Re: SFU installed - rxvt problems

2004-01-17 Thread Larry Hall
At 01:06 AM 1/17/2004, Christopher Faylor you wrote:
On Fri, Jan 16, 2004 at 10:01:17PM -0800, Peter Skj?tt Larsen wrote:
While realizing that this list is not about SFU, closer examination
reveals that the dev environment in SFU 3.5 (and prior versions) is gcc
and SFU allows for Visual Studio to be invoked as well - e.g.  $CC
implies by default the visual studio (command line) compiler.  Don't
pick the standard install however, some useful things are not turned on
by default!

And, so, with this message we now step even more firmly into off-topic
territory.

Maybe you all need to form another mailing list if this is really a
hot topic for discussion.


Right.  Perhaps I should say something here, since it may have been my
earlier comments on this subject that made people think that this was a forum
open for any and all discussion of SFU.  That was not my intent.  While I 
have personal curiosity about SFU and how it may work (or not) with Cygwin,
I don't believe that this list is the proper forum for discussing SFU.  I 
do think there is some benefit to the list if someone who's installed it
would provide a concise review of it in terms of areas of overlap and not as 
well as any clashes.  This would be information that would be generally 
useful for the list in terms of recognizing SFU-induced problems in future 
problem reports (though the resolution is likely to still be don't do that
or uninstall SFU).  But really any general discussion of SFU is off-topic, 
just like any general discussion of U/WIN and MKS are off-topic.  Sorry if
any previous comments from me on this subject generated any confusion.


--
Larry Hall  http://www.rfk.com
RFK Partners, Inc.  (508) 893-9779 - RFK Office
838 Washington Street   (508) 893-9889 - FAX
Holliston, MA 01746 


--
Unsubscribe info:  http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:   http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:   http://cygwin.com/faq/



SFU installed - rxvt problems

2004-01-16 Thread Gerrit P. Haase
Hallo,

I don't know if SFU is the reason, but after installing it and rebooting
the computer I cannot open a rxvt terminal without running X.  It
complains:
$ /usr/bin/rxvt
rxvt: can't open display 127.0.0.1:0.0


Gerrit
-- 
=^..^= http://nyckelpiga.de/donate.html


--
Unsubscribe info:  http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:   http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:   http://cygwin.com/faq/



Re: SFU installed - rxvt problems

2004-01-16 Thread Olaf Föllinger
On Fri, Jan 16, 2004 at 03:07:04PM +0100, Gerrit P. Haase wrote:
 Hallo,
 
 I don't know if SFU is the reason, but after installing it and rebooting
 the computer I cannot open a rxvt terminal without running X.  It
 complains:
 $ /usr/bin/rxvt
 rxvt: can't open display 127.0.0.1:0.0

It seems there is a global defined variable DISPLAY now which points to
127.0.0.1:0.0. And rxvt reads it and thinks that there is a X-Server
running.

I'll try it in a few minutes myself.
 
 
Gruss Olaf Föllinger

-- 
Olaf Föllinger
Berater 
S.E.S.A. Software und Systeme AG

Alt-Moabit 91a
D-10559 Berlin
Germany
Tel:   +49 30 390722 -291
Fax:   +49 30 390722 -222
Mobil: +49 173 6227080
http://www.sesa.de
mailto: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

--
Unsubscribe info:  http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:   http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:   http://cygwin.com/faq/



Re: SFU installed - rxvt problems

2004-01-16 Thread Gerrit P. Haase
Olaf wrote:

 On Fri, Jan 16, 2004 at 03:07:04PM +0100, Gerrit P. Haase wrote:
 Hallo,
 
 I don't know if SFU is the reason, but after installing it and rebooting
 the computer I cannot open a rxvt terminal without running X.  It
 complains:
 $ /usr/bin/rxvt
 rxvt: can't open display 127.0.0.1:0.0

 It seems there is a global defined variable DISPLAY now which points to
 127.0.0.1:0.0. And rxvt reads it and thinks that there is a X-Server
 running.

