daily CVS update output
Updating src tree: P src/distrib/sets/lists/comp/mi P src/share/man/man9/Makefile U src/share/man/man9/pktqueue.9 P src/sys/arch/arm/fdt/pcihost_fdt.c P src/sys/arch/powerpc/fpu/fpu_compare.c P src/sys/arch/powerpc/fpu/fpu_div.c P src/sys/arch/powerpc/fpu/fpu_emu.c P src/sys/arch/powerpc/fpu/fpu_emu.h P src/sys/arch/powerpc/fpu/fpu_explode.c P src/sys/arch/powerpc/fpu/fpu_extern.h P src/sys/arch/powerpc/fpu/fpu_implode.c P src/sys/arch/powerpc/fpu/fpu_subr.c P src/sys/arch/xen/xen/xenevt.c P src/sys/dev/vnd.c P src/sys/dev/pci/if_bge.c P src/sys/dev/pci/if_bgevar.h P src/sys/dev/ppbus/if_plip.c P src/sys/net/if_loop.c P src/sys/net/pktqueue.c P src/usr.bin/make/cond.c P src/usr.bin/make/unit-tests/cond-cmp-numeric.exp P src/usr.bin/make/unit-tests/cond-cmp-numeric.mk P src/usr.bin/make/unit-tests/cond-cmp-string.exp P src/usr.bin/make/unit-tests/cond-op-parentheses.exp P src/usr.bin/make/unit-tests/cond-op-parentheses.mk P src/usr.bin/make/unit-tests/varmod-ifelse.exp P src/usr.bin/netstat/if.c Updating xsrc tree: Killing core files: Updating release-8 src tree (netbsd-8): Updating release-8 xsrc tree (netbsd-8): Updating release-9 src tree (netbsd-9): Updating release-9 xsrc tree (netbsd-9): Updating file list: -rw-rw-r-- 1 srcmastr netbsd 38519204 Sep 5 03:10 ls-lRA.gz
Re: Excessive sleep time
On Sun, 4 Sep 2022, pin wrote: On current since amd64 since August 28, I get the following at boot, [ 1.037893] ACPI Warning: Firmware issue: Excessive sleep time (0x005A ms > 10 ms) in ACPI Control Method (20220331/exsystem-239) [ 1.037893] ACPI Warning: Firmware issue: Excessive sleep time (0x005A ms > 10 ms) in ACPI Control Method (20220331/exsystem-239) Yeah, I'm seeing this too on my laptop. It's a change in the upstream ACPICA code (see [1]): 1) ACPICA kernel-resident subsystem: For the ASL Sleep() operator, issue a warning if the sleep value is greater than 10 Milliseconds. Quick boottime is important, so warn about sleeps greater than 10 ms. Distribution Linux kernels reach initrd in 350 ms, so excessive delays should be called out. 10 ms is chosen randomly, but three of such delays would already make up ten percent of the boottime. [1]: https://mail-index.netbsd.org/source-changes/2022/08/27/msg140579.html -RVP
fsck failing during setinodebuf on medium sized raid
Hello, I'm working with a ~50tb RAID. I currently have small RAIDs running on 8.x and 9.x servers which are between 18tb to 24tb and do not see the issue on those. The RAID is setup just like the smaller raids per NetBSD documentation. The result seems to be a resource limitation as starting from scratch and recreating the raid and partition result with the same inode number during setinodebuf This file system is mounted as rw,log and does not to seem to have any performance issues, but I did experience a kernel panic which led me to try a forced fsck. The panic may be completely unrelated. amanda#newfs -02 -F -s 105468549120 /dev/rld1d amanda# fsck -f -y /dev/rld1d ** /dev/rld1d ** File system is already clean ** Last Mounted on ** Phase 1 - Check Blocks and Sizes [ 2541.7360615] load: 0.99 cmd: fsck 644 [wait] 0.00u 0.00s 0% 1592k /dev/rld1d: phase 1: cyl group 57321 of 65165 (87%) bad inode number 18446744071562068992 to setinodebuf [ 69786.3416697] uvm_fault(0x83e37a369478, 