Re: init and agetty packages available for review/upload.

2002-11-11 Thread Charles Wilson
Corinna -- please add a skip: command to sysvinit's setup.hint (and give 
me write perms on the file).  We don't want sysvinit to appear in 
setup.ini until after I've uploaded the new version of cygutils, since 
there is a conflict over the last and utmpdump commands.

I'll be uploading a new version of cygutils that does not have those 
files later today, and I'll remove the skip: command at that time.



> You should have permissions to do this already, Chuck.

Nope -- I wouldn't have asked if I did.  But its obviously too late now, 
its already been replicated to the mirrors.

-rw-rw-r--1 corinna  cygnus414 Nov 10 07:40 setup.hint

[cwilson@sourceware sysvinit]$ groups
cygwin src cygwin-apps

I'm not a member of the cygnus group.

In any case, I'll be uploading a new cygutils without last.exe and 
utmpdump.exe soon.  Folks who have already installed sysvinit will have 
to reinstall it after upgrading cygutils.  I tried.  Sigh.

BTW, I had found that the following was necessary in cygutil's 
postinstall script when I added last and utmpdump to cygutils.  Now that 
those programs are in sysvinit, sysvinit's /etc/postinstall script 
should contain these commands (that's /etc/postinstall/sysvinit.sh, not 
/usr/bin/init-config):

#!/bin/sh
if [ ! -d /var/run ] ; then \
  mkdir -p /var/run ;
fi
if [ ! -d /var/log ] ; then \
  mkdir -p /var/log ;
fi
if [ ! -f /var/run/utmp ] ; then \
  touch /var/run/utmp ;
fi
if [ ! -f /var/log/wtmp ] ; then \
  touch /var/log/wtmp ;
fi

--Chuck



Re: initscripts package available for review/upload

2002-11-11 Thread Joshua Daniel Franklin
I borrowed a Win98 laptop for the night and am pleased
to say that initscripts and sysvinit worked (at least with
the /etc/rc.d/init.d/sshd script provided) with no configuration
necessary. This is very nice, thanks very much Sergey!
I was unable to track down a workable console cable so unfortunately
I still do not know if agetty works.

My only suggestion is that init-config might do a simple check
for Win9x/ME systems and bail out without doing anything (maybe
a message about getting a "real computer") since running init-config 
gives some ugly errors. Of course this is a stupid thing to do on Win98 
sincethere is no NT service, but the ssh-host-config script at least
just bails out:

$ ssh-host-config
Generating /etc/ssh_host_key
Generating /etc/ssh_host_rsa_key
Generating /etc/ssh_host_dsa_key
Generating /etc/ssh_config file
Generating /etc/sshd_config file
Added ssh to /c/WINDOWS/SERVICES

Host configuration finished. Have fun!

$
With init-config, this happens:

Do you want to set up init to run as NT service? (yes/no) yes
chown: `system.system': invalid user
chown: `system.system': invalid user
/bin/cygrunsrv: Error installing a service: OpenSCManager:  Win32 error 120:
This function is only valid in Win32 mode.

Error 2185: The service name is invalid. Make sure you are specifying a valid
service name, and then try again.

[and then there is a nice popup with this:]
SH caused an invalid page fault in
module KERNEL32.DLL at 0167:bff7d762.
Registers:
EAX=c1556f30 CS=0167 EIP=bff7d762 EFLGS=00010202
EBX=818fa320 SS=016f ESP=0074e600 EBP=0074e648
ECX=bff7d75b DS=016f ESI=0001 FS=0daf
EDX=bffc9490 ES=016f EDI= GS=
Bytes at CS:EIP:
8b 0f 3b ce 76 10 8d 47 10 83 38 00 74 28 83 c0 
Stack dump:
0074e648 818ff620 0001  bff8dd46 818fa320  0074f320
 c14fea20 818ff660 bff7 bff7dcc4  00b8  


__
Do you Yahoo!?
U2 on LAUNCH - Exclusive greatest hits videos
http://launch.yahoo.com/u2



Re: initscripts package available for review/upload

2002-11-11 Thread Sergey Okhapkin
I included a postinstall script to the package to rename existing
/etc/inittab and create a new one.

