Re: package for netstat?
Shapiro, Jonathan wrote: But if other cygwinners use Win netstat, I'll use it too. [OT?] ping, tracert (not traceroute), nslookup and netstat are a few of the shining exceptions among Windows clones of BSD tools, in that they're as generally good as the originals (actually better in a couple of instances, like netstat's "-o" option to associate PIDs with sockets - combines netstat and fuser in a convenient way). -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
RE: package for netstat?
At 04:31 PM 3/25/2005, you wrote: >Pardon if this is mis-posted. I'm a long-time cygwin user and fan, but not >very good at usenet. > >Which package do I get to get 'netstat'? > >I found this (slightly silly) thread: > >http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/2004-06/msg00959.html > >titled "yes -- netstat (was Re: is there any command to see all the current >tcp socket?)", >so it sounds like Cygwin does have netstat, but a search from this page: >http://cygwin.com/packages >found 0 matches, and a quick scan of the package names found no >likely suspects. What am I doing wrong? Ignoring Windows? I typed "which netstat" at my bash prompt just now and was greeted with "/WINDOWS/system32/netstat". YMMV, depending on the version of Windows you're running and your mount points. -- Larry Hall http://www.rfk.com RFK Partners, Inc. (508) 893-9779 - RFK Office 838 Washington Street (508) 893-9889 - FAX Holliston, MA 01746 Actually, yes, I do tend to ignore windows when possible. It keeps me happy. ;-> I've got the system32/netstat in my path currently, too. I guess I was working off some bad past experiences with Windows 'find' vs. GNU 'find' - I use GNU if it's available. But if other cygwinners use Win netstat, I'll use it too. Thanks. This e-mail and any attachment is for authorised use by the intended recipient(s) only. It may contain proprietary material, confidential information and/or be subject to legal privilege. It should not be copied, disclosed to, retained or used by, any other party. If you are not an intended recipient then please promptly delete this e-mail and any attachment and all copies and inform the sender. Thank you. -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
Re: package for netstat?
At 04:31 PM 3/25/2005, you wrote: >Pardon if this is mis-posted. I'm a long-time cygwin user and fan, but not >very good at usenet. > >Which package do I get to get 'netstat'? > >I found this (slightly silly) thread: > >http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/2004-06/msg00959.html > >titled "yes -- netstat (was Re: is there any command to see all the current >tcp socket?)", >so it sounds like Cygwin does have netstat, but a search from this page: >http://cygwin.com/packages >found 0 matches, and a quick scan of the package names found no >likely suspects. What am I doing wrong? Ignoring Windows? I typed "which netstat" at my bash prompt just now and was greeted with "/WINDOWS/system32/netstat". YMMV, depending on the version of Windows you're running and your mount points. -- Larry Hall http://www.rfk.com RFK Partners, Inc. (508) 893-9779 - RFK Office 838 Washington Street (508) 893-9889 - FAX Holliston, MA 01746 -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
package for netstat?
Pardon if this is mis-posted. I'm a long-time cygwin user and fan, but not very good at usenet. Which package do I get to get 'netstat'? I found this (slightly silly) thread: http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/2004-06/msg00959.html titled "yes -- netstat (was Re: is there any command to see all the current tcp socket?)", so it sounds like Cygwin does have netstat, but a search from this page: http://cygwin.com/packages found 0 matches, and a quick scan of the package names found no likely suspects. What am I doing wrong? much thanks, Jonathan This e-mail and any attachment is for authorised use by the intended recipient(s) only. It may contain proprietary material, confidential information and/or be subject to legal privilege. It should not be copied, disclosed to, retained or used by, any other party. If you are not an intended recipient then please promptly delete this e-mail and any attachment and all copies and inform the sender. Thank you. -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
