Re: [UPDATE] Pending package status (11 Jul 2003)

[Matthew Smith]

I'd like to, but time has been pretty scarce lately.  Baby on the way and
all, which means having to build a new room in the basement for my older
son.  If someone else wants to step up, more power to them.  If not, I'll
get around to it eventually.

cheers,
-Matt


> On Fri, Jul 11, 2003 at 09:54:06PM -0400, Igor Pechtchanski wrote:
> >I guess I'll have to become one quickly, for my votes to count...
>
> How about coreutils?
>
> Or has someone already volunteered for that?
>
> cgf
>
>

RE: [UPDATE] Pending package status (11 Jul 2003)

[Trevor Forbes]

That's fine, it was worth a try. I will install them anyway. 

Thanks Chuck.
 
Regards Trevor

 > -Original Message-
 > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 > On Behalf Of Christopher Faylor
 > Sent: Saturday, 12 July 2003 10:28 AM
 > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 > Subject: Re: [UPDATE] Pending package status (11 Jul 2003)
 > 
 > On Sat, Jul 12, 2003 at 09:46:59AM +0930, Trevor Forbes wrote:
 > >I would like to give proj and libgeotiff my vote if that's ok.
 > 
 > Unfortunately, AFAIK, you are not a package maintainer.  The package
 > maintainer club is who gets to vote.
 > 
 > cgf

Re: [UPDATE] Pending package status (11 Jul 2003)

[Christopher Faylor]

On Fri, Jul 11, 2003 at 09:54:06PM -0400, Igor Pechtchanski wrote:
>I guess I'll have to become one quickly, for my votes to count...

How about coreutils?

Or has someone already volunteered for that?

cgf

RE: Updated: (for cygwin 1.5.0) xerces-c 2.3.0-3

[Gary R. Van Sickle]

> On Fri, 11 Jul 2003, Christopher Faylor wrote:
>
> > On Fri, Jul 11, 2003 at 04:59:53AM +0100, Elfyn McBratney wrote:
> > >On Thu, 10 Jul 2003, Christopher Faylor wrote:
> > >
> > >> On Thu, Jul 10, 2003 at 11:35:39PM -0400, Igor Pechtchanski wrote:
> > >> >All in a day's work... ;-)
> > >> >
> > >> >As for rebuilding, IIUC, once you've taken care of the binary
> > >> >incompatibility (i.e., stepped over the 1.5.0 barrier), you
> shouldn't have
> > >> >to rebuild the apps at all (on account of Cygwin, that is).  Unless
> > >> >another one of those ABI changes comes about, which, hopefully, won't be
> > >> >too soon - the development team seemed to cram as many data structure
> > >> >changes as they could in this one release.
> > >> >
> > >> >Anyone, please feel free to correct me if I'm wrong.
> > >>
> > >> Nope, you're not wrong.  Would you care to give yourself a long overdue
> > >> gold star for this and all of the other invaluable advice and service
> > >> you've given in the past?
> > >
> > >Shouldn't you get one, too? :-)
> >
> > I got a lot of gold stars in my PayPal account back in the time when I
> > lost money to the stupid scammer.  There's nothing more flattering or
> > humbling than that.
> >
> > Besides I'd lose a gold star every time I was:
> >
> > >BTW, what is 'idd'?
> >
> > Check out: http://cygwin.com/acronyms/ .
>
> Oh my, how flattering. And there was me thinking that thread went unnoticed...
>
> --
> Elfyn McBratney, EMCB
> http://www.emcb.co.uk
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Sweet, my own acronym!  Less typing next time!

--
Gary R. Van Sickle
Brewer.  Patriot.

Re: [UPDATE] Pending package status (11 Jul 2003)

[Igor Pechtchanski]

On Fri, 11 Jul 2003, Christopher Faylor wrote:

> On Fri, Jul 11, 2003 at 09:26:23PM -0400, Igor Pechtchanski wrote:
> >On Fri, 11 Jul 2003, Christopher Faylor wrote:
> >>On Sat, Jul 12, 2003 at 09:46:59AM +0930, Trevor Forbes wrote:
> >>>I would like to give proj and libgeotiff my vote if that's ok.
> >>
> >>Unfortunately, AFAIK, you are not a package maintainer.  The package
> >>maintainer club is who gets to vote.
> >
> >Oops, neither am I (though I did offer to become one at some point, but
> >Elfyn beat me to it)! I guess I've insinuated myself into the club
> >under false pretenses...  See how trustworthy I am?  :-)
>
> Boy, I am batting a thousand today for making erroneous assumptions.
> Must be the explosive vomiting causing me to become defocused.
>
> It never dawned on me that you weren't a package maintainer.
>
> cgf

I guess I'll have to become one quickly, for my votes to count...
Igor
-- 
http://cs.nyu.edu/~pechtcha/
  |\  _,,,---,,_[EMAIL PROTECTED]
ZZZzz /,`.-'`'-.  ;-;;,_[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 |,4-  ) )-,_. ,\ (  `'-'   Igor Pechtchanski, Ph.D.
'---''(_/--'  `-'\_) fL a.k.a JaguaR-R-R-r-r-r-.-.-.  Meow!

"I have since come to realize that being between your mentor and his route
to the bathroom is a major career booster."  -- Patrick Naughton

Re: [UPDATE] Pending package status (11 Jul 2003)

[Christopher Faylor]

On Fri, Jul 11, 2003 at 09:26:23PM -0400, Igor Pechtchanski wrote:
>On Fri, 11 Jul 2003, Christopher Faylor wrote:
>>On Sat, Jul 12, 2003 at 09:46:59AM +0930, Trevor Forbes wrote:
>>>I would like to give proj and libgeotiff my vote if that's ok.
>>
>>Unfortunately, AFAIK, you are not a package maintainer.  The package
>>maintainer club is who gets to vote.
>
>Oops, neither am I (though I did offer to become one at some point, but
>Elfyn beat me to it)! I guess I've insinuated myself into the club
>under false pretenses...  See how trustworthy I am?  :-)

Boy, I am batting a thousand today for making erroneous assumptions.
Must be the explosive vomiting causing me to become defocused.

It never dawned on me that you weren't a package maintainer.

cgf

Re: [PATCH] Setup: Fix erroneous quoting of __LINE__ and __FILE__

[Christopher Faylor]

On Fri, Jul 11, 2003 at 09:23:06PM -0400, Igor Pechtchanski wrote:
>> If you want them, fill out the form at http://sources.redhat.com/ and use
>> 'cygwin-apps' for the project.
>>  cgf
>
>I can commit to cygrunsrv under cygwin-apps.  Does that mean I have commit
>rights to the whole of cygwin-apps?

Yes.  It's one category on sources.redhat.com.  Sorry.  I should have
remembered that you already had login access.

cgf

Re: [UPDATE] Pending package status (11 Jul 2003)

[Igor Pechtchanski]

On Fri, 11 Jul 2003, Christopher Faylor wrote:

> On Sat, Jul 12, 2003 at 09:46:59AM +0930, Trevor Forbes wrote:
> >I would like to give proj and libgeotiff my vote if that's ok.
>
> Unfortunately, AFAIK, you are not a package maintainer.  The package
> maintainer club is who gets to vote.
>
> cgf

Oops, neither am I (though I did offer to become one at some point, but
Elfyn beat me to it)!  I guess I've insinuated myself into the club under
false pretenses...  See how trustworthy I am? :-)
Igor
-- 
http://cs.nyu.edu/~pechtcha/
  |\  _,,,---,,_[EMAIL PROTECTED]
ZZZzz /,`.-'`'-.  ;-;;,_[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 |,4-  ) )-,_. ,\ (  `'-'   Igor Pechtchanski, Ph.D.
'---''(_/--'  `-'\_) fL a.k.a JaguaR-R-R-r-r-r-.-.-.  Meow!

"I have since come to realize that being between your mentor and his route
to the bathroom is a major career booster."  -- Patrick Naughton

Re: [PATCH] Setup: Fix erroneous quoting of __LINE__ and __FILE__

[Igor Pechtchanski]

On Fri, 11 Jul 2003, Christopher Faylor wrote:

> On Fri, Jul 11, 2003 at 07:23:36PM -0400, Igor Pechtchanski wrote:
> >On 12 Jul 2003, Robert Collins wrote:
> >
> >> On Sat, 2003-07-12 at 01:20, Igor Pechtchanski wrote:
> >> > The attached patch fixes erroneous quoting of the __LINE__ and __FILE__
> >> > macros in exception descriptions.
> >>
> >> Igor, do you have commit access to setup? If so, please apply this -
> >> it's approved.
> >
> >Rob,
> >
> >I don't have commit rights.  Max, could you please do the honors?
>
> You seem pretty trustworthy to me.

Yeah, especially after the recent screw-up with the wrong make output... :-)

> If you want them, fill out the form at http://sources.redhat.com/ and use
> 'cygwin-apps' for the project.
>  cgf

I can commit to cygrunsrv under cygwin-apps.  Does that mean I have commit
rights to the whole of cygwin-apps?
Igor
-- 
http://cs.nyu.edu/~pechtcha/
  |\  _,,,---,,_[EMAIL PROTECTED]
ZZZzz /,`.-'`'-.  ;-;;,_[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 |,4-  ) )-,_. ,\ (  `'-'   Igor Pechtchanski, Ph.D.
'---''(_/--'  `-'\_) fL a.k.a JaguaR-R-R-r-r-r-.-.-.  Meow!

"I have since come to realize that being between your mentor and his route
to the bathroom is a major career booster."  -- Patrick Naughton

Re: [ANN] Updated: rsync-2.5.6-2

[Charles Wilson]

Lapo Luchini wrote:

Charles Wilson wrote:

Umm, rsync.exe uses cygpopt-0.dll, which has not yet been compiled for 
1.5.0.  Problem? 


I know, but seems to work OK, moreover I really don't think that a 
command-line-parsing library has much to do with files ^_^

Actually, it does.  You can have special alias files in your home 
directory so that, for instance, --my-opt-set will be automatically 
translated by popt to --this 1 --that 2 --the-other 4.  etc.

--
Chuck

Re: [UPDATE] Pending package status (11 Jul 2003)

[Christopher Faylor]

On Sat, Jul 12, 2003 at 09:46:59AM +0930, Trevor Forbes wrote:
>I would like to give proj and libgeotiff my vote if that's ok.

Unfortunately, AFAIK, you are not a package maintainer.  The package
maintainer club is who gets to vote.

cgf 

Re: [PATCH] Setup: Fix erroneous quoting of __LINE__ and __FILE__

[Christopher Faylor]

On Fri, Jul 11, 2003 at 07:23:36PM -0400, Igor Pechtchanski wrote:
>On 12 Jul 2003, Robert Collins wrote:
>
>> On Sat, 2003-07-12 at 01:20, Igor Pechtchanski wrote:
>> > The attached patch fixes erroneous quoting of the __LINE__ and __FILE__
>> > macros in exception descriptions.
>>
>> Igor, do you have commit access to setup? If so, please apply this -
>> it's approved.
>
>Rob,
>
>I don't have commit rights.  Max, could you please do the honors?

You seem pretty trustworthy to me.

If you want them, fill out the form at http://sources.redhat.com/ and use
'cygwin-apps' for the project.

cgf

Re: [PATCH] Setup: Fix erroneous quoting of __LINE__ and __FILE__

[Igor Pechtchanski]

On Sat, 12 Jul 2003, Max Bowsher wrote:

> Igor Pechtchanski wrote:
> > On 12 Jul 2003, Robert Collins wrote:
> >
> >> On Sat, 2003-07-12 at 01:20, Igor Pechtchanski wrote:
> >>> The attached patch fixes erroneous quoting of the __LINE__ and __FILE__
> >>> macros in exception descriptions.
> >>
> >> Igor, do you have commit access to setup? If so, please apply this -
> >> it's approved.
> >
> > Rob,
> >
> > I don't have commit rights.  Max, could you please do the honors?
> > Igor
>
> Not commiting. This patch causes compilation failiure on my machine.
> Example error:
> UserSettings.cc:66: error: syntax error before string constant
>
> BTW, unless I'm missing some subtlety on sources.redhat.com, you do appear
> to have commit access.
>
> Max.

Umm, what can I say except "Oops!"?  Would you believe I redirected the
make output to one file, and looked at another?  Bizarre, isn't it?  I've
attached a (verified) working patch.

As for the commit rights, I do have them for some directories in the
cygwin-apps repository, but I was under the impression that those rights
were on a per-directory basis.
Igor
==
2003-07-11  Igor Pechtchanski  <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

* String++.h (TOSTRING): New macro.
* UserSettings.cc (UserSettings::deRegisterSetting): Fix
erroneous __LINE__/__FILE__ usage.
* download.cc (validateCachedPackage, check_for_cached): Ditto.
* geturl.cc (getUrlToStream): Ditto.
* install.cc (md5_one): Ditto.

-- 
http://cs.nyu.edu/~pechtcha/
  |\  _,,,---,,_[EMAIL PROTECTED]
ZZZzz /,`.-'`'-.  ;-;;,_[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 |,4-  ) )-,_. ,\ (  `'-'   Igor Pechtchanski, Ph.D.
'---''(_/--'  `-'\_) fL a.k.a JaguaR-R-R-r-r-r-.-.-.  Meow!

