Re: netbsd-7 build error?

[Martin Husemann]

On Thu, Jan 03, 2019 at 05:05:42PM +0100, Havard Eidnes wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> I just updated one of my source trees to netbsd-7, and did a
> fresh rebuild (empty obj and dest, host oldish 7.1_STABLE), but
> got:

For what value of "just"? You need something from today around noon UTC
or newer.

> Anyone have any guess why I saw this build error but it's not
> seen in the autobuild?

There has been no -7 build since the pullup that broke it (but you see the
lossage in yesterdays -8 builds).

Martin

Re: netbsd-7 build error?

[Havard Eidnes]

>> I just updated one of my source trees to netbsd-7, and did a
>> fresh rebuild (empty obj and dest, host oldish 7.1_STABLE), but
>> got:
>
> For what value of "just"? You need something from today around noon UTC
> or newer.

My update was done 13:06 UTC+1, but via a cvs mirror, so possibly
a few hours earlier than that.

>> Anyone have any guess why I saw this build error but it's not
>> seen in the autobuild?
>
> There has been no -7 build since the pullup that broke it (but
> you see the lossage in yesterdays -8 builds).

Aha, that explains it, thanks!  I suspected it was some local
oddity of my own doing; faith in self restored.

Regards,

- Håvard

Re: netbsd-7 build error?

[Martin Husemann]

On Thu, Jan 03, 2019 at 05:15:10PM +0100, Havard Eidnes wrote:
> >> I just updated one of my source trees to netbsd-7, and did a
> >> fresh rebuild (empty obj and dest, host oldish 7.1_STABLE), but
> >> got:
> >
> > For what value of "just"? You need something from today around noon UTC
> > or newer.
> 
> My update was done 13:06 UTC+1, but via a cvs mirror, so possibly
> a few hours earlier than that.

You need:

src/sys/compat/sys/time_types.h 
$NetBSD: time_types.h,v 1.1.40.1 2019/01/03 11:13:19 martin Exp $

(this adds #include  for userland)

> 
> >> Anyone have any guess why I saw this build error but it's not
> >> seen in the autobuild?
> >
> > There has been no -7 build since the pullup that broke it (but
> > you see the lossage in yesterdays -8 builds).
> 
> Aha, that explains it, thanks!  I suspected it was some local
> oddity of my own doing; faith in self restored.

:-)

Martin