Re: Font support of UTF-8 chars differ between w32 Emacs and Cygwin Emacs
Hello, Ken Brown wrote: On 9/3/2014 8:41 AM, Sebastien Vauban wrote: As you can see on http://screencast.com/t/XTTv9DSAC, win32 binaries of Emacs and Cygwin Emacs can't display the white right-pointing triangle coherently for the same fonts: - win32 Emacs always can display it, in all fonts, - Cygwin Emacs can't display it with Consolas, Courier New and Lucida (among others). MWE: --8---cut here---start-8--- ;; these fonts only display (special?) UTF-8 chars (here: the white ;; right-pointing triangle) in win32 binary of Emacs (modify-all-frames-parameters '((font . Consolas-10))) (char-displayable-p ?\u25B7) (modify-all-frames-parameters '((font . Lucida Console-9))) (char-displayable-p ?\u25B7) ;; these work for both win32 binary of Emacs + Cygwin Emacs (modify-all-frames-parameters '((font . DejaVu Sans Mono-9))) (char-displayable-p ?\u25B7) (modify-all-frames-parameters '((font . Lucida Sans Typewriter-9))) (char-displayable-p ?\u25B7) --8---cut here---end---8--- Any idea why such differences? I've had a chance to look at this now, and it doesn't seem to have anything to do with emacs. I've created a text file 25b7.txt (attached) with a single line containing the white right-pointing-triangle. When I issue the command cat 25b7.txt in a mintty terminal, I sometimes see an empty rectangle (meaning the character can't be displayed), and I sometimes see the white right-pointing triangle, depending on which font I select in the mintty options. I don't know enough about fonts and UTF-8 encoding to be able to shed any more light on this. Maybe someone else can help. The problem would be with Cygwin in general, then, if not limited to Emacs. But why the same fonts (Consolas, Lucida Console) don't display the same range of characters in both worlds? Best regards, Seb -- Sebastien Vauban -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Re: Font support of UTF-8 chars differ between w32 Emacs and Cygwin Emacs
On 10/09/2014 19:49, Ken Brown wrote: On 9/3/2014 8:41 AM, Sebastien Vauban wrote: Hello, As you can see on http://screencast.com/t/XTTv9DSAC, win32 binaries of Emacs and Cygwin Emacs can't display the white right-pointing triangle [1] coherently for the same fonts: - win32 Emacs always can display it, in all fonts, - Cygwin Emacs can't display it with Consolas, Courier New and Lucida (among others). MWE: [cut] Any idea why such differences? Best regards, Seb [1] http://www.scarfboy.com/coding/unicode-tool?s=U%2B25B7 I've had a chance to look at this now, and it doesn't seem to have anything to do with emacs. I've created a text file 25b7.txt (attached) with a single line containing the white right-pointing-triangle. When I issue the command cat 25b7.txt in a mintty terminal, I sometimes see an empty rectangle (meaning the character can't be displayed), and I sometimes see the white right-pointing triangle, depending on which font I select in the mintty options. mintty is using windows fonts as such it needs that MS provides a full set. Using charmap (windows Character Map) I can see that 25B7 is not available in Consolas while for example 25B8 (small black ) and 25BA (large black) are available. In other fonts (like Courier new) only 25BA is available and 25B8 is missing... I don't know enough about fonts and UTF-8 encoding to be able to shed any more light on this. Maybe someone else can help. Ken It seems not a cygwin fault... Regards Marco -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Re: Font support of UTF-8 chars differ between w32 Emacs and Cygwin Emacs
Sebastien Vauban writes: The problem would be with Cygwin in general, then, if not limited to Emacs. But why the same fonts (Consolas, Lucida Console) don't display the same range of characters in both worlds? You seem to assume that those fonts define that particular glyph. Both fonts you use as an example exist in multiple versions with differing UTF-8 support. If they don't have that glyph (which is likely, given the results you report), then Emacs would try to get it from another font with the same dimensions (I don't know if mintty does font substitution and if so, how) and the results very much depend on the font maps used. Regards, Achim. -- +[Q+ Matrix-12 WAVE#46+305 Neuron microQkb Andromeda XTk Blofeld]+ Factory and User Sound Singles for Waldorf rackAttack: http://Synth.Stromeko.net/Downloads.html#WaldorfSounds -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Re: Font support of UTF-8 chars differ between w32 Emacs and Cygwin Emacs