Yes, I've defined this always, since I installed the X server for the
first time, but rxvt always works also without a running X server.

$ cat .bashrc | grep DISPLAY
export DISPLAY=127.0.0.1:0.0

 I'll try it in a few minutes myself.

Thanks,
Gerrit
-- 
=^..^= http://nyckelpiga.de/donate.html


--
Unsubscribe info:  http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:   http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:   http://cygwin.com/faq/



Re: SFU installed - rxvt problems

2004-01-16 Thread Olaf Föllinger
On Fri, Jan 16, 2004 at 03:19:55PM +0100, Gerrit P. Haase wrote:
 Olaf wrote:
 
  On Fri, Jan 16, 2004 at 03:07:04PM +0100, Gerrit P. Haase wrote:
  Hallo,
  
  I don't know if SFU is the reason, but after installing it and rebooting
  the computer I cannot open a rxvt terminal without running X.  It
  complains:
  $ /usr/bin/rxvt
  rxvt: can't open display 127.0.0.1:0.0
 
  It seems there is a global defined variable DISPLAY now which points to
  127.0.0.1:0.0. And rxvt reads it and thinks that there is a X-Server
  running.
 
 Yes, I've defined this always, since I installed the X server for the
 first time, but rxvt always works also without a running X server.
 
 $ cat .bashrc | grep DISPLAY
 export DISPLAY=127.0.0.1:0.0

That's right, rxvt works wthout X, but if DISPLAY is dset, then it
thinks there is an X-server(at least here).

$ export DISPLAY=127.0.0.1:0.0;rxvt
rxvt: can't open display 127.0.0.1:0.0

 
Gruss Olaf Föllinger

-- 
Olaf Föllinger
Berater 
S.E.S.A. Software und Systeme AG

Alt-Moabit 91a
D-10559 Berlin
Germany
Tel:   +49 30 390722 -291
Fax:   +49 30 390722 -222
Mobil: +49 173 6227080
http://www.sesa.de
mailto: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

--
Unsubscribe info:  http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:   http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:   http://cygwin.com/faq/



Re: SFU installed - rxvt problems

2004-01-16 Thread Gerrit P. Haase
Olaf wrote:

 On Fri, Jan 16, 2004 at 03:19:55PM +0100, Gerrit P. Haase wrote:
 Olaf wrote:
 
  On Fri, Jan 16, 2004 at 03:07:04PM +0100, Gerrit P. Haase wrote:
  Hallo,
  
  I don't know if SFU is the reason, but after installing it and rebooting
  the computer I cannot open a rxvt terminal without running X.  It
  complains:
  $ /usr/bin/rxvt
  rxvt: can't open display 127.0.0.1:0.0
 
  It seems there is a global defined variable DISPLAY now which points to
  127.0.0.1:0.0. And rxvt reads it and thinks that there is a X-Server
  running.
 
 Yes, I've defined this always, since I installed the X server for the
 first time, but rxvt always works also without a running X server.
 
 $ cat .bashrc | grep DISPLAY
 export DISPLAY=127.0.0.1:0.0

 That's right, rxvt works wthout X, but if DISPLAY is dset, then it
 thinks there is an X-server(at least here).

 $ export DISPLAY=127.0.0.1:0.0;rxvt
 rxvt: can't open display 127.0.0.1:0.0

After I uninstalled SFU now, it works again;)  And I still have DISPLAY
defined in .bashrc.  Im starting rxvt directly with a shortcut, then
rxvt doesn't see the define in .bashrc until it has started, then bash
is started and .bashrc is sourced, so that isn't the problem here.

I also verified that DISPLAY wasn't defined as a global environment
setting during SFU installation.