0x89ff35bad000, 1) -> e [ 69786.4239488] fatal page fault in supervisor mode [ 69786.4801091] trap type 6 code 0 rip 0x808dd271 cs 0x8 rflags 0x10287 cr2 0x89ff35badf68 ilevel 0 rsp 0x8a01cd3dea90 [ 69786.6225918] curlwp 0x83e379cb8ac0 pid 342.1 lowest kstack 0x8a01cd3dc2c0 [ 69786.7130745] panic: trap [ 69786.7421952] cpu0: Begin traceback... [ 69786.7889954] vpanic() at netbsd:vpanic+0x160 [ 69786.8326774] snprintf() at netbsd:snprintf [ 69786.375] startlwp() at netbsd:startlwp [ 69786.9387596] alltraps() at netbsd:alltraps+0xbb [ 69786.9938801] ffs_hashalloc() at netbsd:ffs_hashalloc+0x40 [ 69787.0620328] ffs_valloc() at netbsd:ffs_valloc+0xdd [ 69787.1134827] ffs_newvnode() at netbsd:ffs_newvnode+0x57 [ 69787.1821239] vcache_new() at netbsd:vcache_new+0xa9 [ 69787.2434861] ufs_mkdir() at netbsd:ufs_mkdir+0x6c [ 69787.2934069] VOP_MKDIR() at netbsd:VOP_MKDIR+0x54 [ 69787.3558079] do_sys_mkdirat.isra.8() at netbsd:do_sys_mkdirat.isra.8+0x144 [ 69787.4422238] syscall() at netbsd:syscall+0x157 [ 69787.4936104] --- syscall (number 136) --- [ 69787.5445717] 7c5c2af6282a: [ 69787.5747325] cpu0: End traceback... [ 69787.6204930] dumping to dev 19,1 (offset=15, size=6289150): [ 69787.6204930] dump i/o error
Excessive sleep time
Hi, On current since amd64 since August 28, I get the following at boot, [ 1.037893] ACPI Warning: Firmware issue: Excessive sleep time (0x0064 ms > 10 ms) in ACPI Control Method (20220331/exsystem-239) [ 1.037893] ACPI Warning: Firmware issue: Excessive sleep time (0x0064 ms > 10 ms) in ACPI Control Method (20220331/exsystem-239) [ 1.037893] ACPI Warning: Firmware issue: Excessive sleep time (0x0064 ms > 10 ms) in ACPI Control Method (20220331/exsystem-239) [ 1.037893] ACPI Warning: Firmware issue: Excessive sleep time (0x0064 ms > 10 ms) in ACPI Control Method (20220331/exsystem-239) [ 1.037893] ACPI Warning: Firmware issue: Excessive sleep time (0x005A ms > 10 ms) in ACPI Control Method (20220331/exsystem-239) [ 1.037893] ACPI Warning: Firmware issue: Excessive sleep time (0x005A ms > 10 ms) in ACPI Control Method (20220331/exsystem-239) [ 1.037893] ACPI Warning: Firmware issue: Excessive sleep time (0x005A ms > 10 ms) in ACPI Control Method (20220331/exsystem-239) [ 1.037893] ACPI Warning: Firmware issue: Excessive sleep time (0x005A ms > 10 ms) in ACPI Control Method (20220331/exsystem-239) [ 1.037893] ACPI Warning: Firmware issue: Excessive sleep time (0x005A ms > 10 ms) in ACPI Control Method (20220331/exsystem-239) [ 1.037893] ACPI Warning: Firmware issue: Excessive sleep time (0x005A ms > 10 ms) in ACPI Control Method (20220331/exsystem-239) [ 1.037893] ACPI Warning: Firmware issue: Excessive sleep time (0x005A ms > 10 ms) in ACPI Control Method (20220331/exsystem-239) [ 1.037893] ACPI Warning: Firmware issue: Excessive sleep time (0x005A ms > 10 ms) in ACPI Control Method (20220331/exsystem-239) [ 1.037893] ACPI Warning: Firmware issue: Excessive sleep time (0x005A ms > 10 ms) in ACPI Control Method (20220331/exsystem-239) The system works fine but, these were not there before. I usually upgrade the base system once a week. Right now, ~ > uname -v NetBSD 9.99.99 (GENERIC) #0: Fri Sep 2 06:51:24 UTC 2022 mkre...@mkrepro.netbsd.org:/usr/src/sys/arch/amd64/compile/GENERIC Any clues? Thanks! Sent with Proton Mail secure email.
