Re: CXF 2.1 Release Date

2008-04-23 Thread thomas_ramapuram

From an  http://www.nabble.com/CXF-2.1-B2-td16755697.html Earlier Mail  it
looks like it will happen in a couple of days.


smodekurti wrote:
 
 Hi there,
 I belong to the enterprise architecture team of a large retail
 corporation. We are in the process of adopting a jax-ws stack for our Web
 Services implementation. After comparing the features offered by different
 stacks, we have decided to go with CXF. But some of the features that we
 wanted to implement in our framework would need cxf 2.1 runtime which I
 believe is not stable yet. Is there any defined date that you are looking
 at to release 2.1. We would love to use CXF provide we are able to get a
 stable release for 2.1 at the earliest. 
 
 Srinivas
 

-- 
View this message in context: 
http://www.nabble.com/CXF-2.1-Release-Date-tp16826273p16834739.html
Sent from the cxf-user mailing list archive at Nabble.com.



CXF 2.1 Release Date

2008-04-22 Thread smodekurti

Hi there,
I belong to the enterprise architecture team of a large retail corporation.
We are in the process of adopting a jax-ws stack for our Web Services
implementation. After comparing the features offered by different stacks, we
have decided to go with CXF. But some of the features that we wanted to
implement in our framework would need cxf 2.1 runtime which I believe is not
stable yet. Is there any defined date that you are looking at to release
2.1. We would love to use CXF provide we are able to get a stable release
for 2.1 at the earliest. 

Srinivas
-- 
View this message in context: 
http://www.nabble.com/CXF-2.1-Release-Date-tp16826273p16826273.html
Sent from the cxf-user mailing list archive at Nabble.com.



Re: CXF 2.1 Release Date

2008-04-22 Thread Daniel Kulp

If things go well with the TCK's and stuff tonight, I'll be doing the 
build tomorrow.  Then the vote for a few days

Dan


On Tuesday 22 April 2008, smodekurti wrote:
 Hi there,
 I belong to the enterprise architecture team of a large retail
 corporation. We are in the process of adopting a jax-ws stack for our
 Web Services implementation. After comparing the features offered by
 different stacks, we have decided to go with CXF. But some of the
 features that we wanted to implement in our framework would need cxf
 2.1 runtime which I believe is not stable yet. Is there any defined
 date that you are looking at to release 2.1. We would love to use CXF
 provide we are able to get a stable release for 2.1 at the earliest.

 Srinivas



-- 
J. Daniel Kulp
Principal Engineer, IONA
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.dankulp.com/blog


Re: CXF 2.1 Release Date

2008-04-22 Thread Vasu Modekurti
Dan,
Thank you very much for the quick response. What could be a possible date
for official release after tomorrow's build, provided no road blocks.

Srinivas

On Tue, Apr 22, 2008 at 5:27 PM, Daniel Kulp [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:


 If things go well with the TCK's and stuff tonight, I'll be doing the
 build tomorrow.  Then the vote for a few days

 Dan


 On Tuesday 22 April 2008, smodekurti wrote:
  Hi there,
  I belong to the enterprise architecture team of a large retail
  corporation. We are in the process of adopting a jax-ws stack for our
  Web Services implementation. After comparing the features offered by
  different stacks, we have decided to go with CXF. But some of the
  features that we wanted to implement in our framework would need cxf
  2.1 runtime which I believe is not stable yet. Is there any defined
  date that you are looking at to release 2.1. We would love to use CXF
  provide we are able to get a stable release for 2.1 at the earliest.
 
  Srinivas



 --
 J. Daniel Kulp
 Principal Engineer, IONA
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 http://www.dankulp.com/blog



Re: CXF 2.1 Release Date

2008-04-22 Thread Daniel Kulp

I would say Monday.   It's normally 72 hours for the vote, but that 
places it on the weekend.  My honey do list is already too long for 
the weekend so I probably won't get to do the uploads and syncs and 
stuff till Monday.

Dan

On Tuesday 22 April 2008, Vasu Modekurti wrote:
 Dan,
 Thank you very much for the quick response. What could be a possible
 date for official release after tomorrow's build, provided no road
 blocks.

