cygwin 1.5.24 bash 3.2.17(15) ls -d only reports .
Hi cygwin, Hope that this is the appropriate place for this question. I have just installed cygwin on my XP machine and tried ls -d. To my surprise only . was reported. ls -l showed several directories were present. Is this expected behaviour? Regards, Simon -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
Fwd: cygwin 1.5.24 bash 3.2.17(15) ls -d only reports .
Here's cygcheck.out to go with previous email -- Forwarded message -- From: Simon Davies [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: 18-Jul-2007 17:28 Subject: cygwin 1.5.24 bash 3.2.17(15) ls -d only reports . To: cygwin@cygwin.com Hi cygwin, Hope that this is the appropriate place for this question. I have just installed cygwin on my XP machine and tried ls -d. To my surprise only . was reported. ls -l showed several directories were present. Is this expected behaviour? Regards, Simon cygcheck.out Description: Binary data -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
Re: cygwin 1.5.24 bash 3.2.17(15) ls -d only reports .
Many thanks Bengt-Arne, Simon On 18/07/07, Bengt-Arne Fjellner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Simon Davies wrote: Hi cygwin, Hope that this is the appropriate place for this question. I have just installed cygwin on my XP machine and tried ls -d. To my Thats what you should get. Try: ls -d * instead. surprise only . was reported. ls -l showed several directories were present. Is this expected behaviour? Regards, Simon -- tel 0920 49 1894 Bengt-Arne Fjellner -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