Achim Gratz wrote: Sebastien Vauban writes: The problem would be with Cygwin in general, then, if not limited to Emacs. But why the same fonts (Consolas, Lucida Console) don't display the same range of characters in both worlds? You seem to assume that those fonts define that particular glyph. Yes, I was. Both fonts you use as an example exist in multiple versions with differing UTF-8 support. If they don't have that glyph (which is likely, given the results you report), then Emacs would try to get it from another font with the same dimensions (I don't know if mintty does font substitution and if so, how) and the results very much depend on the font maps used. I didn't know about that mechanism. But, then, the question is: why does Windows Emacs find a substitution, and not Cygwin Emacs (for the same font)? Best regards, Seb -- Sebastien Vauban -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Re: Font support of UTF-8 chars differ between w32 Emacs and Cygwin Emacs
Greetings, Sebastien Vauban! The problem would be with Cygwin in general, then, if not limited to Emacs. But why the same fonts (Consolas, Lucida Console) don't display the same range of characters in both worlds? You seem to assume that those fonts define that particular glyph. Yes, I was. Both fonts you use as an example exist in multiple versions with differing UTF-8 support. If they don't have that glyph (which is likely, given the results you report), then Emacs would try to get it from another font with the same dimensions (I don't know if mintty does font substitution and if so, how) and the results very much depend on the font maps used. I didn't know about that mechanism. But, then, the question is: why does Windows Emacs find a substitution, and not Cygwin Emacs (for the same font)? Because of different substitution mechanics. -- WBR, Andrey Repin (anrdae...@yandex.ru) 11.09.2014, 16:30 Sorry for my terrible english... -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Re: Font support of UTF-8 chars differ between w32 Emacs and Cygwin Emacs
On 9/11/2014 6:21 AM, Sebastien Vauban wrote: Achim Gratz wrote: Both fonts you use as an example exist in multiple versions with differing UTF-8 support. If they don't have that glyph (which is likely, given the results you report), then Emacs would try to get it from another font with the same dimensions (I don't know if mintty does font substitution and if so, how) and the results very much depend on the font maps used. I didn't know about that mechanism. But, then, the question is: why does Windows Emacs find a substitution, and not Cygwin Emacs (for the same font)? It's clear that I was wrong when I said that this doesn't seem to have anything to do with emacs. The problem might be that the Cygwin-w32 build of emacs is a relatively recent invention and may still need some tweaking to get all the GUI features working properly. If you or someone else is motivated enough, I'm sure it would be possible to figure out how the Windows build finds a glyph for characters that don't have one in the chosen font, and to port that to the Cygwin-w32 build. I'm copying Daniel Colascione, the author of that build, to see if he has any comments. Dan, the thread starts here: https://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin/2014-09/msg00052.html Ken -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Re: Font support of UTF-8 chars differ between w32 Emacs and Cygwin Emacs
On 9/3/2014 8:41 AM, Sebastien Vauban wrote: Hello, As you can see on http://screencast.com/t/XTTv9DSAC, win32 binaries of Emacs and Cygwin Emacs can't display the white right-pointing triangle [1] coherently for the same fonts: - win32 Emacs always can display it, in all fonts, - Cygwin Emacs can't display it with Consolas, Courier New and Lucida (among others). MWE: --8---cut here---start-8--- ;; these fonts only display (special?) UTF-8 chars (here: the white ;; right-pointing triangle) in win32 binary of Emacs (modify-all-frames-parameters '((font . Consolas-10))) (char-displayable-p ?\u25B7) (modify-all-frames-parameters '((font . Courier New-9))) (char-displayable-p ?\u25B7) (modify-all-frames-parameters '((font . Lucida Console-9))) (char-displayable-p ?\u25B7) ;; these work for both win32 binary of Emacs + Cygwin Emacs (modify-all-frames-parameters '((font . DejaVu Sans Mono-9))) (char-displayable-p ?\u25B7) (modify-all-frames-parameters '((font . Lucida Sans Typewriter-9))) (char-displayable-p ?