Sergey Okhapkin
Somerset, NJ
- Original Message -
From: "Corinna Vinschen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, November 11, 2002 8:42 AM
Subject: Re: initscripts package available for review/upload


> On Mon, Nov 11, 2002 at 07:16:51AM -0500, Sergey Okhapkin wrote:
> > http://users.rcn.com/sokhapkin/release/initscripts/setup.hint
> >
http://users.rcn.com/sokhapkin/release/initscripts/initscripts-0.9-1.tar.bz2
> >
> > BTW, I just realized that sysvinit and initscripts have a common file -
> > /etc/inittab. sysvinit includes a basic one, but initscripts has a full
> > featured file. initscripts package has no postinstall script,
/etc/inittab
> > will be overwritten silently on the package installation. But I need to
>
> The answer is probably "don't do this".  The initscripts package should
> only contain skeleton files and/or scripts which create the correct files
> on demand of the user.  My first OpenSSH packages did overwrite the
> config files, too, but that resulted in too much complains.  Since then,
> unpacking config files in place is considered bad practice for Cygwin.
>
> At least the postinstall script of the package should rename the old
> config file (as *.rpmsave on rpm based installations).
>
> Corinna
>
> --
> Corinna Vinschen  Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to
> Cygwin Developermailto:cygwin@;cygwin.com
> Red Hat, Inc.





Re: init and agetty packages available for review/upload.

2002-11-11 Thread Christopher Faylor
On Mon, Nov 11, 2002 at 05:14:59PM -0500, Charles Wilson wrote:
>Corinna -- please add a skip: command to sysvinit's setup.hint (and give 
>me write perms on the file).  We don't want sysvinit to appear in 
>setup.ini until after I've uploaded the new version of cygutils, since 
>there is a conflict over the last and utmpdump commands.

You should have permissions to do this already, Chuck.

cgf



Re: chkconfig package available for review/download

2002-11-11 Thread Nicholas Wourms
Sergey Okhapkin wrote:

http://users.rcn.com/sokhapkin/release/chkconfig/

category: System
requires: cygwin initscripts
sdesc: "Runlevel/xinetd services editor"
ldesc: "chkconfig provides a simple command-line  tool  for
maintaining  the /etc/rc[0-6].d directory hierarchy by relieving
system administrators of the task of directly  manipulating
the numerous symbolic links in those directories."




Good grief, you're really pumping them out, aren't you?

Cheers,
Nicholas





Re: init and agetty packages available for review/upload.

2002-11-11 Thread Charles Wilson
Corinna wrote:
>> 
http://users.rcn.com/sokhapkin/release/sysvinit/sysvinit-2.84-1-src.tar.bz2
>> http://users.rcn.com/sokhapkin/release/sysvinit/sysvinit-2.84-1.tar.bz2
>
> Thanks!
>
> Uploaded.

Ummm...

Charles Wilson wrote:

Also, the cygutils package already includes /usr/bin/last.exe
but I'm not sure what to do about this since I bet Chuck took it from
some sysvinit package and wouldn't mind moving it to its canonical
location once the sysvinit package gets together.



Corinna -- please add a skip: command to sysvinit's setup.hint (and give 
me write perms on the file).  We don't want sysvinit to appear in 
setup.ini until after I've uploaded the new version of cygutils, since 
there is a conflict over the last and utmpdump commands.

I'll be uploading a new version of cygutils that does not have those 
files later today, and I'll remove the skip: command at that time.

Thanks,
Chuck







Re: initscripts package available for review/upload

2002-11-11 Thread Sergey Okhapkin
I can't include a full featured file into sysvinit because it requires other
files from /etc/rc.d, these files are a part of initscripts package.

