Re: Is the Mercurial package still maintained?
On 2019-07-18 18:47, Ken Brown wrote: > On 7/18/2019 2:10 PM, Ti Strga wrote: > > Hi. > > > > Upstream is at v5.0.2. The cygwin repo has been at 4.3.2 for almost two > > years now, missing not only a lot of features but also the security fixes > > in 4.7.2 and 4.9. > > > > Is a new package blocked waiting on other support to be completed? Or is > > it simply orphaned and waiting for a new maintainer or NMU? > > The maintainer is Jari Aalto. I don't know if he reads the list, so I'm > adding > him to the CC. I'll update it, Jari -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Re: Is the Mercurial package still maintained?
On 7/18/2019 2:10 PM, Ti Strga wrote: > Hi. > > Upstream is at v5.0.2. The cygwin repo has been at 4.3.2 for almost two > years now, missing not only a lot of features but also the security fixes > in 4.7.2 and 4.9. > > Is a new package blocked waiting on other support to be completed? Or is > it simply orphaned and waiting for a new maintainer or NMU? The maintainer is Jari Aalto. I don't know if he reads the list, so I'm adding him to the CC. Ken
Is the Mercurial package still maintained?
Hi. Upstream is at v5.0.2. The cygwin repo has been at 4.3.2 for almost two years now, missing not only a lot of features but also the security fixes in 4.7.2 and 4.9. Is a new package blocked waiting on other support to be completed? Or is it simply orphaned and waiting for a new maintainer or NMU? -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
