Re: Can't build evbarm
> Now that Christos moved the function around, that declaration in the > header is just noise, and could be removed. Thank you for fixing this. Adam
daily CVS update output
Updating src tree: P src/distrib/sets/lists/base/mi P src/distrib/sets/lists/tests/mi P src/doc/3RDPARTY P src/doc/CHANGES P src/etc/mtree/NetBSD.dist.base P src/external/mit/xorg/server/xorg-server.old/Makefile.servermod P src/external/mit/xorg/server/xorg-server.old/hw/xfree86/dixmods/fb/Makefile P src/lib/libc/stdlib/Makefile.inc P src/lib/libm/src/e_acoshl.c P src/lib/libm/src/e_acosl.c P src/lib/libm/src/e_asinl.c P src/lib/libm/src/e_atanhl.c P src/lib/libm/src/e_coshl.c P src/lib/libm/src/s_asinhl.c P src/lib/libm/src/s_logl.c P src/lib/libm/src/s_tanhl.c P src/share/terminfo/import P src/share/terminfo/terminfo P src/sys/arch/evbppc/wii/dev/wiifb.c P src/tests/lib/libutil/t_snprintb.c P src/tests/usr.bin/xlint/lint1/check-expect.lua P src/tests/usr.bin/xlint/lint1/msg_252.c U src/tests/usr.bin/xlint/lint1/platform_ilp32_c90.c U src/tests/usr.bin/xlint/lint1/platform_ilp32_c99.c U src/tests/usr.bin/xlint/lint1/platform_ilp32_trad.c U src/tests/usr.bin/xlint/lint1/platform_lp64_c90.c U src/tests/usr.bin/xlint/lint1/platform_lp64_c99.c U src/tests/usr.bin/xlint/lint1/platform_lp64_trad.c P src/usr.bin/getconf/getconf.c P src/usr.bin/xlint/lint1/lex.c Updating xsrc tree: Killing core files: Updating file list: -rw-rw-r-- 1 srcmastr netbsd 44337636 Jan 28 03:03 ls-lRA.gz
Automated report: NetBSD-current/i386 test failure
This is an automatically generated notice of new failures of the NetBSD test suite. The newly failing test cases are: usr.bin/xlint/lint1/t_integration:lex_integer_ilp32 usr.bin/xlint/lint1/t_integration:msg_218 The above tests failed in each of the last 4 test runs, and passed in at least 26 consecutive runs before that. The following commits were made between the last successful test and the first failed test: 2024.01.27.20.03.14 rillig src/tests/usr.bin/xlint/lint1/platform_ilp32_c90.c 1.2 2024.01.27.20.03.14 rillig src/tests/usr.bin/xlint/lint1/platform_ilp32_c99.c 1.2 2024.01.27.20.03.14 rillig src/tests/usr.bin/xlint/lint1/platform_ilp32_trad.c 1.2 2024.01.27.20.03.14 rillig src/tests/usr.bin/xlint/lint1/platform_lp64_c90.c 1.2 2024.01.27.20.03.14 rillig src/tests/usr.bin/xlint/lint1/platform_lp64_c99.c 1.2 2024.01.27.20.03.14 rillig src/tests/usr.bin/xlint/lint1/platform_lp64_trad.c 1.2 2024.01.27.20.03.14 rillig src/usr.bin/xlint/lint1/lex.c 1.203 Logs can be found at: http://releng.NetBSD.org/b5reports/i386/commits-2024.01.html#2024.01.27.20.03.14
Re: GitHub mirror stopped mirroring
On Sat, 2024-01-27 at 16:17 -0800, Chris Hanson wrote: > It looks like there are CVS commits that haven’t made it to the > GitHub mirror yet. > > Anyone know what’s up with that? > > -- Chris > The Mercurial mirror also hasn't been updated for a week. Ngā mihi, Lloyd
GitHub mirror stopped mirroring
It looks like there are CVS commits that haven’t made it to the GitHub mirror yet. Anyone know what’s up with that? -- Chris
Re: Can't build evbarm
On Sat, Jan 27, 2024 at 03:33:06PM +0700, Robert Elz wrote: > Now that Christos moved the function around, that declaration in the > header is just noise, and could be removed. Yes, that would be consistent then (but isn't it against the new style rules?) Martin
Re: Can't build evbarm
Date:Sat, 27 Jan 2024 09:11:58 +0100 From:Martin Husemann Message-ID: <20240127081158.gb16...@mail.duskware.de> | Because the declaration in the relevant header is already there, Now that Christos moved the function around, that declaration in the header is just noise, and could be removed. kre
Re: Can't build evbarm
Date:Fri, 26 Jan 2024 21:09:30 +0100 From:Adam Message-ID: <7be03ef0-a516-4102-951a-be8a0d468...@netbsd.org> | Why not just change the order? Christos has done that now, so I guess that more or less "fixes" the issue. I didn't want to do it that way, as it still leaves _LIBC_INTERNAL unset when building the parts of libc which go in the tools libcompat and one day, we're likely to have the same problem again, for the same reason, and I would have preferred to have the Makefile(s) for the tools libcompat build fixed instead, which would have also solved it. If the "static" hadn't been commented out for MD2Transform() this would certainly have been the right way (then there would have not been any prototype in any md2.h, _LIBC_INTERNAL or not) - either that or just adding a prototype to the .c file (sometimes that is necessary, as there can be 2 such functions which refer to each other, they both can't come first). In this case moving it, rather than adding a prototype is better, as the prototype would have needed another commented out "static" in it, to match the actual function, and that would have been overboard. In any case, my strategy had been to leave md2.c as it was, and attempt to get someone who knew how, to fix the Makefile so that _LIBC_TNTERNAL was defined (those functions are still part of a libc lookalike, even when in libcompat so deserve to be compiled the same way as in libc). I guess we just wait for the next time. kre
Re: Can't build evbarm
On Fri, Jan 26, 2024 at 09:09:30PM +0100, Adam wrote: > Simple and elegant. No hacks involved. Because the declaration in the relevant header is already there, and the order does not matter. But the #ifdef around the declaration needs to do the right thing. No need to move things around and its like this code is compiled everwhere else where it is used. Martin
