Re: Windows XP SP2 and Firewall

2004-03-02 Thread Elliott Wilcoxon
Perhaps you're looking in the wrong place?  ICF came with WinXP 
originally.  Open a network connection-Properties-Advanced-Checkbox 
for ICF.

Elliott Wilcoxon

Alexander Gottwald wrote:
On Tue, 2 Mar 2004, Stuart Adamson wrote:

Maybe we need a wrapper script when runs disable firewall, run X,
enable firewall.  Works well (until the use kills the wrapper script...)


I'll play with the test program I've written. Maybe this will get an simple 
commandline interface for configuring ICF. 

But first I have to find an WinXP with installed ICF anywhere. Win2k did 
not have it and the plain XP box (no SPs) here hasn't it either.

bye
ago


Re: SCP doesn't complete transfers of large files

2004-01-29 Thread Elliott Wilcoxon
Bill C. Riemers wrote:

ssh -T foo tar cfz - somedirectoryorfile|tar xvvfz -

I'm not much of a unix expert, could you explain what that's doing?  I 
know a bit about tar, so I recognize the arguments to it, but I'm not 
sure how they're interacting.  It looks like it might run tar on the 
remote machine, and tar up all the desired files, the output of which is 
streamed over to a local copy of tar that un-tars them.  I'm not 
familiar at all with the -T option for ssh, and the man page entry isn't 
illuminating for one such as I.  Would an example command be:

remote machine abc has sshd running, and has file xyz that I want locally.
ssh -T abc tar cfz - xyz|tar xvvfz -
--
Unsubscribe info:  http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:   http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:   http://cygwin.com/faq/


Re: Really big files?

2003-12-16 Thread Elliott Wilcoxon
I recall at least one recent version with WinXP support, so I'd expect 
that it does support NTFS.

Elliott Wilcoxon

Hannu E K Nevalainen wrote:

From: Brian Dessent
Sent: Tuesday, December 16, 2003 10:19 PM


Greg Freemyer wrote:

=== Session Log
$ mount -f -b //./physicaldrive2 /dev/todds
Just a completely random guess here:  Is 'physicaldrive2' an active
system drive?  IIRC there are some parts of windows that cannot be read
by anything but the kernel itself, such as the SAM database (or
something along those lines.)  If this is the case then you'd have to do
the image when the partition is not active.  I don't know how or if
tools like Ghost get around this.
Brian


Minimal info addition:
 Symantec's ghost.exe is a AFAIK DOS application, with all the
implications - don't know more about it (does it handle NTFS?).
PowerQuest's ghost (i.e. Drive Image) does some 'magic' by booting a
temporary disk image - for creating the backup (this disk image can be
rebuilt using the installed software. Does understand NTFS and at least
'knows about' Linux).
/Hannu E K Nevalainen, B.Sc. EE - 59+16.37'N, 17+12.60'E

** on a mailing list; please keep replies on that particular list **

-- printf(LocalTime: UTC+%02d\n,(DST)? 2:1); --
--END OF MESSAGE--
--
Unsubscribe info:  http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:   http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:   http://cygwin.com/faq/
.

--
Unsubscribe info:  http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:   http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:   http://cygwin.com/faq/


Re: Symbolic Links

2003-12-15 Thread Elliott Wilcoxon
NTFS also supports hard links, and there's a program that comes with 
Windows that lets you make them (searching WinXP Pro's Help and Support 
Center for 'hardlink' gives the relevant entries).  The result would 
then be that it would work in both Cygwin and Windows (all programs), 
although it can be confusing if you're not used to thinking of file 
system-y stuff.

Elliott Wilcoxon

Brian Dessent wrote:

Dan Adams wrote:

My question was, is there any way to use the cygwin links, not the windows
ones, to also be able to work in the open dialog box in MS Office products
like excel for example. As I said, it is working in windows explorer. The
only reason why I was mentioning about the windows links is because they
were working in excel and I figured it would be a good example.


If your filesystem is NTFS (and $deity hope it is, as FAT32 hurts like
something awful) then you can try fooling around with its built in
symbolic links, which are called junctions in the parlance.  There are
no built-in tools to do this but the venerable Mark Russinovich again
comes to the rescue with his freeware: 

from http://www.sysinternals.com/ntw2k/source/misc.shtml#junction:

Junction

Win2K's version of NTFS supports directory symbolic links, where a
directory serves as a symbolic link to another directory on the
computer. For example, if the directory D:\SYMLINK specified
C:\WINNT\SYSTEM32 as its target, then an application accessing
D:\SYMLINK\DRIVERS would in reality be accessing
C:\WINNT\SYSTEM32\DRIVERS. Directory symbolic links are known as NTFS
junctions in Win2K. Unfortunately, Win2K comes with no tools for
creating junctions - you have to purchase the Win2K Resource Kit, which
comes the linkd program for creating junctions. I therefore decided to
write my own junction-creating tool: Junction. Junction not only allows
you to create NTFS junctions, it allows you to see if files or
directories are actually reparse points. Reparse points are the
mechanism on which NTFS junctions are based, and they are used by
Win2K's Remote Storage Service (RSS), as well as volume mount points. 

If you want to view reparse information, the usage for Junction is the
following: 

Usage: junction [-s] directory or file name 

-s	Recurse subdirectories. 

If you want to create or delete a junction, use Junction like this: 

Usage: junction [-d] junction directory [junction target] 

To delete a junction specify the -d switch and the junction name. 

Download Junction (16KB) 

Download Junction Source (22 KB) 

I have not tried this but it sounds like it might be helpful for you.  I
have no idea how Cygwin would interact with one of these, but since it's
layered on top of Windows' kernel NTFS driver I would expect that it
would treat them just as any other app would, i.e. do the right thing.
Brian

--
Unsubscribe info:  http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:   http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:   http://cygwin.com/faq/
.

--
Unsubscribe info:  http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:   http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:   http://cygwin.com/faq/


Re: setup.exe alternative?

2003-11-16 Thread Elliott Wilcoxon
I think he's asking for a installer that uses local stuff, without 
network downloading (e.g. a cygwin installer that runs and installs from 
a CD).

Elliott Wilcoxon

Robert Collins wrote:

On Mon, 2003-11-17 at 07:48, Len Bright wrote:

Hi,
Is there an alternative to the setup.exe network installation such as a
standalone program to install the cygwin core program(s)?


setup.exe is a standalone program. Whats your issue?

Rob


--
Unsubscribe info:  http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:   http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:   http://cygwin.com/faq/