"I have since come to realize that being between your mentor and his route
to the bathroom is a major career booster."  -- Patrick Naughton
Index: String++.h
===
RCS file: /cvs/cygwin-apps/setup/String++.h,v
retrieving revision 2.11
diff -u -p -r2.11 String++.h
--- String++.h  23 Jun 2003 20:48:59 -  2.11
+++ String++.h  12 Jul 2003 00:47:14 -
@@ -106,5 +106,8 @@ String::size() const
 {
   return theData->length;
 }
+
+#define __TOSTRING__(X) #X
+#define TOSTRING(X) __TOSTRING__(X)
 
 #endif /* SETUP_STRING___H */
Index: UserSettings.cc
===
RCS file: /cvs/cygwin-apps/setup/UserSettings.cc,v
retrieving revision 2.3
diff -u -p -r2.3 UserSettings.cc
--- UserSettings.cc 16 Mar 2003 02:06:05 -  2.3
+++ UserSettings.cc 12 Jul 2003 00:47:14 -
@@ -63,6 +63,6 @@ UserSettings::deRegisterSetting(UserSett
 {
   Settings::iterator i = find(settings.begin(), settings.end(), &aSetting);
   if (i == settings.end())
-throw new Exception ("__LINE__ __FILE__", String ("Attempt to deregister non 
registered setting!"), APPERR_LOGIC_ERROR);
+throw new Exception (TOSTRING(__LINE__) " " __FILE__, String ("Attempt to 
deregister non registered setting!"), APPERR_LOGIC_ERROR);
   settings.erase(i);
 }
Index: download.cc
===
RCS file: /cvs/cygwin-apps/setup/download.cc,v
retrieving revision 2.37
diff -u -p -r2.37 download.cc
--- download.cc 7 Apr 2003 12:46:55 -   2.37
+++ download.cc 12 Jul 2003 00:47:14 -
@@ -88,7 +88,7 @@ validateCachedPackage (String const &ful
}
   delete thefile;
   if (count < 0)
-   throw new Exception ("__LINE__ __FILE__", String ("IO Error reading ") + 
pkgsource.Cached(), APPERR_IO_ERROR);
+   throw new Exception (TOSTRING(__LINE__) " " __FILE__, String ("IO Error 
reading ") + pkgsource.Cached(), APPERR_IO_ERROR);
   
   md5_byte_t tempdigest[16];
   md5_finish(&pns, tempdigest);
@@ -128,7 +128,7 @@ check_for_cached (packagesource & pkgsou
if (validateCachedPackage (prefix + pkgsource.Canonical (), pkgsource))
  pkgsource.set_cached (prefix + pkgsource.Canonical ());
else
- throw new Exception ("__LINE__ __FILE__", String ("Package validation 
failure for ") + prefix + pkgsource.Canonical (), APPERR_CORRUPT_PACKAGE);
+ throw new Exception (TOSTRING(__LINE__) " " __FILE__, String ("Package 
validation failure for ") + prefix + pkgsource.Canonical (), APPERR_CORRUPT_PACKAGE);
return 1;
   }
 
@@ -146,7 +146,7 @@ check_for_cached (packagesource & pkgsou
  if (validateCachedPackage (fullname, pkgsource))
pkgsource.set_cached (fullname );
  else
-   throw new Exception ("__LINE__ __FILE__", String ("Package validation 
failure for ") + fullname, APPERR_CORRUPT_PACKAGE);
+   throw new Exception (TOSTRING(__LINE__) " " __FILE__, String ("Package 
validation failure for ") + fullname, APPERR_CORRUPT

RE: [UPDATE] Pending package status (11 Jul 2003)

[Trevor Forbes]

I would like to give proj and libgeotiff my vote if that's ok.
 
Regards Trevor

 
 > 
 > @ proj
 > 
 > date   : 08 Mar 2003
 > version: 4.4.6-1
 > status : not reviewed
 > notes  : http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin-apps/2003-03/msg00176.html
 >  http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin-apps/2003-06/msg00162.html
 > votes  : 2 (Elfyn and Gerrit)
 > url:
 >
http://www.neuro.gatech.edu/users/cwilson/cygutils/testing/release/proj/
p
 > roj-4.4.6-1.tar.bz2
 > 
 >
http://www.neuro.gatech.edu/users/cwilson/cygutils/testing/release/proj/
l
 > ibproj-devel/libproj-devel-4.4.6-1.tar.bz2
 > 
 > @ libgeotiff
 > 
 > date   : 09 Mar 2003
 > version: 1.2.0-1
 > status : not reviewed
 > notes  : http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin-apps/2003-03/msg00298.html
 > votes  : 2 (Elfyn and Gerrit)
 > url:
 >
http://www.neuro.gatech.edu/users/cwilson/cygutils/testing/release/libge
o
 > tiff/libgeotiff1/libgeotiff1-1.2.0-1.tar.bz2
 > 
 >
http://www.neuro.gatech.edu/users/cwilson/cygutils/testing/release/libge
o
 > tiff/libgeotiff-1.2.0-1-src.tar.bz2
 > 

Re: Pending package status (11 Jul 2003)

[Charles Wilson]

Nicholas Wourms wrote:


Right. Sorry. Just the using cygbuild (as apposed to gbs) is allowed.


While technically this is true, I really can't see the difference 
between the two.  For simplicity's sake, using a common script for 
method II would be most helpful.  I'm willing to do the conversion for 
gc & cabextract.
Nicholas, you're not maintaining cabextract or gc; Jari is.  What 
matters is what tool the actual maintainer wants to use.

If you "convert" gc to build using gbs, how happy do you think Jari will 
be to be forced to use what he considers an inferior tool?  How 
motivated will Jari be to keep the packages up-to-date?

Viva libre!

We mandate the layout of binary packages.  We mandate that you must be 
able to build the package on cygwin using freely available tools.  We 
mandate that official packages may only depend -- at runtime, not 
buildtime -- on other official packages (cygipc/postgresql 
notwithstanding).  That's it.

I welcome improvements to gbs.  But lets not march down the no-freedom 
road; let Jari be Jari.

--
Chuck

Re: [PATCH] Setup: Fix erroneous quoting of __LINE__ and __FILE__

[Max Bowsher]

Igor Pechtchanski wrote:
> On 12 Jul 2003, Robert Collins wrote:
>
>> On Sat, 2003-07-12 at 01:20, Igor Pechtchanski wrote:
>>> The attached patch fixes erroneous quoting of the __LINE__ and __FILE__
>>> macros in exception descriptions.
>>
>> Igor, do you have commit access to setup? If so, please apply this -
>> it's approved.
>
> Rob,
>
> I don't have commit rights.  Max, could you please do the honors?
> Igor

Not commiting. This patch causes compilation failiure on my machine.
Example error:
UserSettings.cc:66: error: syntax error before string constant


BTW, unless I'm missing some subtlety on sources.redhat.com, you do appear
to have commit access.

Max.

Re: Proposal: naim

[Charles Wilson]

Daniel Reed wrote:

On 2003-07-11T10:25-0400, Igor Pechtchanski wrote:
) On Wed, 25 Jun 2003, Daniel Reed wrote:
) >  requires: libncurses6 cygwin
)  ^^^
) Shouldn't this be libncurses7 already?
naim should function with any version of ncurses since 4.0 (libncurses[5-7]
are all ncurses-5.x releases). I was confused to see such a major
distinction between two 5.2's and 5.3 in Cygwin (major enough to warrant
separate package names), so I just picked the oldest one that people might
have installed that didn't have the word "compatibility" in it, which was 6.
Any of the ones available now should work equally well, so I'll bump it to
libncurses7 if 5 and 6 are being phased out--it's just that there's no need
to require 7 if you already have 5 or 6 installed.
No, that's not the way this works.

naim requires whichever version of ncurses it was compiled against.  End 
of story.  ("compiled against" means "the version of the import library 
that was installed on the developer's system."  If you're not sure, just 
compile the app, and run cygcheck on the executable.

See, libncurses6 package contains cygncurses-6.dll.  libncurses7 package 
contains cygncurses-7.dll.

naim.exe "knows" that it wants (e.g.) cygncurses-7.dll -- it WILL NOT 
even attempt to use cygncurses-6.dll.  If it can't find -7.dll it will die.

Therefore, (in my example) the naim package should depend on 
libncurses7.  Period.  You don't get to choose.

--
Chuck

exim-4.20-2

[Pierre A. Humblet]

Here is exim 4.20 for Cygwin 1.5, marked "test".

Pierre

http://mysite.verizon.net/phumblet/setup.hint
http://mysite.verizon.net/phumblet/exim-4.20-2.tar.bz2
http://mysite.verizon.net/phumblet/exim-4.20-2.-src.tar.bz2


# Exim-4.20-2 setup.hint
sdesc: "A Mail Transfer Agent."
ldesc: "Mail Transfer Agent with sendmail like command line 
arguments and a single configuration file.
Features: flexible retry algorithms, header & envelope rewriting,
multiple deliveries down single connection or multiple deliveries in
parallel, regular expressions in configuration parameters, file
lookups, supports sender and/or receiver verification, selective
relaying, virtual domains and built-in mail filtering.

See www.exim.org.
This port is compiled with tls/ssl support."
prev: 4.14-1
curr: 4.20-1
test: 4.20-2
category: Mail
requires: cygwin libgdbm3 openssl

Re: [PATCH] Setup: Fix erroneous quoting of __LINE__ and __FILE__

[Igor Pechtchanski]

On 12 Jul 2003, Robert Collins wrote:

> On Sat, 2003-07-12 at 01:20, Igor Pechtchanski wrote:
> > The attached patch fixes erroneous quoting of the __LINE__ and __FILE__
> > macros in exception descriptions.
>
> Igor, do you have commit access to setup? If so, please apply this -
> it's approved.

Rob,

I don't have commit rights.  Max, could you please do the honors?
Igor
-- 
http://cs.nyu.edu/~pechtcha/
  |\  _,,,---,,_[EMAIL PROTECTED]
ZZZzz /,`.-'`'-.  ;-;;,_[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 |,4-  ) )-,_. ,\ (  `'-'   Igor Pechtchanski, Ph.D.
'---''(_/--'  `-'\_) fL a.k.a JaguaR-R-R-r-r-r-.-.-.  Meow!

"I have since come to realize that being between your mentor and his route
to the bathroom is a major career booster."  -- Patrick Naughton

Re: Proposal: naim

[Max Bowsher]

Daniel Reed wrote:
> On 2003-07-11T10:25-0400, Igor Pechtchanski wrote:
> ) On Wed, 25 Jun 2003, Daniel Reed wrote:
> ) >  requires: libncurses6 cygwin
> )  ^^^
> ) Shouldn't this be libncurses7 already?
>
> naim should function with any version of ncurses since 4.0
(libncurses[5-7]
> are all ncurses-5.x releases). I was confused to see such a major
> distinction between two 5.2's and 5.3 in Cygwin (major enough to warrant
> separate package names), so I just picked the oldest one that people might
> have installed that didn't have the word "compatibility" in it, which was
6.
> Any of the ones available now should work equally well, so I'll bump it to
> libncurses7 if 5 and 6 are being phased out--it's just that there's no
need
> to require 7 if you already have 5 or 6 installed.

Despite the sdesc, I believe 6 is a compatibility package too, and 5 and 6
are only still around until all packages using them have been recompiled.

As for the "major distinction". When an ABI change is made upstream, the DLL
version number has to change. But the old DLL will still be required until
all client packages have been recompiled.

Anyway, I think you may safely assume that the current version of the
libncurses-devel package will link you to the correct DLL - which would be
7.

Max.

Re: Proposed patch - make longopts behave as newbies expect

[Max Bowsher]

Robert Collins wrote:
> On Fri, 2003-07-11 at 01:10, Jeremy White wrote:
>> The current setup.exe implementation does not handle longopts
>> in the way that a newbie would expect.  Specifically,
>>   setup.exe --root e:\foo
>> does not work; either
>>   setup.exe -R e:\foo  or
>>   setup.exe --root=e:\foo
>> is required.
>> 
>> This is because the --root, --site, and --override-registry-name
>> StringOptions use the default value that specifies that a value
>> is optional, which, imho, is wrong.
>> 
>>  This patch corrects this, and adds a test program as well.
> 
> Thank you for this. The changes to setup are ok. However, the test
> programs' copyright is -obviously- wrong. Also, I don't see the need for
> an additional user-driven test in this case either - though extending
> testoption.cc would be useful.
> 
> Max, I'm still basically off-the-air - sick - so, could you please
> checkin the setup changes?

No problem, done.

Max.

Re: Pending package status (11 Jul 2003)

[Max Bowsher]

Elfyn McBratney wrote:
> On Fri, 11 Jul 2003, Igor Pechtchanski wrote:
>> On Fri, 11 Jul 2003 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>>> @ stunnel
>>>
>>> date   : 25 Jun 2003
>>> version: 4.04-1
>>> status : reviewed
>>   ^
>>> notes  : http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin-apps/2003-06/msg00207.html
>>>  http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin-apps/2003-06/msg00209.html
>>>  http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin-apps/2003-06/msg00211.html
>>>  http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin-apps/2003-06/msg00227.html
>>>  http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin-apps/2003-06/msg00236.html
>>>  http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin-apps/2003-06/msg00237.html
>>> votes  : 3 (Abraham, Elfyn and Gerrit)
>>
>> Has anyone done a functionality review on this one?  I've only seen a
>> packaging review.  In the last note, Max said that he was planning to do
>> one, but I didn't see a follow-up.
>
> I've tested it with my mailgate and it seems fine to me. I'll post my
> results in a minute. Sorry too much coffee is making me do things
> backwards.