 Srinivas

 On Tue, Apr 22, 2008 at 5:27 PM, Daniel Kulp [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  If things go well with the TCK's and stuff tonight, I'll be doing
  the build tomorrow.  Then the vote for a few days
 
  Dan
 
  On Tuesday 22 April 2008, smodekurti wrote:
   Hi there,
   I belong to the enterprise architecture team of a large retail
   corporation. We are in the process of adopting a jax-ws stack for
   our Web Services implementation. After comparing the features
   offered by different stacks, we have decided to go with CXF. But
   some of the features that we wanted to implement in our framework
   would need cxf 2.1 runtime which I believe is not stable yet. Is
   there any defined date that you are looking at to release 2.1. We
   would love to use CXF provide we are able to get a stable release
   for 2.1 at the earliest.
  
   Srinivas
 
  --
  J. Daniel Kulp
  Principal Engineer, IONA
  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  http://www.dankulp.com/blog



-- 
J. Daniel Kulp
Principal Engineer, IONA
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.dankulp.com/blog


Re: CXF 2.1 Release Date

2008-04-22 Thread Vasu Modekurti
Sounds good for us. Thank you

Srinivas

On Tue, Apr 22, 2008 at 5:35 PM, Daniel Kulp [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:


 I would say Monday.   It's normally 72 hours for the vote, but that
 places it on the weekend.  My honey do list is already too long for
 the weekend so I probably won't get to do the uploads and syncs and
 stuff till Monday.

 Dan

 On Tuesday 22 April 2008, Vasu Modekurti wrote:
  Dan,
  Thank you very much for the quick response. What could be a possible
  date for official release after tomorrow's build, provided no road
  blocks.
 
  Srinivas
 
  On Tue, Apr 22, 2008 at 5:27 PM, Daniel Kulp [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
   If things go well with the TCK's and stuff tonight, I'll be doing
   the build tomorrow.  Then the vote for a few days
  
   Dan
  
   On Tuesday 22 April 2008, smodekurti wrote:
Hi there,
I belong to the enterprise architecture team of a large retail
corporation. We are in the process of adopting a jax-ws stack for
our Web Services implementation. After comparing the features
offered by different stacks, we have decided to go with CXF. But
some of the features that we wanted to implement in our framework
would need cxf 2.1 runtime which I believe is not stable yet. Is
there any defined date that you are looking at to release 2.1. We
would love to use CXF provide we are able to get a stable release
for 2.1 at the earliest.
   
Srinivas
  
   --
   J. Daniel Kulp
   Principal Engineer, IONA
   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
   http://www.dankulp.com/blog



 --
 J. Daniel Kulp
 Principal Engineer, IONA
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 http://www.dankulp.com/blog



Re: CXF 2.1 release

2008-04-01 Thread Daniel Kulp
On Tuesday 01 April 2008, Vincenzo Vitale wrote:
 Hi,

 was the 2.1 released postponed?


Quick update about that.

There are currently two JAX-WS TCK failures with the 2.1 codebase.  
However, they are bugs in the TCK and we have started the challenge 
process, but we have not yet received an update/patch to the TCK from 
Sun.Until we have 100% pass rate on the TCK, we cannot release 
a JAX-WS compatible version of cxf.   To me, the compatibility 
statement is important.


Also, I really don't want to do another incubator release.   They are NOT 
enjoyable to do at all due to constant changing  requirements, people 
voting based on personal opinions, etc  2.0.5 was a pain.  Thus, 
unless one of the other committers wants to step up and be the release 
manager, (which I'm all for, BTW.  I'd be glad to help someone out if 
they are interested.)  I'm going to wait till the April 16th or so when 
we can do releases ourselves.  If, for some reason, the board doesn't 
get to voting on our graduation on the 16th, then I'll go ahead and deal 
with the incubator then, but at this point, I have no desire to do it 
again.

That said, I'll probably build a beta-2 build sometime later this week.   
I'd REALLY like any extra eyes on it to give it some good testing.

-- 
J. Daniel Kulp
Principal Engineer, IONA
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.dankulp.com/blog