Sergey Okhapkin
Somerset, NJ
- Original Message -
From: "Joshua Daniel Franklin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, November 11, 2002 9:33 AM
Subject: Re: initscripts package available for review/upload


> --- Sergey Okhapkin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > BTW, I just realized that sysvinit and initscripts have a common file -
> > /etc/inittab. sysvinit includes a basic one, but initscripts has a full
> > featured file.
>
> Why not include the full-featured file in sysvinit and not at all in
> initscripts? I mean, sysvinit is already required for initscripts to
> run properly anyway.
>
> Also, Corinna, did I see correctly that you've uploaded this package?
> I don't believe all its dependencies have been uploaded.
>





Re: init and agetty packages available for review/upload. (fwd)

2002-11-11 Thread Charles Wilson
$ ls /usr/bin/*-config
/usr/bin/iu-config
/usr/bin/libpng-config
/usr/bin/libpng12-config
/usr/bin/pcre-config
/usr/bin/ssh-host-config
/usr/bin/ssh-user-config




Sorry, these files are not all the same.

libpng-config
libpng12-config
pcre-config

are used by package configure scripts to figure out where libraries and 
header files have been installed.  E.g. they provide information; they 
do not modify your system.

iu-config
ssh-host-config
ssh-user-config

are "system setup" scripts used to install or initialize daemons.  These 
modify your system.

I wouldn't mind if these scripts were moved into /usr/sbin or something, 
but leave the libpng-config/pcre-config style scripts alone.  They NEED 
to be in the path of normal users.

--Chuck





Re: initscripts package available for review/upload

2002-11-11 Thread Sergey Okhapkin
Agree. What do you think - could postinstall script rename inittab silently
and replase it with a new one?

Sergey Okhapkin
Somerset, NJ
- Original Message -
From: "Corinna Vinschen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, November 11, 2002 8:42 AM
Subject: Re: initscripts package available for review/upload


> On Mon, Nov 11, 2002 at 07:16:51AM -0500, Sergey Okhapkin wrote:
> > http://users.rcn.com/sokhapkin/release/initscripts/setup.hint
> >
http://users.rcn.com/sokhapkin/release/initscripts/initscripts-0.9-1.tar.bz2
> >
> > BTW, I just realized that sysvinit and initscripts have a common file -
> > /etc/inittab. sysvinit includes a basic one, but initscripts has a full
> > featured file. initscripts package has no postinstall script,
/etc/inittab
> > will be overwritten silently on the package installation. But I need to
>
> The answer is probably "don't do this".  The initscripts package should
> only contain skeleton files and/or scripts which create the correct files
> on demand of the user.  My first OpenSSH packages did overwrite the
> config files, too, but that resulted in too much complains.  Since then,
> unpacking config files in place is considered bad practice for Cygwin.
>
> At least the postinstall script of the package should rename the old
> config file (as *.rpmsave on rpm based installations).
>
> Corinna
>
> --
> Corinna Vinschen  Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to
> Cygwin Developermailto:cygwin@;cygwin.com
> Red Hat, Inc.





--enable-auto-import extension

2002-11-11 Thread Charles Wilson
This is an update of Egor Duda's original version.  I have made no 
substantive changes, except
  1) remove the "minimal" portion which has already been accepted into 
CVS as an interim measure (August 2002) while we were waiting for Egor's 
copyright assignment for binutils to get in to FSF.
  2) minor formatting changes so that it applies cleanly against 
current CVS.

I've tested the result, and it works as advertised -- and just as well 
as it did back in June/July when we went thru this the FIRST time. 
Please apply.  The concept has already been approved for incorporation; 
we were just waiting for Egor's assignment.  Which I devoutly hope has 
made it in sometime in the past five months.

In
http://sources.redhat.com/ml/binutils/2002-08/msg00548.html
cgf recommended that:

If Nick can verify your assignment status, then I'd like to suggest that
your original patch just be checked in.



And again here, cgf wrote:
http://sources.redhat.com/ml/binutils/2002-08/msg00286.html


What's the status of this change?  I'd vote for including it in ld
iff it is only invoked when the option is specifically used.  Then
we can add the appropriate changes to cygwin, make a new release, and
then make a binutils release as well.



The condition cgf specified is obeyed by the attached patch (with the 
exception of the "minimal" portion which has already been accepted into 
CVS, and which cannot be conditionalized in that manner.)