Beat me to it! I was just about to report that I've tested using it for
secured smtp to exim, invoked both from cygrunsrv and init.

A suggestion for Marcel: In a future version, you might like to create a
short certificate-generating shellscript at /usr/bin/stunnel-config

Max.

Re: [ANN] Updated: rsync-2.5.6-2

[Lapo Luchini]

Charles Wilson wrote:

Umm, rsync.exe uses cygpopt-0.dll, which has not yet been compiled for 
1.5.0.  Problem? 
I know, but seems to work OK, moreover I really don't think that a 
command-line-parsing library has much to do with files ^_^

--
Lapo 'Raist' Luchini
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (PGP & X.509 keys available)
http://www.lapo.it (ICQ UIN: 529796)

Re: [PATCH] Setup: Fix erroneous quoting of __LINE__ and __FILE__

[Robert Collins]

On Sat, 2003-07-12 at 01:20, Igor Pechtchanski wrote:
> The attached patch fixes erroneous quoting of the __LINE__ and __FILE__
> macros in exception descriptions.

Igor, do you have commit access to setup? If so, please apply this -
it's approved.
-- 
GPG key available at: .


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

Re: [ANN] Updated: rsync-2.5.6-2

[Christopher Faylor]

On Fri, Jul 11, 2003 at 06:12:39PM -0400, Christopher Faylor wrote:
>On Fri, Jul 11, 2003 at 05:57:39PM -0400, Charles Wilson wrote:
>>Lapo Luchini wrote:
>>
>>>-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
>>>Hash: SHA1
>>>
>>>This is just good old 2.5.6-1, just recompiled for cygwin-1.5.0.
>>>Local 2.01Gb transfers work correctly, but being in the middle of the
>>>university exam session I can really do no big testing.
>>>
>>
>>Umm, rsync.exe uses cygpopt-0.dll, which has not yet been compiled for 
>>1.5.0.  Problem?
>
>Does cygpopt export data constructs whose size has changed?

To answer my own question: AFAICT, it doesn't appear to.

cgf

Re: [ANN] Updated: rsync-2.5.6-2

[Christopher Faylor]

On Fri, Jul 11, 2003 at 05:57:39PM -0400, Charles Wilson wrote:
>Lapo Luchini wrote:
>
>>-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
>>Hash: SHA1
>>
>>This is just good old 2.5.6-1, just recompiled for cygwin-1.5.0.
>>Local 2.01Gb transfers work correctly, but being in the middle of the
>>university exam session I can really do no big testing.
>>
>
>Umm, rsync.exe uses cygpopt-0.dll, which has not yet been compiled for 
>1.5.0.  Problem?

Does cygpopt export data constructs whose size has changed?

cgf

Re: [ANN] Updated: rsync-2.5.6-2

[Charles Wilson]

Lapo Luchini wrote:

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
This is just good old 2.5.6-1, just recompiled for cygwin-1.5.0.
Local 2.01Gb transfers work correctly, but being in the middle of the
university exam session I can really do no big testing.
Umm, rsync.exe uses cygpopt-0.dll, which has not yet been compiled for 
1.5.0.  Problem?

--Chuck

RE: HEADSUP package maintainers: Welcome to cygwin 1.5.0

[Igor Pechtchanski]

On Fri, 11 Jul 2003, Williams, Gerald S (Jerry) wrote:

> [snip]
> Static libraries don't concern me, since all I'd need to
> do is notify the maintainer and wait until a new one is
> ready. DLLs could be more problematic if updating one of
> them can cause my package to stop working. That's why I
> asked if "cygcheck" is enough to identify all of my DLL
> dependencies.
>
> gsw

Cygcheck should be enough to identify *current* *static* DLL dependences.
If your application uses "dlopen", you'll need to know about it from other
sources (e.g., code).  Also, DLLs are only problematic if your application
uses functions with parameter types that changed size in the switch to
1.5.0, IIUC.
Igor
-- 
http://cs.nyu.edu/~pechtcha/
  |\  _,,,---,,_[EMAIL PROTECTED]
ZZZzz /,`.-'`'-.  ;-;;,_[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 |,4-  ) )-,_. ,\ (  `'-'   Igor Pechtchanski, Ph.D.
'---''(_/--'  `-'\_) fL a.k.a JaguaR-R-R-r-r-r-.-.-.  Meow!

"I have since come to realize that being between your mentor and his route
to the bathroom is a major career booster."  -- Patrick Naughton

Re: Updated Package: Whois 4.6.6

[Corinna Vinschen]

On Fri, Jul 11, 2003 at 02:48:44PM -0400, Mark Bradshaw wrote:
> I haven't changed the hint file in forever.   I didn't think maintainers
> needed to after the first release.  I just assumed christopher or corrinna
> did that in the main copy for updates.

Please always send the full URLs to the files to upload and Igor is
right, it's your responsibility to change the setup.hint file.

Corinna

-- 
Corinna Vinschen  Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to
Cygwin Developermailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Red Hat, Inc.

Re: Pending package status (11 Jul 2003)

[Jason Tishler]

On Sat, Jul 12, 2003 at 12:19:59AM +1000, Gareth Pearce wrote:
> > > @ Aspell
> >
> > The last note mentions that it doesn't work.  Has this been
> > addressed?
> 
> I believe what was stated was that it didnt work from within mutt - I
> personaly had only tested it from the command line.  (which is where i
> personally have used (i|a)spell from in the past)

FWIW, I have been using a private build of aspell from within a private
build of mutt for years.  I don't see why this wouldn't work...

Jason

-- 
PGP/GPG Key: http://www.tishler.net/jason/pubkey.asc or key servers
Fingerprint: 7A73 1405 7F2B E669 C19D  8784 1AFD E4CC ECF4 8EF6

RE: HEADSUP package maintainers: Welcome to cygwin 1.5.0

[Williams, Gerald S (Jerry)]

Christopher Faylor wrote:
>Rebuild your package.
>  Run it.
>  +Does it work?+
> /   \
>No.  Yes.
>  See if it relies on DLLs or libraries Send announcement to
>  which export an interface which   cygwin-announce.
>  has changed.

Will do next week, once I'm back on a fast network.

Static libraries don't concern me, since all I'd need to
do is notify the maintainer and wait until a new one is
ready. DLLs could be more problematic if updating one of
them can cause my package to stop working. That's why I
asked if "cygcheck" is enough to identify all of my DLL
dependencies.

gsw

Re: [UPDATE] Pending package status (11 Jul 2003)

[Christopher Faylor]

On Fri, Jul 11, 2003 at 03:43:05PM -0400, Earnie Boyd wrote:
>Christopher Faylor wrote:
>>On Fri, Jul 11, 2003 at 02:23:16PM -0400, Nicholas Wourms wrote:
>>
>>>[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>>>
>>>
I think it would make sense for there to be a limitation on how long a
package exists in this table with no votes.  I think that after two
months of no votes the package should fall off the list.

>>>
>>>I respectfully disagree, especially now that we have someone who is 
>>>actively tracking them.  What's the harm?
>>
>>
>>An ever growing package list containing packages that no one wants.
>
>And that list should be documented so that someone else doesn't try 
>porting it.  Perhaps should be moved to a short list at the bottom, and 
>documented on the apps web page?

I don't mind if someone wants to try again.  I just don't see any need
for the list to grow without bounds.

cgf

Re: [UPDATE] Pending package status (11 Jul 2003)

[Earnie Boyd]

Christopher Faylor wrote:
On Fri, Jul 11, 2003 at 02:23:16PM -0400, Nicholas Wourms wrote:

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:


I think it would make sense for there to be a limitation on how long a
package exists in this table with no votes.  I think that after two
months of no votes the package should fall off the list.
I respectfully disagree, especially now that we have someone who is 
actively tracking them.  What's the harm?


An ever growing package list containing packages that no one wants.

And that list should be documented so that someone else doesn't try 
porting it.  Perhaps should be moved to a short list at the bottom, and 
documented on the apps web page?

Earnie.

Updated: uw-imap 2002d

[Abe Backus]

This update contains cygwin-specific code changes to the main code base
(which means that I don't have to patch it anymore!) as well as other fixes
listed below.  I've created a new devel package for this, but rather than
calling it uw-imap-devel, I've called it c-client, after the name of the
library used.

http://abackus.imagineis.com/release/uw-imap/uw-imap-2002d-1.tar.bz2
http://abackus.imagineis.com/release/uw-imap/uw-imap-2002d-1-src.tar.bz2
http://abackus.imagineis.com/release/uw-imap/setup.hint

http://abackus.imagineis.com/release/uw-imap/uw-imap-util/uw-imap-util-2002d
-1.tar.bz2
http://abackus.imagineis.com/release/uw-imap/uw-imap-util/setup.hint

http://abackus.imagineis.com/release/uw-imap/uw-imap-imapd/uw-imap-imapd-200
2d-1.tar.bz2
http://abackus.imagineis.com/release/uw-imap/uw-imap-imapd/setup.hint

http://abackus.imagineis.com/release/uw-imap/c-client/c-client-2002d-1.tar.b
z2
http://abackus.imagineis.com/release/uw-imap/c-client/setup.hint

I'd welcome any input on the way that I've packaged c-client.  The
c-client.a that is built as part of uw-imap I've renamed to libc-client.a.
Also, I've tried to select the set of .h files that developers and other
packages might be interested in.  These will be in /usr/include/c-client,
which will need to be added to the include path at build time via the -I
option.  The c-client dev guide "internal.txt" is in /usr/doc/uw-imap-2002d.

(Note: this isn't built against 1.5.0 yet, because it depends on the openssl
libs, so I thought I should wait...)

Thank you!
-Abe


>From the RELNOTES file (included in /usr/doc/uw-imap-2002d/):
imap-2002d is a minor release, released concurrently with Pine 4.56, and
contains primarily bugfixes.  Programs written for imap-2002 should build
with this version without modification, with one exception.  That exception
is the ngbogus envelope flag, which stopped being used in imap-2002c and is
now gone for good.

The NNTP newsgroup listing code now tries to use wildmats on the NNTP
server,
which should result in better performance especially on slow lines.  It is
also once again permitted to log in on NNTP servers when /loser is set.

imapd now supports the UNSELECT command.

A new envelope flag, imapenvonly, indicates that the envelope in a
MESSAGE/RFC822 BODY structure only has the IMAP envelope components and
not the additional components from c-client: Newsgroups, Followup-To,
and References.

Re: [UPDATE] Pending package status (11 Jul 2003)

[Christopher Faylor]

On Fri, Jul 11, 2003 at 02:23:16PM -0400, Nicholas Wourms wrote:
>[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
>>I think it would make sense for there to be a limitation on how long a
>>package exists in this table with no votes.  I think that after two
>>months of no votes the package should fall off the list.
>>
>
>I respectfully disagree, especially now that we have someone who is 
>actively tracking them.  What's the harm?

An ever growing package list containing packages that no one wants.

cgf

Re: HEADSUP package maintainers: Welcome to cygwin 1.5.0

[Christopher Faylor]

On Fri, Jul 11, 2003 at 11:01:28AM -0400, Williams, Gerald S (Jerry) wrote:
>If so, is running cygcheck against all of your executables
>and DLLs (if not already used by your executables) enough
>to identify all of your dependencies? Or is there a more
>preferred way? For packages on "auto-pilot" that just pull
>in whatever configure tells them to, it would be nice to
>make checking such dependencies as painless as possible.


   Rebuild your package.
 Run it.
 +Does it work?+
/   \
   No.  Yes.
 See if it relies on DLLs or libraries Send announcement to
 which export an interface which   cygwin-announce.
 has changed.
  /  \
 It Does It Doesn't
Notify the packageTime for Debugging
maintainer via
cygwin-apps.

RE: Updated Package: Whois 4.6.6

[Mark Bradshaw]

I haven't changed the hint file in forever.   I didn't think maintainers
needed to after the first release.  I just assumed christopher or corrinna
did that in the main copy for updates.

I don't think I'll need to worry about compiling 4.6.6 against 1.3.22.  The
upgrade isn't anything magical, so no one will suffer if they stick with
1.3.x and the old whois.

