Re: Receipt of Payment - $699.99 USD
On 3/15/23 8:27 AM, Rueban Dhillon via Cygwin wrote: PayPal Dear cygwin@cygwin.com, We are writing to confirm that we have received your payment of $699.99 USD for your recent purchase with Coinbase Company. Thank you for your prompt payment. Please find below the details of your transaction: Order Number: #5558-6698-2386 Date of Purchase: March 15, 2023 Payment Amount: $699.99 USD I get these too (don't we all?) Hilarious AND annoying. -Ben -- Ben Kamen - O.D.T., S.P. -- Email: ben AT benkamen DOT net http://www.benkamen.net Cell: 224.619.9006http://www.linkedin.com/in/benkamen -- NOTICE: All legal disclaimers sent to benkamen.net or any of its affiliated domains are rendered null and void on receipt of communications and will be handled/considered as such. -- Problem reports: https://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: https://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation:https://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: https://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Re:
On 12/9/20 6:15 AM, chaparay01--- via Cygwin wrote: Who the fuck are you ! You been writing my husband -- HAHAHAHA... Oh yes... we've been sending him the acronym list and telling him all about posix coding and shell scripting!! THE HORRORS! LoL... -Ben -- Problem reports: https://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: https://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation:https://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: https://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Re: Using ARM GNU GCC with Cygwin
Well then. This certainly turned out to be all sorts of interesting discussion. :) I for one also can say it's nice to have a cygwin environment over DOS if I'm forced to a CLI on Windows. Most of my days are spent on Linux -- but it looks like I have some legit CLI time coming on Windows and cygwin was my first go-to thought for that. It's already bad enough how many times I type 'ls -l' in DOS to get an error. HAhahaha. (two thumbs up) -Ben -- Problem reports: https://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: https://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation:https://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: https://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Re: Audit Executives
On 03/07/2018 02:02 PM, Maria Sadie wrote: > Did you get a chance to review my previous email? Let me know if we can > schedule a call to discuss further. > > Look forward to hearing back > > Regards, > > Maria > Makes you wonder if they really get back all the list emails to their inbox. -Ben -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Re: OPT OUT
On 02/28/2018 12:50 AM, Wayne Barron wrote: > To funny. > Sometimes I wish we could take away some adults internet access. You know -- before they hurt themselves with it. ;) -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Re: Car Auto Wrap
On 07/10/2017 01:58 PM, Wayne Barron wrote: > SPAM > Bloody Vikings!! ;) -Ben -- Ben Kamen - O.D.T., S.P. -- Email: ben AT benkamen DOT net http://www.benkamen.net Cell: 224.619.9006http://www.linkedin.com/in/benkamen -- NOTICE: All legal disclaimers sent to benkamen.net or any of it's affiliated domains are rendered null and void on receipt of communications and will be handled/considered as such. -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Re: Redhat, Sourceware, Cygwin Web Site Outage Recovering
On 04/21/2017 01:30 PM, Brian Inglis wrote: > Looks like Redhat, Sourceware, Cygwin web sites are coming > back up after an outage (confirmed by two isup/down sites) or > there have been some major network issues on the west coast I wonder if it was west-coast... I had issues getting to some Xilinx FPGA resources this morning -Ben -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Re: List configuration?