The "original patch" as modified by subsequent discussion is here:
http://sources.redhat.com/ml/binutils/2002-07/msg00035.html

Although it was first proposed here:

http://sources.redhat.com/ml/binutils/2002-06/msg00757.html

Since my changes were minimal, the "ownership" of this patch is still 
Egor.  (If it matters, I have an assignment on file already).

--Chuck


2002-07-01  Egor Duda  <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

* ldmain.c (main): Make runtime relocs disabled by default. Remove
assignment which has no effect.
* pe-dll.h (pe_create_import_fixup): Change prototype.
* pe-dll.c (make_runtime_pseudo_reloc): New function.
(pe_create_runtime_relocator_reference): Ditto.
(pe_create_import_fixup): Handle relocations with non-zero addends.
* emultempl/pe.em: Add options --enable-runtime-pseudo-reloc and
--disable-runtime-pseudo-reloc.
(make_import_fixup): Handle relocations with non-zero addends. Create
an external reference to _pei386_runtime_relocator symbol if at least
one pseudo reloc was created.
* ld.texinfo: Document --enable-runtime-pseudo-reloc and
--disable-runtime-pseudo-reloc options.

2002-07-01  Egor Duda  <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

* bfdlink.h (struct bfd_link_info): Add new boolean
field pei386_runtime_pseudo_reloc.

Index: bfdlink.h
===
RCS file: /cvs/src/src/include/bfdlink.h,v
retrieving revision 1.22
diff -u -r1.22 bfdlink.h
--- bfdlink.h   8 Aug 2002 03:50:17 -   1.22
+++ bfdlink.h   7 Nov 2002 21:51:42 -
@@ -340,6 +340,11 @@
  is explicitly requested by the user, -1 if enabled by default.  */
   int pei386_auto_import;
 
+  /* Non-zero if runtime relocs for DATA items with non-zero addends
+ in pei386 DLLs should be generated.  Set to 1 if this feature
+ is explicitly requested by the user, -1 if enabled by default.  */
+  int pei386_runtime_pseudo_reloc;
+
   /* True if non-PLT relocs should be merged into one reloc section
  and sorted so that relocs against the same symbol come together.  */
   boolean combreloc;

? ldint.info
Index: ld.texinfo
===
RCS file: /cvs/src/src/ld/ld.texinfo,v
retrieving revision 1.74
diff -u -r1.74 ld.texinfo
--- ld.texinfo  23 Oct 2002 13:24:10 -  1.74
+++ ld.texinfo  7 Nov 2002 21:48:39 -
@@ -1808,7 +1808,11 @@
 There are several ways to address this difficulty, regardless of the
 data type of the exported variable:
 
-One solution is to force one of the 'constants' to be a variable -- 
+One way is to use --enable-runtime-pseudo-reloc switch. This leaves the task
+of adjusting references in your client code for runtime environment, so
+this method works only when runtime environtment supports this feature.
+
+Second solution is to force one of the 'constants' to be a variable -- 
 that is, unknown and un-optimizable at compile time.  For arrays, 
 there are two possibilities: a) make the indexee (the array's address) 
 a variable, or b) make the 'constant' index a variable.  Thus:
@@ -1844,7 +1848,7 @@
   @{ volatile long long * local_ll=&extern_ll; *local_ll @}
 @end example
 
-A second method of dealing with this difficulty is to abandon
+A third method of dealing with this difficulty is to abandon
 'auto-import' for the offending symbol and mark it with 
 @code{__declspec(dllimport)}.  However, in practice that
 requires using compile-time #defines to indicate wheth

Re: Pending packages status

2002-11-11 Thread Lapo Luchini


Yes, I did, and I mulled over it a bit.  As far as I understood it,
the new package doesn't introduce a new regression.  It's just not
clear if it solves a specific problem.  Hmm, did I get something
wrong?


I dont like that 'kind' of bug-hiding patches (nor does cgf) but I can 
confirm that the problem is still present, using rsync-2.5.5-1 and 
cygwin-1.3.15-2.
I was able to reproduce it three times in a row a little ago.