Gerrit
-- 
=^..^= http://nyckelpiga.de/donate.html


--
Unsubscribe info:  http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:   http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:   http://cygwin.com/faq/



Re: SFU installed - rxvt problems

2004-01-16 Thread Christopher Faylor
On Fri, Jan 16, 2004 at 03:07:04PM +0100, Gerrit P. Haase wrote:
I don't know if SFU is the reason, but after installing it and rebooting
the computer I cannot open a rxvt terminal without running X.  It
complains:
$ /usr/bin/rxvt
rxvt: can't open display 127.0.0.1:0.0

I hope this isn't the start of a lot of posts about SFU.  I really don't
want to get too bogged down in incompatibilities between cygwin and
an essentially competing project.

--
Unsubscribe info:  http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:   http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:   http://cygwin.com/faq/



Re: SFU installed - rxvt problems

2004-01-16 Thread David A. Case
On Fri, Jan 16, 2004, Christopher Faylor wrote:

 On Fri, Jan 16, 2004 at 03:07:04PM +0100, Gerrit P. Haase wrote:
 I don't know if SFU is the reason, but after installing it and rebooting
 the computer I cannot open a rxvt terminal without running X.  It
 complains:
 $ /usr/bin/rxvt
 rxvt: can't open display 127.0.0.1:0.0
 
 I hope this isn't the start of a lot of posts about SFU.  I really don't
 want to get too bogged down in incompatibilities between cygwin and
 an essentially competing project.
 

A few such posts are actually helpful, to warn people (like me) who might have
been tempted to install SFU.  Based on posts like Gerrit's, I will probably
wait a while, since rxvt is far more important to me than is nfs.  Knowing
that others find problems is useful information, even if no fixes are
forthcoming.

..dave case


--
Unsubscribe info:  http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:   http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:   http://cygwin.com/faq/



Re: SFU installed - rxvt problems

2004-01-16 Thread Christopher Faylor
On Fri, Jan 16, 2004 at 09:33:51AM -0800, David A. Case wrote:
On Fri, Jan 16, 2004, Christopher Faylor wrote:

 On Fri, Jan 16, 2004 at 03:07:04PM +0100, Gerrit P. Haase wrote:
 I don't know if SFU is the reason, but after installing it and rebooting
 the computer I cannot open a rxvt terminal without running X.  It
 complains:
 $ /usr/bin/rxvt
 rxvt: can't open display 127.0.0.1:0.0
 
 I hope this isn't the start of a lot of posts about SFU.  I really don't
 want to get too bogged down in incompatibilities between cygwin and
 an essentially competing project.
 

A few such posts are actually helpful, to warn people (like me) who might have
been tempted to install SFU.  Based on posts like Gerrit's, I will probably
wait a while, since rxvt is far more important to me than is nfs.  Knowing
that others find problems is useful information, even if no fixes are
forthcoming.

The fact that this is useful is really irrelevant.  There are all sorts
of useful off-topic tidbits that could be posted to the cygwin mailing
list.  The issue, as always, is remaining on-topic and making sure that
this list adheres to its core focus.  This isn't a mailing list devoted
to various unix packages for windows.  It is a mailing list for the
cygwin unix application for windows.

I have no problem with some minor chatter, along the lines of general
discussions about shell programming that crop up from time to time.  I
just don't want it to get out of hand.
--
Please use the resources at cygwin.com rather than sending personal email.
Special for spam email harvesters: send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and be permanently blocked from mailing lists at sources.redhat.com

--
Unsubscribe info:  http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:   http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:   http://cygwin.com/faq/



Re: SFU installed - rxvt problems

2004-01-16 Thread Igor Pechtchanski
On Fri, 16 Jan 2004, Christopher Faylor wrote:

 On Fri, Jan 16, 2004 at 09:33:51AM -0800, David A. Case wrote:
 On Fri, Jan 16, 2004, Christopher Faylor wrote:
 
  On Fri, Jan 16, 2004 at 03:07:04PM +0100, Gerrit P. Haase wrote:
  I don't know if SFU is the reason, but after installing it and rebooting
  the computer I cannot open a rxvt terminal without running X.  It
  complains:
  $ /usr/bin/rxvt
  rxvt: can't open display 127.0.0.1:0.0
 
  I hope this isn't the start of a lot of posts about SFU.  I really don't
  want to get too bogged down in incompatibilities between cygwin and
  an essentially competing project.
 
