Re: [CTRL] White House protected ecoterrorists
-Caveat Lector- A HREF="http://www.ctrl.org/"
/A -Cui Bono?-
Okay, so we are now going to tar *all* environmental activists with the
label "eco-terrorist" fnord. Look, people, there are those of us who
really do believe that it is NOT all right to clearcut old-growth forest in
the name of profit, prosperity, and the Amurrican developer. And a very good
case can be made (see, e.g., last fall's thread on the "anarchist" actions
in Seattle) that destruction of property is justified when that property is
itself used to destroy the natural environment. [BTW, I *don't* agree with
that...I feel that such actions merely feed into the schemes of the
Oligarchy. However, I must respect and honor the people who *do* espouse
such an approach.] If the White House acted to protect the right of American
citizens to exercise their First Amendment rights in the face of opposition
from the corporate elite and their lackeys, so much the better.
At the risk of opening myself to the flames for which certain members of
this list are infamous, I might even suggest that it was Clinton
administration actions such as the ones attacked in this post that lay
behind the impeachment drive. I strongly suspect that the Republican bosses
and their masters could have cared less about how many women Bill Clinton
fondled. What mattered to them was that he potentially posed a serious
threat to their self-defined "right" to exploit whatever they feel like
exploiting, all for the sake of the Divine Market. ("Potentially,"
because--as we have seen--Bill Clinton is no less an agent of the New
Globalism. But at the moment, we're considering what the Republicans
*thought* he intended, not what he *actually* intended.)
- Original Message -
From: Bill Kingsbury [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, April 01, 2000 4:42 PM
Subject: [CTRL] White House protected ecoterrorists
-Caveat Lector- A HREF="http://www.ctrl.org/"
/A -Cui Bono?-
http://www.heartland.org/environment/feb00/ecoterror.htm
Environment Climate News -- February 2000
-
Feds protected ecoterrorists, report says
by Gretchen Randall
-
A House Resource Committee task force assigned three years ago to
investigate eco-terrorist activity at a timber site in Oregon has
issued an interim report that paints a disturbing picture of
aiding and abetting by top Clinton-Gore administration officials.
snip
A HREF="http://www.ctrl.org/"www.ctrl.org/A
DECLARATION DISCLAIMER
==
CTRL is a discussion informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic
screeds are not allowed. Substancenot soap-boxing! These are sordid matters
and 'conspiracy theory'with its many half-truths, misdirections and outright
fraudsis used politically by different groups with major and minor effects
spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought. That being said, CTRL
gives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and always suggests to readers;
be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no credence to Holocaust denial and
nazi's need not apply.
Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.
Archives Available at:
http://home.ease.lsoft.com/archives/CTRL.html
http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Om
Re: [CTRL] White House protected ecoterrorists
-Caveat Lector- A HREF="http://www.ctrl.org/" /A -Cui Bono?- In a message dated 4/2/00 11:24:52 AM Central Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: At the risk of opening myself to the flames for which certain members of this list are infamous, I might even suggest that it was Clinton administration actions such as the ones attacked in this post that lay behind the impeachment drive. I strongly suspect that the Republican bosses and their masters could have cared less about how many women Bill Clinton fondled. What mattered to them was that he potentially posed a serious threat to their self-defined "right" to exploit whatever they feel like exploiting, all for the sake of the Divine Market I think you're absolutely correct! Bill. A HREF="http://www.ctrl.org/"www.ctrl.org/A DECLARATION DISCLAIMER == CTRL is a discussion informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic screeds are not allowed. Substancenot soap-boxing! These are sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'with its many half-truths, misdirections and outright fraudsis used politically by different groups with major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought. That being said, CTRL gives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply. Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector. Archives Available at: http://home.ease.lsoft.com/archives/CTRL.html http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/ To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email: SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED] To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email: SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED] Om
Re: [CTRL] White House protected ecoterrorists
-Caveat Lector- A HREF="http://www.ctrl.org/" /A -Cui Bono?- Well, I agree. BUT, you left out the Liberal DEMORATS Like Al BORE who had inherited and "manages" a Hugh Oil, Etc. Trust that makes Millions off the "Environment" and the "Economy". So Much for the "Environmential VP". I put the sacred "VP TREE" Right up at the "Tree Top" with the Rest of the Elite, who Greedly siphon off our "tax dollars" for their "causes" while making Billions off the various "industries" and "shills who front their causes for all varities of movements". There are more "DEMORATS and REPUBLICRATS" who make Millions off the "sacred earth" and the rest of us "normal average folks". I hate to "Wake Up the Disallusioned Arm Chair Enviromnential Nazi's" out there - BUT You All Have Been HAD by the "Eliteists and International Bankers" who don't care what you *think or feel* as long as *they* can use *you* for their own *gain*. NOT TO MENTION: The "Major Funding" for "Green Peace", et el, gets funneled through "black bag jobs" handled through "international banksters" the likes of the *defunct* B.C.C.I that was headquartered in London, England. If you follow the Trail of Where the Funding Came From - you can trace it all the way back to the Marxist Communists in Eastern Europe Russia. The sole purpose was to disrupt the Western World Economy for their own benefit. As another *example* Look at the *KATO Treaty* that was signed in Japan, through the U.N. This *Treaty* should Never Be Approved by our Congress. It only *benefits* the *Third World Developing Countries" and the "Communist Nations". Because "they" are the one's that don't care about the "Environmental Hazards" - Just their *OWN* Economies - And Seek to Shut Down our American Industrial Production. Prior to WW 2, the U.S. lead the World in Machine Tool Production and use. We were able to out product all the other Nations of the World combined in order to fight a World War on two Fronts.The majority of our "industrial might" and *machine tool industgry" has shifted to Japan and other countries. While the U.S. has an upswing in *service industries*. If We had to Ever Fight Another World War - It Would take too long to Retool.Any comments, many of you know I am right. Thanks for *sharing*, An American First, Last and Always! ~ Mike ~ * U.A.I.C.