Mark Bradshaw
Salem Web Network
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
9401 Courthouse Road, Suite 300
Chesterfield, VA 23832
804.768.9404 x100

> -Original Message-
> From: Igor Pechtchanski [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Friday, July 11, 2003 2:35 PM
> To: Mark Bradshaw
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: Updated Package: Whois 4.6.6
>
>
> On Fri, 11 Jul 2003, Mark Bradshaw wrote:
>
> > I've got new whois 4.6.6 packages ready for upload.  They are
> built against
> > 1.5.0, so I guess they need to be set as Test packages.  The URL is:
> > http://www.networksimplicity.com/whois/
> >
> > Mark Bradshaw
>
> Mark,
>
> You'll need to set the packages up as test packages yourself, in your
> setup.hint.  You could probably do it by simply adding the
>
> prev: 4.5.15-1
> curr: 4.5.17-1
> test: 4.6.6-1
>
> lines to your setup.hint, but I may have missed something.
> Also, it looks like you're using this as an opportunity to upgrade the
> package to a new upstream release, as well.  You may want to first release
> the new version compiled against 1.3.22, and then release 4.6.6-2 compiled
> against 1.5.0.  Again, it's your choice as the maintainer.
>   Igor
> --
>   http://cs.nyu.edu/~pechtcha/
>   |\  _,,,---,,_  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> ZZZzz /,`.-'`'-.  ;-;;,_  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>  |,4-  ) )-,_. ,\ (  `'-' Igor Pechtchanski, Ph.D.
> '---''(_/--'  `-'\_) fL   a.k.a JaguaR-R-R-r-r-r-.-.-.  Meow!
>
> "I have since come to realize that being between your mentor and his route
> to the bathroom is a major career booster."  -- Patrick Naughton
>
>

Re: Updated Package: Whois 4.6.6

[Igor Pechtchanski]

On Fri, 11 Jul 2003, Mark Bradshaw wrote:

> I've got new whois 4.6.6 packages ready for upload.  They are built against
> 1.5.0, so I guess they need to be set as Test packages.  The URL is:
> http://www.networksimplicity.com/whois/
>
> Mark Bradshaw

Mark,

You'll need to set the packages up as test packages yourself, in your
setup.hint.  You could probably do it by simply adding the

prev: 4.5.15-1
curr: 4.5.17-1
test: 4.6.6-1

lines to your setup.hint, but I may have missed something.
Also, it looks like you're using this as an opportunity to upgrade the
package to a new upstream release, as well.  You may want to first release
the new version compiled against 1.3.22, and then release 4.6.6-2 compiled
against 1.5.0.  Again, it's your choice as the maintainer.
Igor
-- 
http://cs.nyu.edu/~pechtcha/
  |\  _,,,---,,_[EMAIL PROTECTED]
ZZZzz /,`.-'`'-.  ;-;;,_[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 |,4-  ) )-,_. ,\ (  `'-'   Igor Pechtchanski, Ph.D.
'---''(_/--'  `-'\_) fL a.k.a JaguaR-R-R-r-r-r-.-.-.  Meow!

"I have since come to realize that being between your mentor and his route
to the bathroom is a major career booster."  -- Patrick Naughton

Re: Pending package status (11 Jul 2003)

[Nicholas Wourms]

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

On Fri, 11 Jul 2003, Christopher Faylor wrote:


On Fri, Jul 11, 2003 at 10:03:12AM -0400, Igor Pechtchanski wrote:

@ cygbuild

date   : 12 Jun 2003
version: 2003.0612-1
status : not reviewed
notes  : http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin-apps/2003-06/msg00104.html
http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin-apps/2003-06/msg00105.html
votes  : 0
Umm, hasn't this been vetoed?
Yes.


Right. Sorry. Just the using cygbuild (as apposed to gbs) is allowed.
While technically this is true, I really can't see the difference 
between the two.  For simplicity's sake, using a common script for 
method II would be most helpful.  I'm willing to do the conversion for 
gc & cabextract.

Cheers,
Nicholas

Re: Pending package status (11 Jul 2003)

[Nicholas Wourms]

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

On Fri, Jul 11, 2003 at 03:34:38PM +0100, Elfyn McBratney wrote:

@ cygbuild

date   : 12 Jun 2003
version: 2003.0612-1
status : not reviewed
notes  : http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin-apps/2003-06/msg00104.html
http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin-apps/2003-06/msg00105.html
votes  : 0
Umm, hasn't this been vetoed?
No Chris withdrew his vetoe.


No, I did not withdraw the veto.  I have been vetoing this consistently
since before it even showed up in this list.
Yes, I totally agree.  I can't understand why the maintainer doesn't 
just use the script by Chuck?  Cygbuild is totally redundant.  Why 
doesn't he merge any improvements in Cygbuild with it?  That would make 
the most sense and allivate even more confusion...

Cheers,
Nicholas

Re: Pending package status (11 Jul 2003)

[Christopher Faylor]

On Fri, Jul 11, 2003 at 02:23:15PM -0400, Christopher Faylor wrote:
>On Fri, Jul 11, 2003 at 03:34:38PM +0100, Elfyn McBratney wrote:
>>> > @ cygbuild
>>> >
>>> > date   : 12 Jun 2003
>>> > version: 2003.0612-1
>>> > status : not reviewed
>>> > notes  : http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin-apps/2003-06/msg00104.html
>>> >  http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin-apps/2003-06/msg00105.html
>>> > votes  : 0
>>>
>>> Umm, hasn't this been vetoed?
>>
>>No Chris withdrew his vetoe.
>
>No, I did not withdraw the veto.  I have been vetoing this consistently
>since before it even showed up in this list.

Just to be clear, what I was not vetoing was a package which uses cygbuild
as its build system.  I still veto cygbuild for inclusion in the cygwin
package list.

cgf

Updated Package: Whois 4.6.6

[Mark Bradshaw]

I've got new whois 4.6.6 packages ready for upload.  They are built against
1.5.0, so I guess they need to be set as Test packages.  The URL is:
http://www.networksimplicity.com/whois/

Mark Bradshaw
Salem Web Network
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
9401 Courthouse Road, Suite 300
Chesterfield, VA 23832
804.768.9404 x100

Re: [UPDATE] Pending package status (11 Jul 2003)

[Nicholas Wourms]

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

I think it would make sense for there to be a limitation on how long a
package exists in this table with no votes.  I think that after two
months of no votes the package should fall off the list.
I respectfully disagree, especially now that we have someone who is 
actively tracking them.  What's the harm?

Cheers,
Nicholas

Re: Pending package status (11 Jul 2003)

[Christopher Faylor]

On Fri, Jul 11, 2003 at 03:34:38PM +0100, Elfyn McBratney wrote:
>> > @ cygbuild
>> >
>> > date   : 12 Jun 2003
>> > version: 2003.0612-1
>> > status : not reviewed
>> > notes  : http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin-apps/2003-06/msg00104.html
>> >  http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin-apps/2003-06/msg00105.html
>> > votes  : 0
>>
>> Umm, hasn't this been vetoed?
>
>No Chris withdrew his vetoe.

No, I did not withdraw the veto.  I have been vetoing this consistently
since before it even showed up in this list.

cgf

Re: [UPDATE] Pending package status (11 Jul 2003)

[Christopher Faylor]

I think it would make sense for there to be a limitation on how long a
package exists in this table with no votes.  I think that after two
months of no votes the package should fall off the list.

On Fri, Jul 11, 2003 at 05:38:08PM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>@ LPRng
>
>date   : 21 Jan 2003
>version: 3.8.19-1
>status : reviewed; source package needs to be fix
>notes  : http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin-apps/2003-01/msg00215.html
> http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin-apps/2003-02/msg00172.html
>reviews: http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin-apps/2003-02/msg00061.html
> http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin-apps/2003-03/msg00172.html
> http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin-apps/2003-03/msg00368.html
> http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin-apps/2003-03/msg00369.html
>votes  : 3 (Corinna, Joshua and Volker)
>url: http://www.as.cmu.edu/~geek/LPRng/LPRng-3.8.19-1.tar.bz2
> http://www.as.cmu.edu/~geek/LPRng/LPRng-3.8.19-1-src.tgz
> http://www.as.cmu.edu/~geek/LPRng/setup.hint
>
>@ ifhp
>
>date   : 21 Jan 2003
>version: 3.5.10-1
>status : not reviewed
>notes  : http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin-apps/2003-01/msg00215.html
> http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin-apps/2003-02/msg00172.html
>votes  : 1 (Joshua)
>url: http://www.as.cmu.edu/~geek/ifhp/ifhp-3.5.10-1.tar.bz2
> http://www.as.cmu.edu/~geek/ifhp/ifhp-3.5.10-1-src.tar.bz2
> http://www.as.cmu.edu/~geek/ifhp/setup.hint
>
>@ TCM
>
>date   : 27 Jan 2003
>version: 2.20-1
>status : updated package is available for review
>notes  : http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin-apps/2003-01/msg00299.html
> http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin-apps/2003-01/msg00100.html
>reviews: http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin-apps/2003-03/msg00046.html
>votes  : 2 (Christopher and Lapo)
>url: http://home.in.tum.de/~boesswet/tcm-2.20-1.tar.bz2
> http://home.in.tum.de/~boesswet/tcm-2.20-1-src.tar.bz2
> http://home.in.tum.de/~boesswet/setup.hint
>
>@ proj
>
>date   : 08 Mar 2003
>version: 4.4.6-1
>status : not reviewed
>notes  : http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin-apps/2003-03/msg00176.html
> http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin-apps/2003-06/msg00162.html
>votes  : 2 (Elfyn and Gerrit)
>url: 
>http://www.neuro.gatech.edu/users/cwilson/cygutils/testing/release/proj/proj-4.4.6-1.tar.bz2
> 
> http://www.neuro.gatech.edu/users/cwilson/cygutils/testing/release/proj/libproj-devel/libproj-devel-4.4.6-1.tar.bz2
>
>@ libgeotiff
>
>date   : 09 Mar 2003
>version: 1.2.0-1
>status : not reviewed
>notes  : http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin-apps/2003-03/msg00298.html
>votes  : 2 (Elfyn and Gerrit)
>url: 
>http://www.neuro.gatech.edu/users/cwilson/cygutils/testing/release/libgeotiff/libgeotiff1/libgeotiff1-1.2.0-1.tar.bz2
> 
> http://www.neuro.gatech.edu/users/cwilson/cygutils/testing/release/libgeotiff/libgeotiff-1.2.0-1-src.tar.bz2
>
>@ DjVuLibre
>
>date   : 29 Mar 2003
>version: 3.5.11-3
>status : not reviewed
>notes  : http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin-apps/2003-03/msg00756.html
> http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin-apps/2003-04/msg00235.html
> http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin-apps/2003-04/msg00242.html
> http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin-apps/2003-04/msg00245.html
> http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin-apps/2003-04/msg00247.html
> http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin-apps/2003-04/msg00410.html
>reviews: http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin-apps/2003-04/msg00248.html
>votes  : 2 (Jakka and Joshua)
>url: 
>http://belnet.dl.sourceforge.net/sourceforge/djvu/djvulibre-3.5.11-3-src.tar.bz2
> http://belnet.dl.sourceforge.net/sourceforge/djvu/djvulibre-3.5.11-3.tar.bz2
>
>@ Aspell
>
>date   : 07 Apr 2003
>version: 0.50.3-1
>status : not reviewed
>notes  : http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin-apps/2003-04/msg00155.html
> http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin-apps/2003-04/msg00356.html
> http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin-apps/2003-06/msg00239.html
>votes  : 4 (Christopher, Elfyn, Gerrit and Igor)
>url: 
>http://www-personal.usyd.edu.au/~gpea0679/aspell/aspell-bin/aspell-bin-0.50.3-1.tar.bz2
> http://www-personal.usyd.edu.au/~gpea0679/aspell/aspell-bin/setup.hint
> 
> http://www-personal.usyd.edu.au/~gpea0679/aspell/aspell-doc/aspell-doc-0.50.3-1.tar.bz2
> http://www-personal.usyd.edu.au/~gpea0679/aspell/aspell-doc/setup.hint
> 
> http://www-personal.usyd.edu.au/~gpea0679/aspell/aspell-dev/aspell-dev-0.50.3-1.tar.bz2
> http://www-personal.usyd.edu.au/~gpea0679/aspell/aspell-dev/setup.hint
> 
> http://www-personal.usyd.edu.au/~gpea0679/aspell/libaspell/libaspell15-0.50.3-1.tar.bz2
> http://www-personal.usyd.edu.au/~gpea0679/aspell/libaspell/setup.hint
> http://www-personal.usyd.edu.au/~gpea0679/aspell/aspell-0.50.3-1-src.tar.bz2
>
>@ astksh
>
>date   : 02 May 2003
>version: 20030422-1
>status : awaiting new version
>notes  : http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin-apps/2003-05/msg00016.html
> http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin-apps/2003-05/msg00017.html
> http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin-apps/2003-05/msg00058.html
> http://cygwin

Re: Proposal: naim

[Igor Pechtchanski]

On Fri, 11 Jul 2003, Daniel Reed wrote:

> On 2003-07-11T10:25-0400, Igor Pechtchanski wrote:
> ) On Wed, 25 Jun 2003, Daniel Reed wrote:
> ) >  requires: libncurses6 cygwin
> )  ^^^
> ) Shouldn't this be libncurses7 already?
>
> naim should function with any version of ncurses since 4.0 (libncurses[5-7]
> are all ncurses-5.x releases). I was confused to see such a major
> distinction between two 5.2's and 5.3 in Cygwin (major enough to warrant
> separate package names), so I just picked the oldest one that people might
> have installed that didn't have the word "compatibility" in it, which was 6.
> Any of the ones available now should work equally well, so I'll bump it to
> libncurses7 if 5 and 6 are being phased out--it's just that there's no need
> to require 7 if you already have 5 or 6 installed.

Fair enough, I was just reading Chuck's message
(), so I thought
it was relevant.

> ) >  category: Communication Net
> )  ^
> ) I don't know if creation of new categories is approved...  At a guess,
> ) "Net" is the same as "Communication", anyway.
>
> My thinking is that since real time chat is "all the rage" these days, it
> might be wise to draw attention to the chat clients distributed with Cygwin,
> including naim and ircII. Gentoo Linux puts naim in "net-im" and NetBSD puts
> it in "chat," both separate from an actual "net" category in their
> respective trees.

