Re: special name for vss shadow copy device?
On Feb 26 10:10, Corinna Vinschen wrote: > On Feb 25 19:20, Greg Freemyer wrote: > > On Wed, Feb 25, 2009 at 6:01 PM, Larry Hall (Cygwin) > > wrote: > > > Greg Freemyer wrote: > > > > > > > > >> Time to experiment with Cygwin 1.7 > > >> > > >> I know the whole package is still considered test. How stable is the > > >> actual dll(s). Especially as relates to this type of functionality. > > The DLL is quite stable but there are certainly some bugs as well. > > > I tried the "dosdev" trick from one of the links to mount the snapshot > > as V:. Apparently that is a XP only trick. Or at least Vista does > > not have it. Here's how it does NOT work: $ dosdev 'V:' '\\?\GLOBALROOT\Device\HarddiskVolumeShadowCopy21' $ mount [...] C: on /cygdrive/c type ntfs ... $ The reason is that the path the drive points to has to be a native NT path. The path containg the GLOBALROOT is a long Win32 path name which is invalid in this case. However, the dosdev functionality is nothing but creating a symbolic link in the native NT namespace and the target of such a symlink can be anything which can be expressed in a 64K buffer. Here is how it works: $ dosdev 'V:' '\Device\HarddiskVolumeShadowCopy21' $ mount [...] C: on /cygdrive/c type ntfs ... V: on /cygdrive/v type ntfs ... What you have to do is to create a native NT symlink which points to the actual native NT device name which is as shown above, just \Device\HarddiskVolumeShadowCopy21. That works like a champ on Cygwin and in Windows Explorer on Vista. Btw., I'm using my own crude dosdev: == #include #include int main (int argc, char **argv) { DWORD flags = 0; if (argc < 2) { fprintf (stderr, "usage: %s DosDevice [NTDevice]\n", argv[0]); return 1; } if (argc == 2) flags = DDD_REMOVE_DEFINITION; else flags = DDD_RAW_TARGET_PATH; if (!DefineDosDevice (flags, argv[1], argc == 2 ? NULL : argv[2])) { fprintf (stderr, "Error %d\n", GetLastError ()); return 1; } return 0; } == $ gcc -o mydosdev mydosdev.c $ # Create the dos link $ ./mydosdev 'V:' '\Device\HarddiskVolumeShadowCopy21' $ # Remove it $ ./mydosdev 'V:' HTH, Corinna -- Corinna Vinschen Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to Cygwin Project Co-Leader cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Red Hat -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
Re: special name for vss shadow copy device?
On Feb 25 19:20, Greg Freemyer wrote: > On Wed, Feb 25, 2009 at 6:01 PM, Larry Hall (Cygwin) > wrote: > > Greg Freemyer wrote: > > > > > >> Time to experiment with Cygwin 1.7 > >> > >> I know the whole package is still considered test. How stable is the > >> actual dll(s). Especially as relates to this type of functionality. The DLL is quite stable but there are certainly some bugs as well. > I tried the "dosdev" trick from one of the links to mount the snapshot > as V:. Apparently that is a XP only trick. Or at least Vista does > not have it. > > From the Vista command prompt I can do: > mklink /d C:\shadow_copy21 \\?\GLOBALROOT\Device\HarddiskVolumeShadowCopy21\ > > and then cd into that directory and see my old snapshot data. I can > also see it from the Vista file explorer. > > From cygwin's shell if I try to do so I get: > $ cd /cygdrive/c/shadow_copy21 > bash: cd: /cygdrive/c/shadow_copy21: No such file or directory If the path really exists on the native NT level, that should work. If it's just faked one way or another, Cygwin has no way to use that path. I never tried anything with VSS. I'll have a look what happens on my Vista machine. Corinna -- Corinna Vinschen Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to Cygwin Project Co-Leader cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Red Hat -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
Re: special name for vss shadow copy device?