 A few such posts are actually helpful, to warn people (like me) who
 might have been tempted to install SFU.  Based on posts like Gerrit's,
 I will probably wait a while, since rxvt is far more important to me
 than is nfs.  Knowing that others find problems is useful information,
 even if no fixes are forthcoming.

 The fact that this is useful is really irrelevant.  There are all sorts
 of useful off-topic tidbits that could be posted to the cygwin mailing
 list.  The issue, as always, is remaining on-topic and making sure that
 this list adheres to its core focus.  This isn't a mailing list devoted
 to various unix packages for windows.  It is a mailing list for the
 cygwin unix application for windows.

 I have no problem with some minor chatter, along the lines of general
 discussions about shell programming that crop up from time to time.  I
 just don't want it to get out of hand.

Well, if you read this thread as SFU makes Cygwin sick.  Bad SFU!
Uninstall it., it seems rather on-topic for the Cygwin community... :-)
But then, I guess if you install two or more competing products together,
you're generally on your own anyway.

Ok, no more noise from me[*]...
Igor
[*] ...in this thread ;-)
-- 
http://cs.nyu.edu/~pechtcha/
  |\  _,,,---,,_[EMAIL PROTECTED]
ZZZzz /,`.-'`'-.  ;-;;,_[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 |,4-  ) )-,_. ,\ (  `'-'   Igor Pechtchanski, Ph.D.
'---''(_/--'  `-'\_) fL a.k.a JaguaR-R-R-r-r-r-.-.-.  Meow!

I have since come to realize that being between your mentor and his route
to the bathroom is a major career booster.  -- Patrick Naughton

--
Unsubscribe info:  http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:   http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:   http://cygwin.com/faq/



RE: SFU installed - rxvt problems

2004-01-16 Thread Robert McNulty Junior
I tried SFU.  Hated it. Going back to Cygwin.
It requires Visual C++.
I have that, but I don't like the fact that it really can't compile any
of my software. Only Cygwin and Mingw can.
Visual Studio Too, but that's because I want MP3 capabiilty on my songs.
Robert

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of Gerrit P. Haase
Sent: Friday, January 16, 2004 8:37 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: SFU installed - rxvt problems

Olaf wrote:

 On Fri, Jan 16, 2004 at 03:19:55PM +0100, Gerrit P. Haase wrote:
 Olaf wrote:
 
  On Fri, Jan 16, 2004 at 03:07:04PM +0100, Gerrit P. Haase wrote:
  Hallo,
  
  I don't know if SFU is the reason, but after installing it and
rebooting
  the computer I cannot open a rxvt terminal without running X.  It
  complains:
  $ /usr/bin/rxvt
  rxvt: can't open display 127.0.0.1:0.0
 
  It seems there is a global defined variable DISPLAY now which
points to
  127.0.0.1:0.0. And rxvt reads it and thinks that there is a
X-Server
  running.
 
 Yes, I've defined this always, since I installed the X server for the
 first time, but rxvt always works also without a running X server.
 
 $ cat .bashrc | grep DISPLAY
 export DISPLAY=127.0.0.1:0.0

 That's right, rxvt works wthout X, but if DISPLAY is dset, then it
 thinks there is an X-server(at least here).

 $ export DISPLAY=127.0.0.1:0.0;rxvt
 rxvt: can't open display 127.0.0.1:0.0

After I uninstalled SFU now, it works again;)  And I still have DISPLAY
defined in .bashrc.  Im starting rxvt directly with a shortcut, then
rxvt doesn't see the define in .bashrc until it has started, then bash
is started and .bashrc is sourced, so that isn't the problem here.