The other "news" of rsync-2.5.5-2 is the use of gcc3.2 and the "optional 
signature-checking" setup script.

--
Lapo 'Raist' Luchini
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (PGP & X.509 keys available)
http://www.lapo.it (ICQ UIN: 529796)




Re: initscripts package available for review/upload

2002-11-11 Thread Corinna Vinschen
On Mon, Nov 11, 2002 at 08:33:30AM -0600, Joshua Daniel Franklin wrote:
> Also, Corinna, did I see correctly that you've uploaded this package?

No.  I've uploaded agetty and sysvinit.

Corinna

-- 
Corinna Vinschen  Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to
Cygwin Developermailto:cygwin@;cygwin.com
Red Hat, Inc.



Re: initscripts package available for review/upload

2002-11-11 Thread Joshua Daniel Franklin
--- Sergey Okhapkin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> BTW, I just realized that sysvinit and initscripts have a common file -
> /etc/inittab. sysvinit includes a basic one, but initscripts has a full
> featured file. 

Why not include the full-featured file in sysvinit and not at all in
initscripts? I mean, sysvinit is already required for initscripts to
run properly anyway.

Also, Corinna, did I see correctly that you've uploaded this package?
I don't believe all its dependencies have been uploaded.




Re: Pending packages status

2002-11-11 Thread Pavel Tsekov


On Mon, 11 Nov 2002, Corinna Vinschen wrote:

> > > > 4. rsync
> > > > version: 2.5.5-2
> >
> > Have you checked the thread in the 'notes' field for that package ? I'm
> > not sure that if it should be uploaded.
>
> Yes, I did, and I mulled over it a bit.  As far as I understood it,
> the new package doesn't introduce a new regression.  It's just not
> clear if it solves a specific problem.  Hmm, did I get something
> wrong?

I don't think so :) My point is that it wasn't clear if the patch is
actually necessary with latest Cygwin and if it wont hide some Cygwin bug.
>From the announcement one also can see that this patch is the only
difference to 2.5.5-1.

Btw from the original announcement that Lapo made, I see that he suggested
'a "test" period'  though I dont know if this should be interpreted that
the package should be marked 'test'.






Re: Pending packages status

2002-11-11 Thread Corinna Vinschen
On Mon, Nov 11, 2002 at 02:05:26PM +0100, Pavel Tsekov wrote:
> Hello, Corinna
> 
> On Mon, 11 Nov 2002, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> 
> > On Mon, Nov 11, 2002 at 11:51:41AM +0100, Pavel Tsekov wrote:
> > > 4. rsync
> > > version: 2.5.5-2
> 
> Have you checked the thread in the 'notes' field for that package ? I'm
> not sure that if it should be uploaded.

Yes, I did, and I mulled over it a bit.  As far as I understood it,
the new package doesn't introduce a new regression.  It's just not
clear if it solves a specific problem.  Hmm, did I get something
wrong?

Corinna

-- 
Corinna Vinschen  Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to
Cygwin Developermailto:cygwin@;cygwin.com
Red Hat, Inc.



Re: initscripts package available for review/upload

2002-11-11 Thread Corinna Vinschen
On Mon, Nov 11, 2002 at 07:16:51AM -0500, Sergey Okhapkin wrote:
> http://users.rcn.com/sokhapkin/release/initscripts/setup.hint
> http://users.rcn.com/sokhapkin/release/initscripts/initscripts-0.9-1.tar.bz2
> 
> BTW, I just realized that sysvinit and initscripts have a common file -
> /etc/inittab. sysvinit includes a basic one, but initscripts has a full
> featured file. initscripts package has no postinstall script, /etc/inittab
> will be overwritten silently on the package installation. But I need to

The answer is probably "don't do this".  The initscripts package should
only contain skeleton files and/or scripts which create the correct files
on demand of the user.  My first OpenSSH packages did overwrite the
config files, too, but that resulted in too much complains.  Since then,
unpacking config files in place is considered bad practice for Cygwin.