Greg Freemyer wrote: On Wed, Feb 25, 2009 at 8:44 PM, Larry Hall (Cygwin) wrote: Greg Freemyer wrote: On Wed, Feb 25, 2009 at 6:01 PM, Larry Hall (Cygwin) wrote: Greg Freemyer wrote: Time to experiment with Cygwin 1.7 I know the whole package is still considered test. How stable is the actual dll(s). Especially as relates to this type of functionality. Difficult to say since this functionality isn't on a typical use path and no specific efforts have been made to 'integrate' it into Cygwin, whatever form that integration might take. What is clear, however, is if there is a problem using this functionality in 1.7, now would be the time to find out. Since the 1.7 DLL is near its final form for release, any hope of fixing problems before the release requires that they be found first. Okay, (trouble report, see the end of the email. Successes first :) I've got the latest 1.7 release. I'm testing right now on Vista Home. Just as an FYI, this machine has 32 snapshots in place. Going back to Thanksgiving. All of these were created automatically by Vista. I don't think I did any config work etc. to make it happen. I can see these from the Vista Command Prompt by running "vssadmin list shadows". Very cool. dd seems to be working great, but I've only done a couple quick tests. dd if= | od -cv | less is showing what looks like good data. I tried the same with snapshot instance 33. As hoped dd came back with an error message since that snapshot does not exist. I currently have 5 dd's running against 5 different snapshots and the output going to /dev/null.Per task manager all are actively reading data. Very cool. They are reading very slowly, but then again I'm beating the heck out of the drive. I tried the "dosdev" trick from one of the links to mount the snapshot as V:. Apparently that is a XP only trick. Or at least Vista does not have it. From the Vista command prompt I can do: mklink /d C:\shadow_copy21 \\?\GLOBALROOT\Device\HarddiskVolumeShadowCopy21\ and then cd into that directory and see my old snapshot data. I can also see it from the Vista file explorer. From cygwin's shell if I try to do so I get: $ cd /cygdrive/c/shadow_copy21 bash: cd: /cygdrive/c/shadow_copy21: No such file or directory I assume that should work? Dunno. I can't get the 'cd' or 'dir' to work from the Vista command prompt. For me, 'dir foo' (I named the link 'foo') gives me 'File Not Found'. So in my case, what you see from Cygwin makes sense since it's consistent with what Windows tells me. Very strange mklink created usable directories for me on both Vista Home and Win 2008. Can you or someone else test it on another machine? Sorry. Fresh out of Vista machines (sniff ;-)) -- Larry Hall http://www.rfk.com RFK Partners, Inc. (508) 893-9779 - RFK Office 216 Dalton Rd. (508) 893-9889 - FAX Holliston, MA 01746 _ A: Yes. > Q: Are you sure? >> A: Because it reverses the logical flow of conversation. >>> Q: Why is top posting annoying in email? -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
Re: special name for vss shadow copy device?
On Wed, Feb 25, 2009 at 8:44 PM, Larry Hall (Cygwin) wrote: > Greg Freemyer wrote: >> >> On Wed, Feb 25, 2009 at 6:01 PM, Larry Hall (Cygwin) >> wrote: >>> >>> Greg Freemyer wrote: >>> >>> Time to experiment with Cygwin 1.7 I know the whole package is still considered test. How stable is the actual dll(s). Especially as relates to this type of functionality. >>> >>> Difficult to say since this functionality isn't on a typical use path >>> and no specific efforts have been made to 'integrate' it into Cygwin, >>> whatever form that integration might take. What is clear, however, is if >>> there is a problem using this functionality in 1.7, now would be the time >>> to find out. Since the 1.7 DLL is near its final form for release, any >>> hope of fixing problems before the release requires that they be found >>> first. >> >> Okay, (trouble report, see the end of the email. Successes first :) >> >> I've got the latest 1.7 release. I'm testing right now on Vista Home. >> >> Just as an FYI, this machine has 32 snapshots in place. Going back to >> Thanksgiving. All of these were created automatically by Vista. I >> don't think I did any config work etc. to make it happen. >> >> I can see these from the Vista Command Prompt by running "vssadmin >> list shadows". >> >> Very cool. >> >> dd seems to be working great, but I've only done a couple quick tests. >> >> dd if= | od -cv | less >> >> is showing what looks like good data. >> >> I tried the same with snapshot instance 33. As hoped dd came back >> with an error message since that snapshot does not exist. >> >> I currently have 5 dd's running against 5 different snapshots and the >> output going to /dev/null. Per task manager all are actively >> reading data. Very cool. They are reading very slowly, but then >> again I'm beating the heck out of the drive. >> >> I tried the "dosdev" trick from one of the links to mount the snapshot >> as V:. Apparently that is a XP only trick. Or at least Vista does >> not have it. >> >> From the Vista command prompt I can do: >> mklink /d C:\shadow_copy21 >> \\?