daily CVS update output

2018-04-02 Thread NetBSD source update

Updating src tree:
P src/crypto/external/bsd/netpgp/dist/src/lib/libnetpgp.3
P src/doc/CHANGES
P src/external/gpl3/gcc/dist/gcc/config/vax/builtins.md
P src/external/gpl3/gcc/dist/gcc/config/vax/predicates.md
P src/external/gpl3/gcc/lib/libasan/Makefile
P src/external/gpl3/gcc/usr.bin/backend/Makefile
P src/sys/arch/amd64/amd64/spl.S
P src/sys/arch/arm/sunxi/sun4i_a10_ccu.c
P src/sys/arch/arm/sunxi/sunxi_ccu_display.c
P src/sys/arch/i386/stand/efiboot/TODO.efiboot
P src/sys/arch/i386/stand/efiboot/boot.c
P src/sys/arch/i386/stand/efiboot/devopen.c
P src/sys/arch/i386/stand/efiboot/devopen.h
P src/sys/arch/i386/stand/efiboot/efidisk.c
P src/sys/arch/i386/stand/efiboot/efidisk.h
P src/sys/arch/i386/stand/lib/biosdisk.c
P src/sys/arch/i386/stand/lib/biosdisk.h
P src/sys/arch/i386/stand/lib/bootmenu.c
P src/sys/arch/i386/stand/lib/bootmenu.h
P src/sys/arch/vax/vax/ctu.c
P src/sys/dev/cardbus/ahc_cardbus.c
P src/sys/dev/ic/aic7xxx.c
P src/sys/dev/pci/pcidevs
P src/sys/dev/pci/pcidevs.h
P src/sys/dev/pci/pcidevs_data.h
P src/sys/dev/pci/ixgbe/ix_txrx.c
P src/sys/dev/pci/ixgbe/ixgbe.c
P src/sys/dev/pci/ixgbe/ixgbe.h
P src/sys/lib/libsa/bootcfg.c
P src/sys/lib/libsa/bootcfg.h
P src/sys/uvm/uvm_emap.c
P src/usr.bin/make/make.1

Updating xsrc tree:


Killing core files:




Updating file list:
-rw-rw-r--  1 srcmastr  netbsd  53911524 Apr  3 03:04 ls-lRA.gz


Re: llvm self-tests looping(?)

2018-04-02 Thread Havard Eidnes
And ... as follow-up I thought I'd check whether "make test" in
lang/llvm (5.0.1nb1) works on NetBSD/amd64 8.0_BETA.  And while the
selftest setup seems to work fine on this platform, there are quite a
bit of unexpected failures:

  Expected Passes: 20309
  Expected Failures  : 130
  Unsupported Tests  : 786
  Unexpected Failures: 211

and it seems a lot of the tests simply crash.  An example:


Testing: 0 .. 10.. 20.. 30.. 40.. 50.. 60
FAIL: LLVM :: ExecutionEngine/test-interp-vec-logical.ll (13657 of 21436)
 TEST 'LLVM :: ExecutionEngine/test-interp-vec-logical.ll' 
FAILED 
Script:
--
/usr/pkgsrc/lang/llvm/work/build/./bin/lli 
/usr/pkgsrc/lang/llvm/work/llvm-5.0.0.src/test/ExecutionEngine/test-interp-vec-logical.ll
 > /dev/null
--
Exit Code: 139

Command Output (stderr):
--
#0 0x7138327c701a llvm::sys::PrintStackTrace(llvm::raw_ostream&) 
(/usr/pkgsrc/lang/llvm/work/build/lib/libLLVM-5.0.so+0x7c701a)
#1 0x7138327c536f llvm::sys::RunSignalHandlers() 
(/usr/pkgsrc/lang/llvm/work/build/lib/libLLVM-5.0.so+0x7c536f)
#2 0x7138327c54b0 SignalHandler(int) 
(/usr/pkgsrc/lang/llvm/work/build/lib/libLLVM-5.0.so+0x7c54b0)
Stack dump:
0.  Program arguments: /usr/pkgsrc/lang/llvm/work/build/./bin/lli 
/usr/pkgsrc/lang/llvm/work/llvm-5.0.0.src/test/ExecutionEngine/test-interp-vec-logical.ll
 
/usr/pkgsrc/lang/llvm/work/build/test/ExecutionEngine/Output/test-interp-vec-logical.ll.script:
 line 1: 18054 Segmentation fault  (core dumped) 
/usr/pkgsrc/lang/llvm/work/build/./bin/lli 
/usr/pkgsrc/lang/llvm/work/llvm-5.0.0.src/test/ExecutionEngine/test-interp-vec-logical.ll
 > /dev/null

However, this doesn't appear to actually give enough information to
zero in on what the actual problem is, sigh!

Isn't the backtracer able to trace through signal delivery events?

I find there's a number of core files left after the selftests have
run:

d3: {10} find work -name '*.core'
work/build/test/MCJITTests.core
work/build/test/OrcJITTests.core
work/build/test/SupportTests.core
work/build/test/BugPoint/opt.core
work/build/test/ExecutionEngine/MCJIT/lli.core
work/build/test/ExecutionEngine/OrcMCJIT/lli.core
work/build/test/ExecutionEngine/lli.core
d3: {11}

but looking at the last one doesn't really give much more useful
information:

d3: {11} gdb -q work/build/./bin/lli
Reading symbols from work/build/./bin/lli...(no debugging symbols found)...done.
(gdb) core-file work/build/test/ExecutionEngine/lli.core
[New process 1]
Core was generated by `lli'.
Program terminated with signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault.
#0  0x701d30805000 in main ()
(gdb) x/i 0x701d30805000
=> 0x701d30805000 :   xor%eax,%eax
(gdb) where
#0  0x701d30805000 in main ()
#1  0x701d2e95bf17 in llvm::MCJIT::runFunction(llvm::Function*, 
llvm::ArrayRef) ()
   from /usr/pkgsrc/lang/llvm/work/build/lib/libLLVM-5.0.so
#2  0x701d2e9378ed in 
llvm::ExecutionEngine::runFunctionAsMain(llvm::Function*, 
std::vector const&, char const* 
const*) () from /usr/pkgsrc/lang/llvm/work/build/lib/libLLVM-5.0.so
#3  0x0041cad6 in main ()
(gdb) i reg
rax0x701d2e95be9a   123270637928090
rbx0x7f7fffecd600   140187731285504
rcx0x701d3080b800   123270670104576
rdx0xff4350da   -12365606
rsi0x20 32
rdi0x701d2d1236e0   123270612530912
rbp0x20 0x20
rsp0x7f7fffecd458   0x7f7fffecd458
r8 0x0  0
r9 0x701d2d1151c0   123270612472256
r100x701d30805000   123270670077952
r110x207519
r120x701d30805000   123270670077952
r130x701d2d16c000   123270612828160
r140x701d2d1236e0   123270612530912
r150x701d2c558b00   123270600166144
rip0x701d30805000   0x701d30805000 
eflags 0x10246  [ PF ZF IF RF ]
cs 0x47 71
ss 0x3f 63
ds 0x3f 63
es 0x3f 63
fs 0x0  0
gs 0x0  0
(gdb) 

?!?  SEGV on "xor %eax,%eax"?!?  I don't think so...

Regards,

- HÃ¥vard