This will have to be decided on a higher level than me...

> ) >  (no patches for Cygwin, just ./configure --prefix=/usr && make install-strip)
> ) The .sh script should also extract the tarball into a directory with the
> ) name of the package (i.e., naim-0.11.5.9.cyg10/) and (technically) apply
>
> Would something like:
> tar -zxvf naim-0.11.5.9.cyg11.tar.gz && cd naim-0.11.5.9.cyg11 && patch -p1 
> <../naim-0.11.5.9.cyg11-1.patch && ./configure --prefix=/usr && make install-strip
> be acceptable? (patch does no op if you feed it an empty stdin)

Perfect.

> ) >  Packaging procedure:
> ) >To create a Slackware pkgtool-compatible tarball, simply run:
> ) >./configure \
> ) >  '--prefix=/usr' \
> ) >  'CFLAGS=-O20 -funroll-loops -fexpensive-optimizations' \
> ) >  && make tgz
> ) >If configure is run under Cygwin, make tgz will adjust itself to conform to
> ) >Cygwin standards. Use make cyg instead of make tgz to produce a complete
> ) >(source and binary) Cygwin release.
> ) What will be the version number the name of the tarball produced by the
> ) above?
>
> It will automatically append -1 to the naim version number. That is, if you
> extract naim-0.11.5.9.cyg10.tar.gz and ./configure ... && make cyg, it will
> produce the same* naim-0.11.5.9.cyg10-cygwinrelease.tar.bz2 on the web site
> now.
>
> * naim extracts the arguments passed to ./configure from config.status when
>   it generates CYGWIN-PATCHES/naim-${VERSION}.README, so if you use
>   different settings there will be slight variances in the README as well as
>   in the binary package.

I may have missed this, but do you plan to keep the "cyg*" in the package
version?  Basically, the "-*" part of the version is for the Cygwin
patchlevel, so the "cyg*" seems pretty redundant (OTOH, looks like the
"-*" part will always be "-1" in your case).

> ) Other than the minor nits for the setup.hint (libncurses7) and the patch
> ) (README), the only problem is the build script in the source package.
> ) Once that is fixed, I think the packaging will be ok.  I can't do a
> ) functionality review, as I don't use the above messengers.
>
> If you run "nirc" by itself, it will attempt to sign you on to an EFnet IRC
> server using your Windows login as the nickname. You don't need an account
> to use IRC, just an unused name (you can use /connect othername if your
> login name is in use). nirc will automatically /join #naim upon startup if
> you have no .nircrc file, and anything you type that doesn't begin with a
> forward slash will be sent to that chat channel (which usually has a couple
> naim users milling about ;).
>
> My cable[modem] has been out for the past hour, so I'll queue this and hold
> off on .cyg11 until after I hear back about the install script and
> "Communication."

I'm sure you've given it that much testing before submitting the package.
What I meant was that I couldn't give it more than a cursory "run; type
something; exit" kind of testing, since I'm not familiar with the tools
and their capabilities.
Igor
-- 
http://cs.nyu.edu/~pechtcha/
  |\  _,,,---,,_[EMAIL PROTECTED]
ZZZzz /,`.-'`'-.  ;-;;,_[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 |,4-  ) )-,_. ,\ (  `'-'   Igor Pechtchanski, Ph.D.
'---''(_/--'  `-'\_) fL a.k.a JaguaR-R-R-r-r-r-.-.-.  Meow!

"I have since come to realize that being between your mentor and his route
to the bathroom is a major care

Re: Proposal: naim

[Daniel Reed]

On 2003-07-11T10:25-0400, Igor Pechtchanski wrote:
) On Wed, 25 Jun 2003, Daniel Reed wrote:
) >  requires: libncurses6 cygwin
)  ^^^
) Shouldn't this be libncurses7 already?

naim should function with any version of ncurses since 4.0 (libncurses[5-7]
are all ncurses-5.x releases). I was confused to see such a major
distinction between two 5.2's and 5.3 in Cygwin (major enough to warrant
separate package names), so I just picked the oldest one that people might
have installed that didn't have the word "compatibility" in it, which was 6.
Any of the ones available now should work equally well, so I'll bump it to
libncurses7 if 5 and 6 are being phased out--it's just that there's no need
to require 7 if you already have 5 or 6 installed.


) >  category: Communication Net
)  ^
) I don't know if creation of new categories is approved...  At a guess,
) "Net" is the same as "Communication", anyway.

My thinking is that since real time chat is "all the rage" these days, it
might be wise to draw attention to the chat clients distributed with Cygwin,
including naim and ircII. Gentoo Linux puts naim in "net-im" and NetBSD puts
it in "chat," both separate from an actual "net" category in their
respective trees.


) >  (no patches for Cygwin, just ./configure --prefix=/usr && make install-strip)
) The .sh script should also extract the tarball into a directory with the
) name of the package (i.e., naim-0.11.5.9.cyg10/) and (technically) apply

Would something like:
tar -zxvf naim-0.11.5.9.cyg11.tar.gz && cd naim-0.11.5.9.cyg11 && patch -p1 
<../naim-0.11.5.9.cyg11-1.patch && ./configure --prefix=/usr && make install-strip
be acceptable? (patch does no op if you feed it an empty stdin)


) >  Packaging procedure:
) >To create a Slackware pkgtool-compatible tarball, simply run:
) >./configure \
) >  '--prefix=/usr' \
) >  'CFLAGS=-O20 -funroll-loops -fexpensive-optimizations' \
) >  && make tgz
) >If configure is run under Cygwin, make tgz will adjust itself to conform to
) >Cygwin standards. Use make cyg instead of make tgz to produce a complete
) >(source and binary) Cygwin release.
) What will be the version number the name of the tarball produced by the
) above?

It will automatically append -1 to the naim version number. That is, if you
extract naim-0.11.5.9.cyg10.tar.gz and ./configure ... && make cyg, it will
produce the same* naim-0.11.5.9.cyg10-cygwinrelease.tar.bz2 on the web site
now.

* naim extracts the arguments passed to ./configure from config.status when
  it generates CYGWIN-PATCHES/naim-${VERSION}.README, so if you use
  different settings there will be slight variances in the README as well as
  in the binary package.


) Other than the minor nits for the setup.hint (libncurses7) and the patch
) (README), the only problem is the build script in the source package.
) Once that is fixed, I think the packaging will be ok.  I can't do a
) functionality review, as I don't use the above messengers.

If you run "nirc" by itself, it will attempt to sign you on to an EFnet IRC
server using your Windows login as the nickname. You don't need an account
to use IRC, just an unused name (you can use /connect othername if your
login name is in use). nirc will automatically /join #naim upon startup if
you have no .nircrc file, and anything you type that doesn't begin with a
forward slash will be sent to that chat channel (which usually has a couple
naim users milling about ;).

My cable[modem] has been out for the past hour, so I'll queue this and hold
off on .cyg11 until after I hear back about the install script and
"Communication."

-- 
Daniel Reed <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://shell.n.ml.org/n/
The pursuit of pretty formulas and neat theorems can no doubt quickly degenerate into 
a silly vice, but so can the quest for austere generalities which are so very general 
indeed that they are incapable of application to any particular. -- Eric Temple Bell
http://site.n.ml.org/download/20030711002922/naim/naim-0.11.6-2003-07-11-0028.tar.gz

[UPDATE] Pending package status (11 Jul 2003)

[elfyn]

@ LPRng

date   : 21 Jan 2003
version: 3.8.19-1
status : reviewed; source package needs to be fix
notes  : http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin-apps/2003-01/msg00215.html
 http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin-apps/2003-02/msg00172.html
reviews: http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin-apps/2003-02/msg00061.html
 http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin-apps/2003-03/msg00172.html
 http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin-apps/2003-03/msg00368.html
 http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin-apps/2003-03/msg00369.html
votes  : 3 (Corinna, Joshua and Volker)
url: http://www.as.cmu.edu/~geek/LPRng/LPRng-3.8.19-1.tar.bz2
 http://www.as.cmu.edu/~geek/LPRng/LPRng-3.8.19-1-src.tgz
 http://www.as.cmu.edu/~geek/LPRng/setup.hint

@ ifhp

date   : 21 Jan 2003
version: 3.5.10-1
status : not reviewed
notes  : http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin-apps/2003-01/msg00215.html
 http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin-apps/2003-02/msg00172.html
votes  : 1 (Joshua)
url: http://www.as.cmu.edu/~geek/ifhp/ifhp-3.5.10-1.tar.bz2
 http://www.as.cmu.edu/~geek/ifhp/ifhp-3.5.10-1-src.tar.bz2
 http://www.as.cmu.edu/~geek/ifhp/setup.hint

@ TCM

date   : 27 Jan 2003
version: 2.20-1
status : updated package is available for review
notes  : http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin-apps/2003-01/msg00299.html
 http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin-apps/2003-01/msg00100.html
reviews: http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin-apps/2003-03/msg00046.html
votes  : 2 (Christopher and Lapo)
url: http://home.in.tum.de/~boesswet/tcm-2.20-1.tar.bz2
 http://home.in.tum.de/~boesswet/tcm-2.20-1-src.tar.bz2
 http://home.in.tum.de/~boesswet/setup.hint

@ proj

date   : 08 Mar 2003
version: 4.4.6-1
status : not reviewed
notes  : http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin-apps/2003-03/msg00176.html
 http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin-apps/2003-06/msg00162.html
votes  : 2 (Elfyn and Gerrit)
url: 
http://www.neuro.gatech.edu/users/cwilson/cygutils/testing/release/proj/proj-4.4.6-1.tar.bz2
 
http://www.neuro.gatech.edu/users/cwilson/cygutils/testing/release/proj/libproj-devel/libproj-devel-4.4.6-1.tar.bz2

@ libgeotiff

date   : 09 Mar 2003
version: 1.2.0-1
status : not reviewed
notes  : http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin-apps/2003-03/msg00298.html
votes  : 2 (Elfyn and Gerrit)
url: 
http://www.neuro.gatech.edu/users/cwilson/cygutils/testing/release/libgeotiff/libgeotiff1/libgeotiff1-1.2.0-1.tar.bz2
 
http://www.neuro.gatech.edu/users/cwilson/cygutils/testing/release/libgeotiff/libgeotiff-1.2.0-1-src.tar.bz2

@ DjVuLibre

date   : 29 Mar 2003
version: 3.5.11-3
status : not reviewed
notes  : http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin-apps/2003-03/msg00756.html
 http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin-apps/2003-04/msg00235.html
 http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin-apps/2003-04/msg00242.html
 http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin-apps/2003-04/msg00245.html
 http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin-apps/2003-04/msg00247.html
 http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin-apps/2003-04/msg00410.html
reviews: http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin-apps/2003-04/msg00248.html
votes  : 2 (Jakka and Joshua)
url: 
http://belnet.dl.sourceforge.net/sourceforge/djvu/djvulibre-3.5.11-3-src.tar.bz2
 http://belnet.dl.sourceforge.net/sourceforge/djvu/djvulibre-3.5.11-3.tar.bz2

@ Aspell

date   : 07 Apr 2003
version: 0.50.3-1
status : not reviewed
notes  : http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin-apps/2003-04/msg00155.html
 http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin-apps/2003-04/msg00356.html
 http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin-apps/2003-06/msg00239.html
votes  : 4 (Christopher, Elfyn, Gerrit and Igor)
url: 
http://www-personal.usyd.edu.au/~gpea0679/aspell/aspell-bin/aspell-bin-0.50.3-1.tar.bz2
 http://www-personal.usyd.edu.au/~gpea0679/aspell/aspell-bin/setup.hint
 
http://www-personal.usyd.edu.au/~gpea0679/aspell/aspell-doc/aspell-doc-0.50.3-1.tar.bz2
 http://www-personal.usyd.edu.au/~gpea0679/aspell/aspell-doc/setup.hint
 
http://www-personal.usyd.edu.au/~gpea0679/aspell/aspell-dev/aspell-dev-0.50.3-1.tar.bz2
 http://www-personal.usyd.edu.au/~gpea0679/aspell/aspell-dev/setup.hint
 
http://www-personal.usyd.edu.au/~gpea0679/aspell/libaspell/libaspell15-0.50.3-1.tar.bz2
 http://www-personal.usyd.edu.au/~gpea0679/aspell/libaspell/setup.hint
 http://www-personal.usyd.edu.au/~gpea0679/aspell/aspell-0.50.3-1-src.tar.bz2

@ astksh

date   : 02 May 2003
version: 20030422-1
status : awaiting new version
notes  : http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin-apps/2003-05/msg00016.html
 http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin-apps/2003-05/msg00017.html
 http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin-apps/2003-05/msg00058.html
 http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin-apps/2003-05/msg00132.html
 http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin-apps/2003-05/msg00180.html
 http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin-apps/2003-05/msg00193.html
 http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin-apps/2003-05/msg00194.html
 http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin-apps/2003-05/msg00197.html
 http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin-apps/2003-05/msg00198.html
 http://cygwin

RE: Pending package status (11 Jul 2003)

[Abe Backus]

+1 naim
+1 cabextract

-Abe

-Original Message-

@ naim

date   : 25 Jun 2003
version: (null)
status : not reviewed
notes  : http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin-apps/2003-06/msg00234.html
 http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin-apps/2003-06/msg00280.html
votes  : 2 (Elfyn and Gerrit)
url:
http://shell.n.ml.org/n/naim/naim-0.11.5.9.cyg10-cygwinrelease.tar.bz2

@ cabextract

date   : 27 Jun 2003
version: 0.6-1
status : not reviewed
notes  : http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin-apps/2003-06/msg00245.html
 http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin-apps/2003-06/msg00244.html
 http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin-apps/2003-06/msg00251.html
 http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin-apps/2003-06/msg00255.html
votes  : 2 (Charles and Jason)
url:
http://tierra.dyndns.org:81/cygwin/cabextract/cabextract-0.6-1-src.tar.bz2
 
http://tierra.dyndns.org:81/cygwin/cabextract/cabextract-0.6-1.tar.bz2

[PATCH] Setup: Fix erroneous quoting of __LINE__ and __FILE__

[Igor Pechtchanski]

The attached patch fixes erroneous quoting of the __LINE__ and __FILE__
macros in exception descriptions.
Igor
==
2003-07-11  Igor Pechtchanski  <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

* UserSettings.cc (UserSettings::deRegisterSetting): Fix
erroneous __LINE__/__FILE__ usage.
* download.cc (validateCachedPackage, check_for_cached): Ditto.
* geturl.cc (getUrlToStream): Ditto.
* install.cc (md5_one): Ditto.