\GLOBALROOT\Device\HarddiskVolumeShadowCopy21\ >> >> and then cd into that directory and see my old snapshot data. I can >> also see it from the Vista file explorer. >> >> From cygwin's shell if I try to do so I get: >> $ cd /cygdrive/c/shadow_copy21 >> bash: cd: /cygdrive/c/shadow_copy21: No such file or directory >> >> I assume that should work? > > Dunno. I can't get the 'cd' or 'dir' to work from the Vista command > prompt. For me, 'dir foo' (I named the link 'foo') gives me 'File Not > Found'. So in my case, what you see from Cygwin makes sense since it's > consistent with what Windows tells me. Very strange mklink created usable directories for me on both Vista Home and Win 2008. Can you or someone else test it on another machine? ie. Cygwin need not be installed to test this Windows feature. Greg -- Greg Freemyer Litigation Triage Solutions Specialist http://www.linkedin.com/in/gregfreemyer First 99 Days Litigation White Paper - http://www.norcrossgroup.com/forms/whitepapers/99%20Days%20whitepaper.pdf The Norcross Group The Intersection of Evidence & Technology http://www.norcrossgroup.com -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
Re: special name for vss shadow copy device?
Greg Freemyer wrote: On Wed, Feb 25, 2009 at 6:01 PM, Larry Hall (Cygwin) wrote: Greg Freemyer wrote: Time to experiment with Cygwin 1.7 I know the whole package is still considered test. How stable is the actual dll(s). Especially as relates to this type of functionality. Difficult to say since this functionality isn't on a typical use path and no specific efforts have been made to 'integrate' it into Cygwin, whatever form that integration might take. What is clear, however, is if there is a problem using this functionality in 1.7, now would be the time to find out. Since the 1.7 DLL is near its final form for release, any hope of fixing problems before the release requires that they be found first. Okay, (trouble report, see the end of the email. Successes first :) I've got the latest 1.7 release. I'm testing right now on Vista Home. Just as an FYI, this machine has 32 snapshots in place. Going back to Thanksgiving. All of these were created automatically by Vista. I don't think I did any config work etc. to make it happen. I can see these from the Vista Command Prompt by running "vssadmin list shadows". Very cool. dd seems to be working great, but I've only done a couple quick tests. dd if= | od -cv | less is showing what looks like good data. I tried the same with snapshot instance 33. As hoped dd came back with an error message since that snapshot does not exist. I currently have 5 dd's running against 5 different snapshots and the output going to /dev/null.Per task manager all are actively reading data. Very cool. They are reading very slowly, but then again I'm beating the heck out of the drive. I tried the "dosdev" trick from one of the links to mount the snapshot as V:. Apparently that is a XP only trick. Or at least Vista does not have it. From the Vista command prompt I can do: mklink /d C:\shadow_copy21 \\?\GLOBALROOT\Device\HarddiskVolumeShadowCopy21\ and then cd into that directory and see my old snapshot data. I can also see it from the Vista file explorer. From cygwin's shell if I try to do so I get: $ cd /cygdrive/c/shadow_copy21 bash: cd: /cygdrive/c/shadow_copy21: No such file or directory I assume that should work? Dunno. I can't get the 'cd' or 'dir' to work from the Vista command prompt. For me, 'dir foo' (I named the link 'foo') gives me 'File Not Found'. So in my case, what you see from Cygwin makes sense since it's consistent with what Windows tells me. -- Larry Hall http://www.rfk.com RFK Partners, Inc. (508) 893-9779 - RFK Office 216 Dalton Rd. (508) 893-9889 - FAX Holliston, MA 01746 _ A: Yes. > Q: Are you sure? >> A: Because it reverses the logical flow of conversation. >>> Q: Why is top posting annoying in email? -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
Re: special name for vss shadow copy device?
