Re: new gdb interface

2002-10-18 Thread Randall R Schulz
At 09:07 2002-10-17, you wrote:

On Thu, Oct 17, 2002 at 04:10:35AM -0400, CBFalconer wrote:
Thomas Mellman wrote:

 Thank you, that helped.  Nevertheless, let me re-iterate my plea:
 particularly in the CYGWIN world, fancy do-dads should be optional,
 rather than standard Unix command line behaviour (IMHO) being optional.

Amen.

Hallelujah!



Praise the Lord!

Nothing invented since 1980 is even remotely an improvement on what came 
before.

Progress -- Bah!

RRS


--
Unsubscribe info:  http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:   http://cygwin.com/faq/



Re: new gdb interface

2002-10-18 Thread Christopher Faylor
On Thu, Oct 17, 2002 at 04:10:35AM -0400, CBFalconer wrote:
Thomas Mellman wrote:
 
 Thank you, that helped.  Nevertheless, let me re-iterate my plea:
 particularly in the CYGWIN world, fancy do-dads should be optional,
 rather than standard Unix command line behaviour (IMHO) being optional.

Amen.

Hallelujah!

--
Unsubscribe info:  http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:   http://cygwin.com/faq/




new gdb interface

2002-10-17 Thread Thomas Mellman

I'm not sure if this is a cygwin issue, but...

I just ran gdb for the first time on CYGWIN to debug a little program I'm writing
 All of a sudden up pops a graphics window.  Now, I've used gdb for many years,
enjoy it, and can operate it.  I can't operate this graphical interface and don't want 
it. 

After 10 minutes of looking at the man page (written  with the Microsoft 
familiar-you)
and info stuff, I see no clear instructions how *not* to get the graphical interface.
Everything seems to address the old, non-graphical interface (hence my suspicion
that this is a CYGWIN issue )

In trying to kill it, I now have an unkillable, dead window on my screen.

Can anybody tell me how to run real gdb?  And can graphical interfaces please be
optional, rather than the other way around?  A graphical interface for a debugger
is not a bad idea, and this one may be a good one (there are already good ones,
like ddd, but that's besides the point), but when I want a graphical interface, I'll 
execute it.

-- 


Thomas Mellman
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Keine verlorenen Lotto-Quittungen, keine vergessenen Gewinne mehr! 
Beim WEB.DE Lottoservice: http://tippen2.web.de/?x=13



--
Unsubscribe info:  http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:   http://cygwin.com/faq/




RE: new gdb interface

2002-10-17 Thread Al Slater

try gdb --help

Al

 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf
 Of Thomas Mellman
 Sent: 17 October 2002 08:02
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject: new gdb interface
 
 
 I'm not sure if this is a cygwin issue, but...
 
 I just ran gdb for the first time on CYGWIN to debug a little 
 program I'm writing
  All of a sudden up pops a graphics window.  Now, I've used 
 gdb for many years,
 enjoy it, and can operate it.  I can't operate this graphical 
 interface and don't want it. 
 
 After 10 minutes of looking at the man page (written  with 
 the Microsoft familiar-you)
 and info stuff, I see no clear instructions how *not* to get 
 the graphical interface.
 Everything seems to address the old, non-graphical interface 
 (hence my suspicion
 that this is a CYGWIN issue )
 
 In trying to kill it, I now have an unkillable, dead window 
 on my screen.
 
 Can anybody tell me how to run real gdb?  And can graphical 
 interfaces please be
 optional, rather than the other way around?  A graphical 
 interface for a debugger
 is not a bad idea, and this one may be a good one (there are 
 already good ones,
 like ddd, but that's besides the point), but when I want a 
 graphical interface, I'll execute it.
 
 -- 
 
 
 Thomas Mellman
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 Keine verlorenen Lotto-Quittungen, keine vergessenen Gewinne mehr! 
 Beim WEB.DE Lottoservice: http://tippen2.web.de/?x=13
 
 
 
 --
 Unsubscribe info:  http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
 Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
 Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html
 FAQ:   http://cygwin.com/faq/
 
 


--
Unsubscribe info:  http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:   http://cygwin.com/faq/




Re: new gdb interface

2002-10-17 Thread egor duda

Hi!

Thursday, 17 October, 2002 Thomas Mellman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

TM I had to power down my box - neither kill(-9) on either the process under test,
TM the debugger or the debugger window, nor even the task manager were able
TM to kill the two processes, and even windows-shutdown hung.

