Box.

If 9/11 was not carried out by Arab terrorists, the perpetrators clearly must have
influence within the highest levels of the US Administration.

Key elements of the mass media must also have been complicit in perpetrating the fraud.

Whoever was ultimately responsible for these crimes against humanity apparently 
intended,
inter alia, to portray terrorism as a quintessentially Muslim phenomenon and trigger 
long-
term western hostility towards the Arab and Moslem world.

With war looming in the middle east, justified largely on the basis of the events of
'9/11', the immediate contemporary relevance of this possibility is self-evident.

Giving credence to this view is not, perhaps, conducive to a successful career in the
western media. Nevertheless, journalists worthy of the title should start seriously
investigating the many anomalies surrounding 9/11 - and stop uncritically regurgitating
officially-sanctioned myths which fail to withstand scientific scrutiny.

###

Completely ignored is the mountain of documented evidence linking the Bush Crime
Syndicate with the actual ORCHESTRATION of the 9/11 attacks--not simply allowing them 
to
happen through ineptness, but actually training, coddling, protecting, shepherding and
funding the "terrorists"...


-> To subscribe send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

------- End of forwarded message -------


"If this were a dictatorship, it'd be a heck of a lot easier, just so
long as I'm the dictator."

 -GW Bush during a photo-op with Congressional leaders on
12/18/2000. As broadcast on CNN and available in transcript on
their website http://www.cnn.com/TRANSCRIPTS/0012/18/nd.01.html

Steve Wingate, Webmaster
ANOMALOUS IMAGES AND UFO FILES
http://www.anomalous-images.com

<A HREF="http://www.ctrl.org/";>www.ctrl.org</A>
DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER
==========
CTRL is a discussion & informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic
screeds are unwelcomed. Substance—not soap-boxing—please!  These are
sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'—with its many half-truths, mis-
directions and outright frauds—is used politically by different groups with
major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought.
That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and
always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no
credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.
========================================================================
Archives Available at:
http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html
 <A HREF="http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html";>Archives of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]</A>

http://archive.jab.org/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
 <A HREF="http://archive.jab.org/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/">ctrl</A>
========================================================================
To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om

Reply via email to