Automated report: NetBSD-current/i386 test failure
This is an automatically generated notice of new failures of the NetBSD test suite. The newly failing test cases are: fs/nfs/t_rquotad:get_nfs_be_1_both fs/nfs/t_rquotad:get_nfs_be_1_group fs/nfs/t_rquotad:get_nfs_be_1_user fs/nfs/t_rquotad:get_nfs_le_1_both fs/nfs/t_rquotad:get_nfs_le_1_group fs/nfs/t_rquotad:get_nfs_le_1_user lib/libc/net/t_hostent:dnsbyaddrlookup4 lib/libc/net/t_hostent:dnsbyaddrlookup6 lib/libc/net/t_hostent:dnsbynamelookup4 lib/libc/net/t_hostent:dnsbynamelookup6 lib/libc/net/t_hostent:gethostbyaddr4 lib/libc/net/t_hostent:gethostbyaddr6 lib/libc/net/t_hostent:gethostbyname4 lib/libc/net/t_hostent:gethostbyname6 lib/librumpclient/t_fd:sigio lib/librumphijack/t_tcpip:http lib/librumphijack/t_tcpip:nfs lib/librumphijack/t_tcpip:ssh net/icmp/t_ping2:basic net/if_loop/t_pr:loopmtu net/if_loop/t_pr:loopmtu_csum net/if_vlan/t_vlan:vlan_basic6 net/net/t_ipv6address:linklocal net/net/t_pktinfo_send:pktinfo_send_bindaddr net/net/t_pktinfo_send:pktinfo_send_bindaddrport net/net/t_pktinfo_send:pktinfo_send_bindany net/net/t_pktinfo_send:pktinfo_send_bindother net/net/t_pktinfo_send:pktinfo_send_bindport net/net/t_pktinfo_send:pktinfo_send_invalidarg net/net/t_pktinfo_send:pktinfo_send_multicast net/net/t_pktinfo_send:pktinfo_send_rawip net/net/t_pktinfo_send:pktinfo_send_unbound The above tests failed in each of the last 4 test runs, and passed in at least 26 consecutive runs before that. The following commits were made between the last successful test and the failed test: 2022.09.02.16.24.31 sjg src/usr.bin/make/cond.c,v 1.335 2022.09.02.16.24.31 sjg src/usr.bin/make/for.c,v 1.169 2022.09.02.16.24.31 sjg src/usr.bin/make/make.1,v 1.331 2022.09.02.16.24.31 sjg src/usr.bin/make/make.h,v 1.304 2022.09.02.16.24.31 sjg src/usr.bin/make/parse.c,v 1.682 2022.09.02.16.24.31 sjg src/usr.bin/make/unit-tests/Makefile,v 1.322 2022.09.02.16.24.31 sjg src/usr.bin/make/unit-tests/directive-for-break.exp,v 1.1 2022.09.02.16.24.31 sjg src/usr.bin/make/unit-tests/directive-for-break.mk,v 1.1 2022.09.02.18.54.25 sjg src/distrib/sets/lists/tests/mi,v 1.1221 2022.09.02.18.54.25 sjg src/usr.bin/make/unit-tests/Makefile,v 1.323 2022.09.02.23.48.10 thorpej src/sys/arch/hppa/hppa/trap.c,v 1.121 2022.09.02.23.48.10 thorpej src/sys/arch/sun68k/sun68k/isr.c,v 1.27 2022.09.02.23.48.10 thorpej src/sys/arch/vax/vax/intvec.S,v 1.23 2022.09.02.23.48.10 thorpej src/sys/arch/xen/xen/xennetback_xenbus.c,v 1.108 2022.09.02.23.48.10 thorpej src/sys/dev/pci/if_jme.c,v 1.55 