\u25B7) --8---cut here---end---8--- Any idea why such differences? Best regards, Seb [1] http://www.scarfboy.com/coding/unicode-tool?s=U%2B25B7 I've had a chance to look at this now, and it doesn't seem to have anything to do with emacs. I've created a text file 25b7.txt (attached) with a single line containing the white right-pointing-triangle. When I issue the command cat 25b7.txt in a mintty terminal, I sometimes see an empty rectangle (meaning the character can't be displayed), and I sometimes see the white right-pointing triangle, depending on which font I select in the mintty options. I don't know enough about fonts and UTF-8 encoding to be able to shed any more light on this. Maybe someone else can help. Ken ▷ -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Font support of UTF-8 chars differ between w32 Emacs and Cygwin Emacs
Hello, As you can see on http://screencast.com/t/XTTv9DSAC, win32 binaries of Emacs and Cygwin Emacs can't display the white right-pointing triangle [1] coherently for the same fonts: - win32 Emacs always can display it, in all fonts, - Cygwin Emacs can't display it with Consolas, Courier New and Lucida (among others). MWE: --8---cut here---start-8--- ;; these fonts only display (special?) UTF-8 chars (here: the white ;; right-pointing triangle) in win32 binary of Emacs (modify-all-frames-parameters '((font . Consolas-10))) (char-displayable-p ?\u25B7) (modify-all-frames-parameters '((font . Courier New-9))) (char-displayable-p ?\u25B7) (modify-all-frames-parameters '((font . Lucida Console-9))) (char-displayable-p ?\u25B7) ;; these work for both win32 binary of Emacs + Cygwin Emacs (modify-all-frames-parameters '((font . DejaVu Sans Mono-9))) (char-displayable-p ?\u25B7) (modify-all-frames-parameters '((font . Lucida Sans Typewriter-9))) (char-displayable-p ?\u25B7) --8---cut here---end---8--- Any idea why such differences? Best regards, Seb [1] http://www.scarfboy.com/coding/unicode-tool?s=U%2B25B7 -- Sebastien Vauban -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Re: Font support of UTF-8 chars differ between w32 Emacs and Cygwin Emacs
On 9/3/2014 8:41 AM, Sebastien Vauban wrote: Hello, As you can see on http://screencast.com/t/XTTv9DSAC, win32 binaries of Emacs and Cygwin Emacs can't display the white right-pointing triangle [1] coherently for the same fonts: - win32 Emacs always can display it, in all fonts, - Cygwin Emacs can't display it with Consolas, Courier New and Lucida (among others). MWE: --8---cut here---start-8--- ;; these fonts only display (special?) UTF-8 chars (here: the white ;; right-pointing triangle) in win32 binary of Emacs (modify-all-frames-parameters '((font . Consolas-10))) (char-displayable-p ?\u25B7) (modify-all-frames-parameters '((font . Courier New-9))) (char-displayable-p ?\u25B7) (modify-all-frames-parameters '((font . Lucida Console-9))) (char-displayable-p ?\u25B7) ;; these work for both win32 binary of Emacs + Cygwin Emacs (modify-all-frames-parameters '((font . DejaVu Sans Mono-9))) (char-displayable-p ?\u25B7) (modify-all-frames-parameters '((font . Lucida Sans Typewriter-9))) (char-displayable-p ?\u25B7) --8---cut here---end---8--- Any idea why such differences? I'm on vacation, but I'll look into this next week when I get back. In the meantime, could you say which version of Cygwin emacs you're using? Is it emacs-X11 or emacs-w32? Ken -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Re: Font support of UTF-8 chars differ between w32 Emacs and Cygwin Emacs
Hello, Ken Brown wrote: On 9/3/2014 8:41 AM, Sebastien Vauban wrote: As you can see on http://screencast.com/t/XTTv9DSAC, win32 binaries of Emacs and Cygwin Emacs can't display the white right-pointing triangle [1] coherently for the same fonts: - win32 Emacs always can display it, in all fonts, - Cygwin Emacs can't display it with Consolas, Courier New and Lucida (among others). MWE: --8---cut here---start-8--- ;; these fonts only display (special?) UTF-8 chars (here: the white ;; right-pointing triangle) in win32 binary of Emacs (modify-all-frames-parameters '((font . Consolas-10))) (char-displayable-p ?\u25B7) (modify-all-frames-parameters '((font . Courier New-9))) (char-displayable-p ?\u25B7) (modify-all-frames-parameters '((font . Lucida Console-9))) (char-displayable-p ?\u25B7) --8---cut here---end---8--- Any idea why such differences? I'm on vacation, but I'll look into this next week when I get back. In the meantime, could you say which version of Cygwin emacs you're using? Is it emacs-X11 or emacs-w32? Yes, I'm using Cygwin Emacs w32. Best regards, Seb -- Sebastien Vauban -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
