Re: maintaner of gcc

2004-07-15 Thread Gerrit P. Haase
Robert wrote:

 Who's maintaining GCC for Cygwin?
 Ours is getting old. Gcc 3.4.1 came out a couple of weeks ago.

What is wrong with 3.3.x release series?  Are there any serious bugs?
Are there issues (for you)?  Why do you need 3.4.x?  Gfortran isn't
included, precompiled headers do not work on Windows/Cygwin, important
bugfixes are backported to 3.3.x.


 I could go ahead and compile it, but I don't know where the patches are to
 make it use -mno-cygwin.

All the stuff is in the CVS repository.  Check the sources (or the
patchfile included with the Cygwin release of GCC).

 Mingw is using Gcc 3.4.0 as a candidate. I seen our version of 3.4.0, as

In the 3.4.0  release there was a serious bug in C++ and some Java build
issues.  I have not tried to build 3.4.1 yet, sorry.

I have 3.3.3 / 3.3.4 ready for release, but there is some private
business on my plate and I'm currently short of spare time therefore.

I think I can finish the gcc-3.3.4 release this month.  Then I'll take a
look into building 3.4.x in August.


Gerrit
-- 
=^..^= http://nyckelpiga.de/donate.html


--
Unsubscribe info:  http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:   http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:   http://cygwin.com/faq/



Re: maintaner of gcc

2004-07-15 Thread Tim Prince
At 06:24 AM 7/15/2004, Gerrit P. Haase wrote:
Robert wrote:
 Who's maintaining GCC for Cygwin?
 Ours is getting old. Gcc 3.4.1 came out a couple of weeks ago.
What is wrong with 3.3.x release series?  Are there any serious bugs?
Are there issues (for you)?  Why do you need 3.4.x?  Gfortran isn't
included, precompiled headers do not work on Windows/Cygwin, important
bugfixes are backported to 3.3.x.
 I could go ahead and compile it, but I don't know where the patches are to
 make it use -mno-cygwin.
All the stuff is in the CVS repository.  Check the sources (or the
patchfile included with the Cygwin release of GCC).
 Mingw is using Gcc 3.4.0 as a candidate. I seen our version of 3.4.0, as
In the 3.4.0  release there was a serious bug in C++ and some Java build
issues.  I have not tried to build 3.4.1 yet, sorry.
AFAICT everyone who has tried has been successful in building and testing 
the standard gcc-3.4.1 and 3.4.2 on cygwin, but shows well over 100 
testsuite failures due to non-support of pch. At least 3 different people 
have posted the results on gcc-testsuite.  I don't count problems such as 
my failure to build it in 32-bit mode on x64.  C++ in my own current 
project doesn't build with 3.3.4, but is good with 3.4.x.  I agree that my 
project is not important nor trendy enough to backport fixes to 
3.3.x.  According to testsuite, Java is slightly better in 3.4.x.  I don't 
know that anyone has tackled the cygwin patches; inclusion of pch will no 
doubt make it much more time consuming.   I haven't seen anyone post 
testsuite results for that mingw 3.4.0 version, so your evidence that mingw 
is ahead of cygwin is lacking.

Tim Prince 

--
Unsubscribe info:  http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:   http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:   http://cygwin.com/faq/


Re: maintaner of gcc

2004-07-15 Thread Sam Steingold
 * Gerrit P. Haase [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2004-07-15 15:24:45 +0200]:

 What is wrong with 3.3.x release series?  Are there any serious bugs?
 Are there issues (for you)?  Why do you need 3.4.x?

g++ 3.3 cannot compile CLISP.
it is alleged that g++ 3.4 can.

(either version of gcc can compile CLISP, but g++ compile is necessary
for some extra bug detection).

-- 
Sam Steingold (http://www.podval.org/~sds) running w2k
http://www.camera.org http://www.iris.org.il http://www.memri.org/
http://www.mideasttruth.com/ http://www.honestreporting.com
If you think big enough, you'll never have to do it.

--
Unsubscribe info:  http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:   http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:   http://cygwin.com/faq/



RE: maintaner of gcc

2004-07-15 Thread Bobby McNulty Junior
And, -mno-cygwin does not work with Timidity, so I thought perhaps Gcc 3.4.1
might be better.
There have been tons of fixes to the 3.4 series.
I'll try and get back on the gcc maintainers list and work with gcc 3.5 to
improve it even further for Cygwin and Windows.
Gcc 3.3.1 will compile Timidity 2.13.0 and CVS, but I get problems with the
mingw portion. Visual Studio complains, so I can't use it to make a GUI
version of Timidity.
GCC 3.4 is on my system, all I have to do is compile. But only with cygwin
stuff.


-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Sam Steingold
Sent: Thursday, July 15, 2004 2:56 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Gerrit P. Haase
Subject: Re: maintaner of gcc

 * Gerrit P. Haase [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2004-07-15 15:24:45 +0200]:

 What is wrong with 3.3.x release series?  Are there any serious bugs?
 Are there issues (for you)?  Why do you need 3.4.x?

g++ 3.3 cannot compile CLISP.
it is alleged that g++ 3.4 can.

(either version of gcc can compile CLISP, but g++ compile is necessary
for some extra bug detection).

--
Sam Steingold (http://www.podval.org/~sds) running w2k
http://www.camera.org http://www.iris.org.il http://www.memri.org/
http://www.mideasttruth.com/ http://www.honestreporting.com
If you think big enough, you'll never have to do it.

--
Unsubscribe info:  http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:   http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:   http://cygwin.com/faq/





--
Unsubscribe info:  http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:   http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:   http://cygwin.com/faq/



Re: maintaner of gcc

2004-07-15 Thread Gerrit P. Haase
Sam schrieb:

 * Gerrit P. Haase [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2004-07-15 15:24:45 +0200]:

 What is wrong with 3.3.x release series?  Are there any serious bugs?
 Are there issues (for you)?  Why do you need 3.4.x?

 g++ 3.3 cannot compile CLISP.
 it is alleged that g++ 3.4 can.

 (either version of gcc can compile CLISP, but g++ compile is necessary
 for some extra bug detection).


Which version exactly?  Is this also true for 3.3.4?  How do you build
the packages for the Cygwin release?

Gerrit
-- 
=^..^=


--
Unsubscribe info:  http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:   http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:   http://cygwin.com/faq/