-Caveat Lector- In a message dated 12/14/98 11:25:19 PM Eastern Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: << Confusion is part of my point: heretofore, the media never missed a chance to post polls showing America's distaste over Starr and the impeachment hearings; but now, editorials (USA Today for instance) bashing Clinton are becoming more common. Even the major networks are shifting to a more "unbiased (for them)" approach to the issue. What's going on?? Edward >> Yeah, but they have to actually report a tiny bit, and Starr is not a man most of us would like living in the next house on our block. Prudy DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER ========== CTRL is a discussion and informational exchange list. Proselyzting propagandic screeds are not allowed. Substance—not soapboxing! These are sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory', with its many half-truths, misdirections and outright frauds is used politically by different groups with major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought. That being said, CTRL gives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no credeence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply. Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector. ======================================================================== To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email: SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED] To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email: SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED] Om