-- 
http://cs.nyu.edu/~pechtcha/
  |\  _,,,---,,_[EMAIL PROTECTED]
ZZZzz /,`.-'`'-.  ;-;;,_[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 |,4-  ) )-,_. ,\ (  `'-'   Igor Pechtchanski, Ph.D.
'---''(_/--'  `-'\_) fL a.k.a JaguaR-R-R-r-r-r-.-.-.  Meow!

"I have since come to realize that being between your mentor and his route
to the bathroom is a major career booster."  -- Patrick Naughton
Index: UserSettings.cc
===
RCS file: /cvs/cygwin-apps/setup/UserSettings.cc,v
retrieving revision 2.3
diff -u -p -r2.3 UserSettings.cc
--- UserSettings.cc 16 Mar 2003 02:06:05 -  2.3
+++ UserSettings.cc 11 Jul 2003 15:00:12 -
@@ -63,6 +63,6 @@ UserSettings::deRegisterSetting(UserSett
 {
   Settings::iterator i = find(settings.begin(), settings.end(), &aSetting);
   if (i == settings.end())
-throw new Exception ("__LINE__ __FILE__", String ("Attempt to deregister non 
registered setting!"), APPERR_LOGIC_ERROR);
+throw new Exception (__LINE__ __FILE__, String ("Attempt to deregister non 
registered setting!"), APPERR_LOGIC_ERROR);
   settings.erase(i);
 }
Index: download.cc
===
RCS file: /cvs/cygwin-apps/setup/download.cc,v
retrieving revision 2.37
diff -u -p -r2.37 download.cc
--- download.cc 7 Apr 2003 12:46:55 -   2.37
+++ download.cc 11 Jul 2003 15:00:12 -
@@ -88,7 +88,7 @@ validateCachedPackage (String const &ful
}
   delete thefile;
   if (count < 0)
-   throw new Exception ("__LINE__ __FILE__", String ("IO Error reading ") + 
pkgsource.Cached(), APPERR_IO_ERROR);
+   throw new Exception (__LINE__ __FILE__, String ("IO Error reading ") + 
pkgsource.Cached(), APPERR_IO_ERROR);
   
   md5_byte_t tempdigest[16];
   md5_finish(&pns, tempdigest);
@@ -128,7 +128,7 @@ check_for_cached (packagesource & pkgsou
if (validateCachedPackage (prefix + pkgsource.Canonical (), pkgsource))
  pkgsource.set_cached (prefix + pkgsource.Canonical ());
else
- throw new Exception ("__LINE__ __FILE__", String ("Package validation 
failure for ") + prefix + pkgsource.Canonical (), APPERR_CORRUPT_PACKAGE);
+ throw new Exception (__LINE__ __FILE__, String ("Package validation failure 
for ") + prefix + pkgsource.Canonical (), APPERR_CORRUPT_PACKAGE);
return 1;
   }
 
@@ -146,7 +146,7 @@ check_for_cached (packagesource & pkgsou
  if (validateCachedPackage (fullname, pkgsource))
pkgsource.set_cached (fullname );
  else
-   throw new Exception ("__LINE__ __FILE__", String ("Package validation 
failure for ") + fullname, APPERR_CORRUPT_PACKAGE);
+   throw new Exception (__LINE__ __FILE__, String ("Package validation 
failure for ") + fullname, APPERR_CORRUPT_PACKAGE);
  return 1;
}
 }
Index: geturl.cc
===
RCS file: /cvs/cygwin-apps/setup/geturl.cc,v
retrieving revision 2.21
diff -u -p -r2.21 geturl.cc
--- geturl.cc   12 May 2002 11:16:24 -  2.21
+++ geturl.cc   11 Jul 2003 15:00:12 -
@@ -125,7 +125,7 @@ getUrlToStream (String const &_url, HWND
 {
   delete n;
   log (LOG_BABBLE) <<  "getUrlToStream failed!" << endLog;
-  throw new Exception ("__LINE__ __FILE__", "Error opening url",  
APPERR_IO_ERROR);
+  throw new Exception (__LINE__ __FILE__, "Error opening url",  APPERR_IO_ERROR);
 }
 
   if (n->file_size)
Index: install.cc
===
RCS file: /cvs/cygwin-apps/setup/install.cc,v
retrieving revision 2.61
diff -u -p -r2.61 install.cc
--- install.cc  25 Mar 2003 20:57:13 -  2.61
+++ install.cc  11 Jul 2003 15:00:12 -
@@ -658,7 +658,7 @@ void md5_one (const packagesource& sourc
   // check the MD5 sum of the cached file here
   io_stream *thefile = io_stream::open (source.Cached (), "rb");
   if (!thefile)
-   throw new Exception ("__LINE__ __FILE__", String ("IO Error opening ") + 
source.Cached(), APPERR_IO_ERROR);
+   throw new Exception (__LINE__ __FILE__, String ("IO Error opening ") + 
source.Cached(), APPERR_IO_ERROR);
   md5_state_t pns;
   md5_init (&pns);
   
@@ -668,7 +668,7 @@ void md5_one (const packagesource& sourc
  md5_append (&pns, buffer, count);

Re: HEADSUP package maintainers: Welcome to Cygwin 1.5.0

[Williams, Gerald S (Jerry)]

Corinna Vinschen wrote:
>   Packages which depend on external libs should be newly build only
>   if all external libs have been newly build first.  E.g. vim depends
>   on ncurses.  So I, the vim maintainer, will wait with creating a new
>   vim version until Charles, the ncurses maintainer, has created a new
>   ncurses version.

Sorry if this question sounds dense, but can you please
clarify something for me:

Is waiting until all dependent libraries really enough, or
should VIM and it's DLL dependencies all be brought forward
lock-step? I'm sure whether something fails will depend on
whether it actually used those features, but once ncurses
has been updated, is it possible VIM won't work until it's
been updated as well?

If so, this would mean you'd need to coordinate the upgrade
of cygintl-2.dll and cygiconv-2.dll at the same time, right?

 $ cygcheck vim.exe
 Found: .\vim.exe
 Found: C:\cygwin\bin\vim.exe
 vim.exe
   .\cygwin1.dll
 C:\WINNT\System32\KERNEL32.dll
   C:\WINNT\System32\ntdll.dll
   .\cygintl-2.dll
 .\cygiconv-2.dll
   .\cygncurses6.dll

 Use -h to see help about each section
 $ _

If so, is running cygcheck against all of your executables
and DLLs (if not already used by your executables) enough
to identify all of your dependencies? Or is there a more
preferred way? For packages on "auto-pilot" that just pull
in whatever configure tells them to, it would be nice to
make checking such dependencies as painless as possible.

gsw

Re: Pending package status (11 Jul 2003)

[Elfyn McBratney]

On Fri, 11 Jul 2003, Christopher Faylor wrote:

> On Fri, Jul 11, 2003 at 10:03:12AM -0400, Igor Pechtchanski wrote:
> >> @ cygbuild
> >>
> >> date   : 12 Jun 2003
> >> version: 2003.0612-1
> >> status : not reviewed
> >> notes  : http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin-apps/2003-06/msg00104.html
> >>  http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin-apps/2003-06/msg00105.html
> >> votes  : 0
> >
> >Umm, hasn't this been vetoed?
>
> Yes.

Right. Sorry. Just the using cygbuild (as apposed to gbs) is allowed.

Elfyn

-- 
Elfyn McBratney, EMCB
http://www.emcb.co.uk
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Pending package status (11 Jul 2003)

[Christopher Faylor]

On Fri, Jul 11, 2003 at 10:03:12AM -0400, Igor Pechtchanski wrote:
>> @ cygbuild
>>
>> date   : 12 Jun 2003
>> version: 2003.0612-1
>> status : not reviewed
>> notes  : http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin-apps/2003-06/msg00104.html
>>  http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin-apps/2003-06/msg00105.html
>> votes  : 0
>
>Umm, hasn't this been vetoed?

Yes.

cgf

Re: Updated: (for cygwin 1.5.0) xerces-c 2.3.0-3

[Christopher Faylor]

On Fri, Jul 11, 2003 at 08:48:49AM -0400, Igor Pechtchanski wrote:
>On Thu, 10 Jul 2003, Christopher Faylor wrote:
>
>> On Thu, Jul 10, 2003 at 11:35:39PM -0400, Igor Pechtchanski wrote:
>> >All in a day's work... ;-)
>> >
>> >As for rebuilding, IIUC, once you've taken care of the binary
>> >incompatibility (i.e., stepped over the 1.5.0 barrier), you shouldn't have
>> >to rebuild the apps at all (on account of Cygwin, that is).  Unless
>> >another one of those ABI changes comes about, which, hopefully, won't be
>> >too soon - the development team seemed to cram as many data structure
>> >changes as they could in this one release.
>> >
>> >Anyone, please feel free to correct me if I'm wrong.
>>
>> Nope, you're not wrong.  Would you care to give yourself a long overdue
>> gold star for this and all of the other invaluable advice and service
>> you've given in the past?
>
>Don't mind if I do.  That'd be a second one for those same reasons,
>though...

Doh.  Oh yeah, right.

Well, still deserved anyway.

cgf

Re: Pending package status (11 Jul 2003)

[Elfyn McBratney]

On Fri, 11 Jul 2003, Igor Pechtchanski wrote:

> On Fri, 11 Jul 2003 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> > @ ccdoc
> >
> > date   : 26 Feb 2003
> > version: 0.8.39-1
> > status : reviewed; the package is ok, it is just missing the votes
> > votes  : 2 (Elfyn and Gerrit)
>
> This sounds interesting; I'm voting for it too.

Your just a moment too late, Igor. I've just uploaded it. ;-)

> > @ Aspell
> >
> > date   : 07 Apr 2003
> > version: 0.50.3-1
> > status : not reviewed
>
> > notes  : http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin-apps/2003-04/msg00155.html
> >  http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin-apps/2003-04/msg00356.html
> >  http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin-apps/2003-06/msg00239.html
>
> The last note mentions that it doesn't work.  Has this been addressed?
>
> > @ cygbuild
> >
> > date   : 12 Jun 2003
> > version: 2003.0612-1
> > status : not reviewed
> > notes  : http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin-apps/2003-06/msg00104.html
> >  http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin-apps/2003-06/msg00105.html
> > votes  : 0
>
> Umm, hasn't this been vetoed?

No Chris withdrew his vetoe.

> > @ dyndns
> >
> > date   : 18 Jun 2003
> > version: 2003.0618-1
> > status : not reviewed
> > notes  : http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin-apps/2003-06/msg00158.html
> > votes  : 0
> > url: none available
>
> This is missing the package URLs altogether -- should it be in the list of
> packages?

URL's weren't provided. I left that there hoping Jari will come and correct me.

>
> > @ Aspell-en
> >
> > date   : 19 Jun 2003
> > version: 0.51.0-1
> > status : reviewed
> > notes  : http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin-apps/2003-06/msg00161.html
> >  http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin-apps/2003-06/msg00229.html
> >  http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin-apps/2003-06/msg00232.html
> > votes  : 0 (aspell prerequisite)
>
> At a guess, people who voted for Aspell will have voted for this one,
> right?

Pretty much. Aspell isn't a very good public speaker without her dict. :-)

> > @ stunnel
> >
> > date   : 25 Jun 2003
> > version: 4.04-1
> > status : reviewed
>   ^
> > notes  : http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin-apps/2003-06/msg00207.html
> >  http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin-apps/2003-06/msg00209.html
> >  http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin-apps/2003-06/msg00211.html
> >  http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin-apps/2003-06/msg00227.html
> >  http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin-apps/2003-06/msg00236.html
> >  http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin-apps/2003-06/msg00237.html
> > votes  : 3 (Abraham, Elfyn and Gerrit)
>
> Has anyone done a functionality review on this one?  I've only seen a
> packaging review.  In the last note, Max said that he was planning to do
> one, but I didn't see a follow-up.

I've tested it with my mailgate and it seems fine to me. I'll post my results in
a minute. Sorry too much coffee is making me do things backwards.

> > @ naim
> >
> > date   : 25 Jun 2003
> > version: (null)
^^^

Oops, I missed the version number in the xml file for that. I'll fix that.