- VT.* ** We Are Not Amused by Pontification with Intellectual Flatulence * *** (c) 2000 M.G.B. A HREF="http://www.ctrl.org/"www.ctrl.org/A DECLARATION DISCLAIMER == CTRL is a discussion informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic screeds are not allowed. Substancenot soap-boxing! These are sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'with its many half-truths, misdirections and outright fraudsis used politically by different groups with major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought. That being said, CTRL gives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply. Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector. Archives Available at: http://home.ease.lsoft.com/archives/CTRL.html http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/ To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email: SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED] To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email: SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED] Om
[CTRL] White House protected ecoterrorists
-Caveat Lector- A HREF="http://www.ctrl.org/" /A -Cui Bono?- http://www.heartland.org/environment/feb00/ecoterror.htm Environment Climate News -- February 2000 - Feds protected ecoterrorists, report says by Gretchen Randall - A House Resource Committee task force assigned three years ago to investigate eco-terrorist activity at a timber site in Oregon has issued an interim report that paints a disturbing picture of aiding and abetting by top Clinton-Gore administration officials. The Task Force's investigation was launched after an e-mail from Agriculture Department employee Thelma Strong to Tom R. King was made public. "I'm told that Leon Panetta [then chief of staff to President Clinton] directed the FS [Forest Service] not to remove protestors from the Warner Creek sale," wrote Strong on August 6, 1996. Strong's e-mail refers to a timber sale underway at Warner Creek, Oregon. A band of eco-terrorists had encamped on the site, barricading themselves there illegally from September 1995 to July 1996 in an effort to stop the sale. On July 9, 1996, the Forest Service and local law enforcement officials were about to move to expel the eco-terrorists when word was received from top Clinton-Gore administration officials to "back off." Dan Glickman, Secretary of Agriculture, told then-Forest Service Chief Jack Ward Thomas he needed to check with "people above his pay grade" about how to handle the situation, according to contemporaneous notes made by Thomas. The next conversation between Glickman and Thomas was a permanent stand-down order. According to the Task Force's investigation, + " . . . several interviewees have alleged that political pressure from within the Clinton-Gore administration was used to protect the protestors, prolonging the occupation and endangering both government property and law enforcement personnel." + ". . . the organization behind the protest was in contact with Council on Environmental Quality (CEQ) within the White House during the protest, airing their complaints and threatening political consequences if the White House failed to act." + ". . . the suspicion of illegal leaks to the protesters was corroborated by telephone notes of a senior Justice Department official [Peter Coppelman], which were obtained under subpoena, noting that a senior CEQ official [Dinah Bear] was suspected of being the source of the law enforcement information leaked to the protestors." Elena Kagen, associate White House counsel, was aware of the information leaks because she had discussed them with Dinah Bear, who was accused of making them. According to the Task Force report, though, neither Kagen nor any other representative of the Clinton-Gore administration initiated an investigation, despite their legal duty to report criminal wrongdoing. Moreover, the Forest Service was never informed about the leaks. Kagan has since been nominated by President Clinton to the D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals. The Warner Creek timber sale was initiated in 1991, when an arson fire burned 9,000 acres on the site. The sale, intended to salvage usable timber from the trees that had died as a result of the fire, would also have cleared dead and decaying trees to reduce the risk of insect infestation and forest fires. Reducing the number of dead trees was thought to be a positive solution for the forest as well as for animals, campers, and hikers in the area. Eco-terrorists began protesting against the salvage logging in June 1995, and even blamed loggers for the arson fire. (There is no evidence that loggers were responsible.) In September of that year, the protests became illegal as the eco-terrorists blocked the road and camped at the site. According to the Forest Service, they also erected barricades, dug trenches, washed out roadways, and left human waste -- efforts that polluted the waterways downstream. They made "booby-traps" of trenches and sharpened metal spikes to damage vehicles or people and chained themselves to buried structures. At least one protester was heavily armed. According to the Task Force report, the Forest Service was concerned because eco-terrorists had recently fire-bombed a Forest Ranger Station and burned a Forest Service truck. Eco-terrorists at other sites had shot squirt guns full of urine at Forest Service personnel and assaulted officers. It was known that eco-terrorists often rotated between sites, and there was concern for the personnel at Warner Creek because of these other incidents. Mark Tarantino, Forest Service Special Agent, states in a sworn declaration that "protestors had planned to 'lock down' in various locations