This is (probably) a bug in windows debugging interface. Similar hangs
(when one tries to kill debugee or debugger, and then they both
remains unkillable) are not gdb specific. They occur with any windows
program which exercise debugging APIs.

Egor.mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ICQ 5165414 FidoNet 2:5020/496.19


--
Unsubscribe info:  http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:   http://cygwin.com/faq/




Re: new gdb interface

2002-10-17 Thread CBFalconer

Thomas Mellman wrote:
 
 Thank you, that helped.  Nevertheless, let me re-iterate my plea:
 particularly in the CYGWIN world, fancy do-dads should be optional,
 rather than standard Unix command line behaviour (IMHO) being optional.

Amen.

-- 
Chuck F ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
   Available for consulting/temporary embedded and systems.
   http://cbfalconer.home.att.net  USE worldnet address!



--
Unsubscribe info:  http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:   http://cygwin.com/faq/




Re: Re: new gdb interface

2002-10-17 Thread Thomas Mellman

egor duda [EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb am 17.10.02 10:10:39:
 Hi!
 
 Thursday, 17 October, 2002 Thomas Mellman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 
 TM I had to power down my box - neither kill(-9) on either the process under test,
 TM the debugger or the debugger window, nor even the task manager were able
 TM to kill the two processes, and even windows-shutdown hung.
 
 This is (probably) a bug in windows debugging interface. Similar hangs
 (when one tries to kill debugee or debugger, and then they both
 remains unkillable) are not gdb specific. They occur with any windows
 program which exercise debugging APIs.


Ah.  Good.  Thank you. 

-- 


Thomas Mellman
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Keine verlorenen Lotto-Quittungen, keine vergessenen Gewinne mehr! 
Beim WEB.DE Lottoservice: http://tippen2.web.de/?x=13



--
Unsubscribe info:  http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:   http://cygwin.com/faq/




Re: new gdb interface

2002-10-17 Thread Roland Schwingel

Hi...

Cygwin uses insight, the gnu gdb frontend (which when you got used to 
it, can help a lot)
and which is included in newer gdb versions.It is *NOT* a cygwin extenstion.

To start in traditional mode run gdb with the -nw option.

Roland

  Thomas Mellman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
17.10.2002 09:02

 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 cc:
 Subject: new gdb interface


I'm not sure if this is a cygwin issue, but...

I just ran gdb for the first time on CYGWIN to debug a little program 
I'm writing
 All of a sudden up pops a graphics window.  Now, I've used gdb for many 
years,
enjoy it, and can operate it.  I can't operate this graphical interface 
and don't want it.

After 10 minutes of looking at the man page (written  with the Microsoft 
familiar-you)
and info stuff, I see no clear instructions how *not* to get the 
graphical interface.
Everything seems to address the old, non-graphical interface (hence my 
suspicion
that this is a CYGWIN issue )

In trying to kill it, I now have an unkillable, dead window on my screen.

Can anybody tell me how to run real gdb?  And can graphical interfaces 
please be
optional, rather than the other way around?  A graphical interface for a 
debugger
is not a bad idea, and this one may be a good one (there are already 
good ones,
like ddd, but that's besides the point), but when I want a graphical 
interface, I'll execute it.

-- 


Thomas Mellman
[EMAIL PROTECTED]



--
Unsubscribe info:  http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:   http://cygwin.com/faq/




Re: new gdb interface

2002-10-17 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]

As mentioned, the behavior of gdb is driven by the developers of gdb and
insight.  You should address your questions and concerns in this area to 
the gdb list.

Larry

Original Message:
-
From: Thomas Mellman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Thu, 17 Oct 2002 11:31:03 +0200
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: new gdb interface


Regarding the default window-fied behaviour of GDB - is that POSIX?
It certainly doesn't seem in the spirit of POSIX.

-- 


Thomas Mellman
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Keine verlorenen Lotto-Quittungen, keine vergessenen Gewinne mehr! 
Beim WEB.DE Lottoservice: http://tippen2.web.de/?x=13



--
Unsubscribe info:  http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:   http://cygwin.com/faq/



mail2web - Check your email from the web at
http://mail2web.com/ .



--
Unsubscribe info:  http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:   http://cygwin.com/faq/