> > status : not reviewed
> > notes  : http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin-apps/2003-06/msg00234.html
> >  http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin-apps/2003-06/msg00280.html
> > votes  : 2 (Elfyn and Gerrit)
> > url: http://shell.n.ml.org/n/naim/naim-0.11.5.9.cyg10-cygwinrelease.tar.bz2
>
> The URL above contains all 3 files (the source tarball, the binary
> tarball, and setup.hint).  The version is a bit weird: 0.11.5.9.cyg10-1.
> I'm assuming the ".cyg10" bit will hopefully go away once the package is
> actually accepted.  As of now, it seems to be propagated throughout (i.e.,
> the readme, etc).  I'll post a separate review message shortly.
>
> > @ cabextract
> >
> > date   : 27 Jun 2003
> > version: 0.6-1
> > status : not reviewed
> > notes  : http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin-apps/2003-06/msg00245.html
> >  http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin-apps/2003-06/msg00244.html
> >  http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin-apps/2003-06/msg00251.html
> >  http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin-apps/2003-06/msg00255.html
> > votes  : 2 (Charles and Jason)
>
> This has my vote.
>   Igor

Elfyn

-- 
Elfyn McBratney, EMCB
http://www.emcb.co.uk
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Proposal: naim

[Igor Pechtchanski]

On Wed, 25 Jun 2003, Daniel Reed wrote:

> Heya, I'm the maintainer of a multi-protocol console chat client called
> naim. I've been in touch with quite a few Cygwin users using naim, and
> thought I'd see about getting naim "into" Cygwin for their convenience.
> ircII already appears to be included, though there is no "Communication"
> category (ircII is simply listed in Net). I've listed Communication as a
> category in my setup.hint, but I will adjust the packaging procedure to
> simply list Net if that is more appropriate. naim documentation is available
> from http://naim.n.ml.org/.
>
> http://shell.n.ml.org/n/naim/naim-0.11.5.9.cyg7-cygwinrelease.tar.bz2:
>  -rw-r--r-- 37556/544   220 2003-06-20 12:13:24 setup.hint
>  -rw-r--r-- 37556/544476934 2003-06-20 12:13:22 naim-0.11.5.9.cyg7-1-src.tar.bz2
>  -rw-r--r-- 37556/544152870 2003-06-20 12:12:58 
> naim-0.11.5.9.cyg7-i686-pc-cygwin.tbz2
>  lrwxrwxrwx 37556/544 0 2003-06-20 12:13:26 naim-0.11.5.9.cyg7-1.tar.bz2 -> 
> naim-0.11.5.9.cyg7-i686-pc-cygwin.tbz2

I'm actually reviewing
,
but most of the points are the same.

> setup.hint:
>  # This file is generated by make cyg, do not edit directly.
>  @ naim
>  sdesc: "Console AIM, ICQ, IRC, and Lily client"
>  ldesc: "Console AIM, ICQ, IRC, and Lily client"
>  requires: libncurses6 cygwin
 ^^^
Shouldn't this be libncurses7 already?

>  category: Communication Net
 ^
I don't know if creation of new categories is approved...  At a guess,
"Net" is the same as "Communication", anyway.

> naim-0.11.5.9.cyg7-1-src.tar.bz2:
>  -rw-r--r-- 37556/544474586 2003-06-20 11:59:16 naim-0.11.5.9.cyg7.tar.gz
>  -rw-r--r-- 37556/544 0 2003-06-20 12:13:06 naim-0.11.5.9.cyg7-1.patch
>  -rw-r--r-- 37556/54438 2003-06-20 12:13:06 naim-0.11.5.9.cyg7-1.sh
>
>  (no patches for Cygwin, just ./configure --prefix=/usr && make install-strip)

The .sh script should also extract the tarball into a directory with the
name of the package (i.e., naim-0.11.5.9.cyg10/) and (technically) apply
the patch.  I realize that the patch is currently null, so I'm not sure
the second step is all that important.  The first one is necessary,
however.  The patch also normally contains the Cygwin readme, but here the
package is Cygwin-aware, so I don't know if that applies.

> naim-0.11.5.9.cyg7-i686-pc-cygwin.tbz2:
>  drwxr-xr-x 37556/544 0 2003-06-20 12:00:10 ./
>  drwxr-xr-x 37556/544 0 2003-06-20 12:07:24 ./usr/
>  drwxr-xr-x 37556/544 0 2003-06-20 12:07:24 ./usr/bin/

The leading ./ is gone in the new package, plus some symlinks were added.
All seems in order.  The usr/doc/naim-0.11.5.9.cyg10/README is just a cat
of the manpage, but I don't think this is a problem.

> usr/doc/Cygwin/naim-0.11.5.9.cyg7.README:
> [snip]
>  Packaging procedure:
>To create a Slackware pkgtool-compatible tarball, simply run:
>./configure \
>  '--prefix=/usr' \
>  'CFLAGS=-O20 -funroll-loops -fexpensive-optimizations' \
>  && make tgz
>If configure is run under Cygwin, make tgz will adjust itself to conform to
>Cygwin standards. Use make cyg instead of make tgz to produce a complete
>(source and binary) Cygwin release.

What will be the version number the name of the tarball produced by the
above?

> [snip]
>  Build requirements:
>libncurses
>libncurses-devel
 
A general question: is there a way to specify this, and if so, how?

>  Maintainer:
>Daniel Reed <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Other than the minor nits for the setup.hint (libncurses7) and the patch
(README), the only problem is the build script in the source package.
Once that is fixed, I think the packaging will be ok.  I can't do a
functionality review, as I don't use the above messengers.
Igor
-- 
http://cs.nyu.edu/~pechtcha/
  |\  _,,,---,,_[EMAIL PROTECTED]
ZZZzz /,`.-'`'-.  ;-;;,_[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 |,4-  ) )-,_. ,\ (  `'-'   Igor Pechtchanski, Ph.D.
'---''(_/--'  `-'\_) fL a.k.a JaguaR-R-R-r-r-r-.-.-.  Meow!

"I have since come to realize that being between your mentor and his route
to the bathroom is a major career booster."  -- Patrick Naughton

Re: naim [Pending package status (11 Jul 2003)]

[Daniel Reed]

On 2003-07-11T10:03-0400, Igor Pechtchanski wrote:
) On Fri, 11 Jul 2003 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
) > @ naim
) >
) > date   : 25 Jun 2003
) > version: (null)
)   ^^^
 ...
) tarball, and setup.hint).  The version is a bit weird: 0.11.5.9.cyg10-1.
) I'm assuming the ".cyg10" bit will hopefully go away once the package is

"0.11.5.9.cyg10-1" is correct, yes. naim is capable of packaging itself
using "make cyg". If anything changes in the packaging procedure, I will
probably bump the patchlevel rather than the Cygwin release number; hence
0.11.5.9.cyg10-1 rather than 0.11.5.9-11: 10 sets of changes have been made
to configure.in and various Makefile.am's between releases, which affects
more than just the Cygwin release.

The next release, assuming I can get module support working, will be
0.11.6-1. Otherwise it will be something like 0.11.5.10-1.

-- 
Daniel Reed <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://shell.n.ml.org/n/
"I don't believe in making something user friendly just for the sake of being user 
friendly, though; if you're decreasing the users' available power, you're not really 
being all that friendly to them."
http://site.n.ml.org/download/20030711002922/naim/naim-0.11.6-2003-07-11-0028.tar.gz

Re: Pending package status (11 Jul 2003)

[Gareth Pearce]

> > @ Aspell
> >
> > date   : 07 Apr 2003
> > version: 0.50.3-1
> > status : not reviewed
>
> > notes  : http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin-apps/2003-04/msg00155.html
> >  http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin-apps/2003-04/msg00356.html
> >  http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin-apps/2003-06/msg00239.html
>
> The last note mentions that it doesn't work.  Has this been addressed?

I believe what was stated was that it didnt work from within mutt - I
personaly had only tested it from the command line.  (which is where i
personally have used (i|a)spell from in the past)

However I've been busy marking (and before that, without a functioning
internet connection on my windows pc) - and since I had to format my machine
a few weeks back, havent reinstalled my own packages to test the problem
described.
I am away for the next week skiing - but my internet connection is now all
good(wondeful infact) so when I get back I'll give it a go - (or if rlc
wants to give it ago first while I'm gone, by all means) - I actually think
i tested my package with nano as internal speller - but that might be a
figment.

Regards,
Gareth

some stuff for cygwin-apps repo

[Elfyn McBratney]

I've written a program to build the pending packages list from an xml file, plus
a script to send the mail. Would it be OK to commit these (including the xml
file) somewhere in the cygwin-apps repo? Say cygwin-apps/pending-packages ?

Elfyn

-- 
Elfyn McBratney, EMCB
http://www.emcb.co.uk
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: re-linking man.. missing include `nl_types.h'

[Christopher Faylor]

On Fri, Jul 11, 2003 at 05:41:32AM +0100, Elfyn McBratney wrote:
>Chris,
>
>I'm probably just being dense, but out of curiousity did you ever have this
>problem? Just downloaded the src package for man-1.5j-2 (from a Cygwin mirror)
>to re-build for 1.5 and when running make I get

No, I never had this problem.  Sorry.

cgf

Re: Pending package status (11 Jul 2003)

[Igor Pechtchanski]

On Fri, 11 Jul 2003 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

> @ ccdoc
>
> date   : 26 Feb 2003
> version: 0.8.39-1
> status : reviewed; the package is ok, it is just missing the votes
> votes  : 2 (Elfyn and Gerrit)

This sounds interesting; I'm voting for it too.

> @ Aspell
>
> date   : 07 Apr 2003
> version: 0.50.3-1
> status : not reviewed
   
> notes  : http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin-apps/2003-04/msg00155.html
>  http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin-apps/2003-04/msg00356.html
>  http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin-apps/2003-06/msg00239.html

The last note mentions that it doesn't work.  Has this been addressed?

> @ cygbuild
>
> date   : 12 Jun 2003
> version: 2003.0612-1
> status : not reviewed
> notes  : http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin-apps/2003-06/msg00104.html
>  http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin-apps/2003-06/msg00105.html
> votes  : 0

Umm, hasn't this been vetoed?

> @ dyndns
>
> date   : 18 Jun 2003
> version: 2003.0618-1
> status : not reviewed
> notes  : http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin-apps/2003-06/msg00158.html
> votes  : 0
> url: none available

This is missing the package URLs altogether -- should it be in the list of
packages?

> @ Aspell-en
>
> date   : 19 Jun 2003
> version: 0.51.0-1
> status : reviewed
> notes  : http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin-apps/2003-06/msg00161.html
>  http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin-apps/2003-06/msg00229.html
>  http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin-apps/2003-06/msg00232.html
> votes  : 0 (aspell prerequisite)

At a guess, people who voted for Aspell will have voted for this one,
right?

> @ stunnel
>
> date   : 25 Jun 2003
> version: 4.04-1
> status : reviewed
  ^
> notes  : http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin-apps/2003-06/msg00207.html
>  http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin-apps/2003-06/msg00209.html
>  http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin-apps/2003-06/msg00211.html
>  http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin-apps/2003-06/msg00227.html
>  http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin-apps/2003-06/msg00236.html
>  http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin-apps/2003-06/msg00237.html
> votes  : 3 (Abraham, Elfyn and Gerrit)

Has anyone done a functionality review on this one?  I've only seen a
packaging review.  In the last note, Max said that he was planning to do
one, but I didn't see a follow-up.

> @ naim
>
> date   : 25 Jun 2003
> version: (null)
  ^^^
> status : not reviewed
> notes  : http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin-apps/2003-06/msg00234.html
>  http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin-apps/2003-06/msg00280.html
> votes  : 2 (Elfyn and Gerrit)
> url: http://shell.n.ml.org/n/naim/naim-0.11.5.9.cyg10-cygwinrelease.tar.bz2

The URL above contains all 3 files (the source tarball, the binary
tarball, and setup.hint).  The version is a bit weird: 0.11.5.9.cyg10-1.
I'm assuming the ".cyg10" bit will hopefully go away once the package is
actually accepted.  As of now, it seems to be propagated throughout (i.e.,
the readme, etc).  I'll post a separate review message shortly.

> @ cabextract
>
> date   : 27 Jun 2003
> version: 0.6-1
> status : not reviewed
> notes  : http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin-apps/2003-06/msg00245.html
>  http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin-apps/2003-06/msg00244.html
>  http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin-apps/2003-06/msg00251.html
>  http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin-apps/2003-06/msg00255.html
> votes  : 2 (Charles and Jason)

This has my vote.
Igor
-- 
http://cs.nyu.edu/~pechtcha/
  |\  _,,,---,,_[EMAIL PROTECTED]
ZZZzz /,`.-'`'-.  ;-;;,_[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 |,4-  ) )-,_. ,\ (  `'-'   Igor Pechtchanski, Ph.D.
'---''(_/--'  `-'\_) fL a.k.a JaguaR-R-R-r-r-r-.-.-.  Meow!

"I have since come to realize that being between your mentor and his route
to the bathroom is a major career booster."  -- Patrick Naughton

Re: Proposal: stunnel (uploaded)

[Elfyn McBratney]

On Fri, 27 Jun 2003, Marcel Telka wrote:

> [...]
> Updated packages are available at:
> http://telka.sk/cygwin/stunnel/stunnel-4.04-3-src.tar.bz2
> http://telka.sk/cygwin/stunnel/stunnel-4.04-3.tar.bz2

Marcel, I have uploaded stunnel. Please send an announcement in a couple of
hours.