On 4/29/2010 10:24 AM, Jeremy Bopp wrote: On 4/29/2010 10:19 AM, Lee Maschmeyer wrote: Hi folks, The user's guide requests that people reply to the list, but the default headers are set up to reply to the sender. This seems a bit strange. I know it's been this way for ages but I do get tired of realizing I forgot to change the recipient. Have you tried using the rely-to-all function of your mailer? When I do that with Thunderbird, the recipient is correctly set to only the list address. If I simply reply, the recipient is indeed set to the sender as you say. The newer thunderbird (I think starting with version 3) has a button Reply to List I try to remember to use that. -Ben -- Ben Kamen - O.D.T., S.P. -- Home: b...@benjammin.net http://www.benjammin.net http://www.linkedin.com/in/benkamen 'fortune' says: If your next pot of chili tastes better, it probably is because of something left out, rather than added. -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Re: [Slightly OT] Need help with GNU ld
On 4/2/2010 1:20 AM, Christopher Faylor wrote: This is more than slightly offtopic here. It's completely offtopic. Please find another forum. Sorry. Not really. I figured there could be a few here who are somewhat gcc saavy. Maybe I'd be lucky enough to find someone who could help me learn this... offlist. Never hurts to ask? Anyway - sorry to bother. Moving along... -Ben -- Ben Kamen - O.D.T., S.P. == Email: bkamen AT benjammin DOT net Web: http://www.benjammin.net -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
[Slightly OT] Need help with GNU ld
Hi all, I'm sort of lost as to where I might even start with this, and since this group is so fluent (I'm guessing) with GCC, I'm hoping someone here can either answer or point me to where I can go look. (I'm looking on the gnu.org's gplusplus list and am not sure if that's a good source since it seems kind of dead) Anyway - here's my problem. I'm working on an embedded app that uses GCC for its compiler. I have 2 pieces of code that share common library functions from libc.a like memcpy and strlen Because the two pieces are a bootloader and the application, I would like the bootloader to be linked with a completely private set of functions which INCLUDEs the library calls they make. This would duplicate those libc.a calls like memcpy() and strlen() inside the bootloader portion. So my question is (and I might be looking in the wrong place to do this, but it seems like 'ld' would take care of it): How do I tell the ld that for bootloader.o, all library references like memcpy() should be inlined/included with that function. I've got all the functions in the bootloader corralled into the memory space I want, but the functions called in libc.a are shared. 'static' only works for the immediate function while any calls to a libc.a function get shared with the main application. I've already tried the forum for the micro-controller I'm using.. but apparently, it's new enough that I'm too far ahead on the curve for anyone else to help me. (even from the company) Thanks in advance and sorry for bugging all of you here.. if I hear crickets, I'll try and keep digging elsewhere. -Ben -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Cygwin Usage -- Occasional but sunny
I just wanted to say thanks to everyone who contributes to Cygwin for the great tool it is. I don't use it often, but like these past 2 weeks using openssl, net-snmp, vi and tcl from a friendly ksh prompt on windows to do some development from my WinXP laptop has been great. The ease which I showed stuff working to my clients prompted them to go out and install/update their own machines. So - I just wanted to say thanks! :D -Ben -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
SNMP utils
Hey all, Pardon this rather neophyte question: I have cygwin on my laptop (from years ago) and it has snmp utils loaded that I can access from cygwin. (net-snmp 5.4.1) Anyway - I don't see net-snmp available from the current list.. so I'm assuming I installed it separately.. But it's in my cygwin directory -- so I thought I'd check here first. Can anyone validate my paranoia? (and forgetfulness) Thanks a bunch! -Ben -- Ben Kamen - O.D.T., S.P. = Email: bkamen AT benjammin DOT net Web: http://www.benjammin.net -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Re: SNMP utils
On 2/15/2010 2:14 PM, Larry Hall (Cygwin) wrote: On 02/15/2010 02:05 PM, Ben Kamen wrote: Hey all, Pardon this rather neophyte question: I have cygwin on my laptop (from years ago) and it has snmp utils loaded that I can access from cygwin. (net-snmp 5.4.1) Anyway - I don't see net-snmp available from the current list.. so I'm assuming I installed it separately.. But it's in my cygwin directory -- so I thought I'd check here first. Can anyone validate my paranoia? (and forgetfulness) http://cygwin.com/cgi-bin2/package-grep.cgi?grep=net-snmp Yep. Did that and wondered if I was insane. Thanks! -Ben -- Ben Kamen - O.D.T., S.P. = Email: bkamen AT benjammin DOT net Web: http://www.benjammin.net -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Re: [CFT] libtool on nix-cygwin cross, with wine
Greg Freemyer wrote: On Tue, Feb 24, 2009 at 4:35 PM, rhubbell rhubb...@ihubbell.com wrote: On Tue, 24 Feb 2009 16:15:33 -0500 Greg Chicares wrote: By the way, this list discourages full quoting: http://www.cygwin.com/acronyms/#TOFU Ok, this is one neurotic list. A lot of Linux mailing lists have that policy. Especially if it is high volume or has a large subscriber base. The idea is that someone can read a single email and understand it without having to bounce all over the place. What still always makes me laugh is the people who are so emphatic about top vs. bottom posting. (someone even had a clever .sig showing the flow of top posting and how backwards it is) But honestly, we humans have remarkable brains that let us put back together the conversation in either order. Is it really *that* hard? Maybe for some. But what made me laugh about the .sig was that it missed something. it said something along the idea of: Because it just does. Why. Yes. So, does that make it evil? because it reverses the flow of discussion. why is top posting evil? But what makes me laugh is that people on a list have now just received a sequence of messages in the correct flow with the most current information at the top without the need for scrolling through redundant previous message info just to get to the goods at the bottom. Personally (and this is the important part), I don't let it bother *me* because I realize everyone's brain works a little differently. Speaking of which.. http://mailformat.dan.info/quoting/top-posting.html Sorry for my ramble. I'll go hide now. -Ben -- Ben Kamen - O.D.T., S.P. = Email: bkamen AT benjammin DOT net Web: http://www.benjammin.net As seen somewhere on the net: My other computer is your Windows Server. -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
Re: Does CYGWIN work on Windows 2008 x86 architecture ?