2022.09.02.23.48.10 thorpej src/sys/dev/pci/if_tl.c,v 1.125 2022.09.02.23.48.10 thorpej src/sys/dev/ppbus/if_plip.c,v 1.37 2022.09.02.23.48.10 thorpej src/sys/dev/qbus/if_qt.c,v 1.27 2022.09.02.23.48.10 thorpej src/sys/dev/sbus/be.c,v 1.97 2022.09.02.23.48.11 thorpej src/sys/dev/sbus/qe.c,v 1.78 2022.09.02.23.48.11 thorpej src/sys/external/bsd/ipf/netinet/ip_auth.c,v 1.7 2022.09.02.23.48.11 thorpej src/sys/net/raw_usrreq.c,v 1.65 2022.09.02.23.48.11 thorpej src/sys/netinet/ip_carp.c,v 1.117 2022.09.02.23.48.11 thorpej src/sys/netipsec/ipsec_netbsd.c,v 1.55 2022.09.03.00.31.02 thorpej src/sys/net/if_ethersubr.c,v 1.316 2022.09.03.00.31.02 thorpej src/sys/net/if_spppsubr.c,v 1.265 2022.09.03.00.50.07 rillig src/usr.bin/make/for.c,v 1.170 2022.09.03.00.50.07 rillig src/usr.bin/make/make.1,v 1.332 2022.09.03.00.50.07 rillig src/usr.bin/make/parse.c,v 1.683 2022.09.03.00.50.07 rillig src/usr.bin/make/unit-tests/directive-for-break.exp,v 1.2 2022.09.03.00.50.07 rillig src/usr.bin/make/unit-tests/directive-for-break.mk,v 1.2 2022.09.03.01.35.03 thorpej src/sys/net/Attic/netisr_dispatch.h,v 1.21 2022.09.03.01.35.03 thorpej src/sys/net/if_arcsubr.c,v 1.84 2022.09.03.01.35.03 thorpej src/sys/net/if_ethersubr.c,v 1.317 2022.09.03.01.35.03 thorpej src/sys/net/if_ieee1394subr.c,v 1.68 2022.09.03.01.35.03 thorpej src/sys/net/netisr_dispatch.h,v 1.21 2022.09.03.01.35.03 thorpej src/sys/netinet/if_arp.c,v 1.308 2022.09.03.01.35.03 thorpej src/sys/netinet/if_inarp.h,v 1.53 2022.09.03.01.35.03 thorpej src/sys/rump/net/lib/libnetinet/netinet_component.c,v 1.12 2022.09.03.01.48.22 thorpej src/sys/net/Attic/netisr_dispatch.h,v 1.22 2022.09.03.01.48.22 thorpej src/sys/net/if_ethersubr.c,v 1.318 2022.09.03.01.48.22 thorpej src/sys/net/if_gre.c,v 1.182 2022.09.03.01.48.22 thorpej src/sys/net/if_loop.c,v 1.115 2022.09.03.01.48.22 thorpej src/sys/net/netisr_dispatch.h,v 1.22 2022.09.03.01.48.22 thorpej src/sys/netatalk/at_extern.h,v 1.21 2022.09.03.01.48.22 thorpej src/sys/netatalk/at_proto.c,v 1.23 2022.09.03.01.48.22 thorpej src/sys/netatalk/at_var.h,v 1.10 2022.09.03.01.48.22 thorpej src/sys/netatalk/ddp_input.c,v 1.32 2022.09.03.01.48.22 thorpej
Re: legacy DRM UMS vs. "options DRM_LEGACY"
"John D. Baker" wrote: > Well, 3 out of 4 kernels built when the above procedure was followed. > the following config still fails when the old DRM drivers are enabled: Your RACKMOUNT config builds fine for me (apart from plip but I will fix that), are you sure that the link errors you are seeing are from the kernel and not from a module?