Thanks,
Elfyn

-- 
Elfyn McBratney, EMCB
http://www.emcb.co.uk
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Pending package status (11 Jul 2003)

[Elfyn McBratney]

On Fri, 11 Jul 2003, Corinna Vinschen wrote:

> Thanks Elfyn, for the new package report.
>
> On Fri, Jul 11, 2003 at 02:19:18PM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > @ stunnel
> >
> > date   : 25 Jun 2003
> > version: 4.04-1
> > status : reviewed
> > notes  : http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin-apps/2003-06/msg00207.html
> >  http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin-apps/2003-06/msg00209.html
> >  http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin-apps/2003-06/msg00211.html
> >  http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin-apps/2003-06/msg00227.html
> >  http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin-apps/2003-06/msg00236.html
> >  http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin-apps/2003-06/msg00237.html
> > votes  : 3 (Abraham, Elfyn and Gerrit)
> > url: http://telka.sk/cygwin/stunnel/stunnel-4.04-2-src.tar.bz2
> >  http://telka.sk/cygwin/stunnel/stunnel-4.04-2.tar.bz2
> >  http://telka.sk/cygwin/stunnel/setup.hint
>
> Looks like stunnel could get uploaded...

Already done. I also took the liberty of uploading ccdoc as well.

Elfyn

-- 
Elfyn McBratney, EMCB
http://www.emcb.co.uk
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Pending package status (11 Jul 2003)

[Corinna Vinschen]

Thanks Elfyn, for the new package report.

On Fri, Jul 11, 2003 at 02:19:18PM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> @ stunnel
> 
> date   : 25 Jun 2003
> version: 4.04-1
> status : reviewed
> notes  : http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin-apps/2003-06/msg00207.html
>  http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin-apps/2003-06/msg00209.html
>  http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin-apps/2003-06/msg00211.html
>  http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin-apps/2003-06/msg00227.html
>  http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin-apps/2003-06/msg00236.html
>  http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin-apps/2003-06/msg00237.html
> votes  : 3 (Abraham, Elfyn and Gerrit)
> url: http://telka.sk/cygwin/stunnel/stunnel-4.04-2-src.tar.bz2
>  http://telka.sk/cygwin/stunnel/stunnel-4.04-2.tar.bz2
>  http://telka.sk/cygwin/stunnel/setup.hint

Looks like stunnel could get uploaded...

Corinna

-- 
Corinna Vinschen  Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to
Cygwin Developermailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Red Hat, Inc.

Pending package status (11 Jul 2003)

[elfyn]

@ LPRng

date   : 21 Jan 2003
version: 3.8.19-1
status : reviewed; source package needs to be fix
notes  : http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin-apps/2003-01/msg00215.html
 http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin-apps/2003-02/msg00172.html
reviews: http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin-apps/2003-02/msg00061.html
 http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin-apps/2003-03/msg00172.html
 http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin-apps/2003-03/msg00368.html
 http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin-apps/2003-03/msg00369.html
votes  : 3 (Corinna, Joshua and Volker)
url: http://www.as.cmu.edu/~geek/LPRng/LPRng-3.8.19-1.tar.bz2
 http://www.as.cmu.edu/~geek/LPRng/LPRng-3.8.19-1-src.tgz
 http://www.as.cmu.edu/~geek/LPRng/setup.hint

@ ifhp

date   : 21 Jan 2003
version: 3.5.10-1
status : not reviewed
notes  : http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin-apps/2003-01/msg00215.html
 http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin-apps/2003-02/msg00172.html
votes  : 1 (Joshua)
url: http://www.as.cmu.edu/~geek/ifhp/ifhp-3.5.10-1.tar.bz2
 http://www.as.cmu.edu/~geek/ifhp/ifhp-3.5.10-1-src.tar.bz2
 http://www.as.cmu.edu/~geek/ifhp/setup.hint

@ TCM

date   : 27 Jan 2003
version: 2.20-1
status : updated package is available for review
notes  : http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin-apps/2003-01/msg00299.html
 http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin-apps/2003-01/msg00100.html
reviews: http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin-apps/2003-03/msg00046.html
votes  : 2 (Christopher and Lapo)
url: http://home.in.tum.de/~boesswet/tcm-2.20-1.tar.bz2
 http://home.in.tum.de/~boesswet/tcm-2.20-1-src.tar.bz2
 http://home.in.tum.de/~boesswet/setup.hint

@ ccdoc

date   : 26 Feb 2003
version: 0.8.39-1
status : reviewed; the package is ok, it is just missing the votes
notes  : http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin-apps/2003-02/msg00262.html
reviews: http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin-apps/2003-02/msg00283.html
 http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin-apps/2003-03/msg00096.html
votes  : 2 (Elfyn and Gerrit)
url: http://ccdoc.sourceforge.net/cygwin_tmp/ccdoc-0.8.39-1/ccdoc-0.8.39-1.tar.bz2
 
http://ccdoc.sourceforge.net/cygwin_tmp/ccdoc-0.8.39-1/ccdoc-0.8.39-1-src.tar.bz2
 http://ccdoc.sourceforge.net/cygwin_tmp/ccdoc-0.8.39-1/setup.hint

@ proj

date   : 08 Mar 2003
version: 4.4.6-1
status : not reviewed
notes  : http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin-apps/2003-03/msg00176.html
 http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin-apps/2003-06/msg00162.html
votes  : 2 (Elfyn and Gerrit)
url: 
http://www.neuro.gatech.edu/users/cwilson/cygutils/testing/release/proj/proj-4.4.6-1.tar.bz2
 
http://www.neuro.gatech.edu/users/cwilson/cygutils/testing/release/proj/libproj-devel/libproj-devel-4.4.6-1.tar.bz2

@ libgeotiff

date   : 09 Mar 2003
version: 1.2.0-1
status : not reviewed
notes  : http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin-apps/2003-03/msg00298.html
votes  : 2 (Elfyn and Gerrit)
url: 
http://www.neuro.gatech.edu/users/cwilson/cygutils/testing/release/libgeotiff/libgeotiff1/libgeotiff1-1.2.0-1.tar.bz2
 
http://www.neuro.gatech.edu/users/cwilson/cygutils/testing/release/libgeotiff/libgeotiff-1.2.0-1-src.tar.bz2

@ DjVuLibre

date   : 29 Mar 2003
version: 3.5.11-3
status : not reviewed
notes  : http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin-apps/2003-03/msg00756.html
 http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin-apps/2003-04/msg00235.html
 http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin-apps/2003-04/msg00242.html
 http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin-apps/2003-04/msg00245.html
 http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin-apps/2003-04/msg00247.html
 http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin-apps/2003-04/msg00410.html
reviews: http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin-apps/2003-04/msg00248.html
votes  : 2 (Jakka and Joshua)
url: 
http://belnet.dl.sourceforge.net/sourceforge/djvu/djvulibre-3.5.11-3-src.tar.bz2
 http://belnet.dl.sourceforge.net/sourceforge/djvu/djvulibre-3.5.11-3.tar.bz2

@ Aspell

date   : 07 Apr 2003
version: 0.50.3-1
status : not reviewed
notes  : http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin-apps/2003-04/msg00155.html
 http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin-apps/2003-04/msg00356.html
 http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin-apps/2003-06/msg00239.html
votes  : 4 (Christopher, Elfyn, Gerrit and Igor)
url: 
http://www-personal.usyd.edu.au/~gpea0679/aspell/aspell-bin/aspell-bin-0.50.3-1.tar.bz2
 http://www-personal.usyd.edu.au/~gpea0679/aspell/aspell-bin/setup.hint
 
http://www-personal.usyd.edu.au/~gpea0679/aspell/aspell-doc/aspell-doc-0.50.3-1.tar.bz2
 http://www-personal.usyd.edu.au/~gpea0679/aspell/aspell-doc/setup.hint
 
http://www-personal.usyd.edu.au/~gpea0679/aspell/aspell-dev/aspell-dev-0.50.3-1.tar.bz2
 http://www-personal.usyd.edu.au/~gpea0679/aspell/aspell-dev/setup.hint
 
http://www-personal.usyd.edu.au/~gpea0679/aspell/libaspell/libaspell15-0.50.3-1.tar.bz2
 http://www-personal.usyd.edu.au/~gpea0679/aspell/libaspell/setup.hint
 http://www-personal.usyd.edu.au/~gpea0679/aspell/aspell-0.50.3-1-src.tar.bz2

@ astksh

date   : 02 May 2003
version: 20030422-1
status : awaiting new version
notes

Re: Updated: (for cygwin 1.5.0) xerces-c 2.3.0-3

[Igor Pechtchanski]

On Thu, 10 Jul 2003, Christopher Faylor wrote:

> On Thu, Jul 10, 2003 at 11:35:39PM -0400, Igor Pechtchanski wrote:
> >All in a day's work... ;-)
> >
> >As for rebuilding, IIUC, once you've taken care of the binary
> >incompatibility (i.e., stepped over the 1.5.0 barrier), you shouldn't have
> >to rebuild the apps at all (on account of Cygwin, that is).  Unless
> >another one of those ABI changes comes about, which, hopefully, won't be
> >too soon - the development team seemed to cram as many data structure
> >changes as they could in this one release.
> >
> >Anyone, please feel free to correct me if I'm wrong.
>
> Nope, you're not wrong.  Would you care to give yourself a long overdue
> gold star for this and all of the other invaluable advice and service
> you've given in the past?
>
> cgf

Don't mind if I do.  That'd be a second one for those same reasons,
though...
Igor
-- 
http://cs.nyu.edu/~pechtcha/
  |\  _,,,---,,_[EMAIL PROTECTED]
ZZZzz /,`.-'`'-.  ;-;;,_[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 |,4-  ) )-,_. ,\ (  `'-'   Igor Pechtchanski, Ph.D.
'---''(_/--'  `-'\_) fL a.k.a JaguaR-R-R-r-r-r-.-.-.  Meow!

"I have since come to realize that being between your mentor and his route
to the bathroom is a major career booster."  -- Patrick Naughton

Re: [ANN] Updated: rsync-2.5.6-2

[Corinna Vinschen]

On Fri, Jul 11, 2003 at 09:26:13AM +0200, Lapo Luchini wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
> 
> This is just good old 2.5.6-1, just recompiled for cygwin-1.5.0.
> Local 2.01Gb transfers work correctly, but being in the middle of the
> university exam session I can really do no big testing.
> 
> This release also has a README, unlike 2.5.6-1 (that was a mistake, of
> course).
> And a hint file.
> Hurray.
> 
> BTW: on the rsync mailing list people is trying to solve cygwni's rsync's
> problem in the meantime... (the child sometimes don't get killed and just
> hangs in the undead army of chaos)
> 
> Ready at the same usual address:
> http://www.lapo.it/tmp/rsync-2.5.6-2.tar.bz2
> http://www.lapo.it/tmp/rsync-2.5.6-2-src.tar.bz2
> 
> sdesc: "Fast remote file transfer program (can use existing data to
> minimize transfer)"
> ldesc: "rsync is a file transfer program. rsync uses the 'rsync algorithm'
> which provides a very fast method for bringing
> remote files into sync. It does this by sending just the
> differences in the files across the link, without requiring
> that both sets of files are present at one of the ends of the
> link beforehand."
> category: Net
> requires: cygwin libpopt0
> curr: 2.5.6-1
> test: 2.5.6-1
 ^^^
 Oops?

Corinna

-- 
Corinna Vinschen  Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to
Cygwin Developermailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Red Hat, Inc.

[ANN] Updated: rsync-2.5.6-2

[Lapo Luchini]

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
This is just good old 2.5.6-1, just recompiled for cygwin-1.5.0.
Local 2.01Gb transfers work correctly, but being in the middle of the
university exam session I can really do no big testing.
This release also has a README, unlike 2.5.6-1 (that was a mistake, of
course).
And a hint file.
Hurray.
BTW: on the rsync mailing list people is trying to solve cygwni's rsync's
problem in the meantime... (the child sometimes don't get killed and just
hangs in the undead army of chaos)
Ready at the same usual address:
http://www.lapo.it/tmp/rsync-2.5.6-2.tar.bz2
http://www.lapo.it/tmp/rsync-2.5.6-2-src.tar.bz2
sdesc: "Fast remote file transfer program (can use existing data to
minimize transfer)"
ldesc: "rsync is a file transfer program. rsync uses the 'rsync algorithm'
which provides a very fast method for bringing
remote files into sync. It does this by sending just the
differences in the files across the link, without requiring
that both sets of files are present at one of the ends of the
link beforehand."
category: Net
requires: cygwin libpopt0
curr: 2.5.6-1
test: 2.5.6-1
BTW: it uses my patch of generic-build-script as proposed in
http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin-apps/2003-06/msg00273.html
(btw: anyone have pro/cons about that one? ^_^)
Lapo

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: PGP 8.0 - not licensed for commercial use: www.pgp.com
iQA/AwUBPw5mfGiYgizI8lL7EQIVRwCgj1LhpBXyaqUuCWovovKq+JHhb+wAn2O3
XZgopbsH8VB5RX4MPgtVrMVZ
=8dNI
-END PGP SIGNATURE-