At least the postinstall script of the package should rename the old
config file (as *.rpmsave on rpm based installations).

Corinna

-- 
Corinna Vinschen  Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to
Cygwin Developermailto:cygwin@;cygwin.com
Red Hat, Inc.



Re: init and agetty packages available for review/upload. (fwd)

2002-11-11 Thread Corinna Vinschen
On Mon, Nov 11, 2002 at 07:06:33AM -0500, Sergey Okhapkin wrote:
> Wow! I fixed the permissions.
> 
> http://users.rcn.com/sokhapkin/release/sysvinit/setup.hint
> http://users.rcn.com/sokhapkin/release/sysvinit/sysvinit-2.84-1-src.tar.bz2
> http://users.rcn.com/sokhapkin/release/sysvinit/sysvinit-2.84-1.tar.bz2

Thanks!

Uploaded.

Corinna

-- 
Corinna Vinschen  Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to
Cygwin Developermailto:cygwin@;cygwin.com
Red Hat, Inc.



Re: Pending packages status

2002-11-11 Thread Pavel Tsekov
Hello, Corinna

On Mon, 11 Nov 2002, Corinna Vinschen wrote:

> On Mon, Nov 11, 2002 at 11:51:41AM +0100, Pavel Tsekov wrote:
> > 4. rsync
> > version: 2.5.5-2

Have you checked the thread in the 'notes' field for that package ? I'm
not sure that if it should be uploaded.




Re: initscripts package available for review/upload

2002-11-11 Thread Sergey Okhapkin
http://users.rcn.com/sokhapkin/release/initscripts/setup.hint
http://users.rcn.com/sokhapkin/release/initscripts/initscripts-0.9-1.tar.bz2

BTW, I just realized that sysvinit and initscripts have a common file -
/etc/inittab. sysvinit includes a basic one, but initscripts has a full
featured file. initscripts package has no postinstall script, /etc/inittab
will be overwritten silently on the package installation. But I need to
replace the existing inittab with a new one. What is the best way to avoid
the file conflict? OTOH, I see no need to uninstall initscripts without
sysvinit uninstallation...

Sergey Okhapkin
Somerset, NJ
- Original Message -
From: "Sergey Okhapkin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, November 11, 2002 6:48 AM
Subject: Re: initscripts package available for review/upload


> OK.
>
> Sergey Okhapkin
> Somerset, NJ
> - Original Message -
> From: "Corinna Vinschen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "cygwin-apps" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Monday, November 11, 2002 6:21 AM
> Subject: Re: initscripts package available for review/upload
>
>
> > On Sun, Nov 10, 2002 at 06:27:52PM -0500, Sergey Okhapkin wrote:
> > > Canonical download:
> > >   http://users.rcn.com/sokhapkin/release/initscripts
> >
> > Sergey, please include the paths to all files (setup.hint, binary,
source)
> > separately in your postings.  It actually makes reviewing more easy.
> >
> > Corinna
> >
> > --
> > Corinna Vinschen  Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to
> > Cygwin Developermailto:cygwin@;cygwin.com
> > Red Hat, Inc.
>
>





Re: init and agetty packages available for review/upload. (fwd)

2002-11-11 Thread Sergey Okhapkin
Wow! I fixed the permissions.

http://users.rcn.com/sokhapkin/release/sysvinit/setup.hint
http://users.rcn.com/sokhapkin/release/sysvinit/sysvinit-2.84-1-src.tar.bz2
http://users.rcn.com/sokhapkin/release/sysvinit/sysvinit-2.84-1.tar.bz2


Sergey Okhapkin
Somerset, NJ
- Original Message -
From: "Corinna Vinschen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, November 11, 2002 6:29 AM
Subject: Re: init and agetty packages available for review/upload. (fwd)