On Wed, Feb 25, 2009 at 6:01 PM, Larry Hall (Cygwin) wrote: > Greg Freemyer wrote: > > >> Time to experiment with Cygwin 1.7 >> >> I know the whole package is still considered test. How stable is the >> actual dll(s). Especially as relates to this type of functionality. > > Difficult to say since this functionality isn't on a typical use path > and no specific efforts have been made to 'integrate' it into Cygwin, > whatever form that integration might take. What is clear, however, is if > there is a problem using this functionality in 1.7, now would be the time > to find out. Since the 1.7 DLL is near its final form for release, any > hope of fixing problems before the release requires that they be found > first. Okay, (trouble report, see the end of the email. Successes first :) I've got the latest 1.7 release. I'm testing right now on Vista Home. Just as an FYI, this machine has 32 snapshots in place. Going back to Thanksgiving. All of these were created automatically by Vista. I don't think I did any config work etc. to make it happen. I can see these from the Vista Command Prompt by running "vssadmin list shadows". Very cool. dd seems to be working great, but I've only done a couple quick tests. dd if= | od -cv | less is showing what looks like good data. I tried the same with snapshot instance 33. As hoped dd came back with an error message since that snapshot does not exist. I currently have 5 dd's running against 5 different snapshots and the output going to /dev/null.Per task manager all are actively reading data. Very cool. They are reading very slowly, but then again I'm beating the heck out of the drive. I tried the "dosdev" trick from one of the links to mount the snapshot as V:. Apparently that is a XP only trick. Or at least Vista does not have it. From the Vista command prompt I can do: mklink /d C:\shadow_copy21 \\?\GLOBALROOT\Device\HarddiskVolumeShadowCopy21\ and then cd into that directory and see my old snapshot data. I can also see it from the Vista file explorer. From cygwin's shell if I try to do so I get: $ cd /cygdrive/c/shadow_copy21 bash: cd: /cygdrive/c/shadow_copy21: No such file or directory I assume that should work? Thanks Greg -- Greg Freemyer Litigation Triage Solutions Specialist http://www.linkedin.com/in/gregfreemyer First 99 Days Litigation White Paper - http://www.norcrossgroup.com/forms/whitepapers/99%20Days%20whitepaper.pdf The Norcross Group The Intersection of Evidence & Technology http://www.norcrossgroup.com -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
Re: special name for vss shadow copy device?
Greg Freemyer wrote: Time to experiment with Cygwin 1.7 I know the whole package is still considered test. How stable is the actual dll(s). Especially as relates to this type of functionality. Difficult to say since this functionality isn't on a typical use path and no specific efforts have been made to 'integrate' it into Cygwin, whatever form that integration might take. What is clear, however, is if there is a problem using this functionality in 1.7, now would be the time to find out. Since the 1.7 DLL is near its final form for release, any hope of fixing problems before the release requires that they be found first. -- Larry Hall http://www.rfk.com RFK Partners, Inc. (508) 893-9779 - RFK Office 216 Dalton Rd. (508) 893-9889 - FAX Holliston, MA 01746 _ A: Yes. > Q: Are you sure? >> A: Because it reverses the logical flow of conversation. >>> Q: Why is top posting annoying in email? -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
Re: special name for vss shadow copy device?
