Re: [CTRL] Why the Bush administration wants war
In a message dated 9/16/01 8:58:59 AM Central Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: who or what is the wsws? World Socialist Web Site. Actually a good source of information on various topics when the coporate media just doesn't cut it. Bill.
Re: [CTRL] Why the Bush administration wants war (fwd)
-Caveat Lector- World Socialist Web Site - try clicking the link below and you'll shockingly discover it -Caveat Lector- I ask again who or what is the wsws? -- -- -- -- - -- - -- -- - - - - -- --- -- - - - - -- - - - -- -- - -- - The police aren't here to create disorder, they are here to preserve disorder. Mayor Richard Daley NEURONAUTIC INSTITUTE on-line: http://home.earthlink.net/~thew > From: Yardbird <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Reply-To: Conspiracy Theory Research List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Date: Sun, 16 Sep 2001 10:28:02 -0300 > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: [CTRL] Why the Bush administration wants war (fwd) > > -Caveat Lector- > > Assalamu'alaikum > > Why the Bush administration wants war > > Statement of the WSWS Editorial Board > > 14 September 2001 > > http://www.wsws.org/articles/2001/sep2001/war-s14_prn.shtml > > In the midst of the hysterical war mongering of the US government and a > state-controlled media that knows no shame, it is more than ever necessary > to retain not only ones composure, but also ones ability to think, > analyze, and reason. It is surely appropriate to mourn the terrible loss > of life on September 11. But sympathy for the victims, their families and > friends should not blind anyone to the fact that powerful sections of the > US ruling elite view this tragedy as a welcome opportunity to implement a > militaristic agenda that has been in the works for more than a decade. > > Modern wars require a pretext, a casus belli that can be packaged to the > public as a sufficient justification for the resort to arms. Every major > war in which the United States has been involved since its emergence as an > imperialist world powerfrom the Spanish-American War of 1898 to the Balkan > War of 1999has required a catalytic event that inflamed public opinion. > > But whatever the nature of such trigger events, they never proved, in the > light of sober historical analysis, to be the real cause of the wars that > followed. Rather, the actual decision to go to warwhile facilitated by the > change in public opinion produced by the casus belliflowed in each > instance from more essential considerations rooted in the strategic > political and economic interests of the ruling elite. > > War, said von Clausewitz in his oft-quoted aphorism, is the continuation > of politics by other means. This means, in essence, that war is a means by > which governments seek to secure political ends they could not achieve > peacefully. There is no reason to believe that this profound truth does > not apply to the events that are now unfolding in the aftermath of > Tuesdays hijackings and bombings. > > The attacks on the World Trade Center and the Pentagon have been seized on > as an opportunity to implement a far-reaching political agenda for which > the most right-wing elements in the ruling elite have been clamoring for > years. Within a day of the attack, before any light had been shed on the > source of the assault or the dimensions of the plot, the government and > the media had launched a coordinated campaign to declare that America was > at war and the American people had to accept all the consequences of > wartime existence. > > The policies that are now being advancedan open-ended expansion of US > military action abroad and a crackdown on dissent at homehave long been in > preparation. The US ruling elite has been hampered in implementing such > policies by the lack of any significant support within the American > population and resistance from its imperialist rivals in Europe and Asia. > > Now the Bush administration has decided to exploit the public mood of > shock and revulsion over the events of September 11 to advance the global > economic and strategic aims of American imperialism. He has the full > support of a debased media and a Democratic Party that is more than happy > to end any pretense of opposition to the Republican right. > > On Thursday Bush all but admitted as much, declaring that the atrocity > carried out two days before had provided an opportunity to wage war > against terrorism. He went on to say that the conduct of this war would be > the focus of his entire administration. Such a declaration of unabashed > militarism would have been unthinkable prior to September 11. But the > assault on the World Trade Center had, in the parlance of imperialist real > politik, created new facts. > > Without having begun to seriously investigate, let alone explain, the very > strange circumstances surrounding the terrorist attacks on New York and > Washington, the Bush administration and the media have declared that > all-out war is the only possible response to these events. This is before > the
