Re: trouble posting to cygwin-apps

2010-10-08 Thread SZABÓ Gergely
Hello,

The mailing list does not accept html email, that's fair enough. 

The real problem is, it also bounces every email with a company
disclaimer about intentions and original addressees.

Well, the original addressee is cygwin at cygwin dot com, which is a public
mailing list, readable even from Alpha Centauri (with 4 years delay).

This policy is OK for most FOSS projects, but Cygwin should be an
exception. I think Cygwin is used most by 3PPs within big companies
where everybody _must_ use Windows and those disclaimers are always attached to
outgoing mail. If you are a free and sane person, attracted to unixy stuff,
you'd probably use Linux.

Yes, I've read the posting instructions, and I know I should convince my
employer to remove the disclaimers. What chance do you think I have to
convince a 2-employee company, where central IT is not even in my
country? They also restrict access to private email from the office. 

I know, I should leave them and/or buy a smartphone for emailing. :-)

But my point is: the mailing list is cut off from its most important
audience.

Best regards
Gergely




--
Problem reports:   http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:  http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple



Re: Slowdown after update on Win32 (XP Home)

2010-10-06 Thread SZABÓ Gergely
Hello,

please see this thread (test scripts included):
http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin/2010-09/msg00871.html

I can only confirm this. Process creation is much slower with 1.7.7 than
it was with 1.5.25. The fork script runs 300% slower on my XP box.

But on the other hand, Marco Atzeri could not confirm this on his XP
box. I'm sure it's all about time slowing down in the vicinity of black
holes...

Best regards
Gergely


--
Problem reports:   http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:  http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple



Re: R: Cygwin 1.7.7 fork/exec performance MUCH slower than 1.5.25

2010-10-01 Thread SZABÓ Gergely
Ciao Marco,

I do not think a real /home would help, as I have several colleagues who
have a real /home, but still have similar slow performance with cygwin
1.7.x. 

What kind of ACL issue could this be? And why is it no problem for
Cygwin 1.5.25? Anything to do with the new cyglsa.dll?

The funny thing is, The sum of the sys and user times for the fork
script is around 1 minute. What happens in the remaining 3 minutes, to
make up that terrible time over 4 min?

If I am watching the Windows Task Manager during the execution of the
fork script, I see that the process System eats more than 50% of the
CPU all the time. 

Best regards
Gergely

P.S: this is all Win32 (not x64) as you can see from the cygcheck
files...


--
Problem reports:   http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:  http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple



Re: R: Cygwin 1.7.7 fork/exec performance MUCH slower than 1.5.25

2010-10-01 Thread SZABÓ Gergely
I'm aware of the bash-completion issue. I've removed it already. This is
a different problem.

My login shells don't take 2 minutes to start any more, now it's just a
mere 2 seconds. :-) 

Best regards
G


--
Problem reports:   http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:  http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple