Re: Procmail bug or me bug?
On Wed, Jul 25, 2007 at 05:42:52PM +0100, R.Renkema wrote: > [snip] > :0fhw > * > |spamtest.php > > [snip] > > Clue cookie? Any one? Remove the "h" in the above recipe. AFAICT, specifying "h" causes procmail to only use the header and not the body. The man page has the following relevant albeit confusing information: If you specify only a `h' or a `b' flag on a delivering recipe, and the recipe matches, then, unless the `c' flag is present as well, the body respectively the header of the mail will be silently lost. Jason -- PGP/GPG Key: http://www.tishler.net/jason/pubkey.asc or key servers Fingerprint: 7A73 1405 7F2B E669 C19D 8784 1AFD E4CC ECF4 8EF6 -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
Procmail bug or me bug?
Hi list, Following problem. I filter a fetchmail message through procmail. Procmail saves a backup: http://assist.dyndns.biz/cygwin/orgmessage.asc and then goes :0fhw * |spamtest.php :0h: * ^MYSPAM.* myspam myspam looks like: http://assist.dyndns.biz/cygwin/mboxmsg.asc As you can see large part of the message gone. OK in this case one might well trow in the bug or feature discussion. Nevertheless it shouldn't do that should it. I checked the output of spamtest and that's fine. And as you can see part of the body is used so it definitly seems to break when procmail adds the header again. Clue cookie? Any one? -- Anti-wrinkle cream there may be, but anti-fat-bastard cream there is not. -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
