Robert Collins wrote:
>
> On Mon, 2002-11-18 at 08:17, Yves Forkl wrote:
> > In various versions of the libxml2/libxslt binaries, the executable
> > "xsltproc" distributed with the latest libxslt package was compiled
> > against an older version of libxml2 than the latest release > > currently
>distributed.
> ...
> > To get xsltproc working properly, it may be necessary either to
> > rebuild it (which I didn't manage to) or to downgrade to the older
> > libxml2 binary.
> >
> > So it would perhaps be better if that correspondence of the libxml2
> > version could be ensured before the libxml2 and libxslt binaries are
> > distributed together in their latest releases.
>
> Do you have an actual bug report, or are you assuming that this is
> casuing whatever unspecified problems you are having?
Sorry for not being clear about the specific problem I encountered which
is almost certainly caused by the version mismatch, but I didn't know if
that classified as a bug proper - please see the description of the
problem in the message included.
> I don't recall any discussion on this on the libx*l lists, which I am
> also on.
Maybe the different libxml2 versions have been too compatible :-) to
produce a problem of that kind in most cases of version mismatch within
xsltproc?
Yves
Subject: Re: [xslt] xsltproc: --stringparam under Cygwin?
Date: Thu, 14 Nov 2002 04:16:26 -0500
From: Daniel Veillard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
CC: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Wed, Nov 13, 2002 at 07:46:25PM +0100, Yves Forkl wrote:
> xsltproc's option stringparam doesn't seem to work in the current
> release (as of 2002-11-10) of precompiled libs and binaries for
> Cygwin. The version of xsltproc included claims to be:
>
> $ xsltproc --version
> Using libxml 20417, libxslt 10010 and libexslt 703
> xsltproc was compiled against libxml 20413, libxslt 10010 and libexslt
> 703
> libxslt 10010 was compiled against libxml 20413
> libexslt 703 was compiled against libxml 20413
Looks 1/ old 2/ bad (the library used an the one the application was
compiled again do not match)
> (I tried it under Windows with another version, "xsltproc compiled
> against libxml 20426, libxslt 10022 and libexslt 713": the problem
> does not appear there.)
Simply upgrade then !
Daniel
--
Daniel Veillard | Red Hat Network https://rhn.redhat.com/
[EMAIL PROTECTED] | libxml GNOME XML XSLT toolkit
http://xmlsoft.org/
http://veillard.com/ | Rpmfind RPM search engine http://rpmfind.net/
--
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