On Wed, Feb 25, 2009 at 1:57 PM, Christian Franke wrote: > Greg Freemyer wrote: >> >> ... >> My personal desire is make a full dd copy of a snapshot onto a external >> drive. >> >> ie. dd if=/dev/sd-shadowcopy4 of= >> >> > > With new Cygwin 1.7, the VSS volume image can be retrieved as follows: > > dd if='//?/GLOBALROOT/Device/HarddiskVolumeShadowCopy4' of=... > > But this does not work with Cygwin 1.5. > > > To access individual files, assign a drive letter X: to the VSS volume: > > http://blogs.msdn.com/adioltean/archive/2006/09/18/761515.aspx > http://blogs.msdn.com/adioltean/archive/2005/01/20/357836.aspx > > Then you can access the files via /cygdrive/x. This works with cygwin 1.5 > also. Only the WinXP explorer refuses to access the drive. > > See also related discussion here: > http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin/2008-11/msg00070.html > > Hope this helps, Wonderful links and information!! That is all I really needed, since I assume 1.5 is basically no longer being developed, I don't see a big need to create mappings for the shadow volumes. I do think it would be good to have the above links and documentation added to the special names section of the documentation. Time to experiment with Cygwin 1.7 I know the whole package is still considered test. How stable is the actual dll(s). Especially as relates to this type of functionality. Thanks Greg -- Greg Freemyer Litigation Triage Solutions Specialist http://www.linkedin.com/in/gregfreemyer First 99 Days Litigation White Paper - http://www.norcrossgroup.com/forms/whitepapers/99%20Days%20whitepaper.pdf The Norcross Group The Intersection of Evidence & Technology http://www.norcrossgroup.com -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
Re: special name for vss shadow copy device?
Greg Freemyer wrote: ... My personal desire is make a full dd copy of a snapshot onto a external drive. ie. dd if=/dev/sd-shadowcopy4 of= With new Cygwin 1.7, the VSS volume image can be retrieved as follows: dd if='//?/GLOBALROOT/Device/HarddiskVolumeShadowCopy4' of=... But this does not work with Cygwin 1.5. To access individual files, assign a drive letter X: to the VSS volume: http://blogs.msdn.com/adioltean/archive/2006/09/18/761515.aspx http://blogs.msdn.com/adioltean/archive/2005/01/20/357836.aspx Then you can access the files via /cygdrive/x. This works with cygwin 1.5 also. Only the WinXP explorer refuses to access the drive. See also related discussion here: http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin/2008-11/msg00070.html Hope this helps, Christian -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
Re: special name for vss shadow copy device?
On Feb 24 15:42, Greg Freemyer wrote: > All, > > I'm familiar with http://www.cygwin.com/cygwin-ug-net/using-specialnames.html > > But it only shows the \device\hardisk mappings. > > Are there also mapppings for the shadow devices. > (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shadow_Copy) > > ie. > \Device\HarddiskVolumeShadowCopy4 > or > \\?\GLOBALROOT\Device\HarddiskVolumeShadowCopy4 Sorry, there's no Cygwin device associated with volume shadow copies so far. There are no plans to add them, but if they can be simply mapped to raw disk devices, we can certainly talk about adding a matching device (/dev/svX or something). As usual http://cygwin.com/acronyms/#PTC. Corinna -- Corinna Vinschen Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to Cygwin Project Co-Leader cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Red Hat -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
special name for vss shadow copy device?
All, I'm familiar with http://www.cygwin.com/cygwin-ug-net/using-specialnames.html But it only shows the \device\hardisk mappings. Are there also mapppings for the shadow devices. (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shadow_Copy) ie. \Device\HarddiskVolumeShadowCopy4 or \\?\GLOBALROOT\Device\HarddiskVolumeShadowCopy4 If your running Vista or Win2008 you can create a shadow copy device by going to the file explorer, right clicking on a local NTFS drive, clicking properties, then the "shadow copies" tab, then create now. To get the instance number (4 above) you go to the command line and type "vssadmin list shadows". In theory I should be able to mount that under cygwin and access my snapshot-ed filesystem. My personal desire is make a full dd copy of a snapshot onto a external drive. ie. dd if=/dev/sd-shadowcopy4 of= Thanks Greg -- Greg Freemyer Litigation Triage Solutions Specialist http://www.linkedin.com/in/gregfreemyer First 99 Days Litigation White Paper - http://www.norcrossgroup.com/forms/whitepapers/99%20Days%20whitepaper.pdf The Norcross Group The Intersection of Evidence & Technology http://www.norcrossgroup.com -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/