Re: [CTRL] Why the Bush administration wants war
-Caveat Lector- I ask again who or what is the wsws? -- -- -- -- - -- - -- -- - - - - -- --- -- - - - - -- - - - -- -- - -- - The police aren't here to create disorder, they are here to preserve disorder. Mayor Richard Daley NEURONAUTIC INSTITUTE on-line: http://home.earthlink.net/~thew > From: Yardbird <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Reply-To: Conspiracy Theory Research List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Date: Sun, 16 Sep 2001 10:28:02 -0300 > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: [CTRL] Why the Bush administration wants war (fwd) > > -Caveat Lector- > > Assalamu'alaikum > > Why the Bush administration wants war > > Statement of the WSWS Editorial Board > > 14 September 2001 > > http://www.wsws.org/articles/2001/sep2001/war-s14_prn.shtml > > In the midst of the hysterical war mongering of the US government and a > state-controlled media that knows no shame, it is more than ever necessary > to retain not only ones composure, but also ones ability to think, > analyze, and reason. It is surely appropriate to mourn the terrible loss > of life on September 11. But sympathy for the victims, their families and > friends should not blind anyone to the fact that powerful sections of the > US ruling elite view this tragedy as a welcome opportunity to implement a > militaristic agenda that has been in the works for more than a decade. > > Modern wars require a pretext, a casus belli that can be packaged to the > public as a sufficient justification for the resort to arms. Every major > war in which the United States has been involved since its emergence as an > imperialist world powerfrom the Spanish-American War of 1898 to the Balkan > War of 1999has required a catalytic event that inflamed public opinion. > > But whatever the nature of such trigger events, they never proved, in the > light of sober historical analysis, to be the real cause of the wars that > followed. Rather, the actual decision to go to warwhile facilitated by the > change in public opinion produced by the casus belliflowed in each > instance from more essential considerations rooted in the strategic > political and economic interests of the ruling elite. > > War, said von Clausewitz in his oft-quoted aphorism, is the continuation > of politics by other means. This means, in essence, that war is a means by > which governments seek to secure political ends they could not achieve > peacefully. There is no reason to believe that this profound truth does > not apply to the events that are now unfolding in the aftermath of > Tuesdays hijackings and bombings. > > The attacks on the World Trade Center and the Pentagon have been seized on > as an opportunity to implement a far-reaching political agenda for which > the most right-wing elements in the ruling elite have been clamoring for > years. Within a day of the attack, before any light had been shed on the > source of the assault or the dimensions of the plot, the government and > the media had launched a coordinated campaign to declare that America was > at war and the American people had to accept all the consequences of > wartime existence. > > The policies that are now being advancedan open-ended expansion of US > military action abroad and a crackdown on dissent at homehave long been in > preparation. The US ruling elite has been hampered in implementing such > policies by the lack of any significant support within the American > population and resistance from its imperialist rivals in Europe and Asia. > > Now the Bush administration has decided to exploit the public mood of > shock and revulsion over the events of September 11 to advance the global > economic and strategic aims of American imperialism. He has the full > support of a debased media and a Democratic Party that is more than happy > to end any pretense of opposition to the Republican right. > > On Thursday Bush all but admitted as much, declaring that the atrocity > carried out two days before had provided an opportunity to wage war > against terrorism. He went on to say that the conduct of this war would be > the focus of his entire administration. Such a declaration of unabashed > militarism would have been unthinkable prior to September 11. But the > assault on the World Trade Center had, in the parlance of imperialist real > politik, created new facts. > > Without having begun to seriously investigate, let alone explain, the very > strange circumstances surrounding the terrorist attacks on New York and > Washington, the Bush administration and the media have declared that > all-out war is the only possible response to these events. This is before > the government has even established the political identity of the > terrorists, or answered troubling questions abo
[CTRL] Why the Bush administration wants war (fwd)
