Re: [CTRL] Semitic Celts

2000-06-21 Thread Nicky Molloy

Josh,

Eat yer heart out. Look I'll tell you what I'll put in a good word for you
when Hurtak's Ets come and collect the 12 tribes of Israel to take to the
Pleiades as planetary Adams.. I'll let them substitute you for me. We know
you are a true Jew, you felt the call to go to Israel. Though according to
the Jewish Brit-Am they may allow me in the fold as I'm from the Kings. Just
think of me as your racial sister.
I don't actually think God gives two hoots about genetics now, it was fine
for 2,000 years to build up a particular desirable DNA but I think 'chosen'
hasn't applied for the last 2,000 years we should all be the same now
consciousness wise ideally, probably having equal opportunity of incarnation
due to karma being wiped.

Nicky




-Original Message-
From: Nurev Ind Research [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Wednesday, 21 June 2000 14:59
Subject: Re: [CTRL] Semitic Celts


 Nicky Molloy wrote:

Molloy, Molloy, h...Oh now I get it YOU are a Semitic Celt.
How blind are those who will not see. YOU are the chosenite. What a
fool I am. All these years I thought I was the chosenite.

Screw genetics. Nicky has presented PROOF up to her ususal standards.

Sad ex-chosenite,
Joshua2

 -Original Message-
 From: yair davidi [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Date: Wednesday, 21 June 2000 09:19
 Subject: Semitic Celts

 Extract from "Lost Israelite Identity" by Yair Davidy
 Chapter Seventeen
 THE ISRAELITE AND NORTH AFRICAN LINKS OF THE INSULAR CELTS IN THE LIGHT
OF
 LINGUISTICS. The Question of Alphabetical Lettering.
 
  The Irish legends are compatible with Israelite origins. They presuppose
 having originally come from the Middle East AND often speak of arriving in
 Spain via North Africa. A Moroccan Jewish legend1 says that when the Ten
 tribes were exiled part of the tribe of Ephraim reached Morocco. They
ruled
 over the land until the time of Ezra (ca.457-445 b.c.e.) at which period
 their rule was lost.  In many respects North Africa and Spain in early
 times were often effectually one entity.
  The Irish, Scottish, and Welsh, and many of the ancient Britons and
Gauls
 spoke forms of Celtic. Celtic is considered an Indo-European tongue
related
 to Latin. The Celts apparently received the Indo-European aspects of their
 language and culture from peoples they had conquered on the Continent
 before continuing their westward trek. Linguistic examinations of the
 speech of the Welsh and Irish reveal a form of Celtic in which there is an
 underlying speech element similar to that found in North Africa. North
 African languages are classified as "Hamitic". Egyptian and Berber are
 Hamitic tongues. They have an affinity with Semitic languages and local
 dialects in various parts of the Middle East occasionally exhibit Hamitic
 features. Aspects of Hamitic speech are also found in Biblical Hebrew but
 they are not emphasised. Most of the ancient Canaanite peoples adopted a
 language similar to Hebrew though both Indo-European and Hamitic languages
 must also have been known to them . The Phoenician use of Hebrew has
 characteristics of a foreign tongue adopted by them2. There also exist
 Arabic dialects which are Hamitic or reveal a Hamitic substratum. Not only
 that but the impression is that much of the difference between Hamitic and
 Semitic is more one of emphasis than of substance. Dialects of Hebrew
 within the Land of Israel could well have absorbed Hamitic elements.
  Insular British Celtic tongues, especially colloquial Welsh, says
 W.H.Worrell3, show certain peculiarities which are reminiscent of Hamitic
 and Semitic tongues and are unparalleled in Aryan languages. Similarly,
 according to H.Wagner:
 
  "Irish..has as many features in common with non-Indo-European languages,
 especially with Hamito-Semitic languages, as  with other Indo-European
 languages"4.
 
 "Insular Celtic languages.. the grammatical categories having many
 affinities with non-Indo-European languages, in particular Basque and
 Berber"5.
 
  "The comparative typology of insular Celtic initiated by Morris Jones
 and further developed by Pokorny, G.B.Adams, and myself has revealed that
 most of the many peculiar features of insular Celtic rarely traceable in
 other Indo-European languages have analogies in Basque, Berber, Egyptian,
 Semitic, and even in Negro languages"6.
 
"Certain features [(of marginal influence only)] of Old Irish verb
 forms can be understood only in the light of Hittite, Vedic, Sanskrit, and
 Mycenean Greek"7.
 
 J.Morris Jones said that,
 
  "The pre-Aryan idioms which still live in Welsh and Irish were derived
 from a language allied to Egyptian  tongues"8.
 
