-Caveat Lector-

WJPBR Email News List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Peace at any cost is a Prelude to War!

Sunday February 25 12:55 PM ET
Nat'l Guard Teams Found Unprepared

By MATT KELLEY, Associated Press Writer

WASHINGTON (AP) - After three years and $143 million, the Army National Guard
has no anti-terrorism teams ready to respond to nuclear, chemical, or
biological attacks because of defective safety equipment and poor training,
an internal Pentagon (news - web sites) review found.

The Pentagon inspector general report said preparedness is so bad that Guard
members at one point were given mobile labs with air filters installed
backward and gas masks with incompatible parts.

``The (team) commanders and personnel lack confidence in the unknown,
untested and unsubstantiated reliability of the equipment that they were
issued,'' investigators said.

Pentagon officials are ``moving as fast as we can'' to fix the problems, said
Charles L. Cragin, who oversees the National Guard.

``All I can say is, everyone is working with great perseverance to resolve
all the issues that the inspector general has identified,'' said Cragin, the
acting assistant secretary of defense for reserve affairs.

Pentagon planners authorized 10 teams in 1998 with a goal that they be ready
for duty in 2000. But the National Guard so badly bungled preparations that
none met last year's deadline, the report said.

An additional 22 teams authorized by Congress in 1999 and 2000 are in various
stages of formation.

After investigators presented their preliminary findings last fall, the
Pentagon transferred management of the teams and launched an official review.
Many of the problems arose because officials tried to get the teams ready
very quickly, Cragin said.

The National Guard units, each with 22 full-time members, are supposed to
help local authorities respond to a terrorist attack by identifying what
nuclear, chemical or biological agents were used.

But Pentagon investigators concluded that defective safety equipment could
put team members at risk of succumbing to the very weapons they were meant to
identify.

Investigators found that air filters had been installed backward in the
teams' mobile laboratories and team members were given gas masks with parts
that were not designed to work together.

One team commander, referring to the gas masks, told investigators, ``It
probably would work. I'm just not willing to bet my life on it.'' Cragin said
that problem has been fixed.

Plans originally called for the teams to be stationed near Air National Guard
bases so they could be flown to the site of a terrorist attack. A second
draft of those plans, however, called for team members to drive their
personal cars to attack scenes, which could be hundreds of miles away. The
guidelines have not been completed.

Coinciding with the recent release of the Pentagon report, a congressional
commission recommended focusing the National Guard on protecting U.S.
territory from weapons of mass destruction.

President Bush (news - web sites) last week said he would like to see the
Guard and Reserve ``more involved in homeland security.''

Frank Hoffman, a researcher for the U.S. Commission on National Security,
said the problems with the National Guard response teams show the Pentagon is
not paying enough attention to terrorist threats.

``Everyone knows we're not prepared,'' said Hoffman, an officer in the Marine
Corps reserves.

Cragin said all safety problems identified by the inspector general will be
fixed before he recommends that Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld certify the
teams ready for duty. Cragin said he did not know when he that would be.




*COPYRIGHT NOTICE** In accordance with Title 17 U. S. C. Section 107,
any copyrighted work in this message is distributed under fair use
without profit or payment to those who have expressed a prior interest
in receiving the included information for nonprofit research and educational
purposes only.[Ref. http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml ]

Want to be on our lists?  Write at [EMAIL PROTECTED] for a menu of our lists!

<A HREF="http://www.ctrl.org/">www.ctrl.org</A>
DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER
==========
CTRL is a discussion & informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic
screeds are unwelcomed. Substance—not soap-boxing—please!  These are
sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'—with its many half-truths, mis-
directions and outright frauds—is used politically by different groups with
major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought.
That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and
always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no
credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.
========================================================================
Archives Available at:
http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html
 <A HREF="http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html">Archives of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]</A>

http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
 <A HREF="http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/">ctrl</A>
========================================================================
To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om

Reply via email to