-Caveat Lector- Assalamu'alaikum Why the Bush administration wants war Statement of the WSWS Editorial Board 14 September 2001 http://www.wsws.org/articles/2001/sep2001/war-s14_prn.shtml In the midst of the hysterical war mongering of the US government and a state-controlled media that knows no shame, it is more than ever necessary to retain not only ones composure, but also ones ability to think, analyze, and reason. It is surely appropriate to mourn the terrible loss of life on September 11. But sympathy for the victims, their families and friends should not blind anyone to the fact that powerful sections of the US ruling elite view this tragedy as a welcome opportunity to implement a militaristic agenda that has been in the works for more than a decade. Modern wars require a pretext, a casus belli that can be packaged to the public as a sufficient justification for the resort to arms. Every major war in which the United States has been involved since its emergence as an imperialist world powerfrom the Spanish-American War of 1898 to the Balkan War of 1999has required a catalytic event that inflamed public opinion. But whatever the nature of such trigger events, they never proved, in the light of sober historical analysis, to be the real cause of the wars that followed. Rather, the actual decision to go to warwhile facilitated by the change in public opinion produced by the casus belliflowed in each instance from more essential considerations rooted in the strategic political and economic interests of the ruling elite. War, said von Clausewitz in his oft-quoted aphorism, is the continuation of politics by other means. This means, in essence, that war is a means by which governments seek to secure political ends they could not achieve peacefully. There is no reason to believe that this profound truth does not apply to the events that are now unfolding in the aftermath of Tuesdays hijackings and bombings. The attacks on the World Trade Center and the Pentagon have been seized on as an opportunity to implement a far-reaching political agenda for which the most right-wing elements in the ruling elite have been clamoring for years. Within a day of the attack, before any light had been shed on the source of the assault or the dimensions of the plot, the government and the media had launched a coordinated campaign to declare that America was at war and the American people had to accept all the consequences of wartime existence. The policies that are now being advancedan open-ended expansion of US military action abroad and a crackdown on dissent at homehave long been in preparation. The US ruling elite has been hampered in implementing such policies by the lack of any significant support within the American population and resistance from its imperialist rivals in Europe and Asia. Now the Bush administration has decided to exploit the public mood of shock and revulsion over the events of September 11 to advance the global economic and strategic aims of American imperialism. He has the full support of a debased media and a Democratic Party that is more than happy to end any pretense of opposition to the Republican right. On Thursday Bush all but admitted as much, declaring that the atrocity carried out two days before had provided an opportunity to wage war against terrorism. He went on to say that the conduct of this war would be the focus of his entire administration. Such a declaration of unabashed militarism would have been unthinkable prior to September 11. But the assault on the World Trade Center had, in the parlance of imperialist real politik, created new facts. Without having begun to seriously investigate, let alone explain, the very strange circumstances surrounding the terrorist attacks on New York and Washington, the Bush administration and the media have declared that all-out war is the only possible response to these events. This is before the government has even established the political identity of the terrorists, or answered troubling questions about how such an elaborate plotapparently involving dozens of conspirators operating within the United Statescould have gone completely undetected by the FBI, CIA and associated intelligence agencies. Nor have the Federal Aviation Administration, the Air Force or the FBI explained the failure to issue an alert or attempt to intercept the hijacked airliners as they swerved off course and made for the nerve centers of the US financial and military establishment. For all the claims of sorrow and sympathy, there could not have been a more timely or fortuitous event for the Bush administration than the attack on the World Trade Center and the Pentagon. When George W. Bush awoke on September 11, he presided over an administration in deep crisis. Having come to power on the basis of fraud and the suppression of votes, his government was seen by millions both in the US and around the world as illegitimate. The very narrow social base of suppor