> On Sun, Nov 10, 2002 at 10:55:58AM -0500, Sergey Okhapkin wrote:
> > Done. I added /etc/postinstall/sysvinit.sh. The script sets up default
> > /etc/inittab and /etc/rc (if not exist) and copies itself to
> > /usr/bin/init-config for setting up init as a service later.
> >
> > http://users.rcn.com/sokhapkin/release/sysvinit/
>
> Sorry but there's a package fault in the binary:
>
> drwx-- sos/None  0 2002-11-10 07:29:10 etc/
> d- Administrators/None 0 2002-11-10 07:29:30 etc/postinstall/
> -- Administrators/None 3584 2002-11-10 07:19:53
etc/postinstall/sysvinit
>
> Look at the permissions.
>
> Other than that, the package seems to be ok now.  Please send the full
> URLs to your files in the next mail.
>
>
> Thanks,
> Corinna
>
> --
> Corinna Vinschen  Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to
> Cygwin Developermailto:cygwin@;cygwin.com
> Red Hat, Inc.





Re: initscripts package available for review/upload

2002-11-11 Thread Sergey Okhapkin
OK.

Sergey Okhapkin
Somerset, NJ
- Original Message -
From: "Corinna Vinschen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "cygwin-apps" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, November 11, 2002 6:21 AM
Subject: Re: initscripts package available for review/upload


> On Sun, Nov 10, 2002 at 06:27:52PM -0500, Sergey Okhapkin wrote:
> > Canonical download:
> >   http://users.rcn.com/sokhapkin/release/initscripts
>
> Sergey, please include the paths to all files (setup.hint, binary, source)
> separately in your postings.  It actually makes reviewing more easy.
>
> Corinna
>
> --
> Corinna Vinschen  Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to
> Cygwin Developermailto:cygwin@;cygwin.com
> Red Hat, Inc.





Re: Pending packages status

2002-11-11 Thread Corinna Vinschen
On Mon, Nov 11, 2002 at 11:51:41AM +0100, Pavel Tsekov wrote:
> 4. rsync
> version: 2.5.5-2

> 6. agetty
> version: 2.1-1

Hi,

I've just uploaded the above two packages.  Lapo, can I remove version
2.5.4-1?

Pavel, I like your status reports!

Thanks,
Corinna

-- 
Corinna Vinschen  Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to
Cygwin Developermailto:cygwin@;cygwin.com
Red Hat, Inc.



Re: init and agetty packages available for review/upload. (fwd)

2002-11-11 Thread Corinna Vinschen
On Sun, Nov 10, 2002 at 10:55:58AM -0500, Sergey Okhapkin wrote:
> Done. I added /etc/postinstall/sysvinit.sh. The script sets up default
> /etc/inittab and /etc/rc (if not exist) and copies itself to
> /usr/bin/init-config for setting up init as a service later.
> 
> http://users.rcn.com/sokhapkin/release/sysvinit/

Sorry but there's a package fault in the binary:

drwx-- sos/None  0 2002-11-10 07:29:10 etc/
d- Administrators/None 0 2002-11-10 07:29:30 etc/postinstall/
-- Administrators/None 3584 2002-11-10 07:19:53 etc/postinstall/sysvinit

Look at the permissions.

Other than that, the package seems to be ok now.  Please send the full
URLs to your files in the next mail.


Thanks,
Corinna

-- 
Corinna Vinschen  Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to
Cygwin Developermailto:cygwin@;cygwin.com
Red Hat, Inc.



Re: initscripts package available for review/upload

2002-11-11 Thread Corinna Vinschen
On Sun, Nov 10, 2002 at 06:27:52PM -0500, Sergey Okhapkin wrote:
> Canonical download:
>   http://users.rcn.com/sokhapkin/release/initscripts

Sergey, please include the paths to all files (setup.hint, binary, source)
separately in your postings.  It actually makes reviewing more easy.

Corinna

-- 
Corinna Vinschen  Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to
Cygwin Developermailto:cygwin@;cygwin.com
Red Hat, Inc.