Corinna Vinschen wrote: Works fine for me. Except in one case: http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin/2008-10/msg00459.html I opened a support case at Microsoft but it has been refused. Since the problem occurs in a Microsoft DLL, we have no way to fix it in Cygwin. Cygwin 1.7 has a crude workaround for this situation, though. So your choices are Boy if that doesn't smack of monopoly abuse. Brings back memories of DR-DOS and others. -Ben -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
Re: Are there vnc packages?
rhubbell wrote: I looked for vnc packages in cygwin but didn't find any. Do they exist? Maybe no need since there are plenty of vnc packages that run on winxp already? Yes. You can download from www.RealVNC.com I used the personal edition. It's very nice and their renewal prices are super reasonable. -Ben -- Ben Kamen - O.D.T., S.P. = Email: bkamen AT benjammin DOT net Web: http://www.benjammin.net As seen somewhere on the net: My other computer is your Windows Server. -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
Re: Are there vnc packages?
Ben Kamen wrote: rhubbell wrote: I looked for vnc packages in cygwin but didn't find any. Do they exist? Maybe no need since there are plenty of vnc packages that run on winxp already? Yes. You can download from www.RealVNC.com I used the personal edition. It's very nice and their renewal prices are super reasonable. Sorry - should have been more specific. For Windows they exist.. for Cygwin, I've never looked, so I don't know... -Ben -- Ben Kamen - O.D.T., S.P. = Email: bkamen AT benjammin DOT net Web: http://www.benjammin.net As seen somewhere on the net: My other computer is your Windows Server. -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
TCL 20080420 lost serial port capabilities
I used to use COM ports on windows all the time and now I installed Cygwin on another machine and the capability has been totally lost. I've recompiled tcl from the cygwin src package to no avail. I haven't starting digging yet --- unfortunately my last post went unanswered. So I'm trying again. Any thoughts? -Ben -- Ben Kamen - O.D.T., S.P. = Email: bkamen AT benjammin DOT net Web: http://www.benjammin.net As seen somewhere on the net: My other computer is your Windows Server. -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
Re: TCL 20080420 lost serial port capabilities
Ben Kamen wrote: I used to use COM ports on windows all the time and now I installed Cygwin on another machine and the capability has been totally lost. Ok, correction -- not totally lost. I was having problems with fconfigure stating that fconfigure wasn't valid when used with a serial port. (COMx:) -- but since compiling the src, it's back to working. So there's something amiss with the default installable pkg. Just an FYI for whoever maintains the package. -Ben -- Ben Kamen - O.D.T., S.P. = Email: bkamen AT benjammin DOT net Web: http://www.benjammin.net As seen somewhere on the net: My other computer is your Windows Server. -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
Hello cygwin List --
Hi all, I'm sorry for posting this here if it's inappropriate for the list, but I already tried the correct list (I think) with a reply to post it here. So I'll re-post here in the hopes I can't get some instruction as to what I should do or a reply from a developer. Thanks, -Ben === Ben Kamen says on Oct, 13th 2008: Subject: Problem with TCL libraries 20080420 Hey guys (anyone listening?) I recently updated my cygwin TCL library and the -mode switch disappeared from fconfigure. The TCL folks mentioned that if no serial devices are present on the machine the package is compiled on, then -mode for fconfigure is no longer made an option. (or something like that). So currently, fconfigure and it's ability to manipulate serial ports is broken. Unless I'm wonky and need to do something extra (which I didn't need to do with my last install) -Ben -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
Problem with TCL libraries 20080420
Hey guys (anyone listening?) I recently updated my cygwin TCL library and the -mode switch disappeared from fconfigure. The TCL folks mentioned that if no serial devices are present on the machine the package is compiled on, then -mode for fconfigure is no longer made an option. (or something like that). So currently, fconfigure and it's ability to manipulate serial ports is broken. Unless I'm wonky and need to do something extra (which I didn't need to do with my last install) -Ben
