Re: rxvt broken in recent snapshots (since cygwin 1.7.10(0.259/5/3))
On 2/14/2012 10:41 PM, Hans Horn wrote: On 2/14/2012 5:39 PM, Christopher Faylor wrote: On Tue, Feb 14, 2012 at 06:02:51PM -0500, Charles Wilson wrote: On 2/14/2012 6:00 PM, Charles Wilson wrote: On 2/14/2012 1:05 PM, Hans Horn wrote: something in the recent post-1.7.10(0.259/5/3) cygwin snapshots (20120207..20120214) broke rxvt. I'll need a few more details than "it broke rxvt". vis. cgf's reply, never mind... If the breakage wasn't so obvious, I would have had the same response. But, really, there is no reason to assume that something is so obvious as to not provide details. *Please* when reporting a problem explain what the problem actually is. cgf I typically do. In this case: rxvt starts (I see window opening) and then disappears quickly, in other words, it is broken. H. snapshot 20120215 has put rxvt back on the map. thx Chris. H. -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Re: rxvt broken in recent snapshots (since cygwin 1.7.10(0.259/5/3))
On 2/14/2012 5:39 PM, Christopher Faylor wrote: On Tue, Feb 14, 2012 at 06:02:51PM -0500, Charles Wilson wrote: On 2/14/2012 6:00 PM, Charles Wilson wrote: On 2/14/2012 1:05 PM, Hans Horn wrote: something in the recent post-1.7.10(0.259/5/3) cygwin snapshots (20120207..20120214) broke rxvt. I'll need a few more details than "it broke rxvt". vis. cgf's reply, never mind... If the breakage wasn't so obvious, I would have had the same response. But, really, there is no reason to assume that something is so obvious as to not provide details. *Please* when reporting a problem explain what the problem actually is. cgf I typically do. In this case: rxvt starts (I see window opening) and then disappears quickly, in other words, it is broken. H. -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Re: rxvt broken in recent snapshots (since cygwin 1.7.10(0.259/5/3))
On Tue, Feb 14, 2012 at 06:02:51PM -0500, Charles Wilson wrote: >On 2/14/2012 6:00 PM, Charles Wilson wrote: >> On 2/14/2012 1:05 PM, Hans Horn wrote: >>> something in the recent post-1.7.10(0.259/5/3) cygwin snapshots >>> (20120207..20120214) broke rxvt. >> >> I'll need a few more details than "it broke rxvt". > >vis. cgf's reply, never mind... If the breakage wasn't so obvious, I would have had the same response. But, really, there is no reason to assume that something is so obvious as to not provide details. *Please* when reporting a problem explain what the problem actually is. cgf -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Re: rxvt broken in recent snapshots (since cygwin 1.7.10(0.259/5/3))
On 2/14/2012 6:00 PM, Charles Wilson wrote: > On 2/14/2012 1:05 PM, Hans Horn wrote: >> something in the recent post-1.7.10(0.259/5/3) cygwin snapshots >> (20120207..20120214) broke rxvt. > > I'll need a few more details than "it broke rxvt". vis. cgf's reply, never mind... -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Re: rxvt broken in recent snapshots (since cygwin 1.7.10(0.259/5/3))
On 2/14/2012 1:05 PM, Hans Horn wrote: > something in the recent post-1.7.10(0.259/5/3) cygwin snapshots > (20120207..20120214) broke rxvt. I'll need a few more details than "it broke rxvt". -- Chuck -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Re: rxvt broken in recent snapshots (since cygwin 1.7.10(0.259/5/3))
On Tue, Feb 14, 2012 at 10:05:37AM -0800, Hans Horn wrote: >Folks, > >something in the recent post-1.7.10(0.259/5/3) cygwin snapshots >(20120207..20120214) broke rxvt. Even though this terminal is abandoned >it is still my favorite one due to its simple copy/past abilities. I >hate to see it go away. Don't worry. We don't intentionally break shipping applications. >Reverted to 1.7.10.. > >Any clues what might have caused this? Yes. The problem should be fixed in the latest snapshot. cgf -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Re: rxvt broken in recent snapshots (since cygwin 1.7.10(0.259/5/3))
On Feb 14 10:05, Hans Horn wrote: > Folks, > > something in the recent post-1.7.10(0.259/5/3) cygwin snapshots > (20120207..20120214) broke rxvt. Even though this terminal is > abandoned it is still my favorite one due to its simple copy/past > abilities. I hate to see it go away. > Reverted to 1.7.10.. > > Any clues what might have caused this? No, but if you're using rxvt for it's simple copy/paste, why don't you use mintty instead, which provides the same type of simple copy/paste? Corinna -- Corinna Vinschen Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to Cygwin Project Co-Leader cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Red Hat -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