Pending packages status

2002-11-11 Thread Pavel Tsekov
1. doxygen

version: 1.2.18-1
status : reviewed; a confirmation is required from someone on this list,
 other than me, that this package is OK
notes  : this package is currently vetoed
 http://www.cygwin.com/ml/cygwin-apps/2002-10/msg00056.html
 http://www.cygwin.com/ml/cygwin-apps/2002-10/msg00156.html
reviews: http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin-apps/2002-09/msg00107.html
 http://www.cygwin.com/ml/cygwin-apps/2002-10/msg00033.html
 http://www.cygwin.com/ml/cygwin-apps/2002-10/msg00040.html
 http://www.cygwin.com/ml/cygwin-apps/2002-10/msg00050.html
 http://www.cygwin.com/ml/cygwin-apps/2002-10/msg00052.html
 http://www.cygwin.com/ml/cygwin-apps/2002-10/msg00065.html
 http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin-apps/2002-10/msg00087.html
 http://www.cygwin.com/ml/cygwin-apps/2002-10/msg00155.html
votes  : 5 (Joshua, John Morrison, Lapo, Nicholas and Robert)
url: 
http://jp.y42.briefcase.yahoo.co.jp/bc/ryu3141/lst?&.dir=/cygwin&.src=bc&.view=l&.last=1

2. tmake

version: 1.8-1
status : reviewed, ready for upload once it gets the necessary votes
reviews: http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin-apps/2002-09/msg00222.html
votes  : 2 (Joshua and Lapo)
url: 
http://www.geocities.co.jp/SiliconValley-SanJose/5153/cygwin-package/tmake-1.8-1-package.tgz

3. xerces-c

version: 2.1.0-1
status : reviewed, need some fixes to the source package and a patch to
 be applied to fix a porting bug
notes  : http://www.cygwin.com/ml/cygwin-apps/2002-10/msg00097.html
reviews: http://www.cygwin.com/ml/cygwin-apps/2002-11/msg9.html
 http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin-apps/2002-11/msg00048.html
 http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin-apps/2002-11/msg00047.html
votes  : 3 (Gerrit, Gareth and Robert)
url: http://abackus.imagineis.com/xerces-c/xerces-c-2.1.0-1.tar.bz2
 http://abackus.imagineis.com/xerces-c-devel/xerces-c-devel-2.1.0-1.tar.bz2
 http://abackus.imagineis.com/xerces-c-doc/xerces-c-doc-2.1.0-1.tar.bz2

4. rsync
version: 2.5.5-2
status : update to an existing package; need some feedback from rsync
 users to understand if latest Cygwin release fixes the following
 issue:
   http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/2002-09/msg01155.html
notes  : http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin-apps/2002-11/msg00031.html
url: http://www.lapo.it/tmp/rsync-2.5.5-2.tar.bz2
 http://www.lapo.it/tmp/rsync-2.5.5-2-src.tar.bz2

5. sysvinit

version: 2.81-1
status : package updated (postinstall script and README file included);
 needs review
notes  : http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin-apps/2002-11/msg00051.html
reviews: http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin-apps/2002-11/msg00052.html
 http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin-apps/2002-11/msg00054.html
 http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin-apps/2002-11/msg00077.html
votes  : 4 (Christopher, Jan, Jason and Joshua)
url: http://users.rcn.com/sokhapkin/release/sysvinit/

6. agetty

version: 2.1-1
status : reviewed, ready for upload
notes  : http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin-apps/2002-11/msg00051.html
reviews: http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin-apps/2002-11/msg00054.html
votes  : 4 (Christopher, Jan, Jason and Joshua)
url: http://users.rcn.com/sokhapkin/release/agetty/

7. xinetd

version: 2.3.9-1
status : needs a patch to be applied to the Cygwin dll before it can be
 released.
notes  : http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin-apps/2002-11/msg00069.html
votes  : ?!
url: http://users.rcn.com/sokhapkin/release/xinetd/

8. initscripts

version: 0.9-1
status : not reviewed
notes  : http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin-apps/2002-11/msg00097.html
votes  : 0
url: http://users.rcn.com/sokhapkin/release/initscripts


9. chkconfig

version: 1.2.24h-1
status : not reviewed
notes  : http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin-apps/2002-11/msg00098.html
votes  : 0
url: http://users.rcn.com/sokhapkin/release/chkconfig/