  The above linguistic remarks show that Insular Celtic (i.e. of Britain
 and Ireland as distinct from the Continental forms which were somewhat
 different) is consistent with the claims propo

Re: [CTRL] Semitic Celts

2000-06-20 Thread Nurev Ind Research

 Nicky Molloy wrote:

Molloy, Molloy, h...Oh now I get it YOU are a Semitic Celt.
How blind are those who will not see. YOU are the chosenite. What a
fool I am. All these years I thought I was the chosenite.

Screw genetics. Nicky has presented PROOF up to her ususal standards.

Sad ex-chosenite,
Joshua2

 -Original Message-
 From: yair davidi [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Date: Wednesday, 21 June 2000 09:19
 Subject: Semitic Celts

 Extract from "Lost Israelite Identity" by Yair Davidy
 Chapter Seventeen
 THE ISRAELITE AND NORTH AFRICAN LINKS OF THE INSULAR CELTS IN THE LIGHT OF
 LINGUISTICS. The Question of Alphabetical Lettering.
 
  The Irish legends are compatible with Israelite origins. They presuppose
 having originally come from the Middle East AND often speak of arriving in
 Spain via North Africa. A Moroccan Jewish legend1 says that when the Ten
 tribes were exiled part of the tribe of Ephraim reached Morocco. They ruled
 over the land until the time of Ezra (ca.457-445 b.c.e.) at which period
 their rule was lost.  In many respects North Africa and Spain in early
 times were often effectually one entity.
  The Irish, Scottish, and Welsh, and many of the ancient Britons and Gauls
 spoke forms of Celtic. Celtic is considered an Indo-European tongue related
 to Latin. The Celts apparently received the Indo-European aspects of their
 language and culture from peoples they had conquered on the Continent
 before continuing their westward trek. Linguistic examinations of the
 speech of the Welsh and Irish reveal a form of Celtic in which there is an
 underlying speech element similar to that found in North Africa. North
 African languages are classified as "Hamitic". Egyptian and Berber are
 Hamitic tongues. They have an affinity with Semitic languages and local
 dialects in various parts of the Middle East occasionally exhibit Hamitic
 features. Aspects of Hamitic speech are also found in Biblical Hebrew but
 they are not emphasised. Most of the ancient Canaanite peoples adopted a
 language similar to Hebrew though both Indo-European and Hamitic languages
 must also have been known to them . The Phoenician use of Hebrew has
 characteristics of a foreign tongue adopted by them2. There also exist
 Arabic dialects which are Hamitic or reveal a Hamitic substratum. Not only
 that but the impression is that much of the difference between Hamitic and
 Semitic is more one of emphasis than of substance. Dialects of Hebrew
 within the Land of Israel could well have absorbed Hamitic elements.
  Insular British Celtic tongues, especially colloquial Welsh, says
 W.H.Worrell3, show certain peculiarities which are reminiscent of Hamitic
 and Semitic tongues and are unparalleled in Aryan languages. Similarly,
 according to H.Wagner:
 
  "Irish..has as many features in common with non-Indo-European languages,
 especially with Hamito-Semitic languages, as  with other Indo-European
 languages"4.
 
 "Insular Celtic languages.. the grammatical categories having many
 affinities with non-Indo-European languages, in particular Basque and
 Berber"5.
 
  "The comparative typology of insular Celtic initiated by Morris Jones
 and further developed by Pokorny, G.B.Adams, and myself has revealed that
 most of the many peculiar features of insular Celtic rarely traceable in
 other Indo-European languages have analogies in Basque, Berber, Egyptian,
 Semitic, and even in Negro languages"6.
 
"Certain features [(of marginal influence only)] of Old Irish verb
 forms can be understood only in the light of Hittite, Vedic, Sanskrit, and
 Mycenean Greek"7.
 
 J.Morris Jones said that,
 
  "The pre-Aryan idioms which still live in Welsh and Irish were derived
 from a language allied to Egyptian  tongues"8.
 
  The above linguistic remarks show that Insular Celtic (i.e. of Britain
 and Ireland as distinct from the Continental forms which were somewhat
 different) is consistent with the claims proposed herein: i.e. The original
 tongue of the Insular Celts was Semitic (Hebrew) which marginally was
 influenced by Mycenean Greek, Hittite, Indo-European (Sanskrit), Syrian,
 Mitanni, and what not. Heavy Hamitic influences may be attributable to
 those of some of the neighbouring peoples, such as the Canaanites, and
 Egyptians, and to having sojourned in a North African environment. In
 addition, the natives of Spain amongst whom the Insular Celts or a good
 portion of them once dwelt, traded with, and fought against, were also at
 least in part of North African Berber related Hamitic origin. This
 explanation may sound involved and complicated but it accords with the
 evidence when archaeological, anthropological, mythological, and linguistic
 findings are compared with each other. At all events the natives of Ireland
 and Wales must have used a Hamitic and/or Semitic tongue(s) before they
 came into contact with Continental Indo-European ones.
 
 
 HEBREW  IN WELSH???
 
  It was seen above