Re: gmp/mpfr status
On 3/18/08, Tim Prince [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I've been building gcc 4.3 and 4.4 with mpfr upgraded to 2.3.1, taking the gmp provided by cygwin. gcc build doesn't complain about mpfr 2.3.0 until you get to a few testsuite failures, but there seems no point in using less than 2.3.1. The timeline is whenever the mpfr maintainer gets to it. svn HEAD of gcc requires no less than mpfr 2.3.0, or top level configure fails. The current cygwin mpfr is 2.2.1. -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
RE: gmp/mpfr status
From: NightStrike Is there an approximate timeline for when the gmp and mpfr packages will be upgraded to the minimum required for compiling gcc? Really, I guess it's just mpfr that has to be upgraded to 2.3.0., but I think mpfr 2.3.0 requires gmp 4.2.2. I have working packages of gmp-4.2.2 and mpfr-2.3.1. I will try and upload them this weekend. David -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
Re: gmp/mpfr status
-- From: David Billinghurst [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, March 18, 2008 6:35 AM To: cygwin@cygwin.com Subject: RE: gmp/mpfr status From: NightStrike Is there an approximate timeline for when the gmp and mpfr packages will be upgraded to the minimum required for compiling gcc? Really, I guess it's just mpfr that has to be upgraded to 2.3.0., but I think mpfr 2.3.0 requires gmp 4.2.2. I have working packages of gmp-4.2.2 and mpfr-2.3.1. I will try and upload them this weekend. I have been going nuts trying to get gmp 4.2.2 to work. thanks for doing this, David. Much appreciated. -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
Re: gmp/mpfr status
Bobby McNulty wrote: I have been going nuts trying to get gmp 4.2.2 to work. thanks for doing this, David. Much appreciated. What in the world are you doing that's causing so much trouble? They always have built out of the box with default options just fine for me, including 2.3.1 and 4.2.2 which pass all checks. Brian -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
Re: gmp/mpfr status
Bobby McNulty wrote: It built fine. Installed. Got to build mpfr 2.31, and gmp 4.2.2 kept showing 4.2.1. That's because toplevel configure will find the system gmp header in /usr/include unless you pass --with-gmp=prefix you built gmp with and --with-mpfr=prefix you built mpfr with. Brian -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
Re: gmp/mpfr status
- Original Message - From: Brian Dessent [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: cygwin@cygwin.com Sent: Tuesday, March 18, 2008 9:33 AM Subject: Re: gmp/mpfr status Bobby McNulty wrote: I have been going nuts trying to get gmp 4.2.2 to work. thanks for doing this, David. Much appreciated. What in the world are you doing that's causing so much trouble? They always have built out of the box with default options just fine for me, including 2.3.1 and 4.2.2 which pass all checks. Brian -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ It built fine. Installed. Got to build mpfr 2.31, and gmp 4.2.2 kept showing 4.2.1. I did something wrong in installing it. not sure where. Waiting on Service pack 1 for Vista. See you guys later. BTW Cygwin works great under Vista Home Premium. All I did to install it under my semi-admin account was: 1 turn off UAC 2 rename setup.exe to foo 3 execute. Takes me about 45 minutes it install from the net. But with it downloaded, with Jari's programs, take 20 minutes from to install from hard drive. With Vista, I made a 30 GB partition, and everything I download off the net goes there. Including Cygwin. -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
Re: gmp/mpfr status
- Original Message - From: Brian Dessent [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: cygwin@cygwin.com Sent: Tuesday, March 18, 2008 9:55 AM Subject: Re: gmp/mpfr status Bobby McNulty wrote: It built fine. Installed. Got to build mpfr 2.31, and gmp 4.2.2 kept showing 4.2.1. That's because toplevel configure will find the system gmp header in /usr/include unless you pass --with-gmp=prefix you built gmp with and --with-mpfr=prefix you built mpfr with. Brian I will till this weekend to get the correct pair. -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
Re: gmp/mpfr status
Bobby McNulty wrote: It built fine. Installed. Got to build mpfr 2.31, and gmp 4.2.2 kept showing 4.2.1. That's because toplevel configure will find the system gmp header in /usr/include unless you pass --with-gmp=prefix you built gmp with and --with-mpfr=prefix you built mpfr with. Brian -- Thanks for the info, BTW. Forgot about that. -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
Re: gmp/mpfr status
On 3/18/08, Brian Dessent [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Bobby McNulty wrote: It built fine. Installed. Got to build mpfr 2.31, and gmp 4.2.2 kept showing 4.2.1. That's because toplevel configure will find the system gmp header in /usr/include unless you pass --with-gmp=prefix you built gmp with and --with-mpfr=prefix you built mpfr with. He said he installed it. Wouldn't that overwrite the gmp.h that's in /usr/include? -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
Re: gmp/mpfr status
Bobby McNulty wrote: It built fine. Installed. Got to build mpfr 2.31, and gmp 4.2.2 kept showing 4.2.1. That's because toplevel configure will find the system gmp header in /usr/include unless you pass --with-gmp=prefix you built gmp with and --with-mpfr=prefix you built mpfr with. He said he installed it. Wouldn't that overwrite the gmp.h that's in /usr/include? -- That was where i installed it to. /usr my prefix was --prefix=/usr nothing else -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
gmp/mpfr status
Is there an approximate timeline for when the gmp and mpfr packages will be upgraded to the minimum required for compiling gcc? Really, I guess it's just mpfr that has to be upgraded to 2.3.0., but I think mpfr 2.3.0 requires gmp 4.2.2. -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
Re: gmp/mpfr status
NightStrike wrote: Is there an approximate timeline for when the gmp and mpfr packages will be upgraded to the minimum required for compiling gcc? Really, I guess it's just mpfr that has to be upgraded to 2.3.0., but I think mpfr 2.3.0 requires gmp 4.2.2. I've been building gcc 4.3 and 4.4 with mpfr upgraded to 2.3.1, taking the gmp provided by cygwin. gcc build doesn't complain about mpfr 2.3.0 until you get to a few testsuite failures, but there seems no point in using less than 2.3.1. The timeline is whenever the mpfr maintainer gets to it. -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