I also verified that DISPLAY wasn't defined as a global environment
setting during SFU installation.


Gerrit
-- 
=^..^=
http://nyckelpiga.de/donate.html


--
Unsubscribe info:  http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:   http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:   http://cygwin.com/faq/




--
Unsubscribe info:  http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:   http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:   http://cygwin.com/faq/



RE: SFU installed - rxvt problems

2004-01-16 Thread Peter Skjøtt Larsen
While realizing that this list is not about SFU, closer examination reveals
that the dev environment in SFU 3.5 (and prior versions) is gcc and SFU
allows for Visual Studio to be invoked as well - e.g. $CC implies by default
the visual studio (command line) compiler. Don't pick the standard install
however, some useful things are not turned on by default!

Kind Regards
Peter

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Robert McNulty Junior
Sent: Friday, January 16, 2004 12:45 PM
To: 'Gerrit P. Haase'; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: SFU installed - rxvt problems


I tried SFU.  Hated it. Going back to Cygwin.
It requires Visual C++.
I have that, but I don't like the fact that it really can't compile any of
my software. Only Cygwin and Mingw can. Visual Studio Too, but that's
because I want MP3 capabiilty on my songs. Robert

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Gerrit P. Haase
Sent: Friday, January 16, 2004 8:37 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: SFU installed - rxvt problems

Olaf wrote:

 On Fri, Jan 16, 2004 at 03:19:55PM +0100, Gerrit P. Haase wrote:
 Olaf wrote:
 
  On Fri, Jan 16, 2004 at 03:07:04PM +0100, Gerrit P. Haase wrote:
  Hallo,
  
  I don't know if SFU is the reason, but after installing it and
rebooting
  the computer I cannot open a rxvt terminal without running X.  It
  complains:
  $ /usr/bin/rxvt
  rxvt: can't open display 127.0.0.1:0.0
 
  It seems there is a global defined variable DISPLAY now which
points to
  127.0.0.1:0.0. And rxvt reads it and thinks that there is a
X-Server
  running.
 
 Yes, I've defined this always, since I installed the X server for the 
 first time, but rxvt always works also without a running X server.
 
 $ cat .bashrc | grep DISPLAY
 export DISPLAY=127.0.0.1:0.0

 That's right, rxvt works wthout X, but if DISPLAY is dset, then it 
 thinks there is an X-server(at least here).

 $ export DISPLAY=127.0.0.1:0.0;rxvt
 rxvt: can't open display 127.0.0.1:0.0

After I uninstalled SFU now, it works again;)  And I still have DISPLAY
defined in .bashrc.  Im starting rxvt directly with a shortcut, then rxvt
doesn't see the define in .bashrc until it has started, then bash is started
and .bashrc is sourced, so that isn't the problem here.

I also verified that DISPLAY wasn't defined as a global environment setting
during SFU installation.


Gerrit
-- 
=^..^=
http://nyckelpiga.de/donate.html


--
Unsubscribe info:  http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:   http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:   http://cygwin.com/faq/




--
Unsubscribe info:  http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:   http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:   http://cygwin.com/faq/


--
Unsubscribe info:  http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:   http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:   http://cygwin.com/faq/



Re: SFU installed - rxvt problems

2004-01-16 Thread Christopher Faylor
On Fri, Jan 16, 2004 at 10:01:17PM -0800, Peter Skj?tt Larsen wrote:
While realizing that this list is not about SFU, closer examination
reveals that the dev environment in SFU 3.5 (and prior versions) is gcc
and SFU allows for Visual Studio to be invoked as well - e.g.  $CC
implies by default the visual studio (command line) compiler.  Don't
pick the standard install however, some useful things are not turned on
by default!

And, so, with this message we now step even more firmly into off-topic
territory.

Maybe you all need to form another mailing list if this is really a
hot topic for discussion.

--
Unsubscribe info:  http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:   http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:   http://cygwin.com/faq/