ASHINGTON, Aug. 23 - More than 60 percent of Border
Patrol agents and immigration officers surveyed for a study issued on
Monday said the Department of Homeland Security could do more to stop
potential terrorists from entering the country, and more than a third said
they were not satisfied that they had the tools and training to do so.
The survey, of 500 border agents and immigration inspectors, was
conducted for the unions representing them by Peter D. Hart Research
Associates. It found them sharply divided on whether the country was safer
now than before the 9/11 attacks: 53 percent said it was, but 44 percent
said it was no safer or was less safe.
"Prior to Sept. 11, 2001, it was extremely easy to enter the United
States illegally," said T. J. Bonner, president of one of the unions, the
National Border Patrol Council. ''Incredibly, this has not changed in any
meaningful way."
The survey also found low morale to be pervasive.
Officials at the Department of Homeland Security dismissed the survey
as biased and inaccurate, saying it offered only a limited snapshot of the
views of the department's 42,000 employees. They cited a number of
strides, among them airport inspectors' collection of digital fingerprints
and photographs from more than six million foreign visitors since January,
the first move toward creating a comprehensive system to screen
travelers.
In the last six months, the officials said, the department has turned
away hundreds of criminals, travelers with fake documents, including
fraudulent passports, and others barred from entry to the United States.
The study did include some positive findings. Sixty-four percent of the
employees surveyed described themselves as very satisfied or fairly
satisfied with their workload, and 59 percent said they received the
support they needed from their immediate supervisors.
The study, conducted from July 30 through Aug. 7, had a margin of
sampling